Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Thursday, April 3, 2025

Arrest Of Mr Zafar Ali Necessitates Immediate Implementation of The Advocate Protection Act

Posted in: Judiciary
Sat, Mar 29, 25, 17:51, 5 Days ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 25566
unexpected and unjustified arrest of Shahi Jama Masjid Committee President and so also eminent, learned and senior lawyer Mr Zafar Ali who commands a huge fan following

It is definitely my most strong personal belief in my individual personal capacity that the unwarranted, unexpected and unjustified arrest of Shahi Jama Masjid Committee President and so also eminent, learned and senior lawyer Mr Zafar Ali who commands a huge fan following not only among Muslims but even among many Hindus and people from other religions and communities alike could definitely have been avoided in connection with the November 24 violence that erupted suddenly in Sambhal over the court ordering survey of the Mughal era 500-year-old mosque after a petition was filed claiming that it was site of an ancient Hindu temple which I definitely feel was not justified at all.

It merits just no reiteration that searching temple in every mosque cannot be ever justified and I have no hesitation whatsoever in saying that courts must also most strongly refrain from freely indulging in ordering survey at the drop of a hat as it leads to lot of discontentment and communal tensions and loss of precious lives as we saw most terribly in Sambhal which must be avoided at all costs! He is certainly a person of eminence and of proven integrity and not some notorious criminal who could flee that his arrest was so necessary that police could not just wait!

It was but quite ostensible that as a natural fallout, lawyers in not just Sambhal but some other districts also staged a pen-down protest against his untimely and unjustified sudden arrest. It cannot be certainly lost sight of that the advocates group which held so many huge protests in all the courts under the Sambhal district against the uncalled arrest of Mr Zafar Ali alleged clearly that the arrest was an attempt to prevent him somehow or anyhow from testifying before a judicial commission investigating the incident.

It is worth paying attention that cannot be just glossed over that Mohammad Nazar Qureshi who is the President of the Chandousi Court Bar Association in Sambhal was most forthcoming in acknowledging graciously that:
Various courts under Sambhal district like Chandousi, Gunnaur, and Sambhal remained closed today as part of the strike. There was no FIR against him, yet he was sent to jail under unspecified charges. This is a wrongful act by the police. Even Hapur Bar Association has also most commendably reiterated its support and abstained from work unitedly on 26.03.2025!

To be sure, it must definitely be asked: How can such a despicable act be ever tried to be justified on one pretext or the other? How can an eminent and senior lawyer like Mr Zafar Ali be sent to jail at the drop of a hat? This definitely only serves to tarnish our international reputation to a large extent and so also beyond an iota of doubt violates the legal right of a serving advocate who is also an officer of the court which police must definitely always bear in mind!

On a strictly personal note, I most strongly believe that all lawyers irrespective of religion, caste, community, creed or sex must all unite in not just Sambhal or in just West UP or in just UP but rather all over India must stand on one platform in full, firm and final solidarity with one of the most eminent, senior and learned lawyer Mr Zafar Ali of Chandausi in Sambhal district. This undoubtedly all the more necessitates the immediate implementation of The Advocate Protection Act! It brooks no more delay any longer now!

Let us not be oblivious of the irrefutable fact that according to Section 11 of the proposed Advocate Protection Act, the Bill also gives the court the authority to compensate the advocates for wrongs done to them. It reads clearly as: No Police Officer shall arrest an Advocate or investigate a case against an Advocate without the explicit direction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate. If this proposed Act had been implemented as advocates have been demanding since such a long time, Mr Zafar Ali would not have been made to suffer most unfairly to rot in jail without even an FIR being lodged against him!

He has so many decades of most distinguished experience of practising in district court yet he has been made to most astoundingly languish in jail with no one even lodging an FIR against him which really makes me shake my head in total disbelief as to how can he be imprisoned still and how can such a senior lawyer be treated so shabbily? As he was being escorted by the police to jail, Mr Zafar Ali was most vocal in telling reporters that:
I did not incite any violence. His unwarranted arrest definitely has to be condemned in the strongest parliamentary language!

By any reckoning, what I find even most astonishing is that when his advocates and his family members wanted to meet him, they were refused which cannot be justified at all from any angle! The family alleges that he was send to Moradabad jail and that his life is in danger which definitely cannot be ever taken lightly under any circumstances! His family also alleges that he is not being given his medicines which is most deplorable and has to be most strongly condemned as it directly involves his survival for which he was taking those medicines!

While speaking to reporters, his elder brother Mr Mohammad Tahir Ali who is also a lawyer claimed that the family members have been denied permission to visit him in jail. He also laid bare lamenting that:
He is being treated as if he is a hardened criminal. He also further alleged that Ali’s life was at risk inside the prison.

What also cannot go unnoticed is that his elder brother also lamented in anguish laying bare that:
He is 70 years old and even his medicines are not being allowed. The police are misbehaving and the administration has crossed all limits. He also further alleged that the arrest was a deliberate move to silence him ahead of his scheduled testimony before a three-member judicial commission on March 24. He also told reporters while conversing with them that, Zafar was supposed to testify before the Commission tomorrow, and that is why they are deliberately sending him to jail.

It is worth noting that he also was unsparing in pointing out that the administration was escalating tensions. He deemed it fit to quote very rightly his brother’s last words before being taken into custody that:
No problem, I am ready to go to jail. I will not back down from the truth. This truly shows how strong his moral fibre is!

It certainly also merits mentioning that eminent and learned and so also senior lawyer – Mohammad Islam who is the President of District Bar Association of Sambhal district has also reiterated the full, firm and final unstinted support to him and I am sure that the lawyers of all streams would definitely stand with him unitedly in this phase which he is undergoing! Even the Bar Council of India must immediately take into note and urge police to cooperate and not harass him and his family! There is no reason why UP Bar Council should not stand in full solidarity with him in his hour of need and I am sure that they will not disappoint him!

In a nutshell, it is high time and Supreme Court must take suo motu cognizance of increasing violations of basic rights of lawyers in India and must order the immediate implementation of The Advocate Protection Act which even the Supreme Court Bar Association has lend its unstinted support always and so also all Bar Bodies in India. Even the police must be definitely taken to task and if they wrongly arrest any lawyer then they must be punished, penalized and put behind bars so that they don’t ever dare to take lawyers for granted again and stop acting at the behest of their political masters blindly, brutally and baselessly! There can be just no denying or disputing it!

The moot question that needs to be asked is: How long will it take to implement the most cherished The Advocate Protection Act? I fervently hope that it does not take so long as to overshadow us and we don’t get to hear in our lifetime the most strict implementation of this long pending Act that has long been in hibernation and it is time now to activate it permanently! It definitely now brooks no more delay any longer!

We need to note that Article 296 of The Criminal Code Of The Russian Federation 1996 provides safeguards for the lawyers and persons participating in the administration of justice. It also must be borne in mind that Section 1503 of title 18 of United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1503) provides protection to the officers of the court. It would be also instructive to note that in Egypt, Article 54 of Law No. 17 of 1983 (Advocacy Law) and so also in Indonesia, article 15 of Law No. 18 of 2003 most commendably guarantees protection to the legal profession. It also is of great relevance to note that The Charter of Core Principles of the European Legal Profession of 25 November 2006 provides as principle (a) the independence of the lawyer, and the freedom of the lawyer to pursue the client’s case. It says that A lawyer needs to be free - politically, economically and intellectually - in pursuing his or her activities of advising and representing the client.

This inter alia means that the lawyer must be totally independent of the state and so also other powerful vested interests. Recently, the National Assembly our very close neighbour – Pakistan has also passed a law titled The Lawyers Welfare and Protection Act, 2023 to ensure that the advocates can render professional services without fear or external influence for the ultimate cause of the administration of justice and the rule of law. This clearly implies that more and more countries are now providing special protection to the lawyers who are most important wheel in the administration of justice without whom even Judges cannot do anything! There can be thus just no gainsaying that India must also definitely join these countries due to the growing incidents of attacks on Advocates in India and unwarranted arrests of advocates so that the dignity and decorum of lawyers is also strictly maintained!

a In essence, one has to concede most graciously that the unexpected and unwarranted arrest of Mr Zafar Ali without even an FIR being lodged against him is definitely most concerning and such unwarranted attack on lawyers liberty will beyond an iota of doubt have a very chilling impact on the independence of legal profession as a whole which definitely cannot be allowed to ever go unchecked under any circumstances any longer now! It is truly incomprehensible that why implementation of The Advocate Protection Act has been allowed to fester for such an indefinitely long period of time? But not any more longer now because a lot of water has already flown under the bridge! It definitely now brooks no more delay!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top