Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Monday, December 30, 2024

Police Had No Business To Lathicharge Lawyers In Court

Posted in: General Practice
Fri, Nov 1, 24, 17:05, 2 Months ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 14455
Ghaziabad in West UP as is being shown in many news channels on October 29, 2024 which left many of them bleeding

I am definitely left completely astounded, appalled, aghast and ashamed to see how terribly the police was lifting chair openly and throwing at lawyers and beating lawyers most mercilessly in Ghaziabad in West UP as is being shown in many news channels on October 29, 2024 which left many of them bleeding just like some time back we had seen in Hapur which is again in West UP and that too not in some road as happened in Hapur but right inside the court and that too in front of District Judge Mr Anil Kumar of Ghaziabad District and Sessions Court following a heated exchange that occurred between him and the lawyer and that too right inside court during hearing of an anticipatory bail plea over hearing of anticipatory bail on priority which he denied and said that the case would be entertained as per the listing. It must be mentioned here that the scuffle that broke out between lawyers and Judge took a very ugly turn after the District Judge most unexpectedly called the police to remove the protesting lawyers from the courtroom who were raising slogans against him over the disagreement.

Why police and even the District Judge forgets that lawyers are the officers of the court and they have to be treated with utmost respect even if they raise some slogans and the solution cannot be by hurling chairs most brazenly at them as police did which has definitely left me completely flabbergasted as we saw in different news channels and so also lathicharging them as if they were some rioters or hooligans?
It must be duly acknowledged that lathicharge on lawyers at the drop of a hat cannot be ever justified unless and until there is no other alternative!

Lawyers are most tolerant and most disciplined and to always blame lawyers cannot be ever justified or condoned under any circumstances! If lawyers have grievance then the wrinkles in the crease can be and must be ironed out peacefully and properly between lawyers and judges!
I must say that when lawyers are accepted as indispensable pillars of justice then how can lathicharge on them be ever justified or condoned? It has to be conceded that courts cannot ever function without the cooperation of lawyers and for this to happen calling police to lathicharge will definitely dent the impeccable credibility of Judges themselves and will definitely only serve to worsen the already complicated situation! This it is the Judges themselves who must first of all realize this and so also the lawyers then!

It must be disclosed here that the former District Bar President Mr Nahar Singh Yadav promptly sent a complaint of the unsavoury incident to the Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court. He alleged that advocates Mr Jitendra Singh and Mr Abhishek Yadav had reached the court to oppose the anticipatory bail plea and very politely urged the District Judge to hear the arguments on priority or transfer the case as the courtroom was crowded. Mr Nahar Singh Yadav also then revealed that the District Judge lost his shirt and after losing his temper started abusing the lawyers.

He added further that the District Judge then called the police force and police personnel headed by DCP (City zone) Rajesh Kumar Singh and ACP (Kavinagar) Abhishek Srivastava came in and resorted to baton charge without any provocation from lawyers which left over a dozen advocates injured as reported in media. He also very rightly demanded that the CCTV footage of the courtroom should be preserved and real truth emerges. It must be also mentioned here that while speaking on the incident, the Ghaziabad Additional Police Commissioner Mr Dinesh Kumar P said that:
Hearing was going on in the courtroom and advocates and many others were present inside the chamber. An advocate demanded the transfer of bail. When it was rejected, the altercation started.

Needless to say, this altercation should ideally have been settled amicably but alas that was not to be! None other than the CJI Hon’ble Dr Dhananjaya Yashwant Chandrachud has always underscored on greater collaboration between lawyers and judges so that such ugly situations don’t emerge ever in the courts which in my opinion are more sacred than any place of worship in this world! I was certainly most happy when I myself heard the incumbent CJI Hon’ble Dr Dhananjaya Yashwant Chandrachud saying that never call districts and trial courts subordinate courts but just saying is not enough and this must translate into reality!

No doubt, there can be no quibbling ever with the irrefutable fact that the CJI must himself before retiring on November 9, 2024 which will be his last working day take suo motu cognizance of it just like he has done so many times even in past and this directly concerns the district judiciary of which both the lawyers and so also the judges are an inseparable and essential part and so without wasting any more time must set up a high powered committee to probe into it to get to the bottom of it and take action against those who are guilty of engineering the huge violence in court premises of Ghaziabad! This would also send a clear message to the police that lawyers have to be treated like officers of the court and not like rioters or hooligans and who exactly is responsible for this fiasco that turned so ugly!

Of course, there can be definitely just no gainsaying that no person leave alone a lawyer in his right senses will ever bat for a lawyer if he assaults a Judge but if without any assault, a Judge orders the police to resort to lathicharge then it is definitely most worrying! It is unfathomable as to how the lawyers of Ghaziabad District and Sessions Court Bar Association can be lathicharged so ruthlessly and that too not even on the non-practising lawyers who never get lathicharged at least I have never heard rather on those lawyers who most proudly call themselves practicing lawyers and some senior lawyers also most unfortunately got injured it is reported in media.

If Mr Kapil Sibal who is President of Supreme Court Bar Association of India, Mr Manan Kumar Mishra who is the Chairman of the Bar Council of India and also a Rajya Sabha MP, Mr Prashant Bhushan, Mr Harish Salve, Mr Ashwani Kumar Upadhyay whose videos are circulated many times in different lawyers group in Meerut due to his huge popularity as I have myself seen among others don’t speak up on such a pressing issue which is directly concerning the advocates fraternity and maintain a deafening silence on such a serious issue then nothing on earth can ever be more unfortunate than this most unpalatable reality! I am sure that if not all at least some of them will speak up most boldly like they speak up on so many other issues which don’t directly concern the lawyers fraternity themselves!

In conclusion, it is high time and reforms must be ushered in police just like has been done in Army by initiating the Agniveer Yojana as was recommended so very commendably by none other than the Supreme Court itself in the landmark case of Prakash Singh vs Union of India in 2006 itself! Even after 18 years of this landmark verdict having been delivered, we see no police reforms being implemented on ground which is definitely most heart breaking to see and only serves to devalue the relevancy of none other than the top court itself which makes for most depressing reading! None other than Mr Kapil Sibal himself had very strongly pointed out recently that the police powers have been increased manifold under the new laws and it is UP which tops the State list in maximum custodial death, maximum fake encounter killings and other crimes pertaining to the police which definitely has to be taken most seriously and not just glossed over as we have been witnessing since independence till now most unfortunately!

It must be mentioned that it was on October 26, 2024 that eminent and senior Supreme Court lawyer and so also the President of Supreme Court Bar Association and former Union Law Minister of India and Rajya Sabha MP and so also former Additional and Solicitor General of India Mr Kapil Sibal said while delivering a most captivating lecture that he delivered at the Sikkim Judicial Academy arguing most fluently saying that the true test of any judiciary lies in public trust. He said that:
If people lack confidence in the judiciary, it undermines its effectiveness. He also very sagaciously touched upon the colonial remnants of the criminal justice system of India. He suggested that India needs to rethink colonial-era laws and so also practices, such as police remand, which he characterized as antithetical to modern democratic principles.

While underscoring the urgent and dire need for reforms that align perfectly with best global practices, Sibal was quick to point out that:
In developed countries, investigations precede arrests while here, arrests precede investigations. In the developed world, the allegation is first investigated and then the arrest takes place. In our world, the arrest comes first and the investigation takes place later. Which country (apart from India) has police remand? It’s the colonial past which has given the police this power. Absolutely right! Mr Kapil Sibal has thus frankly conceded without mincing any words that nothing has changed in last 78 years of independence! He also rightly pointed out that, Oppressive laws are being implemented. What is precedent? There is no such thing as precedent. Each judge decides based on his or her understanding of the law, whether s/he should interpret the law one way or the other. The only precedent is the precedent of the individual Bench that decides a particular case in the way that it decides – that is the only precedent.

That is it. Who suffers?
Ordinary people … It is time for the judiciary to realise, that it’s time for them to stand up and to ensure that what our forefathers gave us need to be zealously protected. These are rights that they gave to the citizens of our country. They can’t be wasted in this fashion. It’s time for citizens to speak up, it’s time for lawyers to speak up and it’s time for the judges to stand up. It is the poorest of the poor who suffer the most and spend more time in jail as an undertrial than the criminal who commits the crime as he is unable to fight the case which reflects the shoddy state of affairs in our legal system which must be changed root and branch! He also added that a revamp of the Indian criminal law is required while briefly also pointing out that the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which replaced the colonial-era Indian Penal Code, has only made things worse.

No doubt, the powers of the police definitely have increased manifold under the new laws! Now even lawyers are not being spared which definitely cannot be a healthy sign for our Indian democratic system! I have just no hesitation in saying that the police had just no business to lathicharge the lawyers in Ghaziabad which has resulted in the ugly scuffle that broke between the lawyers and police which only serves to denigrate the reputation of Judges, Advocates and Police which can never be in our national interests!

So, it is high time and Centre must step in and usher reforms even in police which till date has not been initiated! There can be just no denying or disputing it! It thus merits no reiteration that the earlier this is done, the better definitely it shall be in our national interests in the longer run!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
India is going on grate path of welfare-state. Mahatma Gandhi's greatest ambition for India was to wipe every tear from every eye
Social justice means a way of life with liberty, equality and fraternity as the principles of life.
BJP after always repeatedly assuring the lawyers of West UP that they will make sure that a high court bench is created soon here as soon as it comes to power has reneged on its tall promises and has done virtually nothing on this score till now
To start with, I say this not as a lawyer of West UP but as a good citizen of India that the unending protest of lawyers of West UP severely affects the litigants who have to wait repeatedly to get justice. But who is responsible for this
It is most baffling to note that Centre since 1947 till 2018 has consistently, callously, blatantly and brazenly disregarded the numerous hardships faced by the more than 9 crore people of West UP in travelling nearly 700 to 750 km
Uttarakhand High Court in the landmark case of Lalit Kumar v Union of India & Ors in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 203 of 2014 dated 12 June 2018 directed the Centre to establish a Regional Bench of Armed Forces Tribunal in the State of Uttarakhand within four months.
West UP which deserved statehood right since 1947 has not even a single bench of a high court since last more than 70 years
High Court of Kerala has in a historic move directed the Indian Railways to treat identity cards issued to lawyers by respective Bar Councils as a valid identity proof to undertake a train journey/travel.
Constitution of Special District Courts to try cases as per the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
Foreign law Firms cannot Practice in India, but they are free to give legal advice regarding foreign law on diverse international legal issues on a fly in and fly out basis if it does not amount to practice.
Each and every person who is humane whether he/she is Indian or Pakistani or anyone else is overjoyed on learning the news of the release of Abhinandan
crime against women are multiplying most rapidly in UP and this is most felt in West UP which is the worst affected of all the regions of UP.
In our country around 5 lakh accidents take place every year and 1.5 lakh deaths occur. In world highest number of deaths due to the accidents take place in India. It is our responsibility to control these deaths and promote road safety.
It was decided unanimously by all the lawyers of 22 districts of West UP to go on strike on November 25, 2019 and observe it as  protest day. The lawyers of West UP are not happy with the statement of Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad about the creation of a high court bench in West UP
parents of a married son are not entitled to claim filial compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Rambabu Singh Thakur v/s Sunil Arora serious note of the increase in the number of tainted candidates facing criminal cases entering politics. It has issued a slew of directions in this latest, landmark and extremely laudable judgment which we shall discuss later.
J&K High Court Bar Association v. UOI dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought prohibition of use of pellet guns. How long can security forces restrain themselves if public becomes unruly and start pelting stones, bottles and what not
Harmanbhai Umedbhai Patel vs Bindu Kumar Mohanlal Shahupheld an order passed by the Bar Council of India (BCI) dismissing a complaint alleging professional misconduct by a lawyer. There was no professional misconduct found on the part of the lawyer.
Kangana Ranaut vs Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai restraining the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai from carrying out any further demolition at Kangana Ranaut's residence in Bandra
The Telangana Fire Works Dealers Association vs. P Indra Prakash has modified the order of the Telangana High Court which imposed a complete and immediate ban on the sale and use of firecrackers across the state during Diwali to fall in line with the directions imposed by the National Green Tribunal on November 9
The non-availability of birth certificate is issued when the person does not have a birth proof. One can visit the municipal corporation, gram panchayat or chief medical officer in the area where he or she is born and apply for this document, showing address proof and proofs of 2 more witnesses on an affidavit.
M. Thangaraj (Ex. MC) v. The District Collector, Dindigul to follow the ritual of taking a procession around the temple (Girivalam) has recently on January 18, 2021 observed that all the religious processions should spread positivity and brotherhood and in no manner should be a cause for any communal disturbance.
K Raju v. UOI only senior citizens/parents are entitled to file an appeal against an order passed by the Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007.
Kolkata Municipal Corporation authorities to take action against people found slaughtering cattle including cows and/or exhibiting for sale flesh of slaughtered cattle and/or selling cattle meat.
Legal Industry and the Enhancement of the Technology Towards the Progressive Development In An Amicable Manner
Omnarayan Sharma Vs MP issued directions to the District Legal Services Authorities and the State Authority for ensuring implementation of poverty alleviation schemes promulgated under provisions of Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 and NALSA
Javed v Uttar Pradesh that the cow should be declared the national animal and cow protection should be made a fundamental right of the Hindus because we know that when the country's culture and its faith get hurt, the country becomes weak.
The ‘Green Channel’ is an automated and transparent system for gaining approval for certain type and combination of mergers and acquisition.
Hasae @ Hasana Wae vs UP that dilution of constitutional autonomy of the High Courts would threaten the concept of judicial federalism envisaged in the Constitution and affirmed by judicial precedents.
Madhya Pradesh vs Pujari Utthan Avam Kalyan Samiti that the presiding deity of the temple is the owner of the land attached to the temple and Pujari is only to perform puja and to maintain the properties of the deity.
Alkesh Vs MP in a case under SC/ST Act, the caste of the complainant is of paramount importance and is a sine qua non and that it can't be assumed that the complainant would forget to mention in the FIR that the assailants had made aspersions against his caste.
The non-availability of birth certificate is a document to register unregistered birth. It can also be used in case the applicant has lost his birth certificate to a fire, flood or any other reason.
a Dalit man named Lakhbir Singh aged 35 years who was a food server with no political affiliation of any kind or any past criminal record would first be beaten black
Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Kapil Sibal states The whole Act is an attempt to aggrandize the power of the State.
Char Dham Highway expansion in full court room exchange took the extremely commendable, clear, cogent, composed, courageous and convincing stand that concerns of defence forces cannot be overridden.
Bindu v. Allahabad that as per Article 233(2), a person seeking appointment as a District Judge must be practicing as an advocate for continuous 7 years (without any break) on the date of application.
TC Gupta v. UOI that the petitioner-advocate who in more than one matters, has indulged in filing Original Applications in the Tribunal as well as writ petitions in the High Court and has personally signed the pleadings etc without having been specifically authorized in this regard by the litigants which cannot be glossed over.
Swaran Kaur vs Punjab that entitlement for the grant of family pension to the dependent parents needs to be seen after the widow or the children loose their eligibility for the grant of the said benefit.
Zubair Ahmed Teli Vs. Union Territory of J&K that there is no requirement of prior consideration of the social investigation report by Juvenile Justice Board while considering a bail plea under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Care and Protection Act,
Chandrashekhar R vs Karnataka that Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution embodies the principle of religious tolerance which is a characteristic of Indian civilization disposed of a public interest litigation alleging that the contents of Azan
Suresh Kumar vs CP upholding the dismissal of a police head constable who was caught with 75 dirhams while on duty of checking passengers passports of the Indira Gandhi International Airport in 1996, observing that the police officers who break law must be dealt with iron hands.
Mohd Abdul Khaliq Vs UP that the Central Government would take the request appropriate decision to ban cow slaughter in the country and to declare the same as a protected national animal.
Nikhil Singh Vs UOI that: As would be evident from the chart supplied by Dr KN Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General of India, most of the Airports/Airstrips in the State of Bihar are non-functional.
While striking entirely the right chord as the lawyers anticipated also, we saw how just recently it was none other than the Executive Committee of the Supreme Court Bar Association
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) President Dr Adish C Aggarwala who recently got elected as President after surpassing many of his strong competitors with most strongest being Mr Dushyant Dave
Al Tawaf Hajj And Umrah Travel And Tourism vs UoI that: Haj Pilgrimage and the ceremonies involved therein and the ceremonies involved therein fall within the ambit of a religious practice, which is protected by the Constitution of India.
It is ‘shockingly bizarre’ that UP has maximum pending cases among all States that is more than 10 lakhs in High Courts and about a crore in lower courts and has maximum population
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs BN Magon that an advocate’s office run from a residential building is not subject to property tax under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act as a business building.
Meena Pradhan vs Kamla Pradhan that a will is required to fulfill all the formalities required under Section 63 of the Succession Act.
Whenever you are in doubt, or when the self becomes too much, recall the face of the poorest and the weakest man/woman
Top