-
Trial Courts Cannot Award The Sentence Of Life Imprisonment Till Last Breath: Karnataka HC
Harish vs Karnataka that Trial Courts cannot impose a special category sentence or imprisonment for life without the possibility of remission or, in other words, imprisonment till last breath” of...Hits: 8193 -
Tehsil Bar Association, Sadar Tehsil Parisar, Gandhi Nagar, Ghaziabad vs UP Power Corporation Limited that the profession of an advocate does not constitute a commercial activity and, therefore,...Hits: 10382
-
Laxman Rekha Shouldn’t Be Crossed In Name Of Freedom Of Expression: HP HC
Dr Nadeem Akhtar v/s Himachal Pradesh that while residing in the society, every person must respect the religious beliefs of other members of the community and that in the name of freedom of...Hits: 9884 -
K Indulekha v The Chairman TNPSC that: Before parting with this judgment, we suggest that judicial service examinations shall be conducted every year so as to ensure to minimize the pending...Hits: 13104
-
Vittal vs The PSI of Bableshwar Police Station in Lalita Kumari’s case pertaining to the registration of FIRs when a cognizable offence is made out in the complaint and instruct them to follow it...Hits: 7976
-
Vivek Kumar Maurya vs UP It was also clearly pointed out by the Court that since girls/women have the upper hand when it comes to the protection of the law, they easily succeed in implicating a...Hits: 9864
-
Mohandas v/s Kerala that: As he had already approached the civil court resorting to the civil remedy, the subsequent criminal complaint filed by him, suppressing pendency of the civil suit can be...Hits: 10497
-
Registrar Judicial, Aurangabad Bench v. Maharashtra that was regarding the bad and deplorable conditions of schools being operated by the local civic authorities in Maharashtra.Hits: 8289
-
Duty of Magistrate in Recording Reasons While Issuing Summons Cannot be Marginalized: Allahabad HC
Dr Shail Kumar Jain vs U.P. that the Trial Court while issuing summons, shall record detailed reasons, and this duty of Magistrate cannot be marginalized.Hits: 7171 -
Person Forwarding Social Media Message Liable For Its Contents: Madras HC
S Ve Shekher v Al Gopalsamy has refused to quash a batch of criminal proceedings initiated against actor and BJP politician S Ve Shekher for his derogatory remarks that were directed against women...Hits: 9755 -
Banwari Lal vs Rajasthan taken cognizance for offences under Sections 467, 409 in the alternative Sections 420 and 120B of IPC against him and also issued an arrest warrant against him.Hits: 9314
-
apart from the aforesaid disclosure statement, there is nothing to connect the accused persons with the commission of the offencesHits: 13750
-
Kochu Mani v/s Kerala that merely recovering the object does not establish guilt unless there are other materials connecting the accused to the commission of the offence.Hits: 44332
-
Gurmeet Singh Vs Punjab has rejected the pre-arrest bail of a man in a case that pertained to the hacking of computers of a centre where online examinations for recruitment to various departments...Hits: 12816
-
State v Commandant, Air Force Administrative College that was reserved on March 1, 2023 and then finally pronounced on July 20, 2023 has issued a set of most significant guidelines for the Criminal...Hits: 10052
-
Rape Law Misused As A Weapon By Female Upon Differences With Male Counterpart: Uttarakhand HC
Manoj Kumar Arya v Uttarakhand quashed pending criminal proceedings against a man for allegedly having sexual intercourse with a lady for decades on the false promise of marriage.Hits: 8694 -
Naresh Sharma vs UOI that the Bar Council of India must frame guidelines for establishing an ethical code for self represented litigants to save precious judicial time and minimize frivolous...Hits: 6293
-
Mayra alias Vaishnvi Vilas Shirshikar vs UP that Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is long overdue called upon the Central Government to implement the mandate of Article 44 of the Constitution of IndiaHits: 6826
-
Neha Rafiq Chahchadi vs Karnataka that as per Section 78 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 an officer below the rank of Police Inspector can register FIR for offence punishable under Section...Hits: 10485
-
Aslam Salim Shaikh vs Maharashtra criminal appellate jurisdiction we find that a man who had been sentenced to 83 years in jail was directed to be released by the Bombay High Court after it noted...Hits: 8343
-
Harish Kumar A vs Karnataka that was pronounced as early as on July 7, 2023 has set aside an order of conviction that was handed down to an accused after finding him guilty of outraging the modesty...Hits: 8844
-
Delhi High Court’s Green Judge: Justice Najmi Waziri Can Never Retire From Public Memory
From the past few days, since the court has reopened, there has been an outpouring of affection from the BarHits: 10294 -
Sushil Kumar vs State GNCTD Through SHO that the right of an accused to cross examine a witness is at a higher pedestal under the POCSO ActHits: 9738
-
Rohit Dinanath Ray vs Gujaratacquitted the accused in a case of false promise to marry under Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The case was lodged with Gujarat University police station...Hits: 9829
-
West UP Must Be Promptly Given A High Court Bench
UP has maximum pending cases among all States that is more than 10 lakhs in High CourtsHits: 9062 -
S Amalraj Vs State that non-payment of maintenance amount is a breach of protection order under Section 18 of the Act and registration of an FIR on that ground is lawful.Hits: 11046
-
Just One HC Bench So Close To Allahabad Is Most Bizarre
It is ‘shockingly bizarre’ that UP has maximum pending cases among all States that is more than 10 lakhs in High Courts and about a crore in lower courts and has maximum populationHits: 4898 -
Allauddin vs Karnataka that: A citizen has a right to criticize or comment upon the measures undertaken by the Government and its functionaries,Hits: 9172
-
Penetrative Sexual Assault Against Child Below 12 Years Punishable As Aggavated Sexual Assault: SC
UP vs Sonu Kushwaha that the Courts cannot impose sentence lesser than the minimum punishments prescribed in POCSO Act.Hits: 7386 -
Ramesh Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi that: It is considered appropriate to remind the high courts and the sessions courts not to be unduly swayed by submissions advanced by counsel on behalf of...Hits: 8637
