Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Tuesday, November 5, 2024

Collective Marks Section 61 to Section 68 of Trade Mark Act

Tue, May 1, 18, 18:23, 7 Years ago
star star star star star
4 out of 5 with 5 ratings
comments: 1 - hits: 10409
A Brief Discussion on Collective Marks mentioned Under Section 61 to Section 68 of Trade Mark Act

Collective Marks mentioned Under Section 61 to Section 68 of Trade Mark Act

Section 2 defines the collective mark as under:
It is a that trade mark which has following feature:-
1. It distinguishes the goods or services of members of an association of the persons.
2. Such persons shall not include the partners
3. They shall only be the proprietor of the mark.

Now Let us Discuss Section 61 to 68:
The Act has provided special provisions here for the Collective Marks.

The collective mark cannot be registered under either of the following grounds if it is-
1. Likely to deceive the public
2. Likely to cause confusion

The Registrar may call upon the applicant that the collective mark should carry an indication that it is a collective mark.

One has to apply for registration of the collective mark. The application shall accompany the rules and regulations governing user of the collective mark. Specifically it must specify as to who are the persons so authorized to use the collective mark. The regulation shall also specify, the conditions and it shall contain sanctions against misuse. It may also mention any other matters as may be prescribed.

The Registrar shall accept the application conditionally or unconditionally or may refuse but on acceptance Registrar shall notify the mark with regulation.

These regulations are freely opened for public inspection just like is opened for inspection to the public.

After registration of the Mark there shall not be any amendment without following procedure which is same as for registration of the mark.

When there is an infringement of the rights, the registered proprietor may choose the proceedings. The court shall take into consideration losses caused or likely to be suffered and there can also be the directions as to how shall there be the pecuniary remedies on behalf of the authorized user.

Lastly on the following grounds the registration of the collective mark can be removed on either of the following grounds:

A. The user has caused misleading to the public or
B. The proprietor failed to observe the regulations governing the use.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Adv.T Choudhury
Member since May 1, 2018
Location: India
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
This article seeks to address the loopholes in the TRIPS agreement regarding product patents and EMRs and its negative impact on India and suggest methods to minimize the impact.
Procedure for Removal of Trademark from Registrar under Section 47 of the Trademark Act
Intellectual property is a term referring to a number of distinct types of legal monopolies over creations of mind, both artistic and commercial, and the corresponding fields of law.
The word plagiarism is derived from the Latin word plagium, which means to kidnap or abduct. Plagiarism is an act of plagiarizing.
Strengthening Consumer Protection Against Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights
Copyright is identified as the essential part of any company and the guidelines associated with it are required for defending the makers or different types of styles like music, artistry
Here are a list of things that cannot be Copyrighted in India
Recent emphasis on the effect of the grant of trademark rights on competition has focused largely on
This paper tends to analyze the protection of trade secrets under the different statutes and the laws. This paper also focuses on the need of an hour to have a separate enactment for the protection of the trade secrets.
As a part of WTO Agreement, the implementation of the TRIPS patent regime was the primary requirement in order to enable participation in multilateral trading system. The researcher has given an in depth view of the factors responsible for and outcomes of the TRIPS Agreement.
Copyright Law: Statutory Licence for Broadcasting or Literary And Musical Works And Sound Recording in India
Comparative Advertisement is a relevant field of IPR which is now gaining importance due to the competitive attitude of various traders existing in the market economy.
A Complete guide to How do you Register your Creative work with the Copyright Office in India, quickly and easily - ph no 9891244487
Procedure and Guidelines to Obtain Statutory Licence For Cover Versions of Songs as par Copyright Laws in india
Copyright infringement laws in India have become less effective due to the ease of sharing content over the Web. Music streaming services
Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited Vs Teleone Consumer Product Pvt. Ltd in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has ordered the television channels Maha movie and Manoranjan TV to abstain from broadcasting Zee owned films – Jung and Kartavya.
Vinay Vats v/s Fox Star Studios India Pvt. Ltd While holding thus, it refused to pass an injunction order, restraining the release of Film 'Lootcase' on Hotstar hours before its scheduled release on July 31, 2020.
This article highlights the significance of the intellectual property rights in the fashion industry and how are they co- related to each other
Sanjay Soya Pvt Ltd v. Narayani Trading Company registration of copyright is not mandatory under the Copyright Act, 1957 for seeking an injunction against infringement.
The law gives protection to fashion designs under two types of IP specifically: copyrights and designs.
Fashion Law is an emerging arena of legal specialty, encompassing various legal issues from IP to contracts to laws relating to the entity and its policies and procedures.
I have tried to enlighten people about the role played by Copyrights law during the global pandemic
Havells India Limited v. Panasonic Life Solutions India Pvt Ltd that a plea of passing-off cannot be negated solely on the ground that the plaintiff had asserted trademark rights in the registered designs.
Artificial Intelligence(AI) has been making tremendous strides in recent years on the contrary it also raised questions about copyright laws and how they apply to AI generated work. There is a growing need for clarity in this area. This article provides an overview of the current state of AI and copyright laws in India. G.R. SRIKKANTH
Top