Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Friday, March 14, 2025

Polluted The Fairness And Integrity of Examinations: Patna HC

Posted in: Civil Laws
Mon, Feb 24, 25, 11:44, 3 Weeks ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 14584
Chandan Singh vs Bihar that was filed by the third-year MBBS student accused of arranging ‘dummy candidates’ for the exam denied bail to the alleged ‘solver gang’

It is definitely in the fitness of things that while catching the bull by the horns, the Patna High Court in a most learned, laudable, landmark, logical and latest oral judgment titled Chandan Singh vs The State of Bihar & Anr in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 79243 of 2024 (Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2024 Thana-C.B.I CASE District-Patna) that was pronounced as recently as on 14-02-2025 while dismissing the bail application that was filed by the third-year MBBS student accused of arranging ‘dummy candidates’ for the exam denied bail to the alleged ‘solver gang’ leader who was accused in the NEET UG 2024 paper leak case holding precisely in no uncertain terms most unequivocally that the said gang polluted the fairness and integrity of the medical examination.

It merits noting that the Court was most unambiguous in holding that:
The allegation against the petitioner is serious in nature, having deep rooted conspiracy. Accordingly, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner keeping in mind the aforesaid discussion, including the nature of accusation and the evidence collected in support thereof.” Very rightly so! No denying!

At the very outset, this brief, brilliant, bold and balanced oral judgment authored by the Single Judge Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr Justice Anil Kumar Sinha of Patna High Court sets the ball in motion by first and foremost putting forth in para 1 that:
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and learned Counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation.”

As we see, the Bench then while specifying the purpose of the petition states in para 2 that:
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Shastri Nagar Police Station Case No. 358 of 2024, dated 05.05.2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 407, 408, 409, 120 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, the case was taken over by the Central Bureau of Investigation and re-registered as RC No. 221/2024/ (E) 0006 on 23.06.2024 under Sections 120-B read with Sections 407, 408, 409 of the Indian Penal Code.”

To put things in perspective, the Bench envisages while elaborating in para 3 stating that:
The prosecution case, as per the allegation made in the First Information Report, is that the informant, Inspector -cum- SHO of Shastrinagar Police Station, Patna, on 05.05.2024, during patrolling, got the information from his senior officials that in the NEET UG Examination, 2024, an organized gang, having some students along with staffs, in collusion, has breached the integrity and sanctity of the chain of custody of question papers and leaked the same. The informant got the information that some members of the gang were moving in a white coloured Renault Duster car.

The white-coloured Renault Duster car, bearing registration number JH 01BW-0019, was intercepted, from where three persons were arrested, who disclosed their names as Shikandar Yadwendu, Akhilesh Kumar and Bittu Kumar. Upon search, admit cards of four candidates, namely, Abhishek Kumar, Shivnandan Kumar, Aayush Raj and Anurag Yadav, were recovered. Two mobile phones were also recovered from the pocket of arrested co-accused Shikandar Yadwendu. On interrogation regarding the question papers, co-accused Shikandar Yadwendu told that the students are taking examination at various centres and arrangements for their examination was made by him. Some appearing students of the NEET UG Examination, 2024, were kept in a school for memorizing the answers of NEET questions.”

As it turned out, the Bench enunciates in para 4 mentioning further that, “Subsequently, the police reached at one of the examination centres, i.e. D.A.V. Public School, B.S.E.B. Colony, Patna, where one of the co-accused and examinee, namely, Ayush Raj, was taking the examination. When the examination was over, the police took him in custody and during interrogation, he revealed that on 04.05.2024, he, along with 20-25 other students, were taken to Learn Boys Hostel and Learn Play School, situated at Khemnichak, Patna and were provided with solved question papers in order to memorize them. In the competitive examination, all questions came from the same question booklet.”

Do note, the Bench notes in para 5 that:
So far as the present petitioner is concerned, his name has come up during the investigation, in the second supplementary charge sheet filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation, under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, as head of Patna group of solver gang and he has been arraigned as accused no. 29.”

Do also note, the Bench then notes in para 6 that:
The petitioner has been chargesheeted under Section 120- B read with Sections 109, 201, 380, 409, 411, 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 13 (2) read with Section 13(1)(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.”

Simply put, the Bench then mentions in para 7 that:
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report and his name has transpired in the present case during investigation in the second supplementary charge sheet as Solver. The petitioner is a student, studying in the third year of MBBS course in AIIMS, Patna. The petitioner never solved the question paper of NEET UG Examination, 2024 at Raj Guest House, Ram Nagar, Hazaribagh, as alleged and he had gone to worship at Rajrappa Temple on 05.05.2024 and in course of journey, the petitioner had stayed at Raj Guest House. The petitioner is a meritorious student and has a bright career as a doctor. The petitioner has not committed any offence in the manner alleged and neither any incriminating material nor any question paper has been found in his possession.

No evidence has been collected during investigation and no material has been brought in the charge sheet showing that the petitioner has received any money for solving the question papers. He further submits that charge sheet has already been submitted and cognizance has been taken by the competent court. The petitioner is in custody since 18.07.2024 and keeping him in custody any further would not serve any purpose. The entire career of the petitioner is at stake and due to judicial custody, he is not able to participate in the MBBS examination and in the examination of the second year, the petitioner appeared from jail.”

On the contrary, the Bench then also observes in para 8 that:
On the other hand, learned Counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there were three group of solver gang from different states and cities, namely, Patna, Rajasthan and Chennai. The petitioner was the leader of solver gang, particularly Patna group of solvers was led by the petitioner and consisted of Kumar Shanu, Rahul Anand, Karan Jain, Surbhi Kumari, Raunak Raj and Amit Kumar. Amit kumar had also brought his college mate Sanoj Kumar Yadav with him at Hazaribagh. These students, except Sanoj Kumar Yadav, went to Raj Guest House, Hazaribagh on 05.05.2024 and solved the NEET UG question paper.”

Do further note, the Bench then notes in para 9 that:
The investigation revealed that co-accused Sanjay Kumar, in the year 2021-2022, approached the petitioner with the offer to appear as a dummy candidate in the NEET UG Examination, promising to pay Rs. 15 lakhs in return for securing a Government seat. For the NEET UG Examination, 2024, co-accused Sanjay Kumar tasked the petitioner for arranging dummy candidates. Under the direction of Sanjay Kumar, the petitioner managed other co-accused persons to sit as dummy candidates. Coaccused Sanjay Kumar took the petitioner and other candidates to a photo studio at Phulwarisharif near AIIMS, Patna, for taking their photographs for filling the NEET 2024 examination forms. Co-accused persons, namely, Raunak Raj and Amit Kumar, forwarded their photographs and signatures directly to co-accused Sanjay Kumar through whatsapp. The said co-accused Sanjay Kumar arranged the entire process, including paying for the photographs and collecting their signatures for the NEET application forms. Subsequently, they changed their decision to appear as dummy candidates in the NEET UG Examination, 2024.”

As things stands, the Bench points out in para 10 that:
At the instance of co-accused Sanjay Kumar, the petitioner, along with others, traveled to Koderma by Ganga Damodar Express; while another solver, Surbhi Kumari, traveled to Koderma directly from Ranchi, solver Amit Kumar flew from Chennai to Ranchi on 02.05.2024 by Indigo flight, and reached Koderma on 03.05.2024, co-accused and solver Raunak Raj also flew from Mumbai to Ranchi and then reached to Hazaribagh, co-accused and solver Karan Jain travelled from Patna to Koderma by train on ticket booked by co-accused Kumar Abhishek for coming to Hazaribagh on 04.05.2024.”

Plainly speaking, the Bench then states in para 11 that:
The investigation further discloses that the petitioner, Kumar Shanu and Rahul Anand, along with Kumar Abhishek and Tinku Kumar, stayed at Ramson Hotel in Koderma. They later moved to Hotel Tara Tower, where they stayed till 03.05.2024. On 03.05.2024, the group shifted to Sri Vinayak Hotel in Hazaribagh. All the hotel bookings were made by co-accused persons, Sanjay Kumar and Kumar Abhishek.”

Quite revealingly, the Bench then discloses in para 12 that:
The investigation further reveals that at Raj Guest House, solvers were assigned specific subjects to solve. The petitioner, along with Rahul Anand and Amit Kumar were responsible for solving the physics paper, Karan Jain was given the responsibility to handle all the difficult and time consuming questions. Solver Kumar Shanu along with solvers Deependra Sharma and Sandeep were given the responsibility to solve Biology paper; whereas solvers, Surbhi Kumari and Raunak Raj, were given the responsibility of solving chemistry paper.”

Briefly stated, the Bench states in para 13 that:
Following the solving sessions, the petitioner and co-accused Surbhi Kumari were taken downstairs to instruct the waiting candidates on how to remember the answers and clear their doubts. Shortly thereafter, solvers Rahul Anand, Karan Jain, Raunak Raj, Deependra Sharma and Sandeep joined them to perform the same task. Thereafter, they were asked to destroy the solved question papers.”

Be it noted, the Bench notes in para 14 that:
All the members of the solver gang were paid money in installments and the petitioner received a total payment of Rs. 7,19,000/- from Kumar Abhishek and Sanjay Kumar. Co-accused Sanjay Kumar transferred Rs. 70,000/- to the petitioner from his bank account and co-accused Kumar Abhishek also transferred Rs. 6,49,000/- to the petitioner from his account at the behest of co-accused Sanjay Kumar.”

To put it tersely, the Bench then observes in para 15 that:
In nutshell, the petitioner arranged six solvers for Raj Guest House, Hazaribagh, in conspiracy with co-accused Sanjay Kumar, who is an associate of Amit Kumar Singh. The location of the petitioner was found to be in Hazaribagh on 3rd to 5th May, 2024. The petitioner, along with other accused persons (solvers), solved the question paper.”

Truth be told, the Bench then points out in para 19 that:
In the context of paper leaks, solver gangs play a significant role in solving the leaked question papers, which is subsequently distributed and disseminated by another gang members. Solver gang provide wrongful gain or wrongful assistance to one or more examinees of such public examination. The insiders of paper leak provide leaked question papers to solver gang and once the leaked question papers are obtained, the solver gang works on solving the question paper.”

Notably, we see that the Bench observes in para 20 that:
The solver gangs are consisted of individuals, who are academically strong and capable of providing accurate answers. After solving the leaked question paper, it is distributed amongst a group of examinees, who are willing to pay for the same. This distribution can happen through various means, including social media platforms, messaging apps, or even in person.”

It would be instructive to note that the Bench then hastens to add in para 21 noting that:
From the material collected during investigation, as reflected from the charge sheet, it appears that the petitioner was the leader of the solver gang, who arranged 5-6 academically strong persons, studying in MBBS course and after receiving money from other conspirator, the leaked question papers were solved by different group in a hotel near Hazaribagh. It has come during investigation that the question paper was leaked from Oasis School, Hazaribagh.”

Quite significantly and as a corollary, the Bench then observes in para 22 that, “Considering the aforesaid, I am of the considered view that the role of the petitioner and other members of the solver gang is the key role in the commission of the crime and attaining the final object of the crime. Had the leaked question paper been not solved by the academically strong candidate, the offence of this nature would not have been committed, jeopardizing the career and future of thousands of medical aspirants. The activities of solver gangs severely undermine the sanctity and integrity of the examination process.”

Most significantly and so also most forthrightly, the Bench encapsulates in para 23 what constitutes the cornerstone of this notable judgment postulating that, “In the present case, the solver gang has operated in an organized manner by adopting corrupt practices in connivance with other members of the gang for monetary and wrongful gains. The petitioner and other members of the solver gang created an unfair advantage for those candidates, who can afford to pay for the answers, while honest candidates were put in disadvantageous condition. The petitioner and others polluted the fairness and integrity of the medical examination, undermining the trust of the candidates in the examination process.”

In all fairness, the Bench in its collective wisdom deemed it apt to hold in para 24 that:
The allegation against the petitioner is serious in nature, having deep rooted conspiracy. Accordingly, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner keeping in mind the aforesaid discussion, including the nature of accusation and the evidence collected in support thereof.”

Finally, the Bench then concludes by holding in para 25 that:
This application is, accordingly, dismissed.”

In a nutshell, it is definitely high time and lawmakers must tighten the nuts and bolts of laws pertaining to such organised cheating to deter most strongly potential offenders from daring to ever venture into it. It definitely brooks no more delay any longer now! It is perfectly in order that in this leading case, the Patna High Court deemed it fit to deny bail to the alleged leader of ‘solver gang’ accused in NEET UG 2024 paper leak case and dismissed the bail application as for such serious crime which pollutes the fairness and integrity of examinations, there definitely has to be absolute zero tolerance as held so very commendably! No denying or disputing!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top