Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Wednesday, March 26, 2025

SC Must Step Forward To Address Ills That Are Plaguing And Corroding Judiciary

Posted in: Judiciary
Mon, Feb 24, 25, 11:11, 1 Month ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 16719
I have no hesitation whatsoever to concede that Uttar Pradesh which is the most populated State of India with maximum number of pending cases

“Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph.”- Haile Selassie

I have no hesitation whatsoever to concede that Uttar Pradesh which is the most populated State of India with maximum number of pending cases would never have been partitioned if either Centre or Supreme Court had acted in time and not acted like a helpless, hopeless and hapless spectator with hands tied in ensuring that not even a single High Court Bench is created either in West UP or even in hilly areas of undivided UP as was recommended so very sagaciously by none other than the Justice Jaswant Singh Commission appointed by Centre itself about 50 years ago headed by a former Supreme Court Judge even though it may be recalled that maximum High Court Benches were recommended for undivided UP with two Circuit Benches at hilly areas in Dehradun and Nainital with both now in Uttarakhand that was created in November 2000 as people agitated for separate Statehood as not even a single Bench created and so also permanent seat of High Court Bench in West UP at Agra yet not created till date! Why for such a big State as undivided Uttar Pradesh, we saw only one High Court Bench at Lucknow and that too so near to Allahabad with distance of just about 250 km and worst of all, the litigants of West UP and hilly areas of undivided UP attached not with Lucknow but with Allahabad which is much further away? Why Supreme Court never acted against this most atrocious, arbitrary and arrogant discrimination and cheating perpetrated right under the nose of Supreme Court in judiciary itself in distribution of High Court Benches in different States and different regions when now we see that it did not tolerate cheating even in a very small Mayor election and intervened as we saw in Chandigarh some time back?

What message went out by complete astounding inaction of the Supreme Court on this count? It was that Supreme Court just like Centre favours this most sinister, senseless and shameless discrimination perpetrated against different States and different regions and has left everything on this directly concerning judiciary to Centre that it should have last word on it as held in November 2018 by the Bench led by the then CJI Mr Ranjan Gogoi while listening to a PIL filed by women lawyer KR Chitra and appreciating the dire need for a Bench but yet dismissing it leaving the ball in Centre’s court who since last nearly 80 years has been sleeping most comfortably on such a sensitive issue due to which lawyers of West UP have been agitating and going on strike every Saturday since last nearly 50 years yet to no avail and so also strike some times for even 6 months as in 2001 and in 2014-15 in my time in Meerut in West UP what to talk about past when lawyers even went on hunger strike in 1976 for more than a month! It is the livelihood of lawyers that gets affected most when they go on strike and it is for litigants that they want a High Court Bench in West UP which Centre is overzealous to deny on one flimsy or fake or false ground or other which is definitely most condemnable!

To be sure, the denial of even a single Bench to West UP stands as a testament to how shamelessly, sinisterly and surreptitiously Centre has discriminated against West UP even though it is West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of UP and contributes to more than 80% to State’s economy which definitely portrays Centre in poor spotlight for not doing anything worthwhile to address this long simmering issue for nearly 80 years! How can anyone on this earth ever deny that none other than late Mr Atal Bihari Vajpayee whose 100th birth anniversary was celebrated on December 25, 2024 all across the nation had in 1986 most forcefully demanded the setting up of a High Court Bench in West UP right inside Parliament as Leader of Opposition? In fact, Dr BR Ambedkar had most strongly batted for separate Statehood for West UP which is on record and even former UP CM – Mayawati had recommended separate Statehood for West UP!

Even former PM Late Mr Rajiv Gandhi had wanted to set up a High Court Bench in West UP but as a rift had developed between Meerut and Agra as place where it should be set up, this most pressing issue was not addressed and was receded to the backburner most unfortunately! When two High Court Benches can be created for just 4 and 8 districts of Karnataka in 2008 at Dharwad and Gulbarga then why for 30 districts of West UP three or two or even one High Court Bench cannot be set up inspite of clear recommendations by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission who recommended maximum 3 High Court Benches for undivided UP yet not one created till date which culminated in people of hilly areas agitating for separate Statehood and now Uttarakhand has High Court itself at Nainital?

By any reckoning, there is no credible reason to deny West UP from having even a single High Court Bench! It is for Centre to come clean on this which cannot be done by just passing the buck to Governor or someone else because Governor is not elected by the people but it is the State Government and Central Government who are elected by the people and BJP is in power both in Centre and State for last so many years and many top BJP leaders have always justified the creation of a High Court Bench in West UP which is all on record! Why the people of West UP are still being infantilized and treated as not fit to be given even a single High Court Bench?

In no way can Centre wash away the unpalatable truth which is so demoralizing, disgusting, degrading and disastrous that Uttar Pradesh which has maximum population among all the States more than 25 crores which is more than the population of 16 small States put together and so also maximum pending cases more than 11 lakhs in High Courts and as of January 1, 2025, the alarming pending is of 11,41,687 cases before the Allahabad High Court and still most astoundingly has only one Bench and that too so close to Allahabad at Lucknow in Eastern UP and what is worse is that West UP which owes for majority of total pending cases of UP has not even a single High Court Bench!

What is even more worst is that the litigants of West UP have been attached not even with Lucknow which falls more than 230 km earlier but right uptill Allahabad to seek justice which means whole night and nearly a day wasted on just travelling alone by train who cannot afford plane travel which is not only absolutely preposterous but also biggest betrayal of what Constitution stands for, merciless slaughtering of justice and makes the worst mockery of poorest litigants of West UP and ensures that they suffer the most in all respects! Most disgusting indeed!

By the way, more than one crore cases are pending in lower courts in UP and here too more than half of the pending cases are from West UP and still has just one Bench only and both High Court and a single Bench are in Eastern UP alone and that too just at a distance of about 230 km only even though in 1981 it was agreed that the distance between High Court and Bench should not be less than 300 km yet we see that no change in UP despite India nearing 100 years of independence!

It is high time and Centre must move beyond the myopic view that only Eastern UP alone is fit for both High Court and Bench and not any other region which according to Centre are legally worthless just not fit to be given a Bench which really baffles and boils my temper most! Why is Centre most disinterested on such a sensitive issue which directly impacts population of more than 10 crore people of West UP? So also in lawless Bihar with more than 16 crore population, we see not even a single High Court Bench but for peaceful States like Karnataka with just 6 crore population, we see multiple High Court Benches!

It must be asked: Why so much of opacity in creation of High Court Benches? Why no transparency? That is the nub of the problem! Why big states like UP and Rajasthan have only one High Court Bench and lawless Bihar just like West UP none? Most disconcertingly, we see that Centre till date has taken no tangible and credible steps to resolve this long pending issue of most pressing demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which has only served to deprive the litigants of West UP from achieving “easy and affordable justice at doorsteps” and even 230th Report of Law Commission of India most strongly recommended creation of more High Court Benches in different States yet not implemented even after more than 15 years!

It merits no reiteration that Centre must take a clear stand on it and not indulge in frequent flip-flop over it as we have been seeing since last more than 77 years! Viewed in this light, it can be easily surmised that Centre has been most deadly biased in favouring only one particular region in regard to setting up of a Bench which is most unfortunate and must be strongly and roundly condemned! I have just no inkling as to why Centre has been so deadly biased on this without any logic in this blatant, brazen and blind discrimination against West UP and other regions.

Most significantly, it must be asked: Why even Supreme Court has failed to ever ask Centre that why UP with maximum pending cases, maximum population and what not has just one Bench only and West UP with more than half of the total pending cases has none? Centre definitely can’t pretend to feign ignorance any longer or forward one flimsy or false excuse or other to deny and deprive West UP from having even a Single Bench which is completely bereft of any logic!

It must definitely act now and stop forthwith this most atrocious step-motherly treatment to West UP just like recently it took serious note of more than half of the Judges seat lying vacant in Allahabad High Court which is the biggest High Court in world and yet has just one Bench only created about 77 years ago so close to Allahabad! It is extremely sad and most distressing to see that West UP has been without a High Court Bench for so long!

By all accounts, the handling of High Court Bench issue in West UP has been very slyly done just like filling up of Judges vacancy in different High Courts and lower courts with huge vacancies while we never see any MP or MLA seat lying vacant which Supreme Court should never tolerate just like it did not tolerate cheating in a Mayor election in Chandigarh as this is far more serious issue directly concerning judiciary! It is high time and Centre must refrain from indulging in “dirty tantrums” like sanction of Governor needed or some other pretext to relentlessly deny West UP even a single High Court Bench! There is definitely more to it than meets the eye!

Most lamentably, we see that the denial of even a single High Court Bench to West UP has huge repercussions on litigants of West UP which Centre has simply just failed to address which depicts a dismal picture of the manner in which Centre has contemptuously rode roughshod over the most legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which definitely cannot be justified under any circumstances! What cannot turn away the singular and unremitting attention of people is to see how haphazardly High Court Benches have been allotted to different States and so also in different regions!

What the hell is Centre upto by denying West UP even a single High Court Bench? Will it wake up when people start agitating for separate Statehood like Uttarakhand which had just 88 lakh people when it was created in 2000 as opposed to more than 10 crore people of West UP? Whom is Centre appeasing so terribly? Who is responsible for sabotaging the most legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP just like for lawless Bihar? Responsibility has to be fixed and Supreme Court must immediately take suo motu cognizance of such a serious matter directly pertaining to judiciary just like huge judicial vacancies and corruption! It cannot be a free lunch in perpetuity! No denying it!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top