Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Saturday, December 21, 2024

Sisters-in-law Compelling Woman To Show Clean House On Video Call Is Sadistic: Bombay HC In S.498A Case

Posted in: Family Law
Fri, Aug 2, 24, 17:34, 5 Months ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 12636
Hardik Prakash Shah vs Maharashtra has refused to quash the proceedings under Section 498A (Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) against a man and his family.

In a major development, we see that the Bombay High Court in a learned, laudable, landmark, logical and latest judgment titled Hardik Prakash Shah and Ors vs State of Maharashtra and Anr in Criminal Writ Petition No. 13446 of 2023 and cited in Neutral Citation No.: 2024:BHC-AS:29528-DB that was pronounced as recently as on July 22, 2024 has refused to quash the proceedings under Section 498A (Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) against a man and his family.

We see that a Division Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr Justice AS Gadkari and Hon’ble Ms Justice Dr Neela Kokhale observed that the three sisters-in-law compelling the complainant to show on a video call that the house was clean was a peculiar and sadistic form of ill treatment. The Bombay High Court found merit in the FIR and declined to quash the FIR. We thus see that the petition was dismissed.

At the very outset, this brief, brilliant, bold and balanced judgment authored by Hon’ble Ms Justice Dr Neela Kokhale for a Division Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr Justice AS Gadkari and herself sets the ball in motion by first and foremost putting forth in para 1 that:
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and with the consent of the parties, petition is heard finally.

It would be certainly worthwhile to mention here that the Division Bench then while disclosing the main purpose of the petition very clearly states succinctly in para 2 of this robust judgment observing precisely that,The Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.406 of 2023 dated 1st June 2023 registered with the Tilak Nagar Police Station, Brihanmumbai City for offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 406, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’), the consequent charge-sheet and criminal proceedings bearing C.C.No.1752/PW/2023 pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate, 34th Court, Vikroli, Mumbai.

Of course, the Division Bench then reveals in para 3 that:
The Petitioners are the husband, father-in-law and three sisters-in-law of the Respondent No.2 (‘Complainant’) respectively.

To put things in perspective, the Division Bench envisages in para 4 that, Facts of the case in brief are as follows:

  1. It is the case of the Complainant as discerned from the FIR that she married the Petitioner No.1 on 19th December 2021 and started residing at the matrimonial home along with the Petitioner Nos.1 and 2. The other Petitioners were married and were residing in their respective matrimonial homes. She contends that the entire expenses of the marriage were incurred by her father. It is the specific contention of the Complainant that the three sisters-in-law although residing in their separate houses indulged in interfering in the household of their brother. One such instance of this is they deliberately removed the house help from the Petitioner No.1’s house and directed the Complainant to do all the household work herself.

    They directed her to show them via what’s app video call the house as cleaned by her. They persistently directed her by text messages on her phone regarding what she should make for break-fast, lunch and dinner. They made a what’s app group comprising of all the Petitioners and they continued to berate the Complainant and complain about her to the Petitioner No.1. Even her husband abused her and dug up quarrels on petty issues. He suspected her character and abused her on this count also. He refused to have conjugal relations with the Complainant on the pretext that he was diabetic.
     
  2. On 10th October 2022 at 10.30 pm in the night, sister-in-law Kajal called the Complainant and started abusing her regarding cleaning the house. Her husband also joined and snatched the mobile from her hand and deleted the entire call record. He abused her and pushed her. Next day, all the three sisters-in-law came to her house and abused her in filthy language and asked her to leave the house. The Petitioner No.2 also joined in the abuse. They all demanded gifts, etc. from her parents. Ultimately, they all quarreled with her and drove her out of the house. They have retained all the jewellery comprising her ‘streedhan’ with them and have refused to return the same.
     
  3. The Complainant has thus registered the FIR.


For information, the Division Bench then lays bare in para 5 stating that:
Mr. Vrushabh Savla, learned Counsel appears for the Petitioner and Mr. Prerak Chaudhary learned Counsel represents the Respondent No.2. Mr. V. N. Sagare, learned APP appears for the State.

On the one hand, the Bench states in para 6 that:
Mr. Savla submitted that the complaint is nothing but a matrimonial dispute, which has been given a criminal colour by misusing the due process of law. He states that, the Complainant has influenced the Police and had threatened to implicate them in false criminal cases. He also said that, the Complainant is trying to extort money from the Petitioners by issuing a notice through her Advocate demanding monthly maintenance. Mr. Savla further contends that, the parties have decided to file a divorce petition by mutual consent before the Family Court at Bandra and the draft of the same was already shared by the Petitioner No.1’s uncle with the Complainant’s father. He finally stated that, Section 498-A of the IPC is being abused and has already come under heavy criticism from the Delhi High Court. He thus, states that, there are no specific allegations against the Petitioners and hence, the FIR deserves to be quashed.

On the other hand, the Division Bench mentions in para 7 that:
Mr. Chaudhary drew our attention to the specific allegations appearing in the FIR against all the Petitioners. He also read the statements of witnesses namely, the parents of the Complainant as well as her uncle. All the statements corroborate the story of the Complainant in the FIR. He further stated that, the ‘Streedhan’ of the Complainant has been unlawfully retained by the Petitioners and they have refused to hand over the same. Furthermore, he also contended that, the Petitioners had treated the Complainant with utmost amount of cruelty as is contemplated under Section 498-A of the IPC. Hence, he prayed for dismissal of the Petition.

To be sure, the Division Bench points out in para 8 that:
Mr. Sagare, learned APP supported the case of the Complainant and drew our attention to the evidence from the charge-sheet.

Most significantly, what constitutes the actual cornerstone of this notable judgment is then encapsulated in para 9 postulating aptly that:
Having gone through the contents of the FIR in detail, we find that, specific and categoric roles are attributed to each Petitioner independently and collectively. A fair reading of the FIR reveals that, the complainant, a woman-a newlywed daughter-in-law was pitted against the might of the five Petitioners, who were abusing and ill treating her on petty issues. The sole aim appears to be to extort money from her and her parents.

This is clear from the fact that, even after driving her out of the matrimonial home, they have refused to hand over her ‘Streedhan’ comprising of valuable jewellery and her articles. The allegations against the sisters-in-law pertaining to compelling the Complainant to show them the house cleaned by her on what’s app video call appears to be a peculiar and a sadist manner of ill treatment. This is enough to cause apprehension in the mind of the Complainant that, there was danger to her life and limb at the hands of the Petitioners.

It is worth noting that the Division Bench notes in para 10 that:
We are unable to accept the arguments advanced by Mr. Savla since we are not required to examine his defence at this stage. It is settled position of law that under the extraordinary jurisdiction of Article 226 of the Constitution of India that, the High Court must not conduct a mini-trial at the time of hearing a Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) for quashing of the FIR.

While citing a recent and relevant case law, the Division Bench enunciates in para 11 that:
The Supreme Court in its decision in the case of Priyanka Jaiswal v. The State of Jharkhand and Ors. reported in 2024 INSC 357, has observed as under:

13…...This Court in catena of judgments has consistently held that at the time of examining the prayer for quashing of the criminal proceedings, the Court exercising extra-ordinary jurisdiction can neither undertake to conduct a mini trial, nor enter into appreciation of evidence of a particular case. The correctness or otherwise of the allegations made in the complaint cannot be examined on the touchstone of probable defence that the accused may raise to stave off the prosecution and any such misadventure by the Courts resulting in proceedings being quashed would be set aside.….

Be it noted, the Division Bench as a corollary notes in para 12 that:
The allegations in the FIR prima facie disclose commission of the alleged offences. For the reasons set out above, we are not inclined to quash the FIR and the consequent criminal proceedings arising therefrom. In this view of the matter, the Petition is dismissed.

Finally, the Division Bench then concludes by holding in para 13 that:
Rule is accordingly discharged.

In sum, we thus see clearly that the Bombay High Court found that a prima facie case under Section 498-A of IPC was made out from the allegations in the FIR. It also slammed as sadistic the sisters-in-law compelling women to show clean house on video call. So we see that the petition of the petitioners was thus dismissed. Very rightly so!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Abortion (or miscarriage) may occur spontaneously, in which case it is of no interest to the criminal law; or it may be deliberately induced, when it is a serious crime
To my understanding the MTP Act 1971 allows for abortions only under the following conditions:
Annulment of marriage: An annulment case can be initiated by either the husband or the wife in the marriage
Subject to the provisions of this Act and to the rules made thereunder, a petition for divorce may be presented to the District Court by both the parties together on the ground that they have been living separately
The people of India belong to different religions and faiths. They are governed by different sets of personal laws in respect of matters relating to family affairs, i.e., marriage, divorce, succession.
India a country of cultural values and rituals, ceremonies cannot afford to plunge into western society. But since growing economy and people getting more and more aware
The people of India belong to different religions and faiths. They are governed by different sets of personal laws in respect of matters relating to family affairs, i.e., marriage, divorce, succession.
Conditions relating to solemnization of foreign marriages.-A marriage between parties one of whom at least is a citizen of India may be solemnized under this Act by or before a Marriage Officer in a foreign country, if, at the time of the marriage, the following conditions are fulfilled
Here is a list of stages in a Contest Divorce Proceedings
Your fitness as a parent goes to be questioned in any custody dispute. Do not offer your spouse equivalent any facts
The people of India belong to different religions and faiths. They are governed by different sets of personal laws in respect of matters relating to family affairs,
It has to be stated at the very outset that in a landmark judgment with far reaching consequences, the Supreme Court on May 6, 2018 in Nandkumar & Anr v The State of Kerala & Ors in Criminal Appeal No. 597 of 2018 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4488 of 2017
The Bombay High Court in Neelam Choudhary V/s UOI in Writ Petition while refusing a plea seeking termination of pregnancy held that matrimonial discord cannot be considered as a reason for permitting termination of pregnancy by invoking provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.
Mahadevappa v Karnataka upheld the conviction of a man accused of dowry death, relying largely on the evidence of his deceased wife's parents and relatives. The Apex Court Bench also upheld the High Court finding that this was a case of homicidal death and not a case of accidental death.
Section 21, which purports to provide for legitimacy of children of annulled marriages, appears to be productive of arbitrary and incongruous results when compared to the analogous provisions of the Hindu marriage Act and the Special Marriage Act.
Judicial Separation under section 22 of Divorce Act and Husband not entitled to inherit wife’s property, wife not disentitled
Before the enactment of this Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, a Muslim woman, who was divorced by or from her husband, was granted a right to livelihood from her quondam husband in the shape of maintenance under the provisions of Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure until she remarried.
Complete guidelines on Dissolution of marriage by mutual consent section 10A - Christian Divorce in India
Sunil Kumar vs J&K held in no uncertain terms that an educated woman is supposed to be fully aware of consequences of having sex with a man before marriage. She cannot voluntarily first have sex with her own free will and later term it as rape or a sexual assault on her..
For NRIs, marriage registration is compulsory. The registration period for non-resident’s marriage is 30 days from the day of solemnization. It will be a precautionary measure to lessen the cases of abandoned wives and domestic violence by the non-residents. In case, the marriage remains unregistered, the spouses can be litigated.
There are many NRIs who are married, but still their certificate shows single status. The Registration of Marriage of Non-Residents bill has been passed.
Rupali Devi v State of Uttar Pradesh has laid down categorically that women can file matrimonial cases, including criminal matters pertaining to cruelty from the place where they have taken shelter after leaving or being driven out of their matrimonial home.
The UK citizen has decided to marry with a girl from India. Where can he collect from the marriage certificate in India? Is unmarried certificate required?
Sheenu Mahendru vs Sangeeta and Soniya that the persistent efforts of a wife to compel her husband to get separated from his mother constitute an act of cruelty. The Division Bench thus allowed the appeal of a husband who had sought divorce on the ground of cruelty by wife.
Ravinder Yadav Vs Padmini @ Payal has categorically and convincingly held that mere aggressive behaviour and sadness of mood of wife does not mean that the wife is spoiling the atmosphere of her matrimonial home.
To Protect the rights of married Muslim women and to prohibit divorce by pronouncing to talaq by their husbands and to provide for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Seventieth Year of the Republic of India as follows
SG Vs RKG held that irretrievable breakdown of marriage alone cannot be a ground of divorce and can only be considered as a circumstance by the Court if it is merged with cruelty.
The NRI Marriage Act is proposed to be amended at the beginning of this year. The propositions were tabled while keeping the surging cases of abandoning wives by non-residents of India.
Girish Singh Vs The State of Uttarakhand the Supreme Court has observed that the conviction under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code can be made only if the woman was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or his relatives which must be for or in connection with any demand for dowry, soon before her death.
basic rights and those men who insult them by resorting to triple talaq are not able to escape the long arms of the law. It took three attempts to make sure that ultimately it becomes a law.
Muslims like triple talaq and nikah halala by which if a husband pronounces triple talaq and he wants to marry her again then the women first has to undergo marriage with some other men then take divorce from him and then marry her former husband.
Whether where wife had been responsible for her atrocious allegations, actions and behaviour, same amounted to cruelty to husband? and the Hon'ble court held Yes.
The certificate of no marriage determines that its bearer is unmarried and in a capacity to solemnize marriage with anyone. India has SDM office, MEA and embassy to get it attested. The person can visit the notary officer for getting its affidavit first, showing all authentic proves of birth, address and citizenship.
R Srinivas Kumar v. R Shametha Can exercise its inherent powers under Article 142 of the Constitution for dissolution of a marriage, even if the facts of the case do not provide a ground in law on which the divorce could be granted.
Smt. Surbhi Trivedi Vs. Gaurav Trivedi held that in a matrimonial dispute, if gender of one of the parties is questioned by the other party, the court may direct such a party to undergo medical examination and the plea of violation of privacy shall not be tenable
When summons are served upon you as a respondent in any petition, you may yourself appear before the concerned Court. You may also appear by a pleader or Advocate, whom you should properly instruct so that he is able to answer all material questions before the Court.
The non-availability of birth certificate in India is one of the lesser known documents that could be an alternative to apply for the birth certificate even after 30 years of the age.
Even in the best family circumstances, with pristine intentions, preparing for adversity is a wise choice when separation becomes eminent.
Gurjit Singh vs Punjab the accused cannot be automatically held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the IPC by employing the presumption under Section 113-A of the Indian Evidence Act.
It must be stated forthright that the demand of money for any purpose from the wife can be termed as demand for dowry. The husband would be liable in such cases for demanding dowry even though it may not seem like dowry.
Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar v/s Ramchandra Bhimrao Kondalkar that if allegations of adultery are proved against the wife in a marriage, she is not entitled to maintenance. A wife is entitled to claim maintenance only if she is able to prove that all the allegations of adultery are wrong.
Divorce by Mutual Consent - Divorce petition by husband on adultery - Divorce Petition filed within few days of marriage - Divorce Petition-Provisions of mutatis mutandis,applies and when Can Divorced persons re-marry
Even though most people want things to go well, not everything is always perfect in our families. And like charity, even conflict begins at home.
Soumitra Kumar Nahar v/s Parul Naharthat the parental responsibility of the couple does not end even if there is a breakdown of marriage. It is the child who always suffer immeasurably and invaluably due to the ego clashes of the couple! sought to affix responsibility on the parents which they owe towards the child
Can you get legally married in Spain? Both religious weddings and Civil ceremonies are legally recognized as par Spainish law. Infact in 2005 Sex marriage has been legalized.
Article examines need for divorce by mutual consent and explores evolution of divorce. Application of consent theory under Hindu law. How has the theory been applied in other civil and common law countries. Conclusion- How to evolve the consent theory further?
Getting a divorce can be one of the most difficult decisions that you ever take in your life. Apart from the sentiments involved, there is typically a load of legal and financial implications for both the parties, which unless amicably settled can lead to a messy legal situation apart from details of your personal life coming into the public domain
Top