Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Tuesday, November 5, 2024

Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Posted in: Arbitration Law
Wed, Jun 7, 23, 10:07, 1 Year ago
star star star star star
1 out of 5 with 1 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 1892
Section 11 of the Arbitration and conciliation act deals with the appointment of arbitrators. In this article, I have tried to simplify all the provisions of section 11 by way of questions and answers.

Appointment of Arbitrators
Section 11 of the Arbitration and conciliation act deals with the appointment of arbitrators. In this article, I have tried to simplify all the provisions of section 11 by way of questions and answers.

Who can be an arbitrator?

  • A person of any nationality. [s11(1)]
  • One who is qualified to be an arbitrator. This qualification is determined by the court or agreement of the parties. [s11(8)(a)]
  • One who qualifies the criteria mentioned in Section 12(1) of the Arbitration and conciliation act. [s11(8)(b)]

However, all these conditions are subject to agreement between parties.

Who can appoint an Arbitrator?

  • Parties: Parties are free to agree upon the procedure to appoint an arbitrator. [s.11(2)]
  • Other arbitrators: In case of arbitration with 3 arbitrators each party shall appoint one arbitrator and the two appointed arbitrators shall appoint a third arbitrator who shall act as the presiding arbitrator. [s.11(3)]
  • Court: Failing to appoint an arbitrator, the court has the power to appoint an arbitrator on request of either party.


What Happens if the appointment procedure in subsection 3 does not apply?
The decision of the court is final and no appeal including patent appeal shall lie against such court. [s11(7)]

  • 11(4)(a): A party fails to appoint an arbitrator within 30 days from receipt of the request.
  • 11(4)(b): Two appointed arbitrators fail to agree on the third arbitrator within 30 days from the date of appointment.

In such a situation, SC/HC/Any person or institution designated by such court upon request by the party or parties can appoint an arbitrator.

What happens in the case of the sole arbitrator?
In the case of sole arbitrator parties again have the time of 30 days from the receipt of the request by one party from the other party to agree on the appointment of the arbitrator.

If no arbitrator is appointed, SC/HC and any person or an institution designated by the court on request by the party can appoint an arbitrator. However mere designation does not lead to delegation of judicial powers. [s11(6)(b)]

In this case, the provision of section 11(7) applies empowering the decision to be final.

What is the fate of the Appointment Procedure? [S11(6)(a)(b)(c)]

Party fails to act as required under that procedure
Parties or 2 arbitrators fail to reach an expected agreement
Person or Institution designated by the court fails to perform any function entrusted to him.
The party may request SC/HC and any person or institution designated by such court to take necessary actions. However, if the agreement provides for any other remedy for an appointment, it should be followed. The provisions of section 11(7) apply in this situation also empowering the decision to be final.

Precautions that the court shall practice: The court must confine to the examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement irrespective of any judicial decree or order. [S11(6A)]

Does the court have any power irrespective of an arbitration agreement?
SC/HC may make any scheme to deal with issues listed in sections 11(4), (5), (6). [1]Further, if more than one request has been made under the above sections by different HC, the HC which has first received the request will only be competent to decide. [s11(12)]

Do HCs have competency in International Commercial Arbitration?
No, in matters dealing with subsections 4,5,6,7,8, and 10, the reference to HC/SC in these subsections shall mean a reference to SC only.

Further in any other arbitration, the reference to SC/HC shall mean respectively. [s11(12)(b)]

What is the time to dispose of an Application for the appointment of an arbitrator or arbitrator?
SC/HC and any person or institution designated by the court shall try to dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible. The courts shall try to dispose of the matter within 60 days from the date of service of notice to the opposition party. [s.11(13)

End-Notes:

  1. S11(10)

Written By: Swapnil Vishwakarma, 2nd Year BA-LL.B.(Hons) - ICFAI University Dehdradun

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
swapnilvishw
Member since Jun 7, 2023
Location: n/a
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
The question of punishment for overlapping legal boundaries is a subject of continuing interest. Although not the most frequent used penal sanction, imprisonment of offenders remains a common punishment for crime
The organization officially commence on January 1, 1995 under the Marrakech Agreement, replacing the General Agreement on Tariff and Trade GATT
This paper delineates certain issues that exist in the Institutional Arbitration in India and identifies areas for reform in the Indian arbitration, to strengthen the existing arbitration mechanisms, and also to put forward focus areas for promoting institutional arbitration in India.
Arbitration is still a growing field in India, but it has shown good results in other countries. The solution of dispute related to sports through arbitration is something that India is yet to practice and is going to do so in near future.
Professor GS Tomar v/s Uttarakhand while the holder of first rank in a selection process cannot claim the right to be appointed, the appointment of the second-ranker is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution
This article compares the various methods of ADR and analyses those in the Indian context
M/s. N.N. Global Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Indo Unique Flame Ltd. the ground that allegations of fraud are not arbitrable is a wholly archaic view, which has become obsolete, and deserves to be discarded.
Yashwardhan Raghuwanshi Vs. District & Sessions Judge Commercial matters involving Arbitration disputes can only be heard by Commercial Court of the status of District Judge or Additional District Judge.
Kasim VK vs M Ashraf jurisdiction to entertain a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Alternative Dispute Resolution ( ADR ) has not only gained currency by catching people's imagination but also witnessed sweeping changes over the years and is now becoming the most preferable
Gyan Prakash Arya vs M/s Titan Industries Limited an arbitrator cannot modify an arbitration award on an application filed under Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
Roop Singh Bhatty vs M/s Shriram City Union Finance Limited that the provisions of Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A&C Act) are cast in mandatory terms and the mandate of the arbitrator terminates under Section 29A(4)
Panipat Jalandhar National Highway 1 Tollway Pvt Ltd v. NHAI that multiple arbitrations with regard to existing claims on same contract are to be avoided.
Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 ( Conciliation Procedure) : All about Conciliation
It must be mentioned here that this Act was primarily enacted to ensure that the individuals before directly rushing
Damodar Valley Corporation vs Reliance Infrastructure Limited in Neutral Citation that was passed in favour of the Reliance Infrastructure Limited (RIL).
Power of Courts to refer the parties to Arbitration where there is an Arbitration Agreement
Top