Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Saturday, November 23, 2024

Punjab And Haryana HC Lawyers To Abstain From Work To Protest ‘Custodial Torture Of Lawyer

Posted in: Criminal Law
Wed, Sep 27, 23, 11:24, 1 Year ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 8421
It is most shocking to learn that not even a month has lapsed when the police of Hapur had most mercilessly lathi charged more than 30 lawyers

It is most shocking to learn that not even a month has lapsed when the police of Hapur had most mercilessly lathi charged more than 30 lawyers in front of their chambers without any provocation on the part of lawyers which has sent shivers down the spine of every person who saw those disturbing pictures and the lawyers of Hapur suffered injuries with many lawyers suffering serious injuries also on August 29, 2023 and in less than a month we now get to read that the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association has decided to observe a no-work day on 26 September, 2023 to protest the alleged custodial torture endured by a lawyer which he had to face at the hands of the Punjab Police’s Crime Investigation Agency (CIA). It is good to learn that the Executive Committee of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association has decided not to take it lying down and has firmly decided to stand in full solidarity with the lawyers who was subjected to custodial torture which has again sent shock waves all across the legal fraternity just like the lathicharge on lawyers of Hapur. The Executive Committee also in a statement minced just no words to state in no uncertain terms about the custodial torture that the lawyer was subjected to that:
It strongly condemns the torturous, inhumane and barbarous acts committed by the erring police officials of the District Police Sri Mukhtsar Sahib.

To recapitulate, it was in last week that the lawyer had complained before the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) at Sri Muktsar Sahib that he was beaten black and blue by the CIA Staff officials and also subjected to sexual abuse. The CJM in turn while taking a serious note of it then directed the Station House Office of Police Station in Sri Muktsar Sahib to initiate an investigation against the police officials after registering a case against them. It must be noted that in compliance with the CJM’s order, the police on night of September 25 registered a First Information Report (FIR) under Sections 377 (unnatural offences), 323 (hurt), 342 (wrongful confinement), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 149 (unlawful assembly) of the Indian Penal Code against six police officials. It must also be mentioned that the Senior Superintendent of Police Sri Muktsar Sahib also suspended two police officials.

It also cannot be lost on us that on the morning of September 26, 2023 itself, the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association has also announced that it would file a petition before the High Court to transfer the investigation outside Punjab and for the suspension of the remaining police officials. It was also clarified by the High Court Bar Association that:
The future course of action will be intimated till then the work will remain suspended. Meanwhile, it is also worth noting that the Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana also asked the asked the Bar Associations in Punjab, Haryana and Chandigarh to indefinitely abstain from work with effect from Tuesday in solidarity with the lawyer, who is a Member of the Bar Association of Sri Muktsar Sahib.

We also need to note here that the Punjab and Haryana Bar Council has demanded the transfer of the investigation to an independent agency in Haryana or Chandigarh and for the cancellation of the FIR against the lawyer with immediate effect. In the fitness of things, the Punjab and Haryana Bar Council has also called for an FIR to be registered against the accused police officials and for the SSP at Sri Muktsar Sahib to be immediately suspended. No denying it.

It is also worth mentioning that the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association while understanding the gravity of the situation had earlier promptly written to the Punjab Chief Minister with a similar demand for the suspension of the SSP of District Muktsar Sahib for allegedly not lodging an FIR against the erring police officers in the case of alleged custodial violence and sexual assault against a lawyer despite CJM’s order passed on September 23, 2023. What came as a bolt from the blue is that the letter most damningly further alleged that rather than taking as per law the appropriate action against the concerned officers, the victim-lawyer was being pressurized to withdraw his complaint and even his family members were being threatened on that account. The High Court Bar Association further underscored that upholding the safety and security of lawyers was essential for them to carry out their professional duties without fear.

It cannot be just glossed over that the letter by the Punjab and High Court Bar Association also found the incident as affecting not just the life and liberty of an individual but also attacking the justice delivery system. This begs the all-important question: How can the justice delivery system be allowed to be ever held to ransom by even the police? We are seeing how even in UP ever since the barbaric lathicharge by the police mercilessly lathicharging on armless lawyers of Hapur right in front of their chambers on August 29, 2023 and worst of all, the deadlock is still continuing even after nearly a month as the State Government has not cracked the whip on the erring police officials as demanded by lawyers of Hapur.

To top it all, the billion dollar question is: While we saw how Centre rushed through the Agniveer Yojana for Army soldiers due to which we saw many trains burnt and huge protests but why is it that we never see Centre never bringing such schemes for police personnel? The moot question here is: Why police reforms suggested by the Hon’ble Apex Court way back in 2006 in Prakash Singh vs Union of India case are still lying unimplemented even after more than 17 years? Centre can change penal laws, Centre can change rules for Army soldiers, Centre can change women laws, Centre can change Parliament of India, Centre can change the law on representation of women in Parliament and State Assemblies but why is it that Centre feels completely helpless when it comes to ushering in changes in police functioning and in holding police accountable strictly and punishing them most strictly for not lodging FIR, torturing any person etc?

All told, it is high time and both the State and the Centre must take urgent steps to implement the landmark recommendations of the Supreme Court in Prakash Singh case and take all such steps to ensure that the police is made more accountable and more responsive to the needs of the people! No doubt, even the Supreme Court must take suo motu action and seek accountability from Centre and States that why its landmark recommendations in Prakash Singh case are lying unimplemented for so many years in cold storage? If a child is slapped in school our Supreme Court reacts most promptly as is published in today’s newspaper mentioning about an incident where a teacher tells students to slap their 7-year-old classmate who is a Muslim in Muzaffarnagar for not remembering his time tables which cannot be ever justified and I applaud the Apex Court for raising its voice as discrimination on basis of religion or on any other basis cannot be ever justified under any circumstances!

But the most troubling question here is: Why no Judge in Supreme Court ever feels the pinch when lawyers were so brutally lathicharged by the police without any grave provocation with the women lawyers in Hapur also not being spared by police and the lawyers right in front of their chambers were mercilessly beaten after they had returned from a peaceful protest against the police for not lodging an FIR against a police cop who had a minor accident with a woman advocate Priyanka Tyagi and instead lodging FIR against Priyanka and her father with even Supreme Court Bar Association speaking out most vocally in favour of lawyers of Hapur and due to which lawyers of UP have been on strike for so many days and lawyers of West UP since nearly a month?

I have just no hesitation in saying that even the Bar Council of India has not covered itself with glory by maintaining a deafening silence on it knowing fully well that the Hapur incident was so serious in which even senior lawyers and women lawyers got seriously injured with many even being admitted to hospital!

But I must say that what came as a glimmer of hope for Hapur lawyers is that the Supreme Court Bar Association, Allahabad High Court Bar Association, Lucknow High Court Bar Association, Bar Council of UP and Delhi Bar Council and many other Bar Council of different States including Delhi, Uttarakhand among others and even Kathmandu Bar Association have openly expressed full solidarity with the Hapur lawyers and even boycotted work in their support!

To be deadly honest, it must be conceded that someone has to come forward and bell the cat and who can be better than the top court itself and so the Supreme Court must take the lead in this regard and take suo motu cognizance of the growing attack on lawyers in UP, Punjab and different States by the police officials and it merits no reiteration that the most strictest action must be taken against the guilty men and women in police uniform who resorted to unprovoked lathicharge in Hapur and custodial torture of a young advocate due to which the lawyers of Punjab and Haryana High Court are compelled to strike now!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
The general principle, is that a FIR cannot be depended upon a substantive piece of evidence.The article discusses the general priciple, along with exceptions to it.
Victim plays an important role in the criminal justice system but his/her welfare is not given due regard by the state instrumentality. Thus, the role of High Courts or the Supreme Court in our country in affirming and establishing their rights is dwelt in this article.
Can anybody really know what is going inside the heads of criminal lawyers? I mean, yes, we can pick bits of their intelligence during courtroom trials and through the legal documents that they draft.
Terrorism and organized crimes are interrelated in myriad forms. Infact in many illustration terrorism and organized crimes have converged and mutated.
Right to a copy of police report and other documents As per section 207 of CrPC, accused has the right to be furnished with the following in case the proceeding has been initiated on a police report:
In terms of Section 2 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 hereafter referred to as 'the Act'), "human rights" means the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed under the Constitution
The Oxford dictionary defines police as an official organization whose job is to make people obey the law and to prevent and solve crime
the Supreme Court let off three gang rapists after they claimed a ‘compromise formula’ with the victim and agreed to pay her a fine of Rs 50,000 each for their offence.
benefit those prisoners who are kept in solitary confinement, the Uttarakhand High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of State of Uttarakhand v 1. Mehtab s/o Tahir Hassan 2. Sushil @Bhura s/o Gulab Singh Criminal Reference No. 1 of 2014 on April 27, 2018
this article helps you knowing how to become a criminal lawyer
helps you to know adultery and its types
In the landmark case of Manoj Singh Pawar v State of Uttarakhand & others Writ Petition (PIL) No. 156 of 2016 which was delivered on June 18, 2018, the Uttarakhand High Court issued a slew of landmark directions
Scope and ambit of Section 6 of Indian Evidence Act,1872
Victims of Crime Can Seek Cancellation of Bail: MP HC in Mahesh Pahade vs State of MP
State of Orissa v Mahimananda Mishra said clearly and convincingly that the court must not go deep into merits of the matter while considering an application for bail and all that needs to be established from the record is the existence of a prima facie case against the accused.
Yashwant v Maharashtra while the conviction of some police officers involved in a custodial torture which led to the death of a man was upheld, the Apex Court underscored on the need to develop and recognize the concept of democratic policing wherein crime control is not the only end, but the means to achieve this order is also equally important.
20 more people guilty of killing a 60-year-old Dalit man and his physically-challenged daughter. Upheld acquittals of 21 other accused, holding that there was insufficient evidence to establish their guilt. So it was but natural that they had to be acquitted
No person accused of an offence punishable for offences involving commercial quantity shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless
Accident under section 80 under the Indian Penal Code falls under the chapter of general exceptions. This article was made with the objective of keeping in mind the students of law who are nowadays in dire need of material which simplify the law than complicating it.
Nishan Singh v State of Punjab. Has ordered one Nishan Singh Brar, convicted of abduction and rape of a minor victim girl, and his mother Navjot Kaur to pay Rs 90 lakh towards compensation.
Rajesh Sharma v State of UP to regulate the purported gross misuse of Section 498A IPC have been modified just recently in a latest judgment titled Social Action Forum Manav for Manav Adhikar and another v Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice and others.
Kodungallur Film Society vs. Union of India has issued comprehensive guidelines to control vandalism by protesting mobs. Vandalism is vandalism and it cannot be justified under any circumstances. Those who indulge in it and those who instigate it must all be held clearly accountable and made to pay for what they have done most shamefully.
Ram Lal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh If the court is satisfied that if the confession is voluntary, the conviction can be based upon the same. Rule of prudence does not require that each and every circumstance mentioned in the confession must be separately and independently corroborated. Absolutely right There can be no denying it
Joseph Shine case struck down the law of adultery under Section 497. It declared that adultery can be a ground for civil issues including dissolution of marriages but it cannot be a criminal offence. It invalidated the Section 497 of IPC as a violation of Articles 14 and 15 and under Article 21 of the Constitution
Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) represented through Legal Representatives v/s Karnataka, Had no hesitation to concede right from the start while underscoring the rights of victims of crime that, The rights of victims of crime is a subject that has, unfortunately, only drawn sporadic attention of Parliament, the judiciary and civil society.
State of Kerala v Rasheed observed that while deciding an application to defer cross examination under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. a balance must be struck between the rights of the accused, and the prerogative of the prosecution to lead evidence. The Apex Court in this landmark judgment also listed out practical guidelines.
Reena Hazarika v State of Assam that a solemn duty is cast on the court in the dispensation of justice to adequately consider the defence of the accused taken under Section 313 CrPC and to either accept or reject the same for reasons specified in writing.
Zulfikar Nasir & Ors v UP has set aside the trial court judgment that had acquitted 16 Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) officials in the 1987 Hashimpur mass murder case. The Delhi High Court has convicted all the accused and sentenced them to life imprisonment.
In Babasaheb Maruti Kamble v Maharashtra it was held that the Special Leave Petitions filed in those cases where death sentence is awarded by the courts below, should not be dismissed without giving reasons, at least qua death sentence.
Shambhir & Ors v State upholding the conviction and punishment of over 80 rioters has brought some solace to all those affected people who lost their near and dear ones in the ghastly 1984 anti-Sikh riots which brought disrepute to our country and alienated many Sikhs from the national mainstream
Naman Singh alias Naman Pratap Singh and another vs. UP, Supreme Court held a reading of the FIR reveals that the police has registered the F.I.R on directions of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate which was clearly impermissible in the law.
It has been a long and gruelling wait of 34 long years for the survivors of 1984 anti-Sikh riots to finally see one big leader Sajjan Kumar being sentenced to life term by Delhi High Court
Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik v State of Maharashtra held that criminals are also entitled to life of dignity and probability of reformation/rehabilitation to be seriously and earnestly considered before awarding death sentence. It will help us better understand and appreciate the intricacies of law.
Sukhlal v The State of Madhya Pradesh 'life imprisonment is the rule and death penalty is the exception' has laid down clearly that even when a crime is heinous or brutal, it may not still fall under the rarest of rare category.
Deepak v State of Madhya Pradesh in which has served to clarify the entire legal position under Section 319 CrPC, upheld a trial court order under Section 319 of the CrPc summoning accused who were in the past discharged by it ignoring the supplementary charge sheet against them.
It has to be said right at the outset that in a major reprieve for all the political leaders accused of being involved in the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, in CBI, Mumbai vs Dahyaji Goharji Vanzara
Devi Lal v State of Rajasthan the Supreme Court has dispelled all misconceived notions about suspicion and reiterated that,
Madhya Pradesh v Kalyan Singh has finally set all doubts to rest on the nagging question of whether offences under Section 307 of IPC can be quashed on the basis of settlement between parties.
Dr Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v Maharashtra made it amply clear that if a person had not made the promise to marry with the sole intention to seduce a woman to indulge in sexual acts, such an act would not amount to rape.
Rajesh v State of Haryana conviction under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (Abetment of Suicide) is not sustainable on the allegation of harassment without there being any positive action proximate to the time of occurrence on the part of the accused, which led or compelled the person to commit suicide.
Nand Kishore v Madhya Pradesh has commuted to life imprisonment the death sentence which was earlier confirmed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court of a convicted for the rape and murder of an eight-year-old girl.
Raju Jagdish Paswan v. Maharashtra has commuted the death penalty of a man accused of rape and murder of a nine year old girl and sentenced him to 30 years imprisonment without remission.
Swapan Kumar Chatterjee v CBI permitting the application filed by the prosecution for summoning a hand writing expert in a corruption case of which the trial had started in 1985. On expected lines, the Bench accordingly delivered its significant judgment thus laying down the correct proposition of law to be followed always in such cases
Sukhpal Singh v Punjab that the inability of the prosecution to establish motive in a case of circumstantial evidence is not always fatal to the prosecution case. Importance of motive in determining the culpability of the accused but refused to acknowledge it as the sole criteria for not convicting the accused in the absence of motive.
Gagan Kumar v Punjab it is a mandatory legal requirement for Magistrate to specify whether sentences awarded to an accused convicted for two or more offences, would run concurrently or consecutively.
Dnyaneshwar Suresh Borkar v Maharashtra Even poem can help save a death convict from gallows. The Apex Court has in this latest, landmark and laudable judgment commuted the death penalty of a kidnap cum murder convict who was just 22 years of age at the time of occurrence
Himachal Pradesh v Vijay Kumar Supreme court held about acid attack crime that a crime of this nature does not deserve any kind of clemency.
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Imprisonment Appears To Be An Altogether Inappropriate Punishment: SC
S. Sreesanth v. The Board of Control For Cricket In India the Supreme Court set aside a life ban imposed on former Indian cricketer S Sreesanth in connection with the 2013 IPL spot-fixing scandal and asked the BCCI Disciplinary Committee to take a fresh call on the quantum of his punishment under the Anti-Corruption Code.
Adding Additional Accused To Invoke Section 319 CrPC Stronger Evidence Than Mere Probability of Complicity of A Person Required: SC stated in Sugreev Kumar v. State of Punjab
Top