Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Tuesday, December 3, 2024

Pursuing Master’s Course In Law Doesn’t Constitute A Break In Practice, Suspension Of Enrolment Not Required: Delhi HC

Thu, Apr 13, 23, 16:55, 2 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 7270
Karan Antil vs Delhi that the eligibility criterion of seven years of continuous practice as an advocate to be appointed as a District Judge as set out in Rule 9(2) of the Delhi Higher Judicial Services (DHJS) Rules, 1970 or Article 233(2) of the Constitution of India

While not leaving even a scintilla of doubt of any kind, the Delhi High Court has in a most learned, laudable, landmark and latest judgment titled Karan Antil vs High Court of Delhi & Ors in W.P.(C) 3467/2023 & CM APPL. 13507/2023 and cited in 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 300 that was pronounced as recently as on April 10, 2023 has minced just no words to rule that the eligibility criterion of seven years of continuous practice as an advocate to be appointed as a District Judge as set out in Rule 9(2) of the Delhi Higher Judicial Services (DHJS) Rules, 1970 or Article 233(2) of the Constitution of India, does not require any inquiry into the actual area of practice as an advocate.

It must be noted that the Division Bench of Hon’ble Mr Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Hon’ble Mr Justice Amit Mahajan was dealing with a writ petition challenging the selection of a candidate in the Delhi Higher Judicial Services (DHJS) on the ground that the time period spent by him in pursuing a full time Master’s program in law cannot be considered as a period during which he was in active practice as an advocate.

While referring to the Resolution No. 160/2009 of the Bar Council of India (BCI), as per which the practicing advocates can join an LLM course as a regular student without suspending the practice, the Court said that since the candidate’s practice as an advocate was not suspended during the said period, he did not fail the eligibility criteria for being appointed in the DHJS. Most crucially, the Court also unequivocally held that the enrolment of a person as an advocate and grant of certificate is synonymous to him being in practice of law.

At the very outset, this remarkable, robust, rational and recent judgment authored by Hon’ble Mr Justice Vibhu Bakhru for a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising of himself and Hon’ble Mr Justice Amit Mahajan sets the ball in motion by first and foremost putting forth in para 1 that:
The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning the Notification No. F.1/10/2022-Judl./Suptlaw/213-220 dated 31.01.2023 appointing thirty-two persons (listed in the order of merit) as members of the Delhi Higher Judicial Services (hereafter ‘the DHJS’) against permanent posts. The petitioner, essentially, assails the inclusion of the names of respondent nos. 2 to 5 in the select list of candidates who have been offered appointment in the DHJS.

As we see, the Division Bench then states in para 2 that:
The petitioner had also appeared for the Delhi Higher Judicial Services Examination - 2022 (hereafter ‘DHJSE-22’) along with other candidates and is placed at serial no.36 in the order of merit. The petitioner has not been appointed in the DHJS as the number of vacancies under the general category are limited to thirty-two.

As things stand, the Division Bench then mentions in para 3 that:
Respondent no.6 is placed at serial no.33 in the order of merit but has joined Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service and is no longer interested in seeking appointment in the DHJS. However, another candidate, Aashish Rastogi, who was considered disqualified for being appointed, has prevailed in his challenge to being considered disqualified. In terms of the order dated 17.03.2023 passed in his petition – Ashish Rastogi v. Hon’ble High Court of Delhi & Anr. WP(C) No. 15705/2022 decided on 17.03.2023 – he is now required to be placed at serial no.17 in the order of merit in the select list.

Do note, the Division Bench notes in para 4 that:
It is also relevant to note that the candidate placed at serial no.5 in the select list (Sh. Murari Singh) has since withdrawn his candidature.

To put things in perspective, the Division Bench envisages in para 5 that:
In view of the above, the petitioner stands at serial no.35 in the order of merit in the select list and seeks directions for his appointment in the DHJS. In the aforesaid context, the petitioner seeks to challenge the selection of respondent nos. 3 to 5. The petitioner’s challenge to selection of respondent no.3 is premised on the ground that respondent no.3 had not qualified the DHJS Mains (Written) Examination as his marks in Law Paper-III were one mark less than the qualifying threshold; respondent no. 3 was declared qualified by virtue of the notice dated 13.10.2022, whereby additional 0.5 in the paper of General Knowledge & Language and one mark in the paper of Law-III were awarded to all candidates who appeared in the DHJS Mains (Written) Examination.

The petitioner impugns the said notice dated 13.10.2022 awarding additional marks as being illegal and contrary to the Delhi Higher Judiciary Services Rules, 1970 (hereafter ‘the DHJS Rules’). The petitioner assails the selection of respondent nos.3 and 4 on the ground that they do not satisfy the eligibility criteria of seven years of continuous practice as on the last date of receipt of application.

According to the petitioner, respondent no.4 was ineligible to apply as he was engaged as a legal consultant on contractual basis with the Department of Legal Affairs during the period 06.03.2017 to 12.09.2019. The eligibility of respondent no.5 is questioned on the ground that he had pursued a full time Master of Law Program at the University College London (UCL) during the period September, 2015 to June, 2016. Thus, the continuous period of practice for respondent no.5 was required to be reckoned from June, 2016.

Briefly stated, the Division Bench while dwelling on the factual context specifies in para 8 that:
8.6 The DHJS Preliminary Examination was held on 03.04.2022 and its results were declared on 22.04.2022. In all one thousand nine hundred and nine (1,909) candidates appeared for the said examination and one hundred and forty (140) candidates secured the minimum qualifying marks. Out of the aforesaid candidates, one hundred and twenty-three (123) candidates were from the general category.

8.7 The DHJS Mains (Written) Examination was held on 14.05.2022 and 15.05.2022. The results of the said examination were declared on 26.08.2022. Those candidates who qualified the said written examination were admitted to viva voce.

8.8 On 13.10.2022, the DHC issued a notification awarding additional 0.5 marks in the paper of General Knowledge and Language and one additional mark in Law Paper-III to all candidates who had appeared for the DHJS Mains (Written) Examination. By virtue of the additional marks, three additional candidates including respondent no.3, qualified the DHJS Mains (Written) Examination and were admitted to viva voce.

8.9 The final results of the DHJSE-22 were declared on 10.11.2022. On 31.01.2023, the notification appointing the selected candidates – which is impugned in this petition – was published by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi.

8.10 Respondent no.5 did exceedingly well in the DHJSE-22 and secured the first position in the order of merit. He is, accordingly, placed at serial no.1 in the merit list as well as in the select list of candidates as notified on 31.01.2023.

8.11 Respondent no.5 had graduated in law from the National University of Juridical Science, Kolkata in March, 2008. He performed well in the said course as well and was awarded three gold medals in the subject of constitutional law and jurisprudence. He enrolled as an advocate with the Bar Council of India on 05.07.2008 and commenced his practice. There is no dispute that he has been in active practice in the Supreme Court and has appeared in a number of matters.

8.12 Respondent no.5 pursued the Master of Law Program at the University College London (UCL) from 23.09.2015 to 06.06.2016.

Quite pertinently, the Division Bench stipulates in para 9 that:
The principal question to be addressed is whether respondent no.5 fails to satisfy the eligibility criterion as set out in Rule 9(2) of the DHJS Rules which requires the candidate to have been continuously practicing as an Advocate for not less than seven years as on the last date of receipt of the application.

Be it noted, the Division Bench notes in para 20 that:
There was no material difference between the eligibility criteria as set out for an advocate under Article 233(2) of the Constitution of India and Rule 9(2) of the DHJS Rules. In terms of Article 233(2) of the Constitution of India, any person who has been an advocate for not less than seven years, is eligible to be appointed as a District Judge. It is implicit that the term ‘advocate’ would mean a person who is in practice as an advocate. We are not persuaded to accept that there is a difference between a person who is an advocate, and a person who has practiced as an advocate.

Most significantly, the Division Bench minces absolutely no words to hold in para 48 that:
The profession of law has expanded manifold. It is not confined to acting or pleading before a court of law. The profession of law has many facets, which include drafting of submissions, drafting of regulatory filings, representation before various tribunals or authorities, assistance in regulatory compliance, amongst others. The eligibility criterion of being in practice for seven years does not require any inquiry into the actual area of practice of an advocate.

If a person is enrolled as an advocate for a period of seven years prior to the date of the application, he would satisfy the eligibility criteria unless it is established that he was not entitled for being so enrolled as an advocate; had suspended his practice either voluntarily or otherwise; or had accepted an engagement or vocation, which was impermissible as an advocate.

It is worth noting that the Division Bench notes in para 49 that:
In the present case, respondent no.5’s practice, as an advocate, was not suspended during the period when he was pursuing the Master of Law Program. By virtue of Resolution No. 160/2009 passed by the Bar Council of India, he was not required to suspend his enrolment as an advocate on account of pursuing the said full-time course.

As a corollary, the Division Bench mandates in para 54 that:
In view of the above, we find no merit in the petitioner’s challenge to the appointment of respondent no.5 in the DHJS.

Furthermore, the Division Bench directs in para 55 that:
In view of the above, the petitioner’s prayer that the DHC be directed to appoint him in the DHJS must also fail. It is not necessary for this Court to consider the petitioner’s challenge to the appointment of respondent nos. 3 and 4 to the DHJS.

Finally, the Division Bench concludes by holding in para 56 that:
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The pending application is also disposed of.

In sum, we thus see quite clearly that the Delhi High Court has been most unequivocal in asserting that pursuing Masters degree in law doesn’t constitute a break in practice. It was also made clear by the Court that suspension of enrolment is not required in such cases. No denying it!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
In the wake of the Partition Assam lost one of her districts to Pakistan. Mountbatten’s partition-plan announced on 3 June 1947, provided inter-alia for a referendum to be held in the Sylhet district of Assam
It is reassuring that while the Cricket World Cup is being played in the subcontinent, the organizers have wisely chosen to skirt Pakistan.
Law is a form of Social Science. Society and law are closely related to each other. Law tells the nature to live the social life and this also increases with the Economic, Scientific and Technological progress.
In a democratic country like India, judiciary plays a vital role in establishing a state of justice. Justice is desired by each and every person on this earth.
Our Indian Society consist of a variety of people that differ in Cast, Religion, Economic status and Gender. For this society a different kind of Social Justice required.
some Bizarre laws prevailing in various countries have been mentioned here
In Sweden it is illegal to use the services of a prostitute. Prostitution is legal though.
In the case of Dr Bhupal Singh Bhakuni v State of Uttarakhand & others in Writ petition (PIL) No. 127 of 2014 ordered the State to establish a National Law University (NLU) in Uttarakhand within three months.
Selecting and recruiting human resources for Public Administration is a management area that has been undergoing in – depth changes. An effective response is required to meet the challenges of a society in which growing knowledge and awareness of citizenship demand transparency and speediness of processes.
It is fast becoming a regular phenomenon in Kashmir Valley! These stone pelters who gather in large numbers and then without any provocation start pelting stones at soldiers who are engaged in operations with terrorists themselves behave like terrorists and like terrorists are responsible for inviting death.
It is a matter of utmost concern that in our country Centre is spending money like water on the security expenditure of separatists Hurriyat leaders but is not ready to spend even a small amount on the soldiers who are based properly in Jammu and Kashmir making them soft targets of terrorists
It is extremely appalling to see that Centre right from independence in 1947 till now has outrightly favoured Eastern UP in giving it a single bench of high court in Lucknow
To begin with, it is deeply disgusting, shocking and frustrating to see that BJP which is holding the helm of affairs in Centre as well as in State of UP is not listening to the repeated legitimate demand of its own MPs both in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha
Madhya Pradesh High Court in Praveen Pandey vs Madhya Pradeshhas issued significant directives against the call of a strike by State Bar Council and Bar Associations, including debarring members/officials of the Bar Council/Association which gives a call for a strike, from appearing before the courts.
Non-residents of India can join the Indian administrative cadre by cracking through the UPSC exams. They are the residents of India who are temporarily off from their native land. They should meet the requisite criteria for the IAS.
the change of guard in the Supreme Court with outgoing CJI Dipak Mishra passing the baton of CJI to Ranjan Gogoi might lead to a discernible change in the court proceedings as was evident right from the first day as the CJI made it clear that he will continue to be "strict and perfectionist" in dealing with cases and judicial administration.
It is most astonishing, appalling and ashaming to note that in spite of UP being the rape and crime capital of India as was rightly slammed by none other than former UN Secretary General Ban ki moon while he was UN Secretary Gene
The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 is aimed towards conservation of biological diversity, sustainable use of its components, and fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of the use of biological resource and associated traditional knowledge.
It has be said with deep dismay, utmost dejection and utter disappointment that this NDA government which came to power after categorically and convincingly promising the more than 9 crore people of West UP
This paper discusses the need to include the acts of aggression committed by the Violent Non-State Actors in the definition of Crimes of Aggression as given in Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute.
Quashed resoundingly a government resolution imposing a condition that the Assistant Public Prosecutor, whose rate of conviction is less than 25% of the cases handled by him, is not entitled to promotion and thus accepted the contention of the petitioners as valid.
What is happening in West UP? Who is safe in West UP when police officers are themselves not safe here and can be murdered so openly and brazenly as we saw for ourselves just recently in Bulnadshahr?
The Judges of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President under Article 124 (2) of the Constitution while Judges of the High Courts are appointed by the President under Article 217 (1) and 224 (1) of the Constitution.
TOEFL is an English language test for evaluating the command and understanding of the non-native English speakers. The NRI education consultants suggest registring at least 4 to 5 months before the examination.
Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan University & Another v. UOI imposed a whooping penalty of Rs 5 crore on a medical college for playing fraud on it. It also ordered prosecution of its dean.
the Advocates Act never intended to confer the disciplinary powers upon the High Court or Supreme Court except to the extent dealing with an appeal under Section 38 of the Act.
Nandu @ Gandharva Singh Vs. Ratiram Yadavcame down heavily on a lawyer for seeking repeated adjournments stated that seeking adjournment for no reason by lawyers amounts to professional misconduct..
Lucknow University Vandalism v/s UP guidelines were formulated by a Committee appointed by the Allahabad High Court on July 6. It will remain in effect until the state government and all government-aided universities frame the necessary rules and regulations to ensure a congenial and conducive environment for academic pursuits
Between 2014 to 2019 never Before has India's Image received such a Gigantic Blow from Being a nation of accepting new ideas and Embracing all faiths and beliefs to that of shutting down and shunting away anything that isn't acceptable to the ruling class ideology.
Usha Kanta Das and Amiya Kanti Das V/s S.M. Sefalika Ash, the Calcutta High Court held that only advocates enrolled under the Advocates Act are authorized to plead and argue on behalf of litigants before a court of law. Those who are not so enrolled cannot plead and argue on behalf of litigants before a court of law!
Why is it that only Eastern UP has high court at Allahabad and a single bench at Lucknow and all the other regions like Western UP, Bundelkhand and Purvanchal etc
How long will Centre like a shameless mute spectator just keep watching the law and order situation in West UP from turning more and more lawless? How long will Centre overlook the repeated murder of lawyers in West UP?
How long did Jawaharlal Nehru take to create a high court bench at Lucknow on July 1, 1948? Less than a year! How long will Centre take to create a high court bench in West UP
President of the Youth Bar Association of India The petition alleges that the fundamental rights of the citizens under Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution have been violated by denying them the right to speedy justice due to non-appointment of Judges in Courts.
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of Pakistan
Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasads Reply on Lack of maintenance of Indian Courts and Courtrooms
Jadhav Case that Pakistan violated Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 1963 by not informing Kulbhushan Jadhav without delay of his rights under Article 36(1)(b) to have consular access.
A vision for the education system in India- has been crafted to ensure that it touches the life of each and every citizen, consistent with their ability to contribute to many growing developmental imperatives of this country on the one hand, and towards creating a just and equitable society
The transcript defines a recognized document, validated by the registrar of the university. It is also called a consolidated marksheet, published in the official paper and also attested by the dean or registrar. It is a payable service, generally sought for taking admission in the foreign university or employment abroad.
The certificate attestation is a compulsory practice if any non-resident wants to scale his business abroad. Mainly, any business is proved authentic through the Memorandum of Association (MOA), Articles of Association (AOA), Incorporation Letter and the Board Resolution.
legal giant named Ram Jethmalani finally passed away at the age of 95 just short by 6 days ahead of his 96th birthday on 14 September on 8 September after suffering from prolonged illness.
The Tamil Nadu Dr Ambedkar Law University Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, was directed to supply the copies of answer-sheets sought by the Respondent-students under the RTI Act.
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde to take over from the incumbent Chief Justice of India (CJI) – Justice Ranjan Gogoi on November 18 just a day after Justice Gogoi retires as CJI on November 17.
violence that broke loose at Tis Hazari court on November 2 between lawyers and police which left many injured, the Delhi High Court without wasting any time on November 3 very rightly constituted a judicial committee
BJP and Opposition parties like BSP are repeatedly raising the legitimate and compelling demand for the creation of a high court bench in West UP
UP Bar Council Chairman and senior advocate Harishankar Singh who has an impeccable track record has openly not just espoused the creation of a high court bench in West UP at any cost but has also simultaneously warned that if Centre and UP state government do not pay attention to it there will be a very big movement
to promote our foreign policy since the last Session of Parliament. In doing so, l focus on high-level visits that have taken place recently. ln order that their full significance is properly appreciated, allow me, Mr. Chairman, to briefly share with the House the larger context in which they have been organized.
The Independence of India came with tragic communal violence engulfing the life of more than a million people amidst the demand of separate Pakistan and the threat of Direct Action. The demand of partition was finally met by Indian Independence Act,
Bengalis and Punjabis are two communities which suffered major loss during partition. The evil plan to include entire Bengal in East Pakistan which was foiled by Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerjee and the volcanic outburst of Direct Action made Bengal a victim of Muslim League’s Islamist ideas.
arbitrary transfer of High Court Judges in our country is not stopping in our country at all which is hurting the smooth functioning of our judiciary immensely as some are even resigning in protest.
Top