Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Sunday, December 22, 2024

Delhi High Court’s Green Judge: Justice Najmi Waziri Can Never Retire From Public Memory

Posted in: Supreme Court
Mon, Jul 17, 23, 20:57, 1 Year ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 10267
From the past few days, since the court has reopened, there has been an outpouring of affection from the Bar

While there can certainly be no denying the irrefutable fact that the Delhi High Court Judge Hon’ble Mr Justice Najmi Waziri officially hangs in his boots as a Judge in Delhi High Court on July 14, 2023 which is his last day in office but he can definitely never retire from public memory as he is etched most deep in them especially those who live in Delhi. His relentless, remarkable and robust contribution to make Delhi more greener and eco friendly cannot be ever undermined even by his worst critics! It is also a no-brainer that at a time when we are witnessing so many floods, rains and other environmental crisis, we can ill afford to ever ignore and that too we would be doing at the cost of our own and future generations peril what Hon’ble Mr Justice Najmi Waziri laid down in his most brilliant judgments in his life. The best tribute that can ever be paid rather to be more correct must be paid to Hon’ble Mr Justice Najmi Waziri is to always emulate the most commendable directions which he issued in his landmark judgments regarding the safety of environment to make Delhi more greener and always striving for equality for all.

It must be also mentioned here clearly that even while passing his last order on preservation of trees in national capital, Hon’ble Mr Justice Waziri exhorted for monetary contributions from citizens, public spirited individuals and lawyers in ‘Green Delhi Account’. It goes without saying that the fund was opened after his commendable directions were issued to facilitate plantation of trees in Delhi. We must note here that on July 13, Hon’ble Mr Justice Waziri was informed by DDA’s counsel that the current balance in the account is over Rs 2.38 crores and more money is pouring due to various judicial orders.

Thereafter, Hon’ble Mr Justice Waziri had directed that the monies deposited in the I account shall be used for the plantation of trees so that the environment could become more greener in the betterment of lives of all living beings which is the crying need of the hour also. It must be mentioned here that while passing his last order on preservation of trees in national capital, Hon’ble Mr Justice Waziri had called for monetary contributions from citizens, public spirited individuals and lawyers in “Green Delhi Account”. There can be no gainsaying that this will definitely go a very long way in making Delhi more eco friendly and that extra mile will also be definitely covered by this most commendable initiative heralded by Hon’ble Mr Justice Waziri which is urgently needed also in Delhi which is one of the most polluted city in the world.

According to the official data submitted before the court in September 2022, we find that it was reported that a total of 53,915 trees were planted in Insaf Bagh, Central Ridge on the directions of the Court in the past four years. Similarly, we also saw that it was reported that 80,234 trees were planted in Maufi Bagh in Southern Ridge. There can certainly be no denying that while proper data on the number of trees planted on Hon’ble Mr Justice Waziri’s order is not available but his landmark judgments are sufficient proof that how much concerned he was to make Delhi more greener and environment more eco friendly and one has to concede that the figures that were submitted previously by the Delhi government is definitely indicative of the relentless and invaluable contributions made by the Judge which cannot be ever discounted.

On a very emotional note, Hon’ble Mr Justice Najmi Waziri while delivering his farewell speech as he bid farewell to the Delhi High Court on his very last day as a Judge minced absolutely just no words to say unequivocally that:
This country requires many Sunder Lal Bahugunas, Bhavreen Kandharis and Aditya N Prasads, only then our country and our neighbourhoods will turn into delightful orchards.” It is worth taking note that outside the walls of the courtroom we saw how a group of people had gathered at the High Court’s gate holding a banner in gratitude as a most fitting homage to the retiring Judge’s contributions.

While giving a brief introduction on his initial academic and career background, it definitely deserves to be mentioned here that Hon’ble Mr Justice Waziri had studied philosophy from St Stephen’s College in Delhi and later he completed LLB degree from Campus Law Centre, Delhi University. It must be also brought out here that while he enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi in 1987, he pursued his higher education by doing LLM from Vrije Universiteit Brussels in Belgium in 1994-95. It is worth noting that as a lawyer, he practiced before the Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, other High Courts also and various tribunals and quasi judicial fora. It cannot be discounted that he was also appointed Standing Counsel (Civil), Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, Central Government Pleader in the Delhi High Court; Standing Counsel, Delhi Wakf Board and Standing Counsel, Municipal Corporation of Delhi.

Most significantly, it must be noted here that it was on April 17, 2013 that Hon’ble Mr Justice Najmi Waziri was elevated as a Judge of the Delhi High Court. Of course, we have seen for ourselves especially those who keep taking a cursory look at various judgments of the Delhi High Court and Supreme Court that his most landmark judgments have definitely made a very significant contribution to the green cover of national capital. What is of immense significance to note here is that the Judge didn’t stop at just passing orders and judgments only. More to the point, he always made it a point to ensure that the trees planted on court’s orders are looked after properly and survive for a longer period and not end as a mere paper exercise which has to be definitely lauded most generously!

It also definitely cannot be glossed over that Hon’ble Mr Justice Najmi Waziri also passed orders for periodic training to government officers “for their sensitization and duties to be discharged towards preservation and augmentation of the environment under the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act, 1994 and Indian Forest Act, 1927.” We can certainly ill afford to ignore in the present context when we are witnessing so many devastating floods in Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Delhi and many other states what Hon’ble Mr Justice Najmi Waziri said in one of his recent remarkable verdict most elegantly, eloquently and effectively that:
While land may belong to individuals and land-owning agencies, the environment belongs to all humans, indeed to all living creatures. Each living being needs to be protected from damaged ecology. There is a hared duty and responsibility on each individual to protect the environment from harm. For Indian citizens, there is a constitutional exhortation and duty to do so under Article 51A (g).” There can be just no denying or disputing it!

While giving farewell to the Hon’ble Judge – Mr Justice Najmi Waziri, we saw how the lawyers had showered tsunami of words of praise upon him and very rightly thanked him for his relentless and untiring efforts that he made towards ensuring green cover conservation. Hon’ble Mr Justice Waziri very commendably said in his farewell speech that:
What you do today and what you’ll be doing over the years is not a small thing. It would have ramifications. Nature’s evolution requires time. You can’t see it grow; the growth is otherwise palpable… When a child grows up, you suddenly see the child has grown. It takes time to reach there. Your efforts – as a lawyering community joining this mission along with the members of the civil society who led it from the front – are making a difference. We are just a court.”

It definitely merits mentioning here that Advocate Aditya N Prasad who has represented various litigants in matters concerning damage to trees in Delhi said that Justice Waziri repeated orders have empowered the citizens to come forward and pay attention to such cases. Advocate Prasad pointed out that, “There was no law laid down by this court on DPTA until now since 1994. Till now there was no law laid down. There was no infrastructure with the forest department, there was no empowering of citizens. That has happened in at least in this past six months, a lot of orders have come through from this bench, which have empowered citizens to come forth and look at tree matters.” While concluding Advocate Prasad summed up saying that:
And in the end, there is no end. It is a continuity and there will be no other Justice Bhagwati, there was no other Justice Dileep Singh and there will be no other Justice Waziri. We know it for sure.”

Former President of Supreme Court Bar Association, former Additional Solicitor General and senior Supreme Court lawyer Mr Vikas Singh too said that Justice Waziri was very firm, decisive and polite on the bench and the way he conducted his court is something which should be followed by others. Adding more to it, Mr Vikas Singh also stated that:
The best part is that even on the last day, your lordships is ready to decide the matter and pass a final order. This is a lesson for judges and also this profession.” Absolutely right!

While hearing the pouring of so much of praise from many eminent lawyers, Hon’ble Mr Justice Najmi Waziri too graciously acknowledged it and said that, “From the past few days, since the court has reopened, there has been an outpouring of affection from the Bar….It has been an emotional roller coaster ride for me. All I can say is, I am humbled and honoured simultaneously.”

In sum, there can be no denying that Hon’ble Mr Justice Najmi Waziri’s contribution has been par excellence in not only matters pertaining to environment but in other matters also as acknowledged by senior and eminent lawyer Rahul Mehra also. Rahul too said that:
On behalf of all the wrestlers, sportspersons and others, I take this opportunity to thank your Lordships for doing what was necessary and for those who could not be seen or heard and that’s what justice is all about at the end of the day.” Additional Solicitor General Balbir Singh too added that:
Justice Waziri handled key issues with a lot of sensitivity and respect for seniors.”

Another lawyer too added as reported in media that:
Your Lordships has taken care of not only flora and fauna but also taken care of the speechless that is particularly in the case where an animal was to be shifted to other State and somewhere government was absolutely reluctant to shift…..Your Lordship has shown indulgence and compassion towards an animal. So this shows your Lordship was so graceful and heart touching under the sky and taken care of each and every one of which has been made by the God.” This is truly most remarkable! Advocate MA Niyazi too who had appeared in various tree matters before Hon’ble Mr Justice Waziri said that Justice Waziri was equally articulate even when in silence and always was most supporting towards all lawyers by encouraging them to speak freely!

All in all, it would definitely not be stretching things too far if I acknowledge most candidly that his matchless contribution in making a more greener and more safer environment especially in Delhi where he was a Judge for many years will undoubtedly always be remembered in the days to come ahead! Of course, all the Judges in India must definitely strive to always emulate what he did in making a more greener environment because if environment is not good then the lives of all of us are in constant threat and danger of being totally eliminated and also in always ensuring fearlessly that all are treated equally before the law and no one is ever discriminated against in any manner not even the speechless animals!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
In the light of the latest judgment provided by the SC for commuting the death penalty of former pm Rajiv Gandhi’s assassins to life imprisonment on the ground of excessive wait on govt and President’s part to decide their whim pleas
Shanti Bhushan v Supreme Court of India through its Registrar and another in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 789 of 2018 (Arising out of Diary No. 12405 of 2018) refused pointblank to declare that the function of allocating cases and assigning benches should be exercised by the collegium of five senior Judges instead of the Chief Justice of India.
Coming straight to the nub of the matter, let me begin at the very beginning by first and foremost expressing my full and firm support to the growing perfectly justified demand that seeks chemical castration for child rapists
Justice KS Puttaswamy (Retd) and another v Union of India has upheld the validity of Aadhaar for availing government subsidies and benefits and for filing income tax returns! The lone dissenting Judge in this landmark case is Justice Dr DY Chandrachud. He differed entirely from the majority and struck down Section 139AA.
It is most reassuring, refreshing and re consoling to note that for the first time in at least my memory have I ever noticed a Chief Justice of India who even before assuming office outlined his priorities very clearly and courageously
Manohar Lal Sharma vs Narendra Damodardas Modi dismissed a string of petitions seeking an independent probe into the 2015 Rafale deal, for registration of FIR and Court-monitored investigation by CBI into corruption allegations in Rafale deal.
Judgement by the Supreme Court about energy conservation and infrastructure laws in the state of Himachal Pradesh.
In a major and significant development, the Supreme Court which is the highest court in India has for the second time designated 37 lawyers as Senior Advocates.
On 17th October 2018, the Cannabis Act came into force and Canada became the largest country in the world with a legal marijuana marketplace.
Why Only Lawyers Are Held Liable For Accepting Foreign Funding And Not Politicians? Why is it that under our Indian law only lawyers are held liable for accepting foreign funding and not politicians? Why politicians are mostly never held accountable for accepting foreign funding?
Finally Hindus Get The Right To Worship At Entire Disputed Land And Muslims Get 5 Acre In Ayodhya
I am a student at New Law College, Bharati Vidyapeeth University studying LLB. I am currently majoring in 3 yrs LLB Course from New Law College, and have started with my last year from July 2019.
230th report of Law Commission of India, it will certainly produce more diamonds like the Chief Justice of India designate Sharad Arvind Bobde who is most invaluable and even Kohinoor diamond stands just nowhere near him
Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court Of India vs Subhash Chandra Aggarwal the office of Chief Justice of India is a public authority under the Right to Information Act
Sections 126 to l29 deal with the privilege that is attached to Professional Communications between the legal advisors and their clients. Section 126 and 128 mention the circumstances under which the legal advisor can give evidence of such professional communication.
National Federation Of Societies For Fast Justice & Anr. Vs. UOI Notifications for establishing the Gram Nyayalayas to issue the same within four weeks.. It was considering a PIL filed by National Federation Of Societies For Fast Justice.
Madhuri Jajoo vs. Manoj Jajoo has allowed the first petition for divorce by mutual consent, through the virtual hearing system.
Reepak Kansal vs. Secretary-General, Supreme Court Of India has taken a stern view of the increasing tendency to blame the Registry for listing some cases more swiftly as compared to others.
upheld the Shebait rights of the erstwhile royals of Travancore in the administration, maintenance and management of Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple in Thiruvananthapuram.
Justice R Banumathi had assumed the role of a Supreme Court Judge on 13 August 2014. She is the sixth women to be a Judge of the Supreme Court of India
Judges cannot speak out even if they are humiliated. How long can the Supreme Court and the Judges suffer the humiliation heaped regularly?
Neelam Manmohan Attavar vs Manmohan Attavar that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution would not be maintainable in order to challenge an order which has been passed by the High Court in the exercise of its judicial powers.
Jugut Ram vs. Chhattisgarh the fact that a lathi is also capable of being used as a weapon of assault, does not make it a weapon of assault simpliciter.
Sagufa Ahmed vs. Upper Assam Plywood Products Pvt. Ltd the said order extended only the period of limitation and not the period upto which delay can be condoned in exercise of discretion conferred by the statute
the legendary Kesavananda Bharati whose plea to the Apex Court is considered the real reason behind the much acclaimed Basic Structure doctrine propounded in 1973
Amar Singh vs NCT Of Delhi conviction can be based on the testimony of a single eye witness so long he is found to be wholly reliable.
Madhya Pradesh vs. Bherulalthe governments taking for granted the period of limitation prescribed. In other words, it is high time and all the governments in our country both in the Centre and the States must now
Madhya Pradesh vs. Bherulal the governments taking for granted the period of limitation prescribed.
the manner in which Bombay High Court handled the Arnab Goswami case. A vacation Bench comprising of Justices Dr DY Chandrachud and Indira Banerjee of the Supreme Court is currently hearing the petition filed by Republic TV anchor Arnab Goswami
Indian Olympics Association vs. Kerala Olympic Association civil original jurisdiction dismissed Indian Olympics Association's (IOA) plea seeking transfer of a writ petition before Kerala High Court to Delhi High Court.
In Arnab's case, Justice Dr DY Chandrachud had minced no words to say that: There has to be a message to High Courts – Please exercise your jurisdiction to uphold personal liberty
It is most shocking, most disgusting and most disheartening to read that criminals are ruling the roost and making the headlines in UP time and again
Parveen vs. State of Haryana while setting aside an order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing the plea of a man in view of absence of his counsel has observed in clear, categorical
Madras Bar Association vs Union of India that exclusion of advocates in 10 out of 19 tribunals, for consideration as judicial members is contrary to the Supreme Court judgments in Union of India v. Madras Bar Association
Inderjeet Singh Sodhi vs Chairman, Punjab State Electricity Board the dismissal of special leave petition is of no consequence on the question of law. We all must bear it in mind from now on
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Zaixhu Xie the practice of pronouncing the final orders without reasoned judgments.
It cannot be denied by anyone that government is the biggest litigator in courts and is responsible to a large extent for the huge pending cases in different states all across the country. The top court is definitely not happy with the state of affairs and the lethargic and complacent motto of Sab Chalta Hain attitude of the governments in India.
Centre has finally decided to get its act together and constitute the All India Judicial Service (AIJS) about which we have been hearing since age
Prashant Dagajirao Patil vs. Vaibhav@Sonu Arun Pawar a High Court, while exercising bail jurisdiction cannot issue directions which will have a direct bearing upon the trial.
Commercial Taxes Officer, Circle-B, Bharatpur vs M/s Bhagat Singh in exercise of itsextraordinary appellate jurisdiction that a statute must be interpreted in a just, reasonable and sensible manner
Pravat Chandra Mohanty vs Odisha refused the plea seeking compounding of offences of two police officers accused in a custodial violence case.
Sessions Judge, Bhadrak in S.T. Case No.182/392 of 2014, acquitting the Respondents from charges under Sections 302/201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code IPC
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs. M/S Navigant Technologies Pvt. Ltd. the period of limitation for filing the Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act would commence from the date on which the signed copy of the award was made available to the parties.
Niranjan Hemchandra Sashittal and another v. Maharashtra in page 386 of the citation that: The quantum of bribe is immaterial for judging gravity of the offence under PC Act. Proceedings under PC Act cannot be quashed on the ground of delay in conclusion particularly where the accused adopted dilatory tactics.
The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has proposed to introduce the Cinematograph (Amendment) Bill, 2021.The new proposal would amend the Cinematograph Act of 1952 to grant the Centre "revisionary powers" and allow it to "re-examine" films that have already been certified by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC).
I have not come across a single person in my life who has not complained of milk being not up to the mark and even in my own life I don't remember how many times my mother
Akhila Bharata Kshatriya Mahasabha v/s Karnataka barring installation of statues or construction of any structure in public roads, pavements, sideways and other public utility places.
Manohar Lal Sharma vs Union of India has made it clear that State won't get a free pass by mere mention of national security.
State of MP vs Ghisilal the civil courts has no jurisdiction to try suit relating to land which is subject-matter of ceiling proceedings, Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.
Deserving cases in Supreme Court also don't get listed in time and keep pending for a long time and not so deserving cases get listed most promptly when backed by eminent law firms and senior lawyers
Top