Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Sunday, December 22, 2024

A New Symbol Of Justice In SC Must Be Backed With New Approach

Posted in: Supreme Court
Tue, Oct 22, 24, 16:13, 2 Months ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 13376
A symbolic transformation by removing the blind fold from the statue in Supreme Court and replacing sword with Constitution which has received widespread accolades cutting across party lines

By all accounts, it is definitely in the fitness of things that the Supreme Court of India led by incumbent CJI Hon’ble Dr Dhananjaya Yashwant Chandrachud while taking a very decisive and path breaking step has gone ahead to undergo a symbolic transformation by removing the blind fold from the statue in Supreme Court and replacing sword with Constitution which has received widespread accolades cutting across party lines, religious lines and uniting people all across India in welcoming this historic change for which CJI definitely has to be given credit for leading from the front in heralding this historic change! I am falling short of words to express in words my deepest gratitude to Ms Monisha Sodhi for expressing so elegantly her enlightening views in the editorial titled A New Symbol of Justice: Reflecting India’s Evolving Ethos published in The Daily Punjab Times E-Newspaper dated October 19, 2024 in which she points out rightly that:
This departure from the traditional blindfolded figure of justice is a powerful message to the nation and the world: justice is not blind, but aware, culturally attuned and responsive to the needs of a diverse society like India. Moreover, this change is a nod to the idea that justice in India cannot afford to be a one-size-fits-all-system. The country’s vast and diverse population brings with it a spectrum of challenges, and the legal system must be dynamic enough to address them all. By removing the blindfold, the judiciary recognizes that justice must be delivered with eyes wide open to the disparities and challenges that exist in society.

In addition, by replacing sword with Constitution we see that it has been made indubitably clear that now the decisions will not be taken by dint of police force or any other force but only and only will be taken by what is enshrined in Constitution! Even the Supreme Court is not Supreme, the High Court is not High, it is always the Constitution that is supreme. We are all below the Constitution, and our task is to interpret it as we understand. The real supremacy is of the Constitution. It is none other than a serving Supreme Court Judge – Hon’ble Mr Justice Hrishikesh Roy with an impeccable and untarnished reputation who has made these most pertinent observations which must be definitely always respected both in letter and in spirit. There can be nothing above our Constitution which stands paramount and even the Supreme Court in its judgment itself is bound to implement what it stands for and abide by its principles most strictly.

Having said this, one must add that it is definitely as clear as broad day sunlight that which State needs more High Court Benches and which State does not need even a single High Court Bench! But the most unpalatable truth is that neither any Chief Justice of India nor any Prime Minister of India till date has ever bothered to take any initiative in this regard in last nearly 80 years of independence to do anything substantial to correct the most biggest Himalayan blunder committed in 1948 by creating only one High Court Bench for the most populated State of India with maximum number of pending cases that is Uttar Pradesh at Lucknow so near to Allahabad and nowhere else and worst of all attached litigants of 30 districts of West UP with not even Lucknow which falls 230 km earlier but right uptill Allahabad to seek justice which in itself is the biggest betrayal of Constitution in India and justice as litigants of West UP have to travel whole night and half day averaging 700 to 800 km. How long will Centre keep shamelessly indulging in cherry picking few privileged States like Maharashtra, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Assam and West Bengal only to have multiple High Court Benches while caring the least for most populated State in India with maximum pending cases that is Uttar Pradesh and so also maximum Judges in all courts including High Court numbering 160 but Bench has only one created in 1948 so close to Allahabad in Lucknow! When UP can have maximum expressways and maximum 21 airports then why it has only just one Bench in last nearly 80 years?

It is nothing but plain stupidity and sheer absurdity of the highest order that West UP owing for majority of the cases of UP has not even a single Bench and Eastern UP alone has both High Court and a single Bench so near to each other! Denial of even a single High Court Bench to West UP is a shocking affront to the concept of equality as enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution! It must always be borne in mind that Dr BR Ambedkar who is the key architect of our Constitution had very rightly said many decades ago most sagaciously that, However good the Constitution may be, if those who are implementing it are not good it will prove to be bad. Therefore, providing law and procedure for its implementation may not result as desired if the persons who are implementing the same have mala fide intention or do not respect the law and its procedure. Dr BR favoured Statehood for West UP yet Centre not ready to concede even a Bench!

I am hard pressed to wonder and just can’t visualize that why is Centre behaving so nonchalantly on such a serious and pressing issue at hand? Why does Centre not realize that just by being a prisoner of the past is not going to help in anyway in changing things for the better if litigants of West UP will still be infantilized and denied a Bench inspite of owing for majority of pending cases of UP? At the end of the day, what matters most is the action taken on the ground!

By all accounts, UP must be treated as primus inter pares which means first among equals! But the most unfortunate part is that UP, lawless Bihar and Rajasthan are placed in the last row by depriving them from having multiple High Court Benches most chillingly with West UP and Bihar having none and PM and CJI watching like a helpless, hapless and hopeless spectator! I am astounded, ashamed, appalled and aghast at how much temerity Centre has demonstrated in bulldozing the most legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP, Purvanchal, Bundelkhand and lawless Bihar! Supreme Court must definitely feel most terribly ashamed for doing just nothing on this and it cannot escape its responsibility acting like Centre and kicking the responsibility for it on Centre or Allahabad High Court or Governor or Chief Minister or anyone else! When Supreme Court never hesitates to intervene even if it finds cheating in a Mayor election as we saw in Chandigarh then why on High Court Bench issue which directly affects so many litigants has Apex Court never intervened? It must ponder!

It is very rightly pointed out by eminent and senior lawyer and so also former General Secretary of Meerut Bar – Mr Tarun Dhaka in his enlightening legal article titled How Can It Happen That UP Has Least High Court Benches In India And West UP Has None published most prominently in June 2015 issue of the prestigious All India Reporter (AIR) Law Journal explaining in detail which is definitely a Must Read Article for not just students and lawyers but even for Judges that how most openly Uttar Pradesh has been so wrongly discriminated in allotment of High Court Benches and worst of all how West UP has been deprived from having even a single High Court Bench even though it owes for majority of the pending cases of Uttar Pradesh as acknowledged by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission appointed nearly 50 years ago by Centre itself headed by former Supreme Court Judge due to which it recommended a permanent main Bench for West UP! It is absolutely mind blowing to see how the most populated State of India with maximum number of pending cases has been so chillingly, cunningly and callously discriminated against without any remorse when it comes to High Court Benches where there is just one at Lucknow so close to Allahabad where it was just not needed at all created way back in 1948 and in West UP, Purvanchal and Bundelkhand none just like in lawless Bihar where there is none! There has been a complete non-application of mind when it comes to the creation of High Court Benches in different regions and different States!

Coincidentally we see that incumbent PM Mr Narendra Modi is MP from Varanasi in UP and incumbent CJI Hon’ble Dr Dhananjaya Yashwant Chandrachud whose home State is Maharashtra which has maximum number of High Court Benches even though it tops in Justice Index Ranking of States list and has much less pending cases than UP and less Judges which only underscores how vital it is to ensure that UP has multiple High Court Benches! It was in his tenure as Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court that lawyers of 22 districts of West UP under one banner went on strike for 6 months demanding High Court Bench just like it was done in 2001 and still nothing was done to resolve the deadlock! As CJI Hon’ble Dr DY Chandrachud is on verge of completing two years in CJI post on November 10, 2024 when he will retire finally for which less than 20 days left and he must do something on it which is the biggest and blackest stain on his otherwise unblemished track record which even his worst critics admire openly!

In this regard, I must say that it was most enlightening to read the legal article titled Why CJI Never Dares To Speak Up On High Court Bench In West UP? by eminent, senior and distinguished lawyer of Meerut Bar – Mr Parvez Alam published in prestigious web portal Legal India dated 6 February 2023 and his many other legal articles on the dire need for High Court Bench in West UP has also been published in ‘The Daily Guardian’ newspaper like Neither High Court Nor Even A Bench For Western UP updated on November 29, 2022 and so also Centre Or Apex Court Must Order Bench In West UP updated on December 9, 2022 and so also his many articles on High Court Bench I have read in The Daily Punjab Times e-newspaper underscoring how desperately UP needs more High Court Benches and so also West UP! It is most saddening to note that UP has given maximum PM to India since independence still most unfortunately has just one High Court Bench which cannot be justified somehow or anyhow! It is definitely most pathetic and is most disheartening to see as it is the biggest betrayal of Constitution and justice with no one wanting to catch the bull by the horns!

Which country on earth will act so shamelessly, senselessly and stupidly like India to deprive the most populated State of India that is Uttar Pradesh (UP) from having not just maximum but not even from having multiple High Court Benches which owes for maximum number of pending cases among all the States in India and here too adding salt to wound has further ensured that only one particular region that is Eastern UP alone has both High Court and so also Capital and so also single High Court Bench and rubbing salt on the wounds of the people of West UP attached litigants of West UP with not Lucknow but right uptill Allahabad to seek justice which in itself is definitely the biggest betrayal of justice and Constitution? This despite the irrefutable fact that it is West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of UP which is also the highest in any region of India which has left me completely speechless, shocked, stunned and shattered to the hilt! The argument that West UP cannot be given even a single High Court Bench deserves to be rejected in its entirety. I am a complete loss to comprehend that what is the raison d’être of Centre denying West UP even a single Bench even though majority of cases are from West UP in both High Court and in lower courts?

It merits questioning: How can Apex Court gloss over the time tested dictum that:
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere? Why Apex Court never dares to take suo motu cognizance of this open cheating and blatant discrimination defies logic and is truly incomprehensible raising a big question mark on its firm commitment to equality as envisaged in Article 14 of Constitution? What I find most jaw-dropping to note is that this denial of a High Court Bench to West UP is despite the irrefutable fact that it is West UP which owes for majority of pending cases of UP and ideally High Court itself should be transferred to West UP as it is intending to do in Assam, Uttarakhand, Kerala and Andhra Pradesh but leave alone transferring High Court, we see that Centre is just not at all prepared to create even a single High Court Bench as recommended by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge appointed by Centre itself nearly 50 years ago and even though its recommendations have been implemented in Maharashtra by creating Bench in Aurangabad which already had High Court Benches in Nagpur and Panaji and so also for West Bengal at Jalpaiguri and at Madurai in Tamil Nadu but not a single for UP for which maximum three Benches were recommended with permanent at Agra in West UP yet not even a single Bench approved for West UP as recommended!

But most horrendously and most horribly and most intriguingly, we see that not even the incumbent CJI Dr Dhananjaya Yashwant Chandrachud never dares to question Centre inspite of being Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court for nearly three years as he himself most proudly concedes and to top it all it was in his tenure as Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court for nearly three years as he himself concedes that lawyers of West UP went on total strike demanding Bench in West UP for six months in 2014-15 just like in 2001 yet he did nothing to break the ice and now even as his two years tenure of CJI is about to end in few days we see he has not ever taken suo motu action to address it permanently which makes for a very depressing reading! Is he waiting for last day to act? One had never expected this nonchalant approach from him because he has performed most brilliantly on all other issues which I fully applaud, adore and admire! Why vested interests of powerful lobby deadly opposed to the creation of a Bench in West UP have been allowed to trump over all other factors? The Bench genie is long out and it definitely cannot be put back in, only can be kept on a leash!

Needless to say, the denial of even a single Bench to West UP is utterly unconstitutional as it is West UP which owes for majority of the pending cases of UP! Why has Centre disrobed democracy by denying West UP even a single Bench? Why has Centre so steadfastly maintained a deafening conspiratorial silence on such a hot-button issue such as setting up of Bench in West UP as was recommended by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission appointed by Centre itself nearly 50 years ago headed by former Supreme Court Judges?

The niggling question that prickles me most is: Why is Centre so deadly against the creation of even a single Bench in West UP or in any other part of UP other than in Eastern UP where both High Court and single Bench located so close to each other? This is what PM needs to pause and contemplate most seriously which he has not done till now! Denial of even a single Bench to West UP is premised on false, flawed and flimsy grounds with no merit in it!

What really puts me off is to witness how Centre has most deliberately, derisively, dangerously and dastardly bulldozed the most legitimate demand for a Bench in West UP which cannot be condoned ever! The dire need for a Bench in West UP is inextricably linked to the huge inconvenience that poor litigants face in travelling whole night and half day all the way to Allahabad as they cannot afford plane travel yet Centre never accepts its responsibility and passes the buck to Governor which it itself appoints! One would have to be willfully naïve to believe that West UP does not need a Bench! Also, one would have to be supremely naïve not to see how deliberately Centre has deprived big northern states like Rajasthan which is biggest state areawise, lawless Bihar and UP from having multiple Benches with Bihar not having even single! I really just can’t decipher why the hell Centre has abdicated it’s most sacred duty of ensuring that the litigants of 30 districts of West UP get justice at doorsteps by creating a High Court Bench in any of the 30 districts of West UP which has more than 10 crores population and still not even a Bench!

Even the incumbent CM Shri Yogi Adityanath had forwarded the proposal for a Bench in West UP to Allahabad High Court but most intriguingly withdrew it the very next day! He also 25 years ago had demanded Bench in Gorakhpur right inside Parliament and in 2015 even presented a Private Member Bill for it in Parliament! Still in last 76 years not a single Bench created other than the one at Lucknow since July 1948!

It is most shocking that UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population – more than 26 crore as CM Yogi Adityanath and so also PM Narendra Modi always so very proudly claims, maximum districts - 75, maximum constituencies - 80, maximum MPs – 80, maximum MLAs - 404, maximum PM including Narendra Modi who represents Varanasi as an MP, maximum pending cases – more than 10 lakh and here too West UP accounts for more than half of pending cases as noted by Justice Jaswant Commission about 57% and now after so many decades the percentage of pending cases in West UP has gone substantially much higher, maximum cases in lower courts about to touch 1 crore, maximum Judges both in High Court – 160 and also in lower courts, maximum vacancies of Judges both in High Court and also in lower courts, maximum members in UP Bar Council more than 1 lakh and which is also the largest Bar Council in the world as claimed in the website itself of UP Bar Council yet the former Chairman of UP Bar Council - Darvesh Yadav who was the first woman to get appointed to this post was murdered cold blooded right in court premises in Agra which is again in West UP on June 12, 2019 by pumping bullets on her head and stomach, maximum poverty, maximum villages more than one lakh the exact number being 107040, maximum gram panchayats at 74626, maximum fake encounters killings, maximum custody killings, maximum dowry cases, maximum bride burning cases, maximum cases of human rights violations, maximum robberies, maximum dacoities, maximum cases of crime, loot, arson and riots and here too West UP tops with Saharanpur riots, Meerut riots, Muzaffarnagar riots tarnishing our international reputation to the extent that former UN Secretary General Ban ki Moon termed UP as crime and rape capital of India and just recently we see Bahraich coming in news for communal disturbances most recently, maximum undertrials in all age groups and what not yet Centre till now in October 2024 from July 1948 when a Bench was created in Lucknow which is so close to Allahabad and where it was just not needed at all is not prepared to create even a single bench for not just West UP but for the entire UP nor even ready to attach 30 districts of West UP with more than 10 crore population which is more than majority of States with Lucknow? Area of West UP is 98,933 square km and accounts for 33.61 percent of total area of UP and has 26 districts yet no bench but Lucknow with just 62,363 square km and 12 districts has a Bench! Allahabad High Court is biggest High Court in whole of Asia as was claimed by Yogi Adityanath and many say in whole world and also is one of oldest High Court and UP Bar Council has maximum members yet has least Bench just one and so very near to Allahabad which is nothing but most senseless, shameless and stupid decision perpetuated since independence and not rectified till now! There is a political predicament that is complicating this Bench issue to be addressed effectively!

It must be asked: Why is it that the people of West UP of more than 30 districts foolishly were compelled and are still compelled most senselessly to travel all the way to Allahabad which is far away even from Lucknow where High Court Bench is located and averages 600 to 800 km on an average but the people of Nawab City i.e. Lucknow cannot travel even 200 km away to Allahabad? Most shamefully, why no one ever really cares for poorest of poor, women and infirm and physically handicapped people who can’t travel so far easily and Centre is most happy by inaugurating an international airport at Kushinagar and now again at Jewar in West UP and in Ayodhya in December 2023 which is a very good thing and has maximum airports in India and so also maximum highways but why we then see so miserliness on High Court Bench for West UP which will benefit all whether poor or rich or Hindu or Muslim or of any other religion? Centre must act now and not just keep on advancing one lame excuse or the other as a pretext for not creating a High Bench anywhere in UP other than at Lucknow where it was just not needed at all as it is so close to Allahabad and worst still the 30 districts of West UP were not attached even with Lucknow which falls 230 km earlier but right uptill Allahabad which means more than 700 km on average all the way to Allahabad to seek justice which in itself is the biggest injustice!

It must definitely be asked: When Centre in 2008 can create two High Court Benches for Karnataka which has just 6 crore population for just 4 and 8 districts only at Dharwad and Gulbarga respectively then why for 30 districts with 10 crore population West UP cannot have five or six High Court Benches as maximum number of pending cases are from West UP? Why litigants of West UP have to travel whole night and half day all the way to Allahabad? Area of West UP is 98,933 square km and accounts for 33.61 percent of total area of UP and has 26 districts yet no bench but Lucknow with just 62,363 square km and 12 districts has a bench!

We all know that for just 3 crore people of Telangana Centre approved separate High Court and separate Capital and Statehood on June 2, 2014 just like for Andhra Pradesh with population of just 4 crores by partitioning Andhra Pradesh just like Chhattisgarh was created by partitioning Madhya Pradesh in November 2000 even though population of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh combined is less than West UP alone! But most shockingly for West UP with more than 10 crores people we see that not even a High Court Bench is approved by Centre which leaves me completely speechless! Why the hell on earth Supreme Court has been so tolerant to this open most worst discrimination on distribution of High Court Benches in different States? Why lawless Bihar has not even a single High Court Bench and so also West UP which owes for majority of cases of UP?

It merits just no reiteration that the position of UP must definitely be primus inter pares which means in plain language first among equals. This stands necessitated by the irrefutable fact that UP has maximum pending cases among all the States and here too West UP accounts for majority of the pending cases and still has not even a single High Court Bench! Why has Centre truly messed up all its good work by not approving even a single Bench for West UP in last 78 years and keeps forwarding only lame excuses?

It is a no-brainer that Eastern UP alone cannot be deemed to have an indefeasible right to have both High Court and High Court Bench and in other regions like Western UP or Bundelkhand or Purvanchal not allowing even a single Bench is most horrendous because this flawed approach is against the very core basis on which our Constitution rests upon. It cannot be dismissed lightly that none other than Dr BR Ambedkar who is considered as the key architect of the Constitution himself proposed the division of Uttar Pradesh into three States that is Western, Eastern and Central and still Centre most shamelessly is not ready to concede even a single High Court Bench to West UP leave alone creating five to six High Court Benches as ideally should be the case! This alone explains why Ex-CJI Mr Jagdish Singh Khehar had once very rightly said that, One set of citizens cannot prosper at the cost of another set of citizens, for that would not be fair or unreasonable.

It must be said that Supreme Court which is the last bastion of hope for people and litigants and so also the CJI Hon’ble Dr DY Chandrachud who has been CJI for last nearly two years and who earlier was Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court for nearly three years when lawyers of West UP went on strike for nearly six months in 2014-15 just like in 2001 from July to December and so also most astoundingly strike every Saturday since last 43 years have definitely not crowned themselves with glory by leaving everything on Centre alone who has done just nothing on it! Supreme Court is final but it cannot be always infallible! It has grievously erred by not doing anything on this since last nearly 78 years!

Let’s still fervently hope that better sense prevails on it and it acts keeping in mind the larger interests of the litigants of West UP which owes for majority of cases of UP and still has not even a single Bench! How long will the litigants of West UP be made a scapegoat for no fault of theirs? To say the very least, Supreme Court just like Centre must show some sense of regret, remorse and repentance for maintaining a ‘sphinx-like silence’ on not doing anything to implement the historic Justice Jaswant Singh Commission recommendations in UP of a permanent Bench in West UP also like it was implemented in States like Maharashtra which already had multiple High Court Benches and still one more was created at Aurangabad!

The narrative that is gaining ground because of media not highlighting this Bench issue proactively is that people consider it a trivial issue which is definitely not the case! Even Centre’s role in addressing it leaves a lot to be desired! Why can’t even Centre get to the bottom of the problem which has been festering for such a long time inordinately? How long will even Centre do just nothing to check, combat and crush all those stumbling blocks that have contributed in one way or the other to stymie the chances of West UP being given a Bench as was demanded even by former PM late Mr Atal Bihari Vajpayee in 1986 right inside Parliament as Leader of Opposition?

The upshot of above discussion is that it has become indubitably clear that Centre has favoured worst discrimination in creation of High Court Benches in different States and different regions which definitely is the biggest, blatant, brutal, baseless and blind discrimination that makes an open mockery of Article 14 of Constitution when States like Madhya Pradesh which has just 7 crore population, Karnataka which has just 6 crore population have separate High Court and multiple High Court Benches but West UP with more than 10 crores population has got no Bench leave alone High Court like Tamil Nadu with just 7 crore population and Andhra Pradesh with 4 crore population and Telangana with 3 crore population have separate High Court and so also many other States who have far less population but still have High Court!

Centre must definitely take some inspiration from what CJI Hon’ble Dr DY Chandrachud has done and adopt a complete new approach in according top priority to creating new High Court Benches in West UP and other needy regions like Bundelkhand and Purvanchal in UP and so also in different States like Bihar and Rajasthan! Why can’t people’s interest take centrestage in Centre’s priority list and why can’t the 230th Report of the Law Commission of India which recommended creation of more High Court Benches in 2019 be implemented even after 5 years?

My whole take on this is: Centre is just not doing anything at all to address this long lingering issue! How long will Centre piggyback on lame excuses to deny West UP from having even a single Bench? Centre must act now and if still Centre stays reluctant to act then it is the Supreme Court which should definitely act by placing Constitution on the top and accepting the most landmark recommendations of creating a permanent High Court Bench in West UP which Hon’ble CJI Dr DY Chandrachud despite being the Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court for nearly 3 years as he himself proudly concedes and now as CJI for two years has till date just utterly failed to take suo motu cognizance of it which it is fully empowered under Article 142 of Constitution as it has done in so many other cases of much lesser significance! I still fervently hopes that he will do something on this Bench issue also in West UP before finally hanging his boots on November 10, 2024 and November 9 will be the last working day that is Saturday!

I would now like to draw the curtains with a bright sense of optimism about the future by quoting the famous Lebanese poet – Kahlil Gibran: Yesterday we obeyed kings and bent our necks before emperors. But today we kneel only to truth, follow only beauty and obey only love! Let’s fervently hope that one day or the other, we will see either Supreme Court or Centre doing something on this most decisively just like for lawless Bihar where there is not even a single Bench but at least it has High Court but West UP has not even a Bench which is truly incomprehensible and most baffling indeed! CJI Hon’ble Dr DY Chandrachud has done most commendably to herald change in the statue of Supreme Court for which he must be commended!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
In the light of the latest judgment provided by the SC for commuting the death penalty of former pm Rajiv Gandhi’s assassins to life imprisonment on the ground of excessive wait on govt and President’s part to decide their whim pleas
Shanti Bhushan v Supreme Court of India through its Registrar and another in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 789 of 2018 (Arising out of Diary No. 12405 of 2018) refused pointblank to declare that the function of allocating cases and assigning benches should be exercised by the collegium of five senior Judges instead of the Chief Justice of India.
Coming straight to the nub of the matter, let me begin at the very beginning by first and foremost expressing my full and firm support to the growing perfectly justified demand that seeks chemical castration for child rapists
Justice KS Puttaswamy (Retd) and another v Union of India has upheld the validity of Aadhaar for availing government subsidies and benefits and for filing income tax returns! The lone dissenting Judge in this landmark case is Justice Dr DY Chandrachud. He differed entirely from the majority and struck down Section 139AA.
It is most reassuring, refreshing and re consoling to note that for the first time in at least my memory have I ever noticed a Chief Justice of India who even before assuming office outlined his priorities very clearly and courageously
Manohar Lal Sharma vs Narendra Damodardas Modi dismissed a string of petitions seeking an independent probe into the 2015 Rafale deal, for registration of FIR and Court-monitored investigation by CBI into corruption allegations in Rafale deal.
Judgement by the Supreme Court about energy conservation and infrastructure laws in the state of Himachal Pradesh.
In a major and significant development, the Supreme Court which is the highest court in India has for the second time designated 37 lawyers as Senior Advocates.
On 17th October 2018, the Cannabis Act came into force and Canada became the largest country in the world with a legal marijuana marketplace.
Why Only Lawyers Are Held Liable For Accepting Foreign Funding And Not Politicians? Why is it that under our Indian law only lawyers are held liable for accepting foreign funding and not politicians? Why politicians are mostly never held accountable for accepting foreign funding?
Finally Hindus Get The Right To Worship At Entire Disputed Land And Muslims Get 5 Acre In Ayodhya
I am a student at New Law College, Bharati Vidyapeeth University studying LLB. I am currently majoring in 3 yrs LLB Course from New Law College, and have started with my last year from July 2019.
230th report of Law Commission of India, it will certainly produce more diamonds like the Chief Justice of India designate Sharad Arvind Bobde who is most invaluable and even Kohinoor diamond stands just nowhere near him
Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court Of India vs Subhash Chandra Aggarwal the office of Chief Justice of India is a public authority under the Right to Information Act
Sections 126 to l29 deal with the privilege that is attached to Professional Communications between the legal advisors and their clients. Section 126 and 128 mention the circumstances under which the legal advisor can give evidence of such professional communication.
National Federation Of Societies For Fast Justice & Anr. Vs. UOI Notifications for establishing the Gram Nyayalayas to issue the same within four weeks.. It was considering a PIL filed by National Federation Of Societies For Fast Justice.
Madhuri Jajoo vs. Manoj Jajoo has allowed the first petition for divorce by mutual consent, through the virtual hearing system.
Reepak Kansal vs. Secretary-General, Supreme Court Of India has taken a stern view of the increasing tendency to blame the Registry for listing some cases more swiftly as compared to others.
upheld the Shebait rights of the erstwhile royals of Travancore in the administration, maintenance and management of Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple in Thiruvananthapuram.
Justice R Banumathi had assumed the role of a Supreme Court Judge on 13 August 2014. She is the sixth women to be a Judge of the Supreme Court of India
Judges cannot speak out even if they are humiliated. How long can the Supreme Court and the Judges suffer the humiliation heaped regularly?
Neelam Manmohan Attavar vs Manmohan Attavar that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution would not be maintainable in order to challenge an order which has been passed by the High Court in the exercise of its judicial powers.
Jugut Ram vs. Chhattisgarh the fact that a lathi is also capable of being used as a weapon of assault, does not make it a weapon of assault simpliciter.
Sagufa Ahmed vs. Upper Assam Plywood Products Pvt. Ltd the said order extended only the period of limitation and not the period upto which delay can be condoned in exercise of discretion conferred by the statute
the legendary Kesavananda Bharati whose plea to the Apex Court is considered the real reason behind the much acclaimed Basic Structure doctrine propounded in 1973
Amar Singh vs NCT Of Delhi conviction can be based on the testimony of a single eye witness so long he is found to be wholly reliable.
Madhya Pradesh vs. Bherulalthe governments taking for granted the period of limitation prescribed. In other words, it is high time and all the governments in our country both in the Centre and the States must now
Madhya Pradesh vs. Bherulal the governments taking for granted the period of limitation prescribed.
the manner in which Bombay High Court handled the Arnab Goswami case. A vacation Bench comprising of Justices Dr DY Chandrachud and Indira Banerjee of the Supreme Court is currently hearing the petition filed by Republic TV anchor Arnab Goswami
Indian Olympics Association vs. Kerala Olympic Association civil original jurisdiction dismissed Indian Olympics Association's (IOA) plea seeking transfer of a writ petition before Kerala High Court to Delhi High Court.
In Arnab's case, Justice Dr DY Chandrachud had minced no words to say that: There has to be a message to High Courts – Please exercise your jurisdiction to uphold personal liberty
It is most shocking, most disgusting and most disheartening to read that criminals are ruling the roost and making the headlines in UP time and again
Parveen vs. State of Haryana while setting aside an order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing the plea of a man in view of absence of his counsel has observed in clear, categorical
Madras Bar Association vs Union of India that exclusion of advocates in 10 out of 19 tribunals, for consideration as judicial members is contrary to the Supreme Court judgments in Union of India v. Madras Bar Association
Inderjeet Singh Sodhi vs Chairman, Punjab State Electricity Board the dismissal of special leave petition is of no consequence on the question of law. We all must bear it in mind from now on
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Zaixhu Xie the practice of pronouncing the final orders without reasoned judgments.
It cannot be denied by anyone that government is the biggest litigator in courts and is responsible to a large extent for the huge pending cases in different states all across the country. The top court is definitely not happy with the state of affairs and the lethargic and complacent motto of Sab Chalta Hain attitude of the governments in India.
Centre has finally decided to get its act together and constitute the All India Judicial Service (AIJS) about which we have been hearing since age
Prashant Dagajirao Patil vs. Vaibhav@Sonu Arun Pawar a High Court, while exercising bail jurisdiction cannot issue directions which will have a direct bearing upon the trial.
Commercial Taxes Officer, Circle-B, Bharatpur vs M/s Bhagat Singh in exercise of itsextraordinary appellate jurisdiction that a statute must be interpreted in a just, reasonable and sensible manner
Pravat Chandra Mohanty vs Odisha refused the plea seeking compounding of offences of two police officers accused in a custodial violence case.
Sessions Judge, Bhadrak in S.T. Case No.182/392 of 2014, acquitting the Respondents from charges under Sections 302/201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code IPC
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs. M/S Navigant Technologies Pvt. Ltd. the period of limitation for filing the Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act would commence from the date on which the signed copy of the award was made available to the parties.
Niranjan Hemchandra Sashittal and another v. Maharashtra in page 386 of the citation that: The quantum of bribe is immaterial for judging gravity of the offence under PC Act. Proceedings under PC Act cannot be quashed on the ground of delay in conclusion particularly where the accused adopted dilatory tactics.
The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has proposed to introduce the Cinematograph (Amendment) Bill, 2021.The new proposal would amend the Cinematograph Act of 1952 to grant the Centre "revisionary powers" and allow it to "re-examine" films that have already been certified by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC).
I have not come across a single person in my life who has not complained of milk being not up to the mark and even in my own life I don't remember how many times my mother
Akhila Bharata Kshatriya Mahasabha v/s Karnataka barring installation of statues or construction of any structure in public roads, pavements, sideways and other public utility places.
Manohar Lal Sharma vs Union of India has made it clear that State won't get a free pass by mere mention of national security.
State of MP vs Ghisilal the civil courts has no jurisdiction to try suit relating to land which is subject-matter of ceiling proceedings, Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.
Deserving cases in Supreme Court also don't get listed in time and keep pending for a long time and not so deserving cases get listed most promptly when backed by eminent law firms and senior lawyers
Top