Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Saturday, December 21, 2024

Space Laws in India

Posted in: Civil Laws
Mon, Mar 19, 18, 17:33, 7 Years ago
star star star star star
4 out of 5 with 14 ratings
comments: 4 - hits: 15152
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.

Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there’s fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war. The developed countries have already made strides in consolidating their position in outer space. India created history by launching a record 104 satellites into the earth’s orbit on February 15, 2017[1].This launch reasserts India’s burgeoning place in the Private International Space market as a reliable and cost effective launching state; yielding staggering returns to the country’s space sector[2]. The country is ushering in an era of privatization and commercialization of space activities, expanding capabilities in space exploration and scientific discovery, commercialize its capabilities to build satellites and offer launch services from indigenously designed and tested workhorse of ISRO Polar Satellite Launching Vehicle (PSLV)[3].

India’s space market has been centralized with major investment pooling in from the government. The country’s space sector has been under high scrutiny and control and is managed directly by the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO)[4]. This extreme control of India’s space market has been nascent. The ISRO has made huge strides in space technology and put India on the world map as a major space faring nation and superpower. But, countries like U.S., Russia, China and France have privatized their space market by offering launch services thereby yielding exponential returns. Indian space market is in transition from being a controlled sector to an open sector. The development of Antrix Corporation, the commercial arm of ISRO asserts the fact that India wants to establish herself as juggernaut in the international space market. Before, India can go upward India needs a comprehensive space law to cover a wide range of issues concerning the exploration of the final frontiers and help consolidate India’s position as an emerging global space power in its own right[5]. Space law can be defined as that branch of law which governs the space related activities and exploration. The international law on outer spaces is contained in five instruments adopted under the auspices of the United Nation (UN) through the General Assembly’s Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS)[6]. The UNCOPUOS has been the fore-runner in developing the international law on outer space. The five treaties which forms the corpus of the international law on space consists of: -


 

The Outer Space Treaty, 1967:

“State Parties to the Outer Space Treaty bear international responsibility for national activities in outer space including the moon and other celestial bodies, whether such activities are carried out by governmental or non-governmental entities (NGO) and for assuring that national activities are carried out in conformity with the provisions set forth in the Outer Space Treaty[7]. In other words a ratifying State is bound to the principles of exploration and use of outer space for peaceful purposes, international cooperation, no national appropriation and no weaponization. Furthermore, the State is bound to ensure that all that such activities are duly authorized and carried out under its continuing supervision.

“The Outer Space Treaty imposes liability for damage by making a launching state internationally liable for damage to another State Party, its own natural or juridical person on earth, air and outer space, if its space object or component causes damage[8]”.

Rescue agreement, 1968:
The agreement on the rescue of the astronauts, the return of astronauts and the return of object launched into space gives detailed resolution on the duty imposed on the State parties in Article V of Outer Space Treaty[9].

Liability convention, 1972:
Article 7 of the Outer Space Treaty details the liability of the launching state shall be liable to pay compensation for damages caused by its space objects on the surface of Earth or to aircraft and liable for damage due to its faults in space[10].

In this context, the most important thing to be noted is that under the liability convention, it is not the private person who is held liable but the State to which it belongs is held internationally liable. Thus, the States should have national laws to ensure that their specific interests are protected while entering into a contract with any other international entity in areas which call for collaborative space R&D and also to limit liability in cases of damage. But, non-existence of national laws does not absolve liability under this convention.

Registration convention, 1974:
The registration convention requires the launching State to address issues relating to State Parties Responsibilities concerning space object and requires the launching State to maintain the register of the object launched by them in space[11].

Moon agreement, 1979:
The agreement details and reaffirms that the celestial bodies should be used exclusively for peaceful purposes and that their environment should not be disturbed[12]. It states that moon and other celestial body are the common heritage of mankind and no country should assert claim on it.

It is to be well noted that India is a signatory to all these convention and treaties which forms the main corpus of international law on outer space. India has also been actively participating and extending support to a variety of International forums such as United Nations Committee on Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (UNCOPUOS), International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU), and International Astronautical Federation (IAF) etc. in shaping global space and law policy. Even though India is a member to all these treaties it still has no comprehensive legislation on space related matters[13].

India’s space sector as mentioned above has been under the control of the government which did not necessitate the need for a comprehensive space laws in India[14]. But, as India takes a leap towards privatization it becomes imperative for India to have a dedicated space law.The existing regime of Indian space law is non-extant to say for time being as the entire space law in India is contained in the following policies: -
 

A policy framework for satellite communications in India (SATCOM):

In 1997, the Department of Space framed the Satellite Communication policy, 1997 (SATCOM Policy). Considering the expanse and future possibilities of space activities in India, one would expect this document to be voluminous, running into hundreds of pages containing guidelines for advancement of satellite, telecommunication, broadcasting and exploration of space and other service but what the government released what a meagre 2-page 5-pointer policy. It remains the only policy governing satellite communication in India.

It laid down inter alia the development of satellite communication, launch capabilities and encouraging private investment in space industry. But, the government soon realized the insufficiency of the policy and framed the norms, guidelines & procedure for the SATCOM policy[15].

Norms, Guidelines and procedure (SATCOM) policy, 2000:
The norms laid the procedures to be followed for setting up the satellites system by private Indian companies having less than 74 per cent foreign equity[16]. The policy formed various sub-committees to sanction and authorize the use and rules on sharing of the INSAT satellite system by private companies on commercial basis on ‘capacity and capability’ of transponders and satellites network.

Remote data sensing policy, 2011
The government allowed the transfer of high resolution imaging services up to 1 meter to be distributed on a non-discriminatory and on ‘as requested’ basis freely to be readily available for private use excluding the sensitive imagery data of crucial defense installation in the country[17].The policy apart from opening the remote sensing sector, will remove restriction to facilitate more users access to high resolution data for developmental activities.
 

The technology transfer policy of ISRO

The technology transfer policy of ISRO is aimed at increasing the private participation and investment in the space sector by outsourcing the manufacturing of satellite components, space radars, rocket engines, batteries, space electrical components and optical camera components to national as well as international companies[18]. This will help ISRO focus its entire manpower on R&D thereby opening better avenues for the country in outer space.

The existing regime of Indian space law is insufficient and needs immediate attention of the lawmakers of the country to legislate specifically with regard to national space law. Developing a comprehensive national law will help India achieve greater commercial application of space technology which requires greater participation of private sector in transnational, bilateral and multilateral issues. A national legislation would enlighten the goals and objective of the government in areas related to outer space. Also, it would bring leverage to the nascent private market of the Indian space industry. It would be helpful in assessment of India’s liability in cases of damage to the aircraft flight mission or crash on earth. In such a scenario, there is an imminent need for a national space legislation.Transparency and clarity would be the cardinal principle which will enable lucrative returns from the space sector.The national space law of India should address the legal issues connected to launch services, satellite communications, including satellite broadcasting, issues related to earth observation services as well as data processing, satellite navigational system, regime of intellectual property rights and the liability of the India vis à vis other countries and private entities, dispute resolution and the crowding of the geostationary orbit etc.

End-Notes
[1] ‘India launches a record breaking 104 satellites from single rocket’ The Guardian (February, 15 2017). https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/feb/15/india-launches-record-breaking-104-satellites-from-single-rocket
[2] ‘ISRO Crosses 50 International Customer Satellite Launch Mark’ Indian Space Research Organization, (March 14, 2017 12:00) http://www.isro.gov.in/isro-crosses-50-international-customer-satellite-launch-mark.
[3] Monish Gulati ‘Antrix: Providing Space Products And Services To International Clients – Analysis’ Eurasian Review Journal (February 28, 2017) http://www.eurasiareview.com/28022017-antrix-providing-space-products-and-services-to-international-clients-analysis/
[4] ‘Indian space research organization’ Skybrokers (March 8, 2017 1:00) http://www.sky-brokers.com/home/services/satellite-manufacturers/indian-space-research-organization-isro-
[5] ‘India just launched 104 satellites, but is still a long way from becoming a global space player’ Scroll.in (March 5, 2017 3:35) https://scroll.in/article/829666/india-just-launched-104-satellites-but-it-has-a-long-way-to-go-to-become-a-global-space-player
[6] Dr Ranjana Kual, ‘ Does India Need Space Laws’ Dua Associates, 2005.
[7] Article VI, Outer Space Treaty, 1967.
[8] Article VII, Outer Space Treaty, 1967.
[9] ‘Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space’ United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs http://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/introrescueagreement.html (Last visited March 1, 2017).
[10] ‘Convention on the international liability for damage caused by space objects’ opened for signature at London, Moscow and Washington on 29 March 1972, Source: 961 UNTS 187 (hereinafter referred to as 1972 Liability Convention). 74 countries have ratified and 27 countries have signed the convention. [‘Liability’]
[11] ‘Convention on registration of objects launched into outer space’. Adopted by the General Assembly of the United nations, at New York, on 12 November 1974, Source: 1023 UNTS 15 (hereinafter referred to as 1972 Registration Convention). 37 countries have ratified and 4 have signed the Convention. [‘Registration’]
[12] Article 3(2), Outer Space Treaty, 1967.
[13] Kaushik Dhar, ‘Need of Space Law in India’ NALSAR University of Law, Hyderabad, 2011.
[14] Rajana Kaul, Supra 7 Pg. 3
[15]Nikhil Singal, ‘Satellite Communication Policy in India: Time to revisit and revise’ Lakshimikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys. http://www.lakshmisri.com/News-and-Publications/Publications/Articles/Corporate/satellite-communications-policy-in-india-time-to-revisit-revise(last visited March 5, 2017).
[16] ‘Norms, Guidelines and Procedures for Satellite Communications Announced’ ISRO (May 08, 2000) http://www.isro.gov.in/update/08-may-2000/norms-guidelines-and-procedures-satellite-communications-announced.
[17] ‘Remote Data Sensing Policy’ ISRO. https://www.nrsc.gov.in/Remote_Sensing_Data_Policy (Last visited March 7, 2017)
[18] ‘ISRO Technology Transfer’ ISRO. http://www.isro.gov.in/isro-technology-transfer (Last visited March 5, 2017)
www.lakshmisri.com/News-and-Publications/Publications/Articles/Corporate/satellite-communications-policy-in-india-time-to-revisit-revise(last visited March 5, 2017).
[16] ‘Norms, Guidelines and Procedures for Satellite Communications Announced’ ISRO (May 08, 2000) http://www.isro.gov.in/update/08-may-2000/norms-guidelines-and-procedures-satellite-communications-announced.
[17] ‘Remote Data Sensing Policy’ ISRO. https://www.nrsc.gov.in/Remote_Sensing_Data_Policy (Last visited March 7, 2017)
[18] ‘ISRO Technology Transfer’ ISRO. http://www.isro.gov.in/isro-technology-transfer (Last visited March 5, 2017)

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
sayyedarif51
Member since Mar 17, 2018
Location: n/a
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top