Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Sunday, July 7, 2024

Kapil Sibal Has Definitely Made Jalandhar Most Proud

Posted in: Judiciary
Thu, May 23, 24, 17:43, 2 Months ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 17777
Who does not know all over the world that Mr Kapil Sibal who is one of the most eminent and distinguished lawyers and jurist that India has ever produced

Who does not know all over the world that Mr Kapil Sibal who is one of the most eminent and distinguished lawyers and jurist that India has ever produced in its soil took birth in this great city named Jalandhar on August 8, 1948? He has been India’s Union Law Minister, Union Human Resource Development Minister and has handled many other most important portfolios in Centre in Dr Manmohan Singh regime as PM and earlier also! Whatever he has earned in life till now is solely and solely because of his sheer intelligence and relentless hard work! No doubt, he was born in a rich family of lawyers and his father late Mr Hira Lal Sibal was a most eminent lawyer, jurist and two times Advocate General of Punjab and Haryana who declined an offer to become Judge of Punjab and Haryana High Court and who started his practice from Lahore High Court in undivided India in 1937 and then migrated to Shimla and ultimately settled in Chandigarh. Mr Hira Lal Sibal was a recipient of the Punjab Rattan Award of the Government of Punjab and the International Bar Association awarded him the “Living Legend of Law” honour in 1994. The Government of India very rightly awarded him the third highest civilian award Padma Bhushan in 2006 for his contributions to law. His two elder sons Virender Sibal and Jitendar Sibal are former IAS officers while his third son named Kanwal Sibal has been India’s former Foreign Secretary whose editorials I always enjoy reading in top newspapers and top magazines just like that of Mr Kapil Sibal.

Very few know that Mr Kapil Sibal had qualified for IAS in 1973 but as he did not get IFS like his elder brother Mr Kanwal Sibal and wife late Mrs Nina Sibal and so he decided not to join IAS and continue to pursue law in the Supreme Court as lawyer in which he enrolled in 1972 and really excelled also breaking all barriers emerging as one of the biggest legend that India has ever produced. He did his BA and MA in history from St Stephens College, University of Delhi and so also LLB from University of Delhi as he moved to Delhi in mid-1960s from Chandigarh and completed his LLM from Harvard Law School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts in USA in 1977 while his wife late Mrs Nina Sibal was posted in USA as she was in IFS and also practiced law in Wall Street.

It must be disclosed here that Mr Kapil Sibal was designated as a senior lawyer of the Supreme Court in 1983 at the young age of just 35! He became India’s Additional Solicitor General of India in 1989-90. He earned wide acclaim all over the world in 1993 after he successfully, rationally and most robustly defended the former Chief Justice of High Court of Punjab and Haryana and a Supreme Court Judge – Mr V Ramaswami against impeachment proceedings in the Lok Sabha. He also very rightly underscored what Francis Bacon once famously said that, “The place of justice is a hallowed place, and therefore not only the Bench, but also the foot space and precincts and purpose thereof ought to be preserved without scandal and corruption.”

By all accounts, it must be gracefully conceded that the sheer elegance, immaculate eloquence and so also most meticulous, logical and forceful arguments that Mr Kapil Sibal forwarded in most gracious manner fortunately saved Mr V Ramaswani from being impeached turning the tides in his favour and this very rightly earned laurels for him thus becoming known all over as a well known specialist in Constitutional law. Apart from writing in many reputed newspapers and law journals also, Mr Kapil Sibal also published two volumes of poetry named I witness (2008) and My World Within (2012).

It certainly deserves mentioning here that he was nominated for the first time to the Rajya Sabha in 1998 representing the Congress party from Bihar. In 2000-02, Mr Kapil Sibal had served there as Secretary of Congress’s parliamentary membership. It also definitely merits mentioning here that Mr Kapil Sibal had contested from Chandni Chowk for Lok Sabha and won in 2004 and 2009. It is also worth mentioning here that he left the Indian National Congress party in 2022 only to file his nomination again for the Rajya Sabha independently but backed solidly by Samajwadi Party and won.

Most recently, Mr Kapil Sibal was in news again when he threw in his hat in the ring for the prime post of the President of the Supreme Court Bar Association. The polls were held to elect the Executive Committee of the Supreme Court Bar Association on May 16 and the results were declared in night. It must be mentioned here that Mr Sibal got 1066 votes and his nearest rival and senior lawyer Mr Pradeep Rai got 689 votes. So Mr Kapil Sibal won decisively by a comfortable and clear margin of 377 votes.

As we witnessed, he said on being elected to top post that he will ensure that there is complete cooperation between the Bar and the Bench to ensure smooth dispensation of justice in the Supreme Court. It may be recalled that Mr Kapil Sibal had last served as the President of the Supreme Court Bar Association in 2001-02. It may also be recalled that Mr Sibal had earlier also served twice before that also as well in 1995-96 and so also in 1997-98. So this is the fourth term of Mr Sibal as President.

It is definitely worth noting that even before getting elected to the prestigious post of President of Supreme Court Bar Association, Mr Kapil Sibal while speaking his mind to journalists of ‘The Indian Express’ newspaper said most reassuringly that he intends to ensure that politics is not brought into the courtroom. When asked by journalists about his politics, Mr Sibal said that politics must be outside the courtroom. Delving deeper and speaking straight about his position on it, Mr Sibal said that, “The fact of the matter is that a lawyer is first a lawyer, right? He owes his duty to the values of the Constitution. Some of us are politicians as well but we cannot bring politics into the Bar… We can do our politics independent of the Bar.”

While explaining further his stand, Mr Kapil Sibal said very elegantly, eloquently and effectively that, “Our ideology is the Constitution of India… to uphold the rule of law and to protect citizens from excesses of the State. That’s what a lawyer is for, right? Every government in the history of the world always exceeds the exercise of powers that is warranted by the law. And the lawyers are there to protect the citizens. That’s the only ideology and I don’t think we should bring politics into it at all. I’ve never brought it. I intend to ensure that does not happen.” Absolutely right!

It must also certainly be mentioned here that Mr Kapil Sibal while responding to the Chief Justice of India Dr DY Chandrachud who congratulated the veteran lawyer on his decisive poll victory for the most prestigious post of President waxed eloquent observing that, “It is my honour that I got this post after 22 years. I promise that there will be complete cooperation from our end because without that the objectives which we strike to achieve will not be possible.” He further reiterated once again his firm stand known all over stating unequivocally that, “The Bar has to be cognizant of its own responsibilities and conduct in a fashion that demands the respect of the judges. I think the Bar and Bench are two sides of the same coin and an independent Bar brings an independent judiciary. Ultimately, the independence of the judiciary is fundamental to the rule of law.” There can be just no denying or disputing it!

Frankly speaking, Mr Kapil Sibal also reiterated further that, “That’s all we want. We don’t want any favours from anybody. But we want the court to be perceived by the public as an independent institution, unconcerned with the politics of the day.” It must be mentioned here that on him entering the race for the coveted post of President after nearly 25 years which was totally unexpected this time, Mr Sibal said that he is deeply committed to the judiciary and to the institution. He also added further stating that, “This is my life, you know. I’ve had 50 years in this court, it’s a long time. I am wedded to it and I want the court to thrive. I want every citizen of this country to have great confidence in this institution.”

For clarity, it must also be mentioned here that it was in 2022 that Mr Kapil Sibal had completed 50 years of most distinguished practice with an unblemished track record when my elder brother named Col Rajeev Sirohi turned 50 years with his birth in 1972! I am yet to turn 50 and will have to wait till April 2025 for nearly an year! It cannot be denied that Mr Kapil Sibal just like the great late jurist, lawyer and former Union Law Minister named Mr Ram Jethmalani who practiced for more than 75 years in Supreme Court is definitely also an institution in himself and he also always has conducted himself with utmost elegance which earns him accolades and he commands reverence all over the world cutting across party lines, religious lines or caste lines or boundary lines or any other lines! Whatever Mr Kapil Sibal says cannot be ever dismissed lightly even by his worst critics! I wish him always the very best and am most delighted that he has once again been elected to serve as the President of the Supreme Court Bar Association and will shoulder this great responsibility most wonderfully, most responsibly and most brilliantly just like he did earlier also!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top