In an interesting turn of events after nearly three decades, we come to see that more than 16 months after refusing to commute the death penalty of former Punjab Chief Minister Mr Beant Singh murder case convict Bhai Balwant Singh Rajoana in the notable judgment titled Balwant Singh vs Union of India and Ors, the Supreme Court has finally agreed to re-examine the long pending issue afresh thus igniting a fresh glimmer of hope in this leading case.
It must be disclosed here for the exclusive benefit of my esteemed readers that a Bench of Supreme Court which is led by Hon’ble Mr Justice BR Gavai and so also comprising of Hon’ble Mr Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Hon’ble Mr KV Viswanathan has issued notice to the Centre, the Punjab State Government and so also the Chandigarh administration pertaining to the delay in deciding Rajoana’s mercy petition and so also has asked the Centre, the Chandigarh administration and the Punjab State Government to respond within four weeks to Rajoana’s fresh petition for commutation of his death penalty on the strong premise that the Centre has utterly failed to take a decision on his long pending March 25, 2012 mercy petition till date. It must be mentioned here that this petition that has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution seeks the commutation of his death sentence citing ‘extraordinary’ and ‘inordinate delay’ of one year and four months in the resolution of his mercy petition which is still awaiting a decision from the President of India.
It is an undeniable and unpalatable truth that after being convicted of assassinating the former Punjab CM Mr Beant Singh in 1995, Rajoana has been in jail for 28 long years, awaiting his execution which is worse than even death penalty. This alone explains why I have always been a strongest proponent favouring the abolition of life sentence in my personal capacity. It also cannot be denied that Rajoana earlier was a police constable in Punjab State Police which he had joined on October 1, 1987 and definitely was not some hard core merciless terrorist who was trained most rigorously in Pakistan which has to be certainly borne in mind while considering his case most sympathetically and he was ostensibly most aggrieved and terribly upset by the sudden and unexplained disappearance of upwards of twenty-five thousand of Sikh civilians in Punjab between 1992 and 1995 or were killed and their bodies cremated by the police in unexplained extrajudicial executions as pointed out in esteemed web portal Wikipedia itself which cannot be ever denied!
What also must be definitely mentioned here is that the former Punjab CM Mr Beant Singh and 16 others were killed in an explosion that took place just outside the Civil Secretariat in Chandigarh on August 31, 1995. What also must be noted is that Rajoana was sentenced to death in 2007 by a Special Court. It is most disconcerting to note that his mercy petition has been hanging fire for an inordinately long period of more than 12 years which is an excruciatingly long spell which clearly defies logic and is truly incomprehensible.
It cannot be taken lightly that in his will, Rajoana had clearly said that his wish was to donate his eyes to Lakhwinder Singh (Ragi at Golden Temple Amritsar) and his kidney, heart or any other body parts to needy patients. This clearly demonstrates his humanitarian nature which makes him definitely more better eligible for being considered for mercy and cannot be just glossed over while considering his mercy petition! What also cannot be ever lightly dismissed is that on 28 March 2012, the India’s Home Ministry had stayed the execution following the clemency appeals that had been filed by the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) which is a world reputed Sikh organization with impeccable credentials which serves to make his case for mercy plea even more stronger! Not just this, he was also on 23 March 2012 awarded the title of Living Martyr by the Akal Takht which is the highest temporal seat of the Khalsa!
What also merits mentioning is that on May 3, 2023, the top court had refused to commute his death sentence to life imprisonment and had asked the Centre to take a decision on his mercy plea as and when it is deemed necessary. What is of immense significance that deserves mentioning and noting is that a three-Judge Bench led by Hon’ble Mr Justice BR Gavai had said clearly in no uncertain terms that:
The stand of the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) to defer the decision on the Mercy Petition of the petitioner is also a decision for the reasons given thereunder. It actually amounts to a decision declining to grant the same for the present. However, we need to note that the Bench had directed that the competent authority in due course of time would again as and when it is deemed necessary, may deal with the Mercy Petition, and take a further decision.
Adding more to it, the Bench had further stated that:
We also find that the Ministry of Home Affairs, upon material consideration of various reports from its different branches, has come to the conclusion that the consideration may be deferred as it could have an impact of compromising the security of the nation or creating law and order situation. It would not be within the domain of this Court to delve upon the decision of the competent authority to defer taking any decision at present. It is within the domain of the executive to take a call on such sensitive issues. As such this Court does not deem it appropriate to issue any further directions.
What also needs to be definitely borne in mind is that in his fresh petition, Rajoana has while striking a very passionate and emotional plea fervently submitted pointing out clearly, cogently and convincingly that:
About 01 year and 04 months have now elapsed since disposal of the petitioner’s first writ petition, and a decision on his fate still hangs under a cloud of uncertainty, causing deep mental trauma and anxiety to the petitioner every single living day, which by itself is a sufficient ground for exercise of this court’s Article 32 powers to allow the reliefs sought. There is a lot of merit in what has been pointed out. It cannot be denied that even the killers of former PM late Mr Rajiv Gandhi were later freed on the ground of a huge delay in deciding the mercy petition even though they had been trained by the dreaded terror organization LTTE in Sri Lanka and their role was clearly proved and they were Sri Lankans and were not an Indian unlike we see in case of Bhai Balwant Singh Rajoana who is an Indian Sikh having served earlier in Punjab police for many years and was not a member of some terror organization nor a foreign national! Still why should he be discriminated against and not accorded mercy as we saw in case of killers of former PM late Mr Rajiv Gandhi? This is what merits honest introspection by the top court and so also by the Centre!
Above all, what is definitely beyond a straw of doubt most significant to note is that while contending that Rajoana has been in jail for more than 28 years and on death row for 17 years, none other than senior counsel of Supreme Court – Mr Mukul Rohatgi who has been the former 12th Attorney General of India from 19 June 2014 to 18 June 2017 and who declined to again become Attorney General when offered for second time and I can say this with full sense of responsibility without any hesitation of any kind that he is one of the most eminent and most distinguished legal luminary, lawyer and jurist that our motherland India has ever produced in its soil contended most robustly on behalf of the convict Rajoana that he can’t be made to wait indefinitely on the ground of national security! Absolutely right! There can be just no denying or disputing it!
We also cannot ever dare to gloss over that Mr Mukul Rohatgi had earlier also most vehemently argued that keeping the petitioner on death row while sitting over his mercy plea for such a long time definitely violated his fundamental rights! Where is there any doubt about it? Mr Rohatgi’s most strong and most valid contentions in defence of Rajoana cannot be brushed aside lightly by even the top court itself.
In conclusion, it is now high time and the Supreme Court must definitely take a most sympathetic view of the long pending mercy petition of Bhai Balwant Singh Rajoana that has been proceeding at a snail’s pace and so also the huge respect that he commands among the Sikh community. I don’t think that in India there can be any person better suited than Mr Mukul Rohatgi to argue his case most passionately, most rationally and so also most convincingly and his mercy petition plea must be therefore dealt with most sympathetically considering what all Mr Rohatgi pointed out and above all the most irrefutable fact that he hails from Sikh community which has played the most stellar role in building a modern India without whom India can never be complete and who have always been totally committed in identifying themselves completely with India! His past track record as a police constable also cannot be brushed aside lightly nor what I have already pointed out hereinabove!
The ball is now in court of Apex Court! Let us hope fervently even now that his case will be decided most sympathetically by the Supreme Court and he too will be, to say the very least, given a chance to once again merge in the national mainstream by approving his mercy petition as he has so humbly requested! This will definitely go a long way in strengthening the credibility of the Supreme Court in the eyes of the people both in India and so also in abroad and so also of Centre not only in India but all across the globe if it plays its cards well in ensuring strictly that he again is most fairly allowed to breathe in fresh air after nearly three decades of rotting in jail! It will also instill more unflinching faith among the Sikh community not just in India but also in abroad which has always played the most pivotal role in not just building a modern India but also in always protecting Hindus whenever the need arose even against Mughals and Sikh Gurus like Guru Arjan Dev, Guru Teg Bahadur and Guru Gobind Singh among others never hesitated in shedding their own life or lives of their children for the protection of Hindus which is all recorded in history!
Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh
SC To Re-Examine Bhai Balwant Singh Rajoana’s Plea For Commuting Death Penalty
Posted in:
Criminal Law
Sun, Sep 29, 24, 12:07, 3 Months ago
comments: 0 - hits: 10196
Balwant Singh vs UOI, the Supreme Court has finally agreed to re-examine the long pending issue afresh thus igniting a fresh glimmer of hope in this leading case.
|
Comments
There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.