Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Monday, January 20, 2025

Why West UP Leave Alone High Court Has Not Even A Single High Court Bench?

Posted in: Judiciary
Fri, Jan 17, 25, 17:31, 3 Days ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 12505
High Court Benches in different States hinging on the population, size and pendency of cases

There can be just no refuting the irrefutable fact that it is high time and a major overhaul is needed most desperately in the manner of distribution of High Court Benches in different States hinging on the population, size and pendency of cases because currently we see that most irrationally there has been allotment on this count which is totally incomprehensible at least now when 100 years of independence is just at a stone throw away distance!

It makes absolutely just no sense at all that the most populated State of India that is Uttar Pradesh with maximum number of pending cases has just one High Court Bench only and as if this was not enough, we see most horribly that the one Bench at Lucknow created so close to Allahabad where High Court itself is located in Eastern UP! Adding fuel to fire further, we see that the litigants of 30 districts of West UP attached with not even Lucknow which falls more than 230 km earlier but right uptill Allahabad which in itself is the biggest betrayal of Constitution, brazen throttling of justice and worst of all makes the most horrendous mockery of poorest litigants of West UP who cannot afford to travel by plane and have to travel again and again to attend court hearings by train like a donkey or a slave all the way right till Allahabad most foolishly!

This despite the irrefutable fact that it is West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of UP as conceded on record by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge appointed by Centre itself which alone explains why it recommended a permanent seat of High Court Bench in West UP at Agra yet after nearly 50 years we see no action taken on it! Not just this, we saw how maximum three High Court Benches were recommended for undivided UP yet not one created which led to people of hilly areas giving momentum to separate Statehood as litigants had to travel thousands of kilometers like a ass all the way again till Allahabad most horribly! Is Centre waiting for West UP to tread on lines of Uttarakhand?

How can anyone on this earth ever deny that none other than late Mr Atal Bihari Vajpayee whose 100th birth anniversary was celebrated on December 25, 2024 all across the nation had in 1986 most forcefully demanded the setting up of a High Court Bench in West UP right inside Parliament as Leader of Opposition? Even former PM Late Mr Rajiv Gandhi had wanted to set up a High Court Bench in West UP but as a rift had developed between Meerut and Agra as place where it should be set up, this most pressing issue was not addressed and was receded to the backburner most unfortunately! While indulging in most blatant, brutal, brazen, blind and baseless discrimination, Centre approved one More High Court Bench for Maharashtra at Aurangabad in early 1980s even though it already had multiple High Court Benches as was recommended by the Justice Jaswant Commission!

The only durable solution is creation of High Court Bench in West UP! Denial of even a single Bench in West UP is wholly unjustified! Let us not forget that none other than UP CM Shri Yogi Adityanath himself had even sent a written recommendation to the Allahabad High Court in January 2024 but most perplexingly withdrew it the next day without disclosing that under what circumstances it was withdrawn!

The moot question here is: Why has merit been allowed to become the worst casualty in allotment of High Court Benches in different States? Why Apex Court has never intervened on such a most pressing issue which directly concerns the judiciary itself is the biggest conundrum that still remains unaddressed? Fact is, West UP should have been given a Bench way back in 1947 or 1948 but what we witnessed on ground was that Allahabad which had High Court in Eastern UP since centuries was allotted Bench also at Lucknow so near to Allahabad in 1948 more than 76 years ago and nowhere else even though majority of pending cases are from West UP which also contributes more than 75% to State’s economy yet accorded most step-motherly treatment by being deprived from having even a single Bench which makes a complete sham of our democracy as equality in distribution of High Court Benches even in different regions of the same State has been flouted so openly as we see in UP where Eastern UP alone enjoys the unfettered monopoly of having both High Court and a single Bench so very near to each other which is completely antithetical to the very concept of equality as enshrined in Article 14 of Constitution!

What is worse is that Centre did not do anything to ensure that a High Court Bench is created in West UP or any other region of UP other than East UP! What is even most worst is that even Supreme Court on such a critical issue directly concerning and affecting judiciary did not do anything at all to ensure that UP and especially West UP was not mercilessly discriminated against without any rhyme or reason on allotment of Bench! The whole world saw how Supreme Court got so angry when cheating took place in a Mayor election in Chandigarh but what baffles me most is why the same Supreme Court maintains a deafening silence when it comes to worst discrimination perpetrated against big States like UP and Rajasthan which both have only one and most disgracefully lawless Bihar has none just like West UP and nothing on earth can be more atrocious than this and still has gone completely unchecked, unnoticed and unattended by the top court for nearly 80 long years! Most disgusting indeed!

It is a no-brainer that which State needs more High Court Benches yet most unfortunately we see that Centre is just not at all prepared to see the clear writing on the wall nor is Apex Court prepared to ruffle the feathers of Centre on such a most pressing issue directly affecting the poorest litigants who become the worst casualty due to no Bench being created in needy regions like West UP, Purvanchal and Bundelkhand! One says this not with glee but with sorrow: Centre has never evinced any interest leave alone resolve in addressing this long pending issue since 1947!

It may be recalled that Dr Satyapal Singh who is former BJP MP from Baghpat and so also is former Mumbai Police Commissioner and so also is former Union Minister in PM Narendra Modi’s Cabinet had in 2016 most vociferously demanded creation of two High Court Benches in West UP in Meerut and Agra and so also at Jhansi in Bundelkhand and Gorakhpur in Purvanchal and Varanasi but Centre most horribly till now in 2025 is still not ready to create even a single more Bench for Allahabad High Court which is the biggest High Court in world with maximum members in State Bar Council other than at Lucknow where it was just not needed at all and where it was created more than 76 years ago!

I am not at all inclined to buy one lame excuse or the other forwarded by Centre to deny West UP or even any other part of UP even a single Bench! It is high time and UP definitely needs to be pulled back from the brink of huge pending cases which is possible only by the creation of more Benches especially in West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of UP and still has not even a single Bench leave alone having High Court!

One thing is for sure: All arguments against the creation of a High Court Bench in West UP are not only just ludicrous but also simply a factory of fabricated lies and nothing else! What most deeply disturbs my conscience is that still Centre is totally unrelenting to do anything worthwhile to correct the biggest Himalayan blunder committed since 1947 and perpetrated till date without any bona fide justification for it! There is no prima facie reason for depriving West UP from having even a single Bench!

The prime question here is: Who is responsible for this most messy state of affairs perpetrated most atrociously in allotment of High Court Benches in different regions and different States? It must definitely also be asked: Why Supreme Court has gone into a deep hibernation on such a most pressing issue directly connected with the judiciary itself since last nearly 80 years? The most germane question is: When will it wake up and take suo motu cognizance of it? After 100 years in 2047 or 2048?

What leaves me even more completely dumbfounded is that even our national media barring few newspapers and so also most of the news channels have also turned a complete blind eye and deaf ear to the huge inconvenience faced by the litigants of West UP which definitely makes for most depressing reading. What has really shaken me to the hilt and angered me most is that even after knowing fully well that lawyers of West UP have been going on strike for 6 months as in 2001 and so also in 2014-15 and strike every Saturday since last nearly 45 years and strike for month or two months since last many decades as in 2009 and one month hunger strike also as in 1976 demanding High Court Bench in West UP and what not but still Centre is recalcitrant to take any tangible step to resolve this long pending most pressing issue! This is the real rub!

It must be addressed at the earliest now by the Centre without forwarding one pretext or the other as was done in Karnataka with just 6 crore population in 2008 for just 4 and 8 districts at Dharwad and Gulbarga even though West UP has more than 10 crore population which is more than the population of majority of the States in India and still has not even a Bench leave alone having a High Court as ideally should have been as even Dr BR Ambedkar favoured West UP as a separate State! No denying!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top