Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Tuesday, July 2, 2024

The Uniform Civil Code, Uttarakhand Act, 2024 Is A Right Step In The Right Direction

Posted in: Civil Laws
Mon, Jun 24, 24, 16:50, 1 Week ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 14440
States should not emulate such a worthy step in order to ensure that it is uniformly implemented in all States all across India.

It must be stated right at the outset before stating anything else that The Uniform Civil Code Act, Uttarakhand Act, 2024 is definitely a right step in the right direction and there is no reason why other States should not emulate such a worthy step in order to ensure that it is uniformly implemented in all States all across India. It must be noted here that this Act is a legislation that has been operationalized to establish a common set of personal laws that governs several key matters like marriage, divorce, adoption, inheritance and maintenance for all citizens of Uttarakhand irrespective of their religion, gender, caste or sex exempting only tribal communities from its purview. We must also pay attention here towards the key point that the Bill was finally after a lot of deliberations, discussions and so also debate introduced in the Uttarakhand Assembly by the Chief Minister – Mr Pushkar Singh Dhami on 7 February, 2024 and was finally passed by both the chambers on the same day.

It is imperative to note that all the 70 members of Uttarakhand Assembly voted in favour of the Bill. When there can be consensus in Uttarakhand on passing the Uniform Civil Code among all the different political parties then why can’t it be done nationally as encapsulated in Article 44 of the Constitution which lays down that the State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India? All that is needed is a political will to ensure that it is implemented nationally all across the country!

For the esteemed readers exclusive indulgence and for their exclusive benefit, it must be definitely mentioned here that it was on the 11th of March, 2024 that the 15th President of India – Hon’ble Ms Droupadi Murmu gave her final assent to the historic Uniform Civil Code, Uttarakhand, 2024 under Article 201 of the Constitution of India. It must be noted that the Bill has seven Schedules and 392 Sections focusing primarily on four key areas – marriage, divorce, inheritance and live-in relationships. There are many commendable provisions for ending the most reprehensible practices of polygamy and polyandry which already in The Hindu Marriage Act had been very rightly banned in 1955 which means nearly 70 years ago and so also Nikah Halala among others besides giving equal inheritance rights to males and females without any discrimination on basis of gender. If a case like Nikah Halala comes to light, there is a provision of three-years imprisonment or a fine of Rs 1 lakh or both. There are also several provisions for registration of live-in relationships and failure to comply with can invite hail terms upto six months and/or fine upto Rs 25,000.

To recapitulate, let us chronologically discuss the manner in which the Uniform Civil Code was enacted in Uttarakhand:
Feb 12, 2022 : The plan for the creation of Uniform Civil Code in the State of Uttarakhand was announced by the Chief Minister – Mr Pushkar Singh Dhami.

May 27, 2022 : Five-member expert panel headed by the former Supreme Court Judge and so also eminent jurist Ms Ranjana Prakash Desai to study and draft a Uniform Civil Code law for the State of Uttarakhand. The Committee also comprised of retired Sikkim High Court Judge – Permod Kohli, activist Manu Gaur, retired bureaucrat Shatrughan Singh and Vice Chancellor of Doon University Surekha Dangwal. The report submitted by them ran into 7440 pages and four volumes.

August 22, 2022 : Two sub-panels formed to assist the Committee.

Sept 8, 2022 : Portal launched to receive suggestions formed. Panel conducted 43 meetings with different stakeholders. 2.33 lakh suggestions received from people from all across state. 61,000 through portal, 36,000 via post, 1.1 lakh in person and 24,000 by email regarding its drafting and implementation. It would be quite relevant to note here that points were taken from similar laws that have been enacted in Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Indonesia, France, Nepal, Germany, Japan, Canada and Azerbaijan.

Feb 2, 2024 : The five-member expert panel submitted its report and so also the UCC Bill Draft to the Uttarakhand State Government led by Chief Minister – Mr Pushkar Singh Dhami.

Feb 4, 2024 : Dhami-led State Cabinet clears the draft after a lot of deliberations.

Feb 6, 2024 : State Government tables the Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code Bill, 2024 in the State Assembly.

Feb 7, 2024 : The Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code Bill, 2024 is finally passed by the State Assembly unanimously with no one voting against or no one abstaining. This is what makes it most special and generates high hopes that this can be done nationally also by consensus as we have seen in case of Uttarakhand.

March 11, 2023 : The 15th President of India – Hon’ble Ms Droupadi Murmu gave her final assent to the historic Uniform Civil Code, Uttarakhand, 2024 under Article 201 of the Constitution of India.

It must be definitely mentioned here that soon after the Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code Bill was approved by the State Assembly, the Chief Minister – Mr Pushkar Singh Dhami termed it as a ‘historic day for the State and the country’ saying most confidently that:
The Bill will help end the harmful and evil practices targeting girls and women. UCC aims for societal uniformity empowering women to be self-reliant. He further said that:
In 2022, before the Assembly elections, we had taken a pledge to implement UCC and I am so happy that it is taking shape now. Each one of us who is associated with the process, including the people of the State, will be a part of history. It gives me great pleasure that a law that will usher in equality for all is coming out of Devbhoomi Uttarakhand.

We must pay attention here that even Union Law and Justice Minister – Mr Arjun Ram Meghwal on June 16, 2024 expressed hope about implementation of the Uniform Civil Code, contending that some States have started to bring it into force. He made the remark while speaking his mind at the sidelines of a conference on ‘India’s Progressive Path in the Administration of Criminal Justice System’ in Kolkata. He said very frankly that:
In BJP manifesto, we have mentioned about the UCC. There are states like Goa and Uttarakhand that have started implementing them. The UCC is still on the BJP’s agenda.

It cannot be lost on us that even JD(U) leader Mr KC Tyagi said that while the party is not against UCC, it wants that such a move should come through a consensus. For this to happen, it must be conceded that leaders of Opposition must behave like the leaders of Uttarakhand where it has already become a law with the President giving final assent to it! There can be just no gainsaying that Uttarakhand’s law is expected to be the blueprint for other States as well such as Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat and Assam and so also Rajasthan who have promised to implement the ‘Uniform Civil Code’ in the coming days ahead. It cannot be denied that a Uniform Civil Code has been operational in Goa since a very long time which dates back to the Portuguese rule and this motivates many States to similarly follow suit which alone explains why even Uttarakhand also has joined the elite club of States to have its own ‘Uniform Civil Code’ as enshrined in Article 44 of the Constitution.

It is worth noting that the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) of the State of Uttarakhand proposes very rightly a standardized age of marriage for women at 18 years across all faiths as per Section 4 of the The Uniform Civil Code Act, Uttarakhand Act, 2024. The age of marriage has been set at 21 years for men. We also need to note that it proposes a complete ban on polygamy, polyandry and child marriage which is definitely worth applauding.

It would be instructive to note that the Uttarakhand UCC Act, 2024 also stipulates for compulsory registration of marriage as per Section 6 and 7. It also mandates the compulsory registration of live-in relationships as per Section 378 of the Uttarakhand UCC Act, 2024. This will certainly go a long way in ensuring that no one is exploited mercilessly under the guise of live-in relationships which must be definitely applauded.

It is no doubt definitely most heartening to note that the Uttarakhand UCC Act, 2024 as stated hereinabove makes it compulsory provision for partners in a live-in relationship within the State irrespective of whether they are residents of the State of Uttarakhand or not to submit a statement to the Registrar thus granting legal recognition and protecting the right of individuals in such partnerships. This will definitely check, curb and combat effectively merciless exploitation of women especially. It is therefore entirely in order that under the Uttarakhand UCC Act, 2024, the couples who are staying together in a live-in relationship for more than a month without submitting the statement as mandated can be punished with a jail term of upto 3 months imprisonment or a fine of upto Rs 10,000 or both.

In sum, it is high time and what has been done in Uttarakhand needs to be replicated all across India as even the Supreme Court had called upon many decades ago! The Chief Minister of Uttarakhand - Mr Pushkar Singh Dhami very rightly said that:
The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) will create equal laws for men and women across all faiths and will help create a non-partisan and non-discriminatory society. No denying it! This alone explains why even Mr KM Munshi who was a Congress member and a member of the Constituent Assembly Drafting Committee had pointed out most unequivocally without mincing any words that:
If matters like inheritance and succession were accepted under the umbrella of personal religious laws, then women would never be treated equally despite the fundamental right against discrimination. Therefore, there is no reason why there should not be a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India. Absolutely right!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top