Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, November 21, 2024

Supreme Court Ends Traditional Summer Vacation And Introduces Partial Court Working Days

Posted in: Judiciary
Mon, Nov 11, 24, 12:35, 1 Week ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 9978
for the benefit of the litigants has decided to finally do away with its centuries old colonial tradition of summer vacations

It is definitely most refreshing, most reassuring and most reinvigorating to learn that none other than the Supreme Court which is the top court in India while adhering fully, firmly and finally to the well known old adage that, Example is better than precept has led from the front in demonstrating most boldly that in a most historic and transformative move with far reaching consequences for the benefit of the litigants has decided to finally do away with its centuries old colonial tradition of summer vacations in which huge time gets wasted most senselessly which Britishers had started as they were not accustomed to hot weather! We need to note that this most commendable initiative has been heralded after more than 78 years of independence in favour of ‘partial court working days’ as has been disclosed in the latest amendment to its procedural rules. We thus see that with just few days left for the retirement of the incumbent CJI Hon’ble Dr Dhananjaya Yashwant Chnadrachud, he has finally resorted to scrapping the summer breaks in the Supreme Court. He said now there would only be ‘partial court working days’.

Interestingly enough, we need to note here that this change has been ushered by the Supreme Court (Second Amendment) Rules, 2024 that was officially sanctioned with the approval of the 15th President of India – Droupadi Murmu and announced on November 5, 2024. We certainly need to note here that under the new system, the Court will from 2025 not close for an extended summer break as has been the case till 2024! Instead what we will now witness is that it will operate on a modified schedule throughout the year. What should attract maximum eyeballs is that it is made abundantly clear that according to the amended rules, which came into force immediately, the partial working days will begin from May 26, 2025 and full working days will resume from July 14, 2025.

It is definitely worth noting that under the new system, the Court will not close for an extended summer break; instead, it will operate on a modified schedule throughout the year. It must be borne in mind that this most commendable and path breaking initiative has been designed to bolster the Court’s efficiency by continuing to address the urgent legal matters during these reduced operational days, while still granting judicial officers and staff the requisite time off which must be welcomed unconditionally as this will ensure that litigants don’t suffer because of long vacations! Of course, there can be just no denying or disputing it!

Most commendably, we must also note that in order to prevent the huge delays that occur in critical legal proceedings, this new arrangement also allows designated Judges to preside over urgent matters which have considerable importance. What also must be definitely noted here is that this includes everything from admission hearings to applications for special leave in cases where an interim relief is sought. What is also of immense significance to note here is that judges during these days will refrain from deciding on petitions that involve significant constitutional interpretations unless they convene in full Court. Very rightly so!

It is also in the fitness of things that it has been decided that the Apex Court’s annual calendar will now be divided into two main terms, separated by the Christmas and New Year holidays. There can be just no gainsaying that this scheduling will definitely ensure that the judiciary remains active nearly year-round, with the total non-working days not to exceed 95 days per year, excluding Sundays. There can be no getting away from the irrefutable ostensible fact that this most path breaking, progressive, pertinent and pragmatic decision that has been taken by the incumbent CJI – Hon’ble Dr Dhananjaya Yashwant Chandrachud will definitely always be remembered in the days to come and cannot ever be forgotten or ignored!

What is also of considerable importance to note is that a glaring and quite significant aspect of the new rules that have been initiated is the specific provision that has been made for hearing special leave applications during these partial working days, focusing on those requiring urgent interim relief. It also deserves to be mentioned here that this structural shift definitely represents a very major departure from the centuries-old most stagnant and reprehensible practice of prolonged summer recesses that was started by Britishers as they came from very cold place and favoured holidays during summers as they could not tolerate it and most astoundingly we saw how this had been in practice till 2024 without any break and is definitely aimed at increasing the accessibility and responsiveness of India’s top court which has to be lauded most generously which it so richly deserves also as it is the litigants which will stand to gain the most in the longer run! This should definitely have been done a long time back but anyway, as goes a well known adage that:
It is better to be late than never!

No doubt, it has to be graciously conceded by one and all that this most historic move by the Apex Court to a more continuous operational model is widely expected to expedite the handling of urgent legal matters and so also enhance the overall judicial productivity thus reflecting a very modern approach free from the centuries old colonial influence to ensure that legal proceedings are not left hanging during the vacations in the top court itself which will benefit the litigants who urgently deserve relief but earlier had to wait till vacations were over! Of course, all kudos to the incumbent CJI Hon’ble Dr DY Chandrachud for ensuring this is done before he finally hangs his boots!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top