Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Wednesday, March 26, 2025

Abysmal To Note That Section 498A IPC Is Being Misused To Harass Husband, Family: Delhi HC

Posted in: Family Law
Mon, Feb 24, 25, 11:00, 1 Month ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 14540
Ajay vs State that although it was meant to protect married women, it is now being used as a tool to harass husbands and their families.

It is definitely most alarming to note that there is an increasing trend of most blatant, brazen, blind, baseless and brutal misuse of Section 498A IPC that keeps on surfacing in news one after the other. Most recently, we witnessed how the Delhi High Court which is one of the most esteemed High Court in India with stellar track record in a most learned, laudable, landmark, logical and latest judgment titled Ajay vs State & Anr in Crl.M.C. 4689/2019 and cited in Neutral Citation No.: 2025:DHC:746 that was pronounced as recently as on 07.02.2025 has expressed its serious concern about the gross misuse of Section 498A (cruelty to married women) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), noting that although it was meant to protect married women, it is now being used as a tool to harass husbands and their families. Even Supreme Court also has in many cases noted similarly the growing chilling abuse of Section 498A IPC which definitely cannot go unnoticed. Why should women and her relatives not be punished for levelling false allegations and send to jail for at least few years?

It is high time and to say the least, what Justice Malimath Committee appointed to recommend reforms in the criminal justice system headed under the Chairmanship of Hon’ble Mr Justice VS Malimath who is former Chief Justice of Karnataka and Kerala High Court, former Chairman of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and so also former Member of National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) about 22 years ago in 2003 who had very strongly recommended that Section 498A IPB should be made compoundable and bailable so that there is less misuse and disputes between husband and wife don’t end in divorce quickly needs to be implemented at the earliest! Absolutely right! It is most unfortunate that even in the revised penal laws we see no such changes which makes me hang my head in shame as the old laws have been copy pasted which definitely cannot be ever justified! I had never expected this from our learned law makers!

In the same vein, we need to also note that the Single Judge Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr Justice Amit Mahajan who authored this most sagacious judgment clarified that the Court is not blind to the deeply rooted social evil of greed for dowry, due to which numerous victims are subjected to unspeakable conduct and harassment. But the Bench was quick to further point out that there was an increasing tendency to misuse Section 498A IPC by misrepresenting actual events to gain leverage. No denying it!

Interestingly enough, we need to note that the Bench made the key observation while it quashed a First Information Report (FIR) that had been registered by a woman against her estranged husband and his family members on most serious allegations of dowry harassment and cruelty. It observed that the wife had made vague allegations after years of delay. The Bench concluded that the continuation of the criminal case would amount to an abuse of the process of law. So it was but quite ostensible that the Bench deemed it absolutely fit in the fitness of things to allow his plea and accordingly quashed the maliciously imposed case! Very rightly so!

At the very outset, this brief, brilliant, bold and balanced judgment authored by the Single Judge Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr Justice Amit Mahajan of Delhi High Court sets the ball in motion by first and foremost putting forth in para 1 that:
The present petition is filed seeking quashing of the FIR No. 262/2017 dated 06.10.2017, registered at Police Station Delhi Cantt, for offences under Sections 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’), and consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

To put things in perspective, the Bench envisages in para 2 while elaborating on the facts of the case stating that:
The brief facts of the case are as follows:
2.1. The present FIR was registered at the behest of Respondent No. 2 against the petitioner and his family members alleging harassment on the ground of demand for dowry and for not returning her stridhan. The marriage of the petitioner and Respondent No.2 was solemnized on 25.12.2011 and it is alleged that Rs 10 lakhs were spent in the marriage.

2.2. It is alleged that only a few days after marriage, the petitioner, and his family, including, his father, mother, and brother, started taunting Respondent No.2 that even though the petitioner earns Rs 6 lakhs/month and they had gotten many marriages offers for him, however, they got him married to Respondent No.2 as they thought her father, who is a government officer, will match their status. It was further alleged that Respondent No.2’s in-laws stated that they were expecting a Honda City car, but her father had not even gifted a bike.

2.3. It is alleged that the petitioner and his family members used to taunt Respondent No.2 that her father was a greedy person as he had given no gold items, bike, or car to them. It is further alleged that the complainant suffered the cruelty owing to the poor financial status of her father, and by each passing day, the taunts and demands became more aggressive.

2.4. It is alleged that even though the father of Respondent No.2 called the panchayat multiple times, however, on 13.07.2014, Respondent No.2 was forcibly ousted from her matrimonial home. It is alleged that Respondent No.2’s mobile phone, 3 ATM cards, gold- silver jewelry were also not returned. Due to the constant mental and physical torture, Respondent No.2 allegedly suffered miscarriage.

2.5. In the year 2014, the petitioner came to the maternal home of Respondent No.2 and tried to fraudulently take a divorce from her by assuring her that she would suffer no more torture or humiliation. It is alleged that the petitioner and his father also made allegations against Respondent No.2 that she is a characterless woman and she was not given back her stridhan despite several requests.

It is worth noting that the Bench notes in para 21 that:
In the current case as well, sweeping and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. No date or time or particulars of the alleged instances of demand for dowry or harassment have been specified in the FIR.

Do note, the Bench notes in para 22 that:
As noted above, when quashing of an FIR is sought on the ground that the proceedings are manifestly frivolous, this Court owes a duty to look beyond the allegations into ancillary circumstances as well.

Do further note, the Bench then notes in para 23 that:
At this juncture, before proceeding further, it is important to take note of the complaint made by Respondent No.2’s father on 09.05.2015 to the SHO of Police Station Dhaula Kuan. The complainant’s father, in his complaint dated 09.05.2015, has made sweeping allegations of harassment on account of demand of dowry. It is stated in the said complaint that the petitioner’s family members had harassed the complainant for dowry after the petitioner had left on ship as he was employed in merchant navy. Certain allegations in relation to the petitioner and his family threatening to misuse the alleged obscene photos and videos of complainant for defaming the complainant’s family are also made.

Quite significantly, the Bench notes in para 24 that:
No allegations in relation to any such threats have been levelled in the FIR, however, it cannot be ignored that even in the complaint dated 09.05.2015, no specific incident of harassment by the petitioner for dowry has been spelt out. On the other hand, the complaint seems to suggest that the petitioner refused to take dowry at the time of marriage and the rancour was between the petitioner’s family and Respondent No.2.

Notably, the Bench then also notes in para 25 that:
No evidence was found against the family members of the petitioner either. In such circumstances, this Court finds merit in the contention of the petitioner that the allegations appear to be an afterthought and counterblast to the divorce petition.

It cannot be lost sight of that the Bench notes in para 26 that:
The petitioner has obtained a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty way back on 23.08.2019, where it has been noted that Respondent No.2 was involved in voluntary physical intimacy with her boyfriend. It is pointed out that Respondent No.2 has not challenged the same.

Most significantly, most forthrightly and so also most remarkably, what definitely cannot and should not escape our singular unremitting attention and what truly constitutes the cornerstone of this notable judgment is then encapsulated in para 27 wherein it is postulated that:
Courts have taken note of the increasing tendency of implicating the husband and his family in matrimonial litigation in a number of cases. While the provision of Section 498A of the IPC was introduced with an object to combat harassment meted out to married woman, however, it is abysmal to note that the same is now also being misused as a tool to harass the husband and his family members and gain a leverage.

Such matters are now filed in the heat of the moment on advice of counsel by exaggerating and misconstruing actual events. That is not to say that genuine cases of harassment don’t exist. This Court is not blind to the ground reality of the deeply rooted social evil of greed for dowry, due to which numerous victims are subjected to unspeakable conduct and harassment. However, in matters such as this, where vague allegations have been made against the petitioner, that too belatedly, in the opinion of this Court, continuation of proceedings would amount to an abuse of the process of law.

As a corollary, the Bench then holds in para 28 that:
In view of the aforesaid discussion, FIR No. 262/2017 and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

Finally, we see that the Bench then concludes by holding in para 29 that:
The present petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Abortion (or miscarriage) may occur spontaneously, in which case it is of no interest to the criminal law; or it may be deliberately induced, when it is a serious crime
To my understanding the MTP Act 1971 allows for abortions only under the following conditions:
Annulment of marriage: An annulment case can be initiated by either the husband or the wife in the marriage
Subject to the provisions of this Act and to the rules made thereunder, a petition for divorce may be presented to the District Court by both the parties together on the ground that they have been living separately
The people of India belong to different religions and faiths. They are governed by different sets of personal laws in respect of matters relating to family affairs, i.e., marriage, divorce, succession.
India a country of cultural values and rituals, ceremonies cannot afford to plunge into western society. But since growing economy and people getting more and more aware
The people of India belong to different religions and faiths. They are governed by different sets of personal laws in respect of matters relating to family affairs, i.e., marriage, divorce, succession.
Conditions relating to solemnization of foreign marriages.-A marriage between parties one of whom at least is a citizen of India may be solemnized under this Act by or before a Marriage Officer in a foreign country, if, at the time of the marriage, the following conditions are fulfilled
Here is a list of stages in a Contest Divorce Proceedings
Your fitness as a parent goes to be questioned in any custody dispute. Do not offer your spouse equivalent any facts
The people of India belong to different religions and faiths. They are governed by different sets of personal laws in respect of matters relating to family affairs,
It has to be stated at the very outset that in a landmark judgment with far reaching consequences, the Supreme Court on May 6, 2018 in Nandkumar & Anr v The State of Kerala & Ors in Criminal Appeal No. 597 of 2018 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4488 of 2017
The Bombay High Court in Neelam Choudhary V/s UOI in Writ Petition while refusing a plea seeking termination of pregnancy held that matrimonial discord cannot be considered as a reason for permitting termination of pregnancy by invoking provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.
Mahadevappa v Karnataka upheld the conviction of a man accused of dowry death, relying largely on the evidence of his deceased wife's parents and relatives. The Apex Court Bench also upheld the High Court finding that this was a case of homicidal death and not a case of accidental death.
Section 21, which purports to provide for legitimacy of children of annulled marriages, appears to be productive of arbitrary and incongruous results when compared to the analogous provisions of the Hindu marriage Act and the Special Marriage Act.
Judicial Separation under section 22 of Divorce Act and Husband not entitled to inherit wife’s property, wife not disentitled
Before the enactment of this Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, a Muslim woman, who was divorced by or from her husband, was granted a right to livelihood from her quondam husband in the shape of maintenance under the provisions of Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure until she remarried.
Complete guidelines on Dissolution of marriage by mutual consent section 10A - Christian Divorce in India
Sunil Kumar vs J&K held in no uncertain terms that an educated woman is supposed to be fully aware of consequences of having sex with a man before marriage. She cannot voluntarily first have sex with her own free will and later term it as rape or a sexual assault on her..
For NRIs, marriage registration is compulsory. The registration period for non-resident’s marriage is 30 days from the day of solemnization. It will be a precautionary measure to lessen the cases of abandoned wives and domestic violence by the non-residents. In case, the marriage remains unregistered, the spouses can be litigated.
There are many NRIs who are married, but still their certificate shows single status. The Registration of Marriage of Non-Residents bill has been passed.
Rupali Devi v State of Uttar Pradesh has laid down categorically that women can file matrimonial cases, including criminal matters pertaining to cruelty from the place where they have taken shelter after leaving or being driven out of their matrimonial home.
The UK citizen has decided to marry with a girl from India. Where can he collect from the marriage certificate in India? Is unmarried certificate required?
Sheenu Mahendru vs Sangeeta and Soniya that the persistent efforts of a wife to compel her husband to get separated from his mother constitute an act of cruelty. The Division Bench thus allowed the appeal of a husband who had sought divorce on the ground of cruelty by wife.
Ravinder Yadav Vs Padmini @ Payal has categorically and convincingly held that mere aggressive behaviour and sadness of mood of wife does not mean that the wife is spoiling the atmosphere of her matrimonial home.
To Protect the rights of married Muslim women and to prohibit divorce by pronouncing to talaq by their husbands and to provide for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Seventieth Year of the Republic of India as follows
SG Vs RKG held that irretrievable breakdown of marriage alone cannot be a ground of divorce and can only be considered as a circumstance by the Court if it is merged with cruelty.
The NRI Marriage Act is proposed to be amended at the beginning of this year. The propositions were tabled while keeping the surging cases of abandoning wives by non-residents of India.
Girish Singh Vs The State of Uttarakhand the Supreme Court has observed that the conviction under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code can be made only if the woman was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or his relatives which must be for or in connection with any demand for dowry, soon before her death.
basic rights and those men who insult them by resorting to triple talaq are not able to escape the long arms of the law. It took three attempts to make sure that ultimately it becomes a law.
Muslims like triple talaq and nikah halala by which if a husband pronounces triple talaq and he wants to marry her again then the women first has to undergo marriage with some other men then take divorce from him and then marry her former husband.
Whether where wife had been responsible for her atrocious allegations, actions and behaviour, same amounted to cruelty to husband? and the Hon'ble court held Yes.
The certificate of no marriage determines that its bearer is unmarried and in a capacity to solemnize marriage with anyone. India has SDM office, MEA and embassy to get it attested. The person can visit the notary officer for getting its affidavit first, showing all authentic proves of birth, address and citizenship.
R Srinivas Kumar v. R Shametha Can exercise its inherent powers under Article 142 of the Constitution for dissolution of a marriage, even if the facts of the case do not provide a ground in law on which the divorce could be granted.
Smt. Surbhi Trivedi Vs. Gaurav Trivedi held that in a matrimonial dispute, if gender of one of the parties is questioned by the other party, the court may direct such a party to undergo medical examination and the plea of violation of privacy shall not be tenable
When summons are served upon you as a respondent in any petition, you may yourself appear before the concerned Court. You may also appear by a pleader or Advocate, whom you should properly instruct so that he is able to answer all material questions before the Court.
The non-availability of birth certificate in India is one of the lesser known documents that could be an alternative to apply for the birth certificate even after 30 years of the age.
Even in the best family circumstances, with pristine intentions, preparing for adversity is a wise choice when separation becomes eminent.
Gurjit Singh vs Punjab the accused cannot be automatically held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the IPC by employing the presumption under Section 113-A of the Indian Evidence Act.
It must be stated forthright that the demand of money for any purpose from the wife can be termed as demand for dowry. The husband would be liable in such cases for demanding dowry even though it may not seem like dowry.
Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar v/s Ramchandra Bhimrao Kondalkar that if allegations of adultery are proved against the wife in a marriage, she is not entitled to maintenance. A wife is entitled to claim maintenance only if she is able to prove that all the allegations of adultery are wrong.
Divorce by Mutual Consent - Divorce petition by husband on adultery - Divorce Petition filed within few days of marriage - Divorce Petition-Provisions of mutatis mutandis,applies and when Can Divorced persons re-marry
Even though most people want things to go well, not everything is always perfect in our families. And like charity, even conflict begins at home.
Soumitra Kumar Nahar v/s Parul Naharthat the parental responsibility of the couple does not end even if there is a breakdown of marriage. It is the child who always suffer immeasurably and invaluably due to the ego clashes of the couple! sought to affix responsibility on the parents which they owe towards the child
Can you get legally married in Spain? Both religious weddings and Civil ceremonies are legally recognized as par Spainish law. Infact in 2005 Sex marriage has been legalized.
Article examines need for divorce by mutual consent and explores evolution of divorce. Application of consent theory under Hindu law. How has the theory been applied in other civil and common law countries. Conclusion- How to evolve the consent theory further?
Getting a divorce can be one of the most difficult decisions that you ever take in your life. Apart from the sentiments involved, there is typically a load of legal and financial implications for both the parties, which unless amicably settled can lead to a messy legal situation apart from details of your personal life coming into the public domain
Top