Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Wednesday, April 16, 2025

CJI Led SC Bench Expresses Its Worry On Rule Of Law In UP

Posted in: Constitutional Law
Thu, Apr 10, 25, 11:15, 6 Days ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 15523
Debu Singh vs Uttar PradeshThis is wrong! What is happening in UP? Everyday civil suits are being converted to criminal cases. That’s not correct! That’s break down of rule of law completely! Absolutely right! No denying

It is definitely a matter of utmost concern that none other than a Bench of Supreme Court comprising of Hon’ble CJI Mr Justice Sanjiv Khanna who led the Apex Court Bench and also comprising Hon’ble Mr Justice Sanjay Kumar and Hon’ble Mr Justice KV Viswanathan in a most learned judgment titled Debu Singh And Anr vs The State of Uttar Pradesh in SLP(Crl) No. 3620/2025 as recently as on April 7, 2025 has minced just no words to hold in no uncertain terms that, “This is wrong! What is happening in UP? Everyday civil suits are being converted to criminal cases. That’s not correct! That’s break down of rule of law completely!” Absolutely right! No denying!

If we jog our memory a little back, we can recall how even UN Secretary General Ban ki Moon had slammed UP as “rape and crime capital of India”! At first blush, even a layman can point out that which State in India needs multiple High Court Benches and which State needs maximum High Court Benches! Still we see that UP which is most populated State of India with maximum pending cases and Rajasthan which is largest State areawise have only one Bench at Lucknow and Jaipur and lawless Bihar has none! There cannot be ever a bigger tragedy than this that for 78 years of independence we see that West UP has been denied even a single High Court Bench even though it is West UP which owes for majority of the pending cases of UP which is highest not just in UP but is also highest in any other region of India yet mercilessly deprived from having even a single High Court Bench which is undoubtedly most disastrous!

What is even most worst is that the litigants of 30 districts of West UP have been most atrociously attached with not even Lucknow where a High Court Bench exists since July 1948 in Eastern UP but attached most stupidly with Allahabad which is more than 250 km away from even Lucknow which means the poorest litigants of 30 districts of West UP have to spend more and travel whole night and nearly a day by train to attend court hearings which is plainly unconstitutional just like litigants of hilly areas of undivided UP had to travel thousands of kilometers all the way again till Allahabad in true dictatorial style making the worst mockery of our Constitution and so also of poorest litigants till Uttar Pradesh was partitioned and this was the major reason which political parties never like to concede! The trials and tribulations that litigants of West UP have to face due to no Bench in this region even though majority of pending cases are from West UP are simply unending yet most atrociously we see that Centre has done absolutely just nothing to resolve it and media too has utterly failed to highlight it effectively!

With a very heavy heart, I want to say that Centre has been most biased in denying West UP even a single Bench! You don’t need a telescope to see that which State should have maximum High Court Benches as it is the most populated State of India with maximum number of pending cases! How long will Supreme Court be in hibernation mode on this count? It has to be acknowledged with grace that denial of even a single High Court Bench to West UP is not only dangerous and deleterious but also most disastrous, most despicable and most discriminatory!

It is most shocking that UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population – more than 26 crore as CM Yogi Adityanath and so also PM Narendra Modi always so very proudly claims, maximum districts - 75, maximum constituencies - 80, maximum MPs – 80, maximum MLAs - 404, maximum PM including Narendra Modi who represents Varanasi as an MP, maximum pending cases – more than 11 lakh in Allahabad High Court and here too West UP accounts for more than half of pending cases as noted by Justice Jaswant Commission about 57% and now after so many decades the percentage of pending cases in West UP has gone substantially much higher, maximum cases in lower courts about to touch 1 crore, maximum Judges both in High Court – 160 and also in lower courts, maximum vacancies of Judges both in High Court and also in lower courts, maximum members in UP Bar Council more than 1 lakh and which is also the largest Bar Council in the world as claimed in the website itself of UP Bar Council yet the former Chairman of UP Bar Council – Darvesh Yadav who was the first woman to get appointed to this post was murdered cold blooded right in court premises in Agra which is again in West UP on June 12, 2019 by pumping bullets on her head and stomach, maximum poverty, maximum villages more than one lakh the exact number being 107040, maximum gram panchayats at 74626, maximum fake encounters killings, maximum custody killings, maximum dowry cases, maximum bride burning cases, maximum cases of human rights violations, maximum robberies, maximum dacoities, maximum cases of crime, loot, arson and riots and here too West UP tops with Saharanpur riots, Meerut riots, Muzaffarnagar riots tarnishing our international reputation to the extent that former UN Secretary General Ban ki Moon termed UP as “crime and rape capital” of India and just recently we see Bahraich coming in news for communal disturbances most recently, maximum undertrials in all age groups and what not yet Centre till now in April 2025 from July 1948 when a Bench was created in Lucknow which is so close to Allahabad and where it was just not needed at all is not prepared to create even a single bench for not just West UP but for the entire UP nor even ready to attach 30 districts of West UP with more than 10 crore population which is more than majority of States with Lucknow? Much water has flown down the bridge since India became independent in 1947 but the most stark truth is that even nearly 80 years later in April 2025, we see that West UP is without a High Court Bench which is definitely most deplorable, most dangerous, most self destructive and most discriminatory that even Supreme Court has dared not to ever intervene even when UP was undivided! Why Supreme Court has tolerated such dastardly discrimination in distribution of High Court Benches in different States and in different regions?

Why is Centre so ambivalent and inimical in taking any proactive step that goes a long way in resolving this key issue at the earliest? One can’t fathom that why Centre has behaved so partially, so irrationally and so undemocratically that the most populated State of India with maximum number of pending cases was given only one Bench and that too very close to Allahabad itself and worst of all attached litigants of West UP and hilly areas of undivided UP with not even Lucknow which is more than 230 km earlier but right uptill Allahabad as if India was still being ruled by colonial Britishers with even Lahore in Pakistan closer to West UP as compared to Allahabad High Court? This is exactly that has led to catastrophic results and culminated in partition of UP into UP and Uttarakhand in 2000! Will any democratic country behave in such autocratic manner?

Is this democratic or autocratic style of functioning? Centre’s approach in this regard in last nearly 80 years has been most diabolically outrageous and has to be most strongly condemned! Why these elected representatives are behaving like monarchs depriving the people from having easy and affordable justice at doorsteps is truly incomprehensible? But yes I must concede and be on same page with eminent journalist Tavleen Singh who in her enlightening editorial titled “Investment needed in people” published in “The Sunday Express” newspaper dated March 16, 2025 points out and concedes that:
In fairness to Narendra Modi, it must be said that since he became Prime Minister the speed at which roads, ports, airports and other vital infrastructure is being built has been truly remarkable.” But in the same vein, I will hasten to add that why so miserliness when it comes to creating High Court Benches and why in last about 11 years in power, we see that not even a single High Court Bench has been created in any State? When will this drought on Bench end especially in UP, Bihar and Rajasthan?

Why Centre favours unjustified discrimination on this count? The most ticklish question is: Why Centre fails to display political will power to address this long pending issue? One has to say with extreme dismay that Centre has always tried to play safe and has not taken any interest nor demonstrated any political will in resolving this Bench issue prolonging it foolishly for nearly 80 years which is nothing but absolute stupidity of the highest order!

The area of West UP is 98,933 square km and accounts for 33.61 percent of total area of UP and has 26 districts yet no bench but Lucknow with just 62,363 square km and 12 districts has a Bench! Allahabad High Court is biggest High Court in whole of Asia as was claimed by Yogi Adityanath and many say in whole world and also is one of oldest High Court and UP Bar Council has maximum members yet has least Bench just one and so very near to Allahabad which is nothing but most senseless, shameless and stupid decision perpetuated since independence and not rectified till now! There is a political predicament that is complicating this Bench issue to be addressed effectively! What needs to be watched out is how Centre now adopts a new approach or keeps treading on the lame path of forwarding one pretext or the other to justify denial of even a single Bench to West UP! How long will the litigants of West UP be made scapegoat?

It must be asked: Why is it that the litigants of West UP of more than 30 districts foolishly were compelled and are still compelled most senselessly to travel all the way to Allahabad which is far away even from Lucknow where High Court Bench is located and averages 600 to 800 km on an average but the litigants of Lucknow cannot travel even 200 km away to Allahabad? Most shamefully, why no one ever really cares for poorest of poor, women and infirm and physically handicapped people who can’t travel so far easily and Centre is most happy by inaugurating an international airport at Kushinagar and now again at Jewar in West UP and in Ayodhya in December 2023 and most recently in Saharanpur in West UP which is a very good thing and has maximum airports in India and so also maximum highways and super expressways but why we then see so miserliness on High Court Bench for West UP which will benefit all whether poor or rich or Hindu or Muslim or of any other religion?

Centre must act now and not just keep on advancing one lame excuse or the other as a pretext for not creating a High Bench anywhere in UP other than at Lucknow where it was just not needed at all as it is so close to Allahabad and worst still the 30 districts of West UP were not attached even with Lucknow which falls 230 km earlier but right uptill Allahabad which means more than 700 km on average all the way to Allahabad to seek justice which in itself is the biggest injustice! Why litigants of West UP have to travel whole night and half day all the way to Allahabad? Area of West UP is 98,933 square km and accounts for 33.61 percent of total area of UP and has 26 districts yet no bench but Lucknow with just 62,363 square km and 12 districts has a Bench since 1948!

Huge pending cases in Allahabad High Court taken note recently even by Apex Court is inextricably linked to West UP being attached with it and not with even Lucknow and majority of cases are from West UP which all the more necessitates a separate High Court Bench but has not materialized most pathetically till date even though Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge recommended about 50 years ago a permanent Bench for West UP! Why is Centre in a quandary in such an “open and shut” case? For all practical purposes, there is no reason that why a High Court Bench cannot be created in West UP!

I just don’t buy the most rubbish argument that except Lucknow in Eastern UP so close to Allahabad High Court, no other city in UP is fit to be given even a single Bench! To recapitulate, we saw how Justice Jaswant Singh Commission recommended High Court Circuit Bench for Nainital and Dehradun about 50 years ago yet not created but when people agitated for separate State then we saw how Nainital which was earlier denied even a Circuit Bench till it formed part of UP became fit to have separate High Court on partition of UP in 2000 about 25 years ago when Uttarakhand came into existence as State! This is exactly what perception is all about!

How long will the unjustified monopoly of few regions and few States in distribution of High Court and High Court Benches continue unrestricted without any pragmatic reason to justify it? It is a no-brainer that the denial of even a single High Court Bench to West UP is plainly unconstitutional! Why no tremors ever felt even in Supreme Court over West UP having not even a single High Court Bench which takes suo motu cognizance in cheating in Mayor elections as we saw in Chandigarh Mayor elections? This is all the more most distressing because it directly concerns judiciary yet nothing done absolutely just nothing most astoundingly even by top court! If Supreme Court still tolerates this worst discrimination in judiciary itself then with what face can it fret, fume and fulminate over discrimination in other streams?

If the top court had ordered creation of two High Court Benches as recommended by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission for hilly areas of undivided UP perhaps UP would never have been partitioned but most unfortunately we did not see any suo motu cognizance being taken which was the most fit case in this earth! This alone explains why it is said that:
Supreme Court is final but is definitely not infallible!” Failure to act even now depriving West UP from having even a single Bench will slowly but surely and inexorably exacerbate the huge pending cases in UP till it explodes with nation bearing worst casualty as it is UP which is most populated State of India with maximum pending cases and not MP or Karnataka or Maharashtra or West Bengal or Assam!

How long will Centre piggyback on lame excuses to deny West UP from having even a single Bench? Why such a pressing issue never dominates the discourse in different news channels is truly incomprehensible and most baffling indeed! Why can’t Centre keep powerful vested elements at bay when it comes to taking a call on the creation of a permanent High Court Bench in West UP? Even Madhya Pradesh with just 7 crore population has two High Court Benches at Gwalior and Indore but West UP with more than ten crores has not even a single Bench!

Just recently, we saw acid was thrown in the most ghastly manner on woman lawyer in Moradabad in West UP right inside court premises! Many such horrific criminal acts clearly portrays how most unjustly Centre has been most complicit in depriving West UP from having even a single Bench which is plainly unconstitutional yet Supreme Court has been in hibernation on such a key issue for nearly 80 long years! This is the real tragedy!

It is a no-brainer that such gruesome incidents in West UP clearly depict the unpalatable truth which ruling elite never wants to confront candidly and honestly! What I find absolutely most inexplicable is that why only Eastern UP has both High Court and a single Bench so close to each other and nowhere else? It is as clear as broad day sunlight that which State of India needs more High Court Benches because it is UP which has maximum population and maximum pending cases and here too it is crystal clear that which part of UP needs more Benches as it is West UP which owes for majority of the pending cases of UP and yet has not even a single High Court Bench leave alone having High Court itself as ideally should be!

Why Centre has been so unscrupulous in denying West UP from having even a single High Court Bench? No senseless arguments no matter how carefully crafted by Centre can ever on earth justify the denial of even a single High Court Bench to West UP with more than 10 crores population which is more than majority of the States in India and so also owes for majority of pending cases of UP and is higher than the population of most of the States and still most perplexingly we see that there is not even a single Bench in West UP! It is fair to say for sure that Centre needs to do a lot more than what it is doing to resolve this long simmering issue!

It will be fairly right to say that Centre has taken this most pressing Bench issue in West UP for granted for far too long! One may very well ask: Why has Centre been holding to ransom and gambling with the most basic fundamental rights of litigants of West UP to get “affordable” and “speedy justice” and “justice at doorsteps” for nearly 80 long years on one flimsy ground or the other that cannot be ever justified by even CJI or any Justice of Supreme Court or High Court what to talk about others and playing merciless havoc with the litigants of 30 districts of West UP with more than 10 crore population so brazenly, brutally, blindly, boldly, biasedly and baselessly is for Centre to specify instead of behaving most arrogantly by refusing to see the clear writing on the wall which most adversely affects the poorest litigants and not Union Minister like Shivraj Singh who inspite of even travelling in aeroplane in air conditioners and not in second class seat get most agitated and complain of poor facility as we saw recently? Whose vested interests Centre is serving by denying West UP even a single High Court Bench?

It is really most reassuring to note that leaders of Opposition parties like Samajwadi Party and so also even of ruling BJP like BJP MLA Manju Siwach from Modinagar in West UP too recently demanded High Court Bench in West UP! RLD MLA Prasanna Kumar from Shamli pointed out in Vidhan Sabha recently that from Shamli the distance till Delhi is just 100 km and even Chandigarh is near but Allahabad High Court is 700 km and demanded High Court Bench in West UP! Umar Ali Khan who is MLA of Samajwadi Party from Behat in Saharanpur in West UP too demanded High Court Bench recently in Vidhan Sabha and pointed out that it is very difficult for people to travel all the way till Allahabad which is about 800 km away from Saharanpur to secure justice especially poor litigants! Former Union Minister and so also former Mumbai Police Commissioner Mr Satyapal Singh who is former BJP MP from Baghpat in 2016 demanded in Parliament 5 High Court Benches in Meerut, Agra, Gorakhpur, Varanasi and Jhansi in 2016 but Centre till date is not ready to create even one!

Even former PM late Mr Atal Bihari Vajpayee had raised this in Parliament in 1986 as Leader of Opposition and so also Mr Rajnath who is now Union Defence Minister and there are many such eminent galaxy of tall leaders like Mr Laxmikant Vajpayee of BJP who has been former party President of BJP in UP still we did not witness movement of even an inch forward on this key “open and shut” case! The creation of a Bench in West UP is the best antidote to all the huge problems faced by the litigants yet Centre is doing absolutely just nothing to ensure that a High Court Bench is created at the earliest on one pretext or the other which definitely cannot be ever justified under any circumstances! Why has plain logic taken a backseat in West UP being most mercilessly deprived from having even a single Bench is the best and clear indicator that there is certainly more to it than meets the eye?

What leaves me completely speechless and totally flabbergasted is to see how contemptuously Centre still dares to invent some lame excuse or the other to justify denial of a High Court Bench in West UP like sanction of Governor needed as we saw recently when Union Law Minister said that we have no problem with Bench in West UP which definitely cannot be justified by any person in his right senses under any circumstances as Justice Jaswant Singh Commission appointed by Centre itself nearly 50 years ago headed by former Supreme Court Judge recommended permanent seat in West UP at Agra yet not created till date!

What complicates this long pending Bench issue in West UP is complete brazen, brutal, blind and baseless disregard of what Justice Jaswant Singh Commission so very commendably recommended of creating permanent High Court Bench in West UP only to be thrown in dustbin while creating High Court Bench in States like Maharashtra which already had multiple High Court Benches at Aurangabad as recommended in 1980s! Why Centre has degenerated to the extent that it keeps inventing one ludicrous ground or the other to most shamelessly justify without any rhyme or reason the creation of even a single High Court Bench for more than 10 crore people of 30 districts of West UP even though it is West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of UP as acknowledged by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission due to which it recommended creation of permanent Bench in West UP at Agra yet most astoundingly not created even after nearly 50 years most atrociously!

To be sure, the denial of even a single Bench to West UP stands as a testament to how shamelessly, sinisterly and surreptitiously Centre has discriminated against West UP even though it is West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of UP and contributes to more than 80% to State’s economy which definitely portrays Centre in poor spotlight for not doing anything worthwhile to address this long simmering issue for nearly 80 years! How can anyone on this earth ever deny that none other than late Mr Atal Bihari Vajpayee whose 100th birth anniversary was celebrated on December 25, 2024 all across the nation had in 1986 most forcefully demanded the setting up of a High Court Bench in West UP right inside Parliament as Leader of Opposition? In fact, Dr BR Ambedkar had most strongly batted for separate Statehood for West UP just like for Eastern UP and Central UP which is on record yet no action not even a single Bench created!

When two High Court Benches can be created for just 4 and 8 districts of Karnataka in 2008 at Dharwad and Gulbarga then why for 30 districts of West UP three or two or even one High Court Bench cannot be set up inspite of clear recommendations by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission who recommended maximum 3 High Court Benches for undivided UP yet not one created till date which culminated in people of hilly areas agitating for separate Statehood and now Uttarakhand has High Court itself at Nainital? Why has plain logic taken a backseat in West UP being most mercilessly deprived from having even a single Bench is the best and clear indicator that there is certainly more to it than meets the eye?

This is just not done and is outright most blatant partiality and cheating which even Supreme Court most lamentably has failed to take suo motu cognizance of while it spares no time in taking suo motu cognizance of cheating in a Mayor election as we saw in Chandigarh! This directly concerns judiciary itself yet we see no action taken on it! Eminent jurist and Supreme Court lawyer – Late Mr Fali Sam Nariman once very rightly said that:
What’s the use of our Constitution without liberal Judges?” Why is Centre so unaccountably stubborn on such a key issue of setting up a High Court Bench in West UP and why it keeps blaming Governor for not giving sanction who cannot be above Constitution nor can Chief Minister be nor can Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court be?

An even more bigger question is: For how long will Centre remain so hell bent in denying West UP even a single Bench which owes for maximum pending cases in any region of India? What knocks me off completely is to see how irrationally and most discriminatingly West UP has been deprived from having even a single High Court Bench in last nearly 80 years of independence! When High Court can be given for Uttarakhand for whom Justice Jaswant Singh Commission recommended just two Circuit Benches then why West UP for whom permanent seat of High Court Bench recommended yet not even a single Circuit Bench created till date? Where is Supreme Court sleeping and when it can single out discrimination in an election of Mayor in Chandigarh as we saw some time back then why on an issue directly concerning judiciary, it has never bothered to take any initiative in holding Centre and State of UP to account?

What message went out by complete astounding inaction of the Supreme Court on this count? It was that Supreme Court just like Centre favours this most sinister, senseless and shameless discrimination perpetrated against different States and different regions and has left everything on this directly concerning judiciary to Centre that it should have last word on it as held in November 2018 by the Bench led by the then CJI Mr Ranjan Gogoi while listening to a PIL filed by women lawyer KR Chitra and appreciating the dire need for a Bench but yet dismissing it leaving the ball in Centre’s court who since last nearly 80 years has been sleeping most comfortably on such a sensitive issue due to which lawyers of West UP have been agitating and going on strike every Saturday since last nearly 50 years yet to no avail and so also strike some times for even 6 months as in 2001 and in 2014-15 in my time in Meerut, what to talk about the past when lawyers even went on hunger strike in 1976 for more than a month! It is the livelihood of practising lawyers that gets affected most when they go on strike and it is the practising lawyers of West UP who are the driving force behind such sacred agitation for the benefit of the litigants and it is for litigants that they want a High Court Bench in West UP which Centre is overzealous to deny on one flimsy ground or other which is definitely most condemnable! Most disgusting and most degrading indeed!

We all know that for just 3 crore people of Telangana Centre approved separate High Court and separate Capital and Statehood on June 2, 2014 just like for Andhra Pradesh with population of just 4 crores by partitioning Andhra Pradesh just like Chhattisgarh was created by partitioning Madhya Pradesh in November 2000 even though population of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh combined is less than West UP alone! Now we hear that Andhra Pradesh State Assembly has approved a High Court Bench in Kurnool also!

But most shockingly for West UP with more than 10 crores people we see that not even a High Court Bench is approved by Centre which leaves me completely speechless! Why the hell on earth Supreme Court has been so tolerant to this open most worst discrimination on the distribution of High Court Benches in different States? Why lawless Bihar has not even a single High Court Bench and so also West UP which owes for majority of cases of UP?

Succinctly put, this long lingering key issue needs to be addressed at the earliest! How long will Centre remain wedded to the most historical blunder of allowing only one Bench so close to Allahabad at Lucknow? How long will Supreme Court keep questioning law and order situation in UP but never order more High Court Benches in UP even though this key issue directly concerns judiciary and will go a long way in bringing the number of pending cases down and in ensuring “justice at doorsteps” for the litigants of West UP?

There is not even an iota of doubt that CJI led Supreme Court Bench has very rightly expressed its unhappiness on rule of law in Uttar Pradesh and has gone to extent of saying that there is a break down of rule and law completely in UP! This all the more necessitates the creation of more High Court Benches in UP especially in UP which owes for majority of pending cases of Allahabad High Court!

Before concluding, it must be asked: Why only one region of UP that is Eastern UP enjoys the unfettered monopoly of having both High Court at Allahabad and Bench at Lucknow so nearby for so long even though it is West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of UP still no Bench! Why even though West UP contributes more than 80% to State’s economy yet accorded such a step-motherly treatment for nearly 80 long years?

Is this the way to make India a developed country by 2047 as PM Mr Narendra Modi wants that you deprive most deserving big States like UP, Bihar and Rajasthan from having multiple High Court Benches and confer only few elite States like Maharashtra, Karnataka, MP, Assam and West Bengal with having multiple High Court Benches? Yet why even media which is considered the fourth pillar of democracy very rarely bothers to ever highlight it most forcefully especially in news channels and top newspapers and top magazines? I just can’t second guess!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
This article critically analyses the concept of Parliamentary privileges enshrined under Article 105 of the Constitution of India along with various judicial pronouncement.
Here we have two legal systems, one tracing its roots to Roman law and another originating in England or we can say one codified and the other not codified or one following adversarial type of system other inquisitorial or one is continental whereas the other one Anglo-American
The principle of gender equality is enshrined in the Indian Constitution in its Preamble, Fundamental Rights, Fundamental Duties and Directive Principles.
The constitutional interpretations metamorphose a non-federal constitution into a federal one which results into a shift from reality to a myth
What justice is? and why one wants access to it? are important question which need to be addressed in introductory part of the literature. Justice is a concept of rightness, fairness based on ethics, moral, religion and rationality.
It is not the whole Act which would be held invalid by being inconsistent with Part III of the Constitution but only such provisions of it which are violative of the fundamental rights
Thomas Mann had in 1924 said; a man’s dying is more the survivor’s affair than his own’. Today his words are considered to be true as there is a wide range of debate on legalizing euthanasia.
India became one of 135 countries to make education a fundamental right of every child, when the Parliament passed the 86th Constitutional amendment in 2002.
Following are the salient features of the amended Lokpal bill passed by Parliament:
Good governance is associated with efficient and effective administration in a democratic framework. It is considered as citizen-friendly, citizen caring and responsive administration. Good governance emerged as a powerful idea when multilateral and bilateral agencies like the World Bank, UNDP, OECD, ADB, etc.
A democratic society survives by accepting new ideas, experimenting with them, and rejecting them if found unimportant. Therefore it is necessary that whatever ideas the government or its other members hold must be freely put before the public.
This article describes relationship between Indian Legislative provisions and freedom of press.
This article gives an overview of the Definition of State as per Article 12 Of the Constitution of India with emphasis on Relevant case law
Coming straight to the nub of the matter, The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Bir Singh v Delhi Jal Board held that Pan India Reservation Rule in force in National Capital Territory of Delhi is in accord with the constitutional scheme relating to services under the Union and the States/Union Territories
Jasvinder Singh Chauhan case that denial of passport or its non-renewal without assigning reasons as listed under the Passports Act, 1967 infringes the fundamental rights. who was praying for the renewal of his passport and issuance of a fresh passport to him.
In Indian Young Lawyers Association v/s Kerala has very laudably permitted entry of women of all age groups to the Sabarimala temple, holding that 'devotion cannot be subjected to gender discrimination'. It is one of the most progressive and path breaking judgment that we have witnessed in last many decades just like in the Shayara Bano case
Sadhna Chaudhary v U.P. has upheld the dismissal of a judicial officer on grounds of misconduct, on the basis of two orders passed by her in land acquisition cases. This has certainly sent shockwaves across Uttar Pradesh especially in judicial circles.
The term judiciary refers to the higher officials of the government i.e Judges of all the hierarchy of the courts. The constitution of India gives greater importance to the independence of the Indian judiciary. Every democratic country set up it’s own independent judiciary for the welfare of it’s citizens.
various allowances, perquisites, salaries granted to mp and mla
This article presents a glimpse of human life through the constitutional approach.
Er. K. Arumugam v. V. Balakrishnan In the contempt jurisdiction, the court has to confine itself to the four corners of the order alleged to have been disobeyed
As Parliamentarians, we remain the guardians and protectors of fundamental rights, and always need to ensure we are fulfilling our many responsibilities, as legislators, representatives and role models. to uphold the rights set out in the Declaration, particularly as regards safeguarding political and civil society space.
Kashmiri Sikh Community and others v. J&K has very rightly upheld PM's Employment Package 2009 for Kashmiri Pandits living in the Valley.
The Supreme Court on 12th September stuck down the penal provision of adultery enshrined under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code.
President A. Akeem Raja case it has been made amply clear that, Freedom of religion can't trump demands of public order. Public order has to be maintained at all cost. There can be no compromise on it.
Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghosh who is a former Supreme Court Judge and former Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh High Court who retired in May 2017 and a current member of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) was appointed as India's first Lokpal
colonial era Official Secrets Act (OSA) as many feel that it has far outlived its utility. Before drawing any definite conclusion on such an important issue, we need to certainly analyse this issue dispassionately from a close angle.
Sri Aniruddha Das Vs The State Of Assam held that bandhs / road/rail blockades are illegal and unconstitutional and organizers must be prosecuted.
ABout changes in Changes in Constitutional (Forty-Second) Amendment Act
Definition of State as per Article 12 f the Constitution of India with emphasis on Relevant case law
Justice KS Puttaswamy (Retd) and Anr vs UOI held that right to privacy is a fundamental right.
You want India to defend Kashmir, feed its people, give Kashmiris equal rights all over India. But you want to deny India and Indians all rights in Kashmir. I am a Law Minister of India, I cannot be a party to such a betrayal of national interests.
Faheema Shirin RK Vs State of Kerala and others that right to access internet is a fundamental right forming part of right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
the Supreme Court of UK has gone all guns blazing by categorically and courageously pronouncing in Gilham v Ministry of Justice the whistle-blowing protection envisaged under Employment
The Constitution directs the government that High Court shall have power, throughout in relation to it jurisdiction, to issue to any person or authority, including in appropriate cases, any Government, directions, orders or writs, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by Part III and for any other purpose also.
What is child labour ? Why bonded in india?
Shiv Sena And Ors. Vs UOI whether the newly sworn in Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis enjoys majority in the State Assembly or not! This latest order was necessitated after Shiv Sena knocked the doors of the Apex Court along with Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and Congress.
Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC), saying they are two different things. We all saw in different news channels that many people who were protesting did not had even the elementary knowledge of CAA but were protesting vehemently just on the provocation of leaders from different political parties
Sanmay Banerjee v/s. West Bengal in exercise of Constitutional writ jurisdiction on the appellate side has that people have every right to criticize dispensation running the country, being legislature, executive or judiciary
On May 16, 1946 Cabinet Mission Plan arbitrarily announced to group British Indian states in A, B & C categories. Assam was kept in Group C with Bengal, creating a predominantly Muslim zone in Eastern India like the one proposed to be setup in western India.
Top political leaders and Members of Parliament from Left Parties have very often raised the questions of atrocities and accommodation of these minorities even in the Parliament. Unfortunately when this dream of opening the doors of India for her cultural children was about to be realized
Why is it that even after more than 81 days the blocking of road at Shaheen Bagh in Delhi is continuing uninterrupted since 15 December 2019? Why is it that Centre allowed this to happen? Why were they not promptly evicted?
The Basic Structure Of Indian Constitution Or Doctrine Applies During The Time Of Amendments In Constitution Of India. These Basic Structure State That The Government Of India Cann’t Touch Or Destroy
Arjun Aggarwal Vs Union Of India And Anr (stay) dismissed a PIL filed by a petitioner who is a law student. The PIL had challenged the June 30 order of the Ministry of Home Affairs wherein considerable relaxations from lockdown were operationalised under Unlock 1.0
This blog deals explains the Right to Access Internet as a Fundamental Right under Constitution of India and the reasonable restrcitions which it is subject to and whether it can be considered to be a fundamental right or not.
This article talks about what exactly is meant by the doctrine of colourable legislation, how various case laws have come up time and again to reiterate its meaning and how the supreme court views this doctrine. To address legislative transparency for some improvements in the legislative system, colorable legislation is necessary to be studied
Shri Naini Gopal Vs The Union of India and Ors. in Case No. – LD-VC-CW-665 of 2020 has minced no words to hold that: We need to remind the Bank that the pension payable to the employees upon superannuation is a property under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India
Article 25 of the Constitution of India, thus ruled that the immediate family members of Covid-19 victims be permitted to perform the funeral rites of the deceased subject to them following certain precautionary guidelines
Top