Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Wednesday, March 26, 2025

Manan Kumar Mishra Re-elected As Chairman Of Bar Council Of India For 7th Consecutive Term

Posted in: Judiciary
Mon, Mar 10, 25, 10:45, 2 Weeks ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 13459
Not for one time, not for two times, not for three times, not for four times, not for five terms, not for six times but for historic seventh consecutive term, we see that Mr Manan Kumar Mishra

Not for one time, not for two times, not for three times, not for four times, not for five terms, not for six times but for historic seventh consecutive term, we see that Mr Manan Kumar Mishra who is a Rajya Sabha member from Bihar and belongs to the ruling BJP and is a gold medalist of his batch while doing LLB from Patna University has been re-elected as Chairman of most prestigious Bar Council of India which is the Apex statutory body that regulates the legal profession and legal education in India. It was in April 2012 that he was elected for the first time as Chairman of Bar Council of India. How can it happen but it has happened because of his stellar leadership qualities and his soaring popularity among lawyers which even his critics grudgingly acknowledge!

I fondly and most fervently hope that he will at least now most vociferously now demand multiple High Court Benches for most deserving States like his home state Bihar which has not even a single High Court Bench even though he himself practiced in Patna High Court for about 26 years from 1982 till 2008 and in 2009 shifted to Supreme Court as has been pointed out in the most prestigious website "Wikipedia" and Union Minister Giriraj Singh some time back had slammed Bihar as "lawless"! When Karnataka with just 6 crore population can have multiple High Court Benches then why Bihar with 16 crore population not have even a single High Court Bench from where Mr Manan Kumar Mishra comes? Why he never feels most ashamed about this most unpalatable truth?

I am sure that in his heart, he too must be most deeply and most terribly ashamed that his home State that is Bihar has not even a single High Court Bench even though he has been elected to the most prestigious post of Chairman of Bar Council of India for the record 7th consecutive term which is no mean or ordinary achievement, is simply unbelievable and will always be written in golden letters in the pages of history! We saw how recently during ‘Question Hour’, the JD(U)’s Banka MP – Girdhari Yadav raised the most critical issue of setting up of High Court Benches in Bihar which it is sorely lacking. It was pointed out so very commendably by Girdhari Yadav in Parliament that:
Setting up of High Court Benches is under the Central list. In Bihar, which has a population of 13 crore, there is just one High Court and no Bench. In States with much lower populations, there is a High Court and two Benches. Does the Centre have any intention to set up a Bench in Bhagalpur or elsewhere in Bihar?" Centre must swing into action instead of dishing out lame excuses one after the other!

There can definitely be just no gainsaying that this historic win of Mr Manan Kumar Mishra reaffirms his stronghold in the legal community and so also underscores the unflinching trust that has been reposed on him by the entire legal fraternity. It must be pointed out that Mr Sanjay Sharma who has been elected decisively as President of Meerut Bar Association just recently for the first time too met him to apprise the most legitimate needs of the lawyers and so also congratulated him for his most spectacular win. I am sure that Mr Sanjay Sharma will definitely apprise him of the long pending most legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP that merits prompt redressal which he reaffirmed that he will pursue it most seriously without resorting to strikes which definitely is most gladdening to note! Even as General Secretary of Meerut Bar Association, Mr Sanjay Sharma had taken up the matter with the then Union Law Minister – Mr Ravi Shankar Prasad and so also with another Union Minister – Gen (Retd) VK Singh among others!

We need to note that Mr Manan Kumar Mishra clearly outlined several key initiatives that are aimed at enhancing the legal profession and advocate welfare. He also was most unequivocal to clearly underscore the dire need to introduce the Advocates Amendment Bill ensuring that it contains provisions for the well-being of lawyers while excluding any contentious aspects that might compromise in any manner with the profession’s integrity.

What also deserves our singular unremitting attention is that among his most significant commitments which he has resolved to take them to their logical conclusion are:

  1. Strengthening the autonomy of an independent Bar to prevent any external influence that may dare to venture to compromise it in any manner.
  2. Introducing structured training programs for young lawyers under the Advocates Act.
  3. Implementing the Advocate Protection Act to ensure legal professionals' security and rights.
  4. Enhancing advocate welfare measures, including financial and social security provisions.
  5. Debate on policy matters that directly affect the judiciary and legal practitioners.
  6. Reaffirmed his unshakable resolve to serve the legal community and underscored his dedication to do his best to ensure that all issues pertaining to the welfare of advocates are accorded the paramount priority!

What I find most particularly distressing is that we see no mention of the most strict implementation of the 230th Report of the Law Commission of India which in 2009 had most strongly recommended creation of more High Court Benches prepared under a panel of legal jurists headed by former Supreme Court Judge and an eminent jurist himself – Late Dr AR Lakshmanan but which are still gathering dust even after nearly 16 years! But I am not the one who will lose hope as the newly elected President of Meerut Bar Association – Mr Sanjay Sharma is the most vocal supporter of the creation of a High Court Bench in West UP just like his worthy predecessor – Mr Rohitashwa Kumar Agarwal who has been six times President of Meerut Bar Association and so also Member of UP Bar Council since 1999 and former Chairman also! I am hundred percent sure that Mr Sanjay Sharma who has got decisive mandate from the voters of Meerut Bar Association will take it most seriously and pursue the most sacred agitation for a High Court Bench in West UP for which 22 districts have united under the banner of Meerut Bar Association in his fresh first term which he keeps reiterating also time and again as published also in local newspapers which really warms the innermost cockles of my heart and take it to its logical conclusion!

What sends shivers down my spine is to see how Centre is totally unrepentant in depriving West UP just like Bihar from having even a single High Court Bench despite so many compelling factors! None other than Mr Atul Pradhan who is a distinguished Samajwadi Party MLA from Sardhana seat adjoining Meerut has most forcefully pitched for the creation of a High Court Bench in West UP in UP Vidhan Sabha as litigants have to travel about 700 to 800 km on average all the way worse than a donkey by train who cannot afford plane travel till Allahabad! Attaching litigants with not even Lucknow which is more than 250 km earlier but right uptill Allahabad which averages 700 to 800 km on average to seek justice which in itself is the biggest betrayal of what the concept of equality as enshrined in Article 14 of Constitution stands for, most brutal stabbing of justice and to top it all is the worst mockery of poorest litigants of West UP! Why every Prime Minister has behaved like a copy cat of Jawaharlal Nehru who ensured a single High Court Bench in Lucknow so close to Allahabad in July 1948 just like capital of Uttar Pradesh also in Lucknow on this is truly incomprehensible? This is exactly what I find most deeply problematic!

It will be fairly right to say that Centre has taken this most pressing Bench issue in West UP for granted for far too long! Why has Centre been holding to ransom and gambling with the most basic fundamental rights of litigants of West UP to get "affordable" and "speedy justice" and "justice at doorsteps" for nearly 80 long years on one flimsy ground or the other that cannot be ever justified by even CJI or any Justice of Supreme Court or High Court what to talk about others and playing merciless havoc with the litigants of 30 districts of West UP with more than 10 crore population so brazenly, brutally, blindly, boldly, biasedly and baselessly is for Centre to specify instead of behaving most arrogantly by refusing to see the clear writing on the wall which most adversely affects the poorest litigants and not Union Minister like Shivraj Singh who inspite of even travelling in aeroplane in air conditioners and not in second class seat get most agitated and complain of poor facility!

It is really most reassuring to note that leaders of Opposition parties like Samajwadi Party and so also even of ruling BJP like BJP MLA Manju Siwach from Modinagar in West UP too recently demanded High Court Bench in West UP! RLD MLA Prasanna Kumar from Shamli pointed out in Vidhan Sabha recently that from Shamli the distance till Delhi is just 100 km and even Chandigarh is near but Allahabad High Court is 700 km and demanded High Court Bench in West UP! Umar Ali Khan who is MLA of Samajwadi Party from Behat in Saharanpur in West UP too demanded High Court Bench recently in Vidhan Sabha and pointed out that it is very difficult for people to travel all the way till Allahabad which is about 800 km away from Saharanpur to secure justice especially poor litigants! Former Union Minister and so also former Mumbai Police Commissioner Mr Satyapal Singh who is former BJP MP from Baghpat in 2016 demanded in Parliament 5 High Court Benches in Meerut, Agra, Gorakhpur, Varanasi and Jhansi in 2016 but Centre till date is not ready to create even one!

Even former PM late Mr Atal Bihari Vajpayee had raised this in Parliament in 1986 as Leader of Opposition and so also Mr Rajnath who is now Union Defence Minister and there are many such eminent galaxy of tall leaders like Mr Laxmikant Vajpayee of BJP who has been former party President of BJP in UP still we did not witness movement of even an inch forward on this key "open and shut" case! The creation of a Bench in West UP is the best antidote to all the huge problems faced by the litigants yet Centre is doing absolutely just nothing to ensure that a High Court Bench is created at the earliest on one pretext or the other which definitely cannot be ever justified under any circumstances! Why has plain logic taken a backseat in West UP being most mercilessly deprived from having even a single Bench is the best and clear indicator that there is certainly more to it than meets the eye?

What leaves me completely speechless and totally flabbergasted is to see how conveniently, cunningly, consciously and contemptuously Centre dares to invent some lame excuse or the other to justify denial of a High Court Bench in West UP like sanction of Governor needed as we saw recently when Union Law Minister said that we have no problem with Bench in West UP which definitely cannot be justified by any person in his right senses under any circumstances as Justice Jaswant Singh Commission appointed by Centre itself nearly 50 years ago headed by former Supreme Court Judge recommended permanent seat in West UP at Agra yet not created till date!

What complicates this long pending Bench issue in West UP is complete brazen, brutal, blind and baseless disregard of what Justice Jaswant Singh Commission so very commendably recommended of creating permanent High Court Bench in West UP only to be thrown in dustbin while creating High Court Bench in States like Maharashtra which already had multiple High Court Benches at Aurangabad as recommended in 1980s! Why Centre has degenerated to the extent that it keeps inventing one ludicrous ground or the other to most shamelessly justify without any rhyme or reason the creation of even a single High Court Bench for more than 10 crore people of 30 districts of West UP even though it is West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of UP as acknowledged by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission due to which it recommended creation of permanent Bench in West UP at Agra yet most astoundingly not created even after nearly 50 years most atrociously!

To be sure, the denial of even a single Bench to West UP stands as a testament to how shamelessly, sinisterly and surreptitiously Centre has discriminated against West UP even though it is West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of UP and contributes to more than 80% to State’s economy which definitely portrays Centre in poor spotlight for not doing anything worthwhile to address this long simmering issue for nearly 80 years! How can anyone on this earth ever deny that none other than late Mr Atal Bihari Vajpayee whose 100th birth anniversary was celebrated on December 25, 2024 all across the nation had in 1986 most forcefully demanded the setting up of a High Court Bench in West UP right inside Parliament as Leader of Opposition? In fact, Dr BR Ambedkar had most strongly batted for separate Statehood for West UP just like for Eastern UP and Central UP which is on record yet no action not even a single Bench created!

Even former PM Late Mr Rajiv Gandhi had wanted to set up a High Court Bench in West UP but as a rift had developed between Meerut and Agra as place where it should be set up, this most pressing issue was not addressed and was receded to the backburner most unfortunately! When two High Court Benches can be created for just 4 and 8 districts of Karnataka in 2008 at Dharwad and Gulbarga then why for 30 districts of West UP three or two or even one High Court Bench cannot be set up inspite of clear recommendations by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission who recommended maximum 3 High Court Benches for undivided UP yet not one created till date which culminated in people of hilly areas agitating for separate Statehood and now Uttarakhand has High Court itself at Nainital? Why has plain logic taken a backseat in West UP being most mercilessly deprived from having even a single Bench is the best and clear indicator that there is certainly more to it than meets the eye?

Before closing, let me say that I really still nurture lot of hopes from Mr Manan Kumar Mishra who has been elected for the 7th consecutive term as Chairman of Bar Council of India and so also from Mr Sanjay Sharma who has made his debut as President of Meerut Bar Association that they both will definitely leave no stone unturned to ensure that the unjustified monopoly of only few elite States like Karnataka, Maharashtra, Assam, West Bengal and Madhya Pradesh in having multiple High Court Benches while depriving big States like Bihar and Orissa from having even a single High Court Bench and so also big States like UP which tops the State list in having maximum number of pending cases and maximum population and so also Rajasthan which is biggest State areawise from having more than one High Court Bench most atrociously, arbitrarily, authoritatively and arrogantly with Supreme Court, Bar Council of India and Press considered rightly as the fourth pillar of democracy not being able to do anything worthwhile to ensure that this most Himalayan blunder is corrected at the earliest!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top