Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Tuesday, November 5, 2024

Policy Hampering Illegal Data Entry Via Apps/Social Media

Posted in: Computer laws
Wed, Apr 25, 18, 15:48, 7 Years ago
star star star star star
4 out of 5 with 1 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 3400
The policy to hamper the illegal use of app data and social media is a necessity. Illegal acquisition of data from the CA and YouTube Kids’ app for monetizing made it compulsory to launch a stringent privacy policy. The implementation of COPPA and GDPR can prove a milestone is abandoning malicious data acquisition.

How do you feel if someone unknowingly spies on your credit card number online?
Won’t it get on your nerves? It definitely would come out as a blast of impulsiveness. Nobody, actually, likes to keep a watch on what indeed is so sensitive. Today, almost every organization takes a sneak peek into your personal data. Online shopping or trading is trending. But, you can’t place an order without passing your details to the websites, like amazon, aliexpress, flipkart and many more. Alone amazon had 197 million visitors per month in 2017, according to the statista. The Wal-Mart trailed it with 127 million unique visitors during the similar year.

Now put on your thinking cap and predict, how much information they would have. The market research for the business intelligence emerges as a key performance indicator in the present scenario. But, it can’t be so sans data. This is why most of the market researchers delve into the data mining. They stack millions of data entries in their data warehouse. Its biggest example is Facebook. Although it is a social media channel, yet it invests on 5,000 data brokers.

Why is it so? Why does Mark Zuckerberg need more data?
The reason is its vitality and potential. The data analysts mine golden opportunities out of the collective data sets. If we look into the Facebook’s revenue, the whopping $27 billion would be found as its earning through advertising strategies in 2016. These are all drawn out of the gathered data.

Data Acquisition Fiasco:
Almost everyone lives in the fool’s paradise before the outburst of the CA (Cambridge Analytica) fiasco. Every FB user did not have any clue that his detail is churned out to make significant business decisions. All these blunders begin with a false interpretation of tech-based companies. They mouth off that their product is dirt cheap. But actually, it’s not free. You pay them, although not in dollars, but in data.

Facebook fiasco: It might be an untold fact, but the fiasco of CA brought it in the spotlight. It indeed was not an excuse of Mark (the FB owner) because it was Kogan, who came with the app called ‘its mydigitallife’. It ran an online survey that was meant to deliver to the CA.

However, FB allows in-app experience for improving its functionality for the users. Alexander Kogan (a Russian-American Academic) took leverage out of this policy. When approximately 80 million users authorized an access to their FB account, the app took away their data. FB’s Zuckerberg called it a case of ‘an unauthorized acquisition of data’. He didn’t sell the data chunks to monetize. But, the third party (CA) used it to derive monitory benefit. If the questionnaire ought to read as ‘your information may be used for commercial purpose’, Zuckerberg might not appear in a negative role.

Meanwhile, the CA used users’ details for building tools to target voters. Understanding their identity & behavior was no big deal. Subsequently, an online campaign was drafted on the basis of the so-called psychographic modeling. It benefitted Donald Trump to win the US presidential election.

FB removed that app on being informed about its malicious attempts in 2015. But, its aftermath quizzed Zuckerberg. Dozens of communities have left it.

YouTube fiasco:
More than 20 Consumer groups lodged a complaint with federal officials (US). They found this product of Google indulged in unethical practice. The appellant groups noticed that YouTube failed to abide by the rules of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.

The aforesaid act mandates to obtain consent of the parents before extracting kid’s data. It has defined 13 or more as the age limit of the YouTube users. If the user is younger than this age, he/she can access YouTube Kids App. It shows the filtered videos that are fit for the under-age kids.

Its privacy policy amplifies that it prohibits interest-based advertising or re-marketing on the YouTube Kids’ app. But in reality, it collects the data from this app and draws a blueprint of targeting accordingly.

Launch of GDPR:
Who implemented GDPR?
On seeing the disruptive nature of data violation, the EU (European Union) has decided to strictly implement the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). It was conceived two years ago. But now, the necessity has made it to follow strictly. It would come into effect from May 2018 formally.

Why?
The surging up cases of breaching emerged as a mother of this regulation. It would put the barrier on the roads that bridge the data to the data services providers. The European Union is its origin. But, its impact would be seen far beyond the borders.

What does it do?
The GDPR safeguards the privacy of the user’s data. It defines a global standard of privacy and confidentiality. This law will fasten the noose around the app owner who illicitly exploits the users’ data. The rephrased structure of the previous Governing Data Protection (1995) protects user name, his/her email id, number, location, IP address, cookies and other digital fingerprints.

What policies are made?
The data subjects (individuals whose data are) would have right to know which companies are collecting data and why. It would ensure transparency in using one’s personal data.
The consent of the data subjects would be a must.

If the data subjects want to delete their data, they would have that right.

If the data is hacked, the data subjects must be informed about it within 72 hours of disclosure. If it doesn’t happen, the infringer may be penalized with $1.6 billion or 4 percent of his annual revenue.
Obtaining parental consent would be compulsory if the data subject is under 16.

Coppa Rule for YouTube:

The Coppa or Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (1998) was expanded in 2012 by the Federal officials. The disruptive use of mobile phones led to this amendment. According to the revamped regulation for the YouTube.

The data mining company shall take the consent of the parents before using the identity, contact and location of the child. They can be the photos of the kids, videos, audios and mobile location.

The privacy terms of YouTube service straightforwardly states that it is strictly for the 13 and above users. It also defines how a company collects it to tailor an ad.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
semlovelysharma
Member since Apr 25, 2018
Location: New Delhi
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Is the freedom of speech and expression being misused or is internet the new platform to stage the views of the world’s largest democracy.
Another word for cyberspace is the virtual world a place in which computer programs function and data moves. Terrorism is a much used term, with many definitions. For the purposes of this project,
On October 28, 1998, then-President Clinton signed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) into law.
On-line Legal Dispute Resolution itself denotes that the person who is interested to get his dispute resolved on-line without approaching personally either an arbitrator or a mediator
Liability of network service providers / intermediaries, for the offence of cyber pornography under section 67 of the I.T. Act, 2000
Licenses are far more prevalent in the intangible world as compared to the real world.
Information Technology (Reasonable security practices and procedures and sensitive personal data or information) Rules 2011
The cyber-crime is on the surge. The copyright law can combat it. Clearly state the copyright policy to your users. Lock the content of your eCommerce website under the encryption lock.
National Digital Communications Policy 2018 - It is hoped that this policy will facilitate the unleashing of the creative energies of citizens, enterprises and institutions in India; and play a seminal role in fulfilling the aspirations of all Indians for a better quality of life.
If you are a developer with experience in Salesforce, it is evident that you must be skilled and confident by now. Now, you are a professional when it comes to the cleaning and organizing of production metadata.
Startups and their success depend on a variety of things. Yet, even in the face of adversity, they always seem to succeed when other businesses seem to fail.
tightening of rules governing social media and streaming companies, requiring them to take down contentious content quicker, appoint grievance redressal officers and assist probe.
t really warms the innermost cockles of my heart to see that the Centre has in a bold, balanced and brilliant move weeks after a long spat with Twitter very rightly
The article talks about the liability of Internet Intermediaries
In this Article I have discussed about various type of cyber crimes and different types of ways of hacking, phishing, etc. and I have also discussed about some safety measures which one can follow to save himself/ herself from cyber frauds or from any other harm which one can face on the Internet.
Is the freedom of speech and expression being misused or is internet the new platform to stage the views of the world's largest democracy.
Niyaz Ahmad Khan vs U.P that the use of cyberspace by some people to vent out their anger and frustration by travestying the Prime Minister, key figures holding the highest office in the country, or any other individual is abhorrent and it violates the right to reputation of others.
Christian Louboutin SAS vs Shoe Boutique – SHUTIQ that: Accuracy and reliability of AI generated data is still in the grey area.
Seagate Technology LLC vs Daichi International has issued a slew of directions for the sale of used and refurbished hard disk drives (HDDs). There cannot be even an iota of doubt that it is these directions that constitute the cornerstone of this notable judgment.
Dharmendra vs UP expressed its utmost concern and deepest dismay over the pathetic and poor quality of shoddy investigation by the Uttar Pradesh police into cases of sharing and circulating non-consensual images, particularly of women
It must be disclosed here that the Division Bench comprising of Hon’ble Sri Justice Ananda Sen and Hon’ble Smt Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary who authored this notable judgment had passed the order after hearing a Public Interest Litigation
Top