-
SC Issues SOP For Summoning Government Officials In Court Proceedings
Uttar Pradesh v/s Association of Retired Supreme Court and High Court Judges at Allahabad that constantly summoning government officials in judicial proceedings runs contrary to the scheme...Hits: 10689 -
Prisoners Have Fundamental Right To Procreation And Parenthood: Delhi HC
Kundan Singh vs Govt of NCT Delhi that right to procreation and parenthood is a fundamental right of a convict and protected under Article 21 of the Constitution.Hits: 7766 -
Why Not Even A Single HC Bench For West UP In 77 Years?
It is a monumental tragedy of the worst epic proportions that Uttar Pradesh which as we all know fully well is the most populated State of IndiaHits: 9610 -
Vijay Singh Pal v/s Uttarakhand that to establish liability under Section 153A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), it is required to prove the ‘necessary mens rea’ and evidence indicating enmity...Hits: 8686
-
Court Of Appeals In Qatar Commutes Death Of 8 Navy Veterans
the Lion’s Credit definitely goes to the Central Government led by PM Mr Narendra Modi who is in close touch with the legal team and so also with the family members of the 8 Navy Veterans.Hits: 9474 -
that Rule 4 of the Quartermaster Rules only entitles a married army officer to an accommodation.Hits: 10104
-
Almas Pasha vs Karnataka that an accused is not entitled to bail merely because the co-accused was granted bail.Hits: 9475
-
Rajinder Kaur Jaspal Singh Layal vs Union of Indiathat: A person cannot be deprived of his/her fundamental right to travel abroad on the ground that there is a disputeHits: 10753
-
ABC vs The State & Anr. has quashed a criminal trespass and intimidation case against a man who attempted to visit his eight-year-old daughter posing as a waste collector after his estranged...Hits: 8181
-
Himanshu Shroti vs State two students named Himanshu Shroti and Sukrit Sharma who were booked in Padav police station in Gwalior for stealing a High Court Judge’s car to transport a dying person to...Hits: 9867
-
Chandrasekhar Patel vs Suresh that not allowing the relevant questions to be put to the eye-witness being the independent witness causes serious prejudice to the defence of the accused.Hits: 10249
-
Amandeep Singh vs U.P. that succeeding in law profession does not require support of barrel of a gun and also made it crystal clear that lawyer cannot carry any arms in Court premises.Hits: 12811
-
Rape Is A Crime Even If Committed By The Husband : Gujarat HC
Anjanaben Modha vs Gujarat that: Rape is rape even if committed by a husband on his wife.Hits: 9240 -
Insult Of Vice-President By Mimicry Is Just Not Acceptable
The moot question here is pertaining to the impeccable reputation of Mr Jagdeep Dhankhar which is non-negotiable.Hits: 10329 -
Tariq Ahmad Wagay vs UT of Jammu & Kashmir that a preventive detention order becomes legally unsustainable if there is a failure to provide a reasonable explanation for any delay in its issuance.Hits: 9327
-
Mr Amandeep Singh Dhall vs Directorate Of Enforcement that every prisoner, regardless of his financial standing, is entitled to basic medical care.Hits: 9286
-
Occurrence Took Place Suddenly And On Petty Count: Bombay HC Sets Aside Murder Conviction
Digambar @ Digu Baburao Shirole vs Maharashtraset aside the murder’s conviction and instead sentenced a man for a rigorous imprisonment of eight years under Section 304 Part I of the Indian Penal CodeHits: 8315 -
Strictest Rules For MPs And MLAs Must Be Enacted Now
We must definitely also acknowledge now most candidly in all fairness that as compared to the other fieldsHits: 9384 -
Keeping Constituency Unrepresented For Indefinite Period Wholly Unconstitutional: Bombay HC
Sughosh Joshi vs The Election Commission of India has directed the Election Commission of India (ECI) to hold the bye-election for the Pune Lok Sabha seat immediately.Hits: 9989 -
X vs State that the rape victims are promptly made aware of their rights to terminate pregnancies that culminate from rape so that they are not later forced to approach courts for permission to get...Hits: 9968
-
Dharmesh Jivanlal Gurjar vs Gujarat Registrar of the High Court to expeditiously complete the installation of CCTV cameras in the Registry in a strategic manner so as to ensure that no court...Hits: 8908
-
Charges Unframed Five Years Since Arrest: Bombay High Court Seeks Explanation From Trial Court
t cannot be left unsaid that those who leave charges unframed against the accused for a very long period of time must be definitely punished very strictly no matter who they are whether they are...Hits: 7004 -
Monika Yadav vs High Court of Madhya Pradesh has provisionally permitted all the law graduates from appearing in the exam who were earlier barred for not meeting the mandatory requisite of three...Hits: 9967
-
Litigants Have No ‘Kangaroo Right’ To Hop Around Jurisdiction On Whims: Allahabad HC
Prem Prakash Yadav vs UOI that merely because a litigant has a right to file a writ petition either at Allahabad or Lucknow Bench, it does not give them a kangaroo right to hop around on whims...Hits: 8429 -
Paramjit Kaur vs Haryana that accused’s right to free and fair trial prevails over the right to privacy of police officials.Hits: 9349
-
Locking Gates And Denying Access To Public Is Totally Unacceptable: Delhi HC
Mohd Arslan vs Delhi has directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to assume possession of public parks near the Jama Masjid from the Waqf Board.Hits: 8490 -
Commissioner of Income Tax vs M/s Jindal Steel & Power Limited that there is no requirement under the second proviso to sub-rule (1A) of Rule 5 of the Income Tax Rules 1962 that any particular...Hits: 9276
-
US, UK And Canada Have No Business To Point Fingers At India
With what face are countries like US, UK and Canada pointing an accusing finger at India without any basis?Hits: 8430 -
Keshav Prasad Gupta vs Delhi that while filing of the chargesheet is a material consideration in bail matters, it is not the sole criterion and must be considered in conjunction with the facts and...Hits: 9398
-
Kerala HC Issues Guidelines For Handling Digital Evidence Containing Sexually Explicit Material
XXXX vs Kerala The Court addressed a petition that had been filed by the victim of the 2017 South Indian actress assault caseHits: 10467
