Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Sunday, December 22, 2024

SCBA Stands In Full Solidarity With Lawyers of Ghaziabad District Bar

Posted in: Judiciary
Fri, Nov 1, 24, 16:59, 2 Months ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 9946
I am really in tears of joy to see how much boldness the Supreme Court Bar Association

I am really in tears of joy to see how much boldness the Supreme Court Bar Association has demonstrated in standing in full, firm, final and complete solidarity with the lawyers of the Ghaziabad District Bar many of whom were most brutally thrashed which has really shaken me to the hilt. I was definitely left completely astounded, appalled, aghast and ashamed to see how terribly the police was lifting chair openly and throwing at lawyers and beating lawyers most mercilessly in Ghaziabad in West UP as is being shown in many news channels that took place on October 29, 2024 which left many of them including some senior lawyers bleeding just like some time back we had seen in Hapur which is again in West UP and that too not in some road as happened in Hapur but right inside the court and that too in front of and that too at the behest of District Judge Mr Anil Kumar of Ghaziabad District and Sessions Court following a heated exchange that occurred between him and the lawyer and that too right inside the court during the hearing of an anticipatory bail plea over hearing of anticipatory bail on priority which he denied and said that the case would be entertained as per the listing. It must be mentioned here that the scuffle that broke out between the lawyers and Judge right inside the courtroom took a very ugly turn after the District Judge most unexpectedly called the police to remove the protesting lawyers from the courtroom who were raising slogans against him over the disagreement.

Why police and even the District Judge forgets or glosses over the irrefutable fact that lawyers are the officers of the court and they have to be definitely treated with utmost respect even if they raise some slogans and the solution cannot be by hurling chairs most brazenly at them as police did which has definitely left me completely flabbergasted as we saw in different news channels and so also lathicharging them as if they were some rioters or hooligans?

It must be duly acknowledged that lathicharge on lawyers at the drop of a hat cannot be ever justified unless and until there is no other alternative which was not the case here! Lawyers are undoubtedly most tolerant and so also most disciplined and to always blame lawyers like media does inspite of watching that it was police who was throwing chairs and lathicharging lawyer and Judge shouting most loudly at lawyers which cannot be ever justified or condoned under any circumstances! If lawyers have any grievance, then the wrinkles in the crease can be and must be ironed out peacefully, carefully and properly between lawyers and judges which we don’t see either the District Judge or the Police doing so in this leading case and only added more fuel to the small smoke of fire! This is what I find most troubling to watch!

I must say this with full sense of responsibility that when lawyers are accepted as indispensable pillars of justice then how can lathicharge on them be ever justified or condoned? It has to be conceded with grace that courts cannot ever function anywhere in the world without the unstinted cooperation of the lawyers who play the most prime and pivotal role and for this to happen calling police to lathicharge them as if they are rioters or unruly mob will definitely dent the impeccable credibility of Judges themselves and will definitely only serve to worsen the already complicated situation! This it is the Judges themselves who must first of all realize this and so also the lawyers then!

It is most commendable to note that the Supreme Court Bar Association and so also the Supreme Court Advocate on Record Association have demanded an inquiry and dismissal of the District Judge and so also most strong action against the police officers who had ordered the most atrocious lathicharge on advocates! It is entirely in the fitness of things that the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) has passed a resolution strongly condemning the recent inhumane and violent act of police in the lathi charge violence against the advocates inside the premises of Ghaziabad Court in West Uttar Pradesh at the behest of the directions of Mr Anil Kumar-X (the Ld. District Court & Sessions Judge of Ghaziabad. The SCBA has also deemed it fit to seek an inquiry against the Judge. What also must be taken note is that according to the SCBA, the incident occurred under the direction of Mr. Anil Kumar-X, the District & Sessions Judge of Ghaziabad.

What is of utmost significance to note is that the SCBA has declared most unequivocally that it will not tolerate any attack on the prestige of advocates which undoubtedly has to be paramount and has also in no uncertain terms in pursuance thereof demanded immediate action from the Allahabad High Court and so also the Uttar Pradesh State Government. The SCBA in its resolution dated 30.10.2024 titled SCBA/EC.2024-25 also most explicitly stated that the high handedness of UP Police is a clear violation of advocates rights and the rule of law. Very rightly so! Most strikingly, we need to also note that the SCBA resolution also demanded that –

 

  1. Demand inquiry into the conduct of Mr. Anil Kumar-X (Ld. District & Sessions Judge) Ghaziabad by a sitting Hon'ble Judge of Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad headed by the Hon'ble Chief Justice of High Court of Allahabad along with Hon'ble Administrative Judge of Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad looking after the affairs of Ghaziabad District.
  2. Investigate the incident and bring the guilty Ld. District & Sessions Judge and police officers to justice.
  3. Dismiss the services of Mr. Anil Kumar-X (Ld. District & Sessions Judge) Ghaziabad and police officers, responsible for the lathi charge.
  4. Pay compensation to the injured advocates.
  5. Take measures to ensure that such incidents do not recur.
  6. Introduce and implement the Advocates Protection Act for protection of Advocates and their families against such brutal incidents.
  7. Take steps to improve the law and order situation in the State and to ensure that the police personnel are accountable for their actions.


Not stopping here, we must also note that the SCBA further also called upon the Bar Council of India and so also all the State Bar Councils to take necessary steps to protect advocates' rights and ensure they can perform their duties without any harassment or violence. Adding more to it, the SCBA further added that:
Supreme Court Bar Association also calls upon the Bar Council of India and all other State Bar Councils to take necessary steps to protect the rights of Advocates and to ensure that they are able to discharge their duties without fear of intimidation or harassment. Supreme Court Bar Association stands in solidarity with the advocates of Ghaziabad and pledges to do everything in its power to ensure that justice is served.

It merits just no reiteration that all the lawyers of District Courts especially of West UP of which Ghaziabad District Bar is an inseparable part must always be deeply indebted to the incumbent SCBA led by its President Mr Kapil Sibal who have all stepped forward in extending unstinted and unanimous support to the lawyers of Ghaziabad who were brutally lathicharged by the police! Even the UP Bar Council has expressed its unstinted support to the lawyers of West UP which must be definitely applauded! It is worth noting that the President of the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh Mr Shiv Kishore Gaur has written a letter to the office bearers of all the Bar Associations of the State of Uttar Pradesh informing them in no uncertain terms that the Uttar Pradesh Bar Council has condemned strongly the recent lathi charge violence against the advocates in Ghaziabad Court allegedly at the behest of a District Court Judge. It is written most explicitly in this letter that:
The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh strongly opposes this incident and after watching the video clipping, strongly condemns the conduct of the District Judge, Ghaziabad and strongly opposes his act.

In conclusion, it is high time and time is ripe for reforms to be ushered in police just like has been done in Army by initiating the Agniveer Yojana as was recommended so very commendably by none other than the Supreme Court itself in the landmark case of Prakash Singh vs Union of India in 2006 itself! Even after 18 years of this landmark verdict having been delivered, we see no police reforms being implemented on ground which is definitely most heart breaking to see and only serves to devalue the relevancy of none other than the top court itself which makes for most depressing reading!

None other than Mr Kapil Sibal himself had very strongly pointed out recently that the police powers have been increased manifold under the new laws and it is UP which tops the State list in maximum custodial death, maximum fake encounter killings and other crimes pertaining to the police which definitely has to be taken most seriously and not just glossed over as we have been witnessing since independence till now most unfortunately!

It must be mentioned that it was on October 26, 2024 that eminent and senior Supreme Court lawyer and so also the President of Supreme Court Bar Association and former Union Law Minister of India and Rajya Sabha MP and so also former Additional and Solicitor General of India Mr Kapil Sibal said while delivering a most captivating lecture that he delivered at the Sikkim Judicial Academy arguing most fluently saying that the true test of any judiciary lies in public trust.

He said that:
If people lack confidence in the judiciary, it undermines its effectiveness. He also very sagaciously touched upon the colonial remnants of the criminal justice system of India. He suggested that India needs to rethink colonial-era laws and so also practices, such as police remand, which he characterized as antithetical to modern democratic principles. While underscoring the urgent and dire need for reforms that align perfectly with best global practices, Sibal was quick to point out that:
In developed countries, investigations precede arrests while here, arrests precede investigations.

In the developed world, the allegation is first investigated and then the arrest takes place. In our world, the arrest comes first and the investigation takes place later. Which country (apart from India) has police remand? It’s the colonial past which has given the police this power. Absolutely right! Mr Kapil Sibal has thus frankly conceded without mincing any words that nothing has changed in last 78 years of independence! He also rightly pointed out that, Oppressive laws are being implemented.

What is precedent? There is no such thing as precedent. Each judge decides based on his or her understanding of the law, whether s/he should interpret the law one way or the other. The only precedent is the precedent of the individual Bench that decides a particular case in the way that it decides - that is the only precedent. That is it. Who suffers? Ordinary people … It is time for the judiciary to realise that it’s time for them to stand up and to ensure that what our forefathers gave us need to be zealously protected. These are rights that they gave to the citizens of our country. They can’t be wasted in this fashion. It’s time for citizens to speak up, it’s time for lawyers to speak up and it’s time for the judges to stand up.

It is the poorest of the poor who suffer the most and spend more time in jail as an undertrial than the criminal who commits the crime as he is unable to fight the case which reflects the shoddy state of affairs in our legal system which must be changed root and branch! He also added that a revamp of the Indian criminal law is required while briefly also pointing out that the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which replaced the colonial-era Indian Penal Code, has only made things worse.

No doubt, the powers of the police definitely have increased manifold under the new laws! Now even lawyers are not being spared which definitely cannot be a healthy sign for our Indian democratic system! I have just no hesitation in saying that the police had just no business to lathicharge the lawyers in Ghaziabad which has resulted in the ugly scuffle that broke between the lawyers and police which only serves to denigrate the reputation of Judges, Advocates and Police which can never be in our national interests! So, it is high time and Centre must step in and usher reforms even in police which till date has not been initiated! There can be just no denying or disputing it! It thus merits no reiteration that the earlier this is done, the better definitely it shall be in our national interests in the longer run!

Above all, those who are guilty in this entire episode definitely needs to be brought to book! Those who violate the dignity and decorum of the court must be punished most strongly, no matter who they may be! It brooks no more delay any longer! No denying it!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top