Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Friday, September 20, 2024

Sharjeel Imam Bail Plea Definitely Deserves Early Hearing

Posted in: Civil Laws
Thu, Sep 5, 24, 17:35, 2 Weeks ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 9870
2020 Delhi riots accused, JNU scholar and student activist Sharjeel Imam who was seeking early hearing of his bail application in connection with the Delhi riots larger conspiracy case

It is a matter of deep regret that the Delhi High Court on September 4, 2024 rejected a plea that had been filed by 2020 Delhi riots accused, JNU scholar and student activist Sharjeel Imam who was seeking early hearing of his bail application in connection with the Delhi riots larger conspiracy case which was scheduled to be heard on October 7. It is worth noting that the Division Bench of Delhi High Court headed by Hon’ble Mr Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and also comprising Hon’ble Mr Justice Girish Kathpalia took the stand that since the matter was already listed for hearing on October 7 which they themselves listed, there was no ground to advance the date. It must be disclosed here that the prosecution had named him as the main conspirator behind the North-East Delhi riots that took place on February 2020 which had left 53 people dead and over 700 injured. It would be worthwhile to mention that this same Division Bench had on August 29 posted the bail pleas of nine accused in the larger conspiracy case of the northeast Delhi riots including former JNU student Umar Khalid and Imam for October 7.

It must be also informed here for my esteemed readers exclusive indulgence that Sharjeel Imam who was arrested in January 2020 was at that point of time pursuing his final year of PhD in modern history from JNU and has now been incarcerated for more than four years. He also argued most fervently that being a research scholar who has spent his entire life seeking academic pursuits, he is unable to pursue his education and graduate with a doctorate degree. It must be also laid bare here that Sharjeel Imam along with other accused are facing allegations of pre-planned conspiracy to allegedly cause riots in northeast Delhi between February 23, 2020, and February 25, 2020, with offences lodged under the Indian Penal Code, Prevention of Damage to Public Property (PDPP) Act, Arms Act and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 (UAPA).

There can be just no gainsaying that as long as the charges are not proved in court, the accused cannot be judged guilty by media trial and has every right to get bail. It cannot be lost sight of that the Apex Court in various judicial pronouncements has time and again reiterated the famous maxim that:
Bail is the rule and jail is the exception. It must be mentioned here that Sharjeel Imam was arrested by the Delhi Police in 2020. He has been in judicial custody in this high profile case since January 28, 2020. He stated that his bail plea has been pending for the last 28 months.

It must be mentioned here that Sharjeel Imam was arrested by the Delhi Police in 2020 and charged with the offence of sedition by the Delhi Police in 2020 for allegedly making inflammatory speeches at Aligarh Muslim University and Jamia Millia Islamia that pertained to the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 (CAA). He was later also charged with Section 13 that pertains to punishment for unlawful activities under the stringent provisions of the most draconian Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 that was invoked against him under which the maximum punishment that has been prescribed is seven years. It must be revealed here that Sharjeel Imam had moved the Court for early hearing of his bail plea stating clearly that it has been pending since April 2022.

It is really most astonishing to learn as pointed out by Sharjeel Imam himself that the petition was listed for hearing more than 60 times before seven different Benches of the High Court. This is truly incomprehensible. It is for the Delhi High Court to come clean as to why so many times his bail plea was not heard which is most baffling indeed!

With a very heavy heart, Sharjeel Imam lamented shelling out his innermost feelings saying most unequivocally stating that:
It is most humbly stated that the present Appeal has been pending adjudication before this Hon’ble Court since 29.04.2022, on which date, the Hon’ble Court was pleased to issue notice to the Respondent. It is pertinent to mention here that since the issuance of notice, the present Appeal has been listed for hearing at least 62 times before 7 different Division Benches of this Hon’ble Court, however, on account of frequent changes in the composition of benches owing to roster change, recusal and transfer of Hon’ble Judges, the hearing in the matter never concluded and thereby having led to a fresh cycle of hearing beginning every such time. This is really most telling and a sad commentary on the existing deplorable state of affairs even in the Delhi High Court, what to speak about the lower courts where the conditions are much more worse! This has to change now if the faith of the people in judiciary has to be retained!

Adding more to what is stated above, Sharjeel Imam further also added that there is no likelihood of the trial concluding anytime soon since the police is yet to conclude its probe and more than 1000 witnesses along with lakh of pages of documents are to be examined by the Court. There is definitely a lot of merit in what Sharjeel Imam has pointed out. There is no reason why an accused who has still not been heard should be kept languishing in jail for an inordinately long period of time!

The billion dollar question to ask here is: What if he ultimately is proved innocent? Who will return his days which he had to spend in jail for no fault of his? We have seen in so many cases that an undertrial accused spends more time in jail than if he had actually committed the offence due to the trial not being conducted in time! This definitely is most disgusting and cannot be ever justified under any circumstances!

While pleading for the early hearing of the case, it was contended by the lawyers named Talib Mustafa and so also Ahmad Ibrahim before the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court on behalf of Sharjeel Imam that:
It is pertinent to mention that the trial in the present matter has been pending before the Ld. Special Court since 2020, however, the investigation by the Prosecuting agency is still ongoing and charges have not yet been framed so far. Further, the Prosecution seeks to examine more than 1,000 witnesses in the matter and the documents being relied upon run into lakhs of pages. Needless to say, the trial in the present case shall be protracted and will take a long time to even commence, much less conclude.

To recapitulate, it must be definitely also recalled here that the advocates Talib Mustafa and Ahmad Ibrahim who had appeared on behalf of Sharjeel Imam had moved a plea for the early/urgent hearing of Criminal Appeal seeking the setting aside of the order of 11.04.2022 that was passed by Karkardooma Court by which the regular bail application of the Appellant was dismissed. It was also pointed out by the lawyers of Sharjeel Imam that by the provisions of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act, the appeals that had been preferred under Section 21 of the NIA Act shall as far as possible be disposed of within 3 months from the date of admission of the appeal. But in Sharjeel case, the early hearing has been pending for an inordinately long period of time which definitely cannot be ever justified on one pretext or the other!

It is definitely a matter of deep regret that the Delhi High Court did not appear to be convinced by the arguments that were made by him and his lawyers. We thus see that the Division Bench of Delhi High Court headed by Hon’ble Mr Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and also comprising of Hon’ble Mr Justice Girish Kathpalia thus rejected the plea that was made by Sharjeel Imam. He will thus have to wait further till October 7 for just his case to be heard on merits.

In conclusion, it is high time and now the Courts must be most firm in granting bail to the accused with certain conditions so that the accused does not have to spend a huge time in jail without even charges being framed against him and without his being even heard in any competent court which is nothing but the worst travesty of justice which jeopardizes the whole life of the accused without even being heard which definitely is most unfortunate cannot be ever justified under any circumstances. It also merits no reiteration that the brazen media trial that we see these days so galore in so many high profile cases must stop immediately so that the concerned accused is not prematurely convicted by media trial without any evidence but by court trial! No denying it!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top