Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, November 21, 2024

Advocates Protection Act Must Be Enacted At The Earliest

Posted in: General Practice
Sun, Apr 9, 23, 11:31, 2 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 1 - hits: 8097
While striking entirely the right chord as the lawyers anticipated also, we saw how just recently it was none other than the Executive Committee of the Supreme Court Bar Association

While striking entirely the right chord as the lawyers anticipated also, we saw how just recently it was none other than the Executive Committee of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) itself which has condemned most strongly and also most unequivocally while expressing its utmost dismay at the recent most brutal, cowardly and ghastly attack on late Advocate Mr Virender Kumar Narwal aged 53 years who was practicing in New Delhi and who was shot dead from close range in South West Delhi’s Dwarka by two bike-borne assailants, that led to his most unfortunate killing in the most horrifying manner.

It is somewhat consoling and refreshing to see that to ensure the safety, security and vital interests of lawyers which stands paramount as it is the lawyers who are the legs and tyres of the judicial system without which it cannot ever function smoothly under any circumstances, we see most laudably that the Supreme Court Bar Association has resolved to ensure that all efforts are made without fail to secure the safety of life and protection of vital interests of the lawyers. It is also good to see that in the pursuance in this direction to ensure the safety and security of the life of the lawyers and so also their vital interests, the Supreme Court Bar Association’s Executive Committee also resolved most commendably that the pending Advocates Protection Bill, 2021, be enacted at the earliest as it contains various such provisions which would be of immense usage to the lawyers which is certainly the crying need of the hour also!

For the exclusive benefit of esteemed readers, it must be certainly mentioned here that in its most commendable resolution dated April 4, 2023 which was signed by the Supreme Court Bar Association Secretary - Rahul Kaushik, the Supreme Court Bar Association while condemning the recent most dastardly killing of an advocate as mentioned above has said most unambiguously that the investigation into the said attack should be conducted in an expedited and fair manner by the Investigating Authority, and if the need so arises an SIT (Special Investigation Team) should be constituted to handle the case. It must be definitely mentioned here that in the fitness of things we see that the Supreme Court Bar Association in its resolution says most unequivocally that:
Lawyers have been an integral part of the society, and such an attack on Lawyers will completely shatter the confidence of the public at large if the people who are meant to protect the rule of law are attacked in such manners, and the culprits are not caught expeditiously. Advocates are otherwise also vulnerable sections of the society having no social security. There can be no denying it and so the Advocates Protection Act must be enacted at the earliest as it brooks no more delay anymore!

While adding more to it, the Executive Committee of the Supreme Court Bar Association has also resolved that the Advocates Protection Bill, 2021 which is pending Parliamentary enactment for almost two years, be passed at the earliest, which will ensure the safety and security of the lawyers while performing their professional obligations fearlessly. The earlier this is done, the better it shall be in the paramount interest of the lawyers who form an inseparable and most vital organ of the judiciary which cannot be denied by even the worst critics!

The resolution of the Supreme Court Bar Association also minced just no words to point out explicitly, elegantly, eloquently and effectively that:
By virtue of bringing in of such an Act, certain provisions will come in force for taking care of the interests of the Advocates, be it with providing of Police Protection in certain cases, forming of a Redressal Committee for Advocates at each levels of Judiciary, protection of Advocates from illegal Arrests and Malicious Prosecutions, waiving of bail bonds for Advocates, providing extended protection in cases of privileged communications with clients, providing insurances and financial aids and loans to the Advocates, etc.

It also certainly merits mentioning that the Supreme Court Bar Association has also fervently expressed the hope that its legitimate demands shall definitely be considered on priority. Just recently, we also saw how the State Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana sent two drafts of the Punjab Advocates (Protection) Bill 2023 and Haryana Advocates (Protection) Bill 2023 to both the States of Punjab and Haryana demanding the enactment of the same at the earliest. The Bar Council of both the States have warned of initiating peaceful protest by participating in a state-wide agitation if adequate steps are not taken for the same.

It is worth noting that the incumbent Chairman of Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Council - Mr Suvir Sidhu said that the council would send the draft legislation to the governments through the proper channel. He minced just no words to state in simple, straightforward and suave language that:
In the coming days, if adequate steps are not taken and if need be, all advocates from Punjab, Haryana and Chandigarh will be compelled to gather at a mass congregation or maha panchayat and initiate a peaceful protest (without suspending any judicial work) by participating in a statewide agitation in this regard. Sidhu said that attacks against advocates and cases of false implication against legal professionals had increased manifold.

So he also hastened to add further that:
Now more than ever, it has become imperative to penalize such acts and protect advocates who discharge their duties by enacting effective legislation making such offences cognizable in the territories of the States of Punjab and Haryana. It cannot be glossed over that under Section 6 of the Advocates Act, 1961, the Council has been assigned to protect and safeguard the rights, privileges and interests of all advocates on its roll.

It must also be noted that the State Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana also said in its press note that:
The year 2023 alone, as reported so far, has sadly witnessed two broad-daylight murders of Adv Umesh Pal in Uttar Pradesh and the recent of Adv Virender Narwal in Delhi. The trend is clear : Lawyers are under attack because of their work, and they need better legal protections to sustain the viability of justice delivery systems. It also further mentions that as per the last 2022 UN Report, in the decade from 2010 to 2020, more than 2,500 lawyers were killed, detained or kidnapped around the world and since 2010, every year, the International Day of the Endangered Lawyer has been observed worldwide with the purpose to create awareness about the threat to the safety of lawyers.

Most significantly, we must note that the drafts of the Punjab Advocates (Protection) Bill 2023 and Haryana Advocates (Protection) Bill 2023 consists of the following important provisions:

  1. Section 3 : Punishment in case of committing or abetting the commission of an act of violence against an advocate i.e., 6 months imprisonment which may extend to 5 years, and with a fine up to Rs. 1 lakh.
  2. Section 4 : Compensation by the person convicted for causing any act of violence against any advocate.
  3. Section 5 : An offence punishable under Section 3 shall be cognizable and non-bailable.
  4. Section 6 : Compounding of offences.
  5. Section 7 : Police protection to an advocate under the threat of being a victim of an act of violence.
  6. Section 8 : An advocate shall be deemed to be an office of the institution.
  7. Section 9 : Protection of action in due conduct of duties by advocates.


As we see, the State Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana has requested the States to consider their representation for the enactment of the Advocates (Protection) Act, 2023 at the earliest. To recapitulate, it was earlier in March 2023 that Rajasthan became the first State in India to pass a law specifically meant for the protection of the advocates which has to be definitely lauded in no uncertain terms! It must also be noted that the Rajasthan State Legislature had passed the Rajasthan Advocates Protection Bill, 2023 after it was tabled in the Assembly by voice vote.

It may be recalled that it was on March 21, 2023 that Rajasthan’s Law and Legal Affairs Minister Shanti Kumar Dhariwal said that the State Assembly has passed the Rajasthan Advocates Protection Bill, 2023 in amended form to prevent violence against advocates. It must be also mentioned here that for the welfare of the advocates, every year Rs 5 crore is given by the State Government to the Bar Council. It has also been stipulated that if a criminal damages the property of an advocate, a provision has been made to recover the amount of compensation fixed by the court and give it to the aggrieved advocate. It was also clarified that the speedy recovery of this amount of compensation will be done on the lines of arrears of land revenue.

In a nutshell, it is high time and Advocates Protection Act must be enacted at the earliest. It must be implemented in all states of India and no state should be left out of it on one pretext or the other! The stellar role of the advocates which they perform in one form or the other cannot be glossed over and it is none other than the advocates themselves who are most essential for the smooth, effective and proper functioning of judiciary and to protect their life and vital interests, it becomes all the more imperative to most promptly implement the Advocate Protection Act at the earliest as it brooks no more delay any longer now! No denying!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
India is going on grate path of welfare-state. Mahatma Gandhi's greatest ambition for India was to wipe every tear from every eye
Social justice means a way of life with liberty, equality and fraternity as the principles of life.
BJP after always repeatedly assuring the lawyers of West UP that they will make sure that a high court bench is created soon here as soon as it comes to power has reneged on its tall promises and has done virtually nothing on this score till now
To start with, I say this not as a lawyer of West UP but as a good citizen of India that the unending protest of lawyers of West UP severely affects the litigants who have to wait repeatedly to get justice. But who is responsible for this
It is most baffling to note that Centre since 1947 till 2018 has consistently, callously, blatantly and brazenly disregarded the numerous hardships faced by the more than 9 crore people of West UP in travelling nearly 700 to 750 km
Uttarakhand High Court in the landmark case of Lalit Kumar v Union of India & Ors in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 203 of 2014 dated 12 June 2018 directed the Centre to establish a Regional Bench of Armed Forces Tribunal in the State of Uttarakhand within four months.
West UP which deserved statehood right since 1947 has not even a single bench of a high court since last more than 70 years
High Court of Kerala has in a historic move directed the Indian Railways to treat identity cards issued to lawyers by respective Bar Councils as a valid identity proof to undertake a train journey/travel.
Constitution of Special District Courts to try cases as per the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
Foreign law Firms cannot Practice in India, but they are free to give legal advice regarding foreign law on diverse international legal issues on a fly in and fly out basis if it does not amount to practice.
Each and every person who is humane whether he/she is Indian or Pakistani or anyone else is overjoyed on learning the news of the release of Abhinandan
crime against women are multiplying most rapidly in UP and this is most felt in West UP which is the worst affected of all the regions of UP.
In our country around 5 lakh accidents take place every year and 1.5 lakh deaths occur. In world highest number of deaths due to the accidents take place in India. It is our responsibility to control these deaths and promote road safety.
It was decided unanimously by all the lawyers of 22 districts of West UP to go on strike on November 25, 2019 and observe it as  protest day. The lawyers of West UP are not happy with the statement of Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad about the creation of a high court bench in West UP
parents of a married son are not entitled to claim filial compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Rambabu Singh Thakur v/s Sunil Arora serious note of the increase in the number of tainted candidates facing criminal cases entering politics. It has issued a slew of directions in this latest, landmark and extremely laudable judgment which we shall discuss later.
J&K High Court Bar Association v. UOI dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought prohibition of use of pellet guns. How long can security forces restrain themselves if public becomes unruly and start pelting stones, bottles and what not
Harmanbhai Umedbhai Patel vs Bindu Kumar Mohanlal Shahupheld an order passed by the Bar Council of India (BCI) dismissing a complaint alleging professional misconduct by a lawyer. There was no professional misconduct found on the part of the lawyer.
Kangana Ranaut vs Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai restraining the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai from carrying out any further demolition at Kangana Ranaut's residence in Bandra
The Telangana Fire Works Dealers Association vs. P Indra Prakash has modified the order of the Telangana High Court which imposed a complete and immediate ban on the sale and use of firecrackers across the state during Diwali to fall in line with the directions imposed by the National Green Tribunal on November 9
The non-availability of birth certificate is issued when the person does not have a birth proof. One can visit the municipal corporation, gram panchayat or chief medical officer in the area where he or she is born and apply for this document, showing address proof and proofs of 2 more witnesses on an affidavit.
M. Thangaraj (Ex. MC) v. The District Collector, Dindigul to follow the ritual of taking a procession around the temple (Girivalam) has recently on January 18, 2021 observed that all the religious processions should spread positivity and brotherhood and in no manner should be a cause for any communal disturbance.
K Raju v. UOI only senior citizens/parents are entitled to file an appeal against an order passed by the Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007.
Kolkata Municipal Corporation authorities to take action against people found slaughtering cattle including cows and/or exhibiting for sale flesh of slaughtered cattle and/or selling cattle meat.
Legal Industry and the Enhancement of the Technology Towards the Progressive Development In An Amicable Manner
Omnarayan Sharma Vs MP issued directions to the District Legal Services Authorities and the State Authority for ensuring implementation of poverty alleviation schemes promulgated under provisions of Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 and NALSA
Javed v Uttar Pradesh that the cow should be declared the national animal and cow protection should be made a fundamental right of the Hindus because we know that when the country's culture and its faith get hurt, the country becomes weak.
The ‘Green Channel’ is an automated and transparent system for gaining approval for certain type and combination of mergers and acquisition.
Hasae @ Hasana Wae vs UP that dilution of constitutional autonomy of the High Courts would threaten the concept of judicial federalism envisaged in the Constitution and affirmed by judicial precedents.
Madhya Pradesh vs Pujari Utthan Avam Kalyan Samiti that the presiding deity of the temple is the owner of the land attached to the temple and Pujari is only to perform puja and to maintain the properties of the deity.
Alkesh Vs MP in a case under SC/ST Act, the caste of the complainant is of paramount importance and is a sine qua non and that it can't be assumed that the complainant would forget to mention in the FIR that the assailants had made aspersions against his caste.
The non-availability of birth certificate is a document to register unregistered birth. It can also be used in case the applicant has lost his birth certificate to a fire, flood or any other reason.
a Dalit man named Lakhbir Singh aged 35 years who was a food server with no political affiliation of any kind or any past criminal record would first be beaten black
Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Kapil Sibal states The whole Act is an attempt to aggrandize the power of the State.
Char Dham Highway expansion in full court room exchange took the extremely commendable, clear, cogent, composed, courageous and convincing stand that concerns of defence forces cannot be overridden.
Bindu v. Allahabad that as per Article 233(2), a person seeking appointment as a District Judge must be practicing as an advocate for continuous 7 years (without any break) on the date of application.
TC Gupta v. UOI that the petitioner-advocate who in more than one matters, has indulged in filing Original Applications in the Tribunal as well as writ petitions in the High Court and has personally signed the pleadings etc without having been specifically authorized in this regard by the litigants which cannot be glossed over.
Swaran Kaur vs Punjab that entitlement for the grant of family pension to the dependent parents needs to be seen after the widow or the children loose their eligibility for the grant of the said benefit.
Zubair Ahmed Teli Vs. Union Territory of J&K that there is no requirement of prior consideration of the social investigation report by Juvenile Justice Board while considering a bail plea under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Care and Protection Act,
Chandrashekhar R vs Karnataka that Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution embodies the principle of religious tolerance which is a characteristic of Indian civilization disposed of a public interest litigation alleging that the contents of Azan
Suresh Kumar vs CP upholding the dismissal of a police head constable who was caught with 75 dirhams while on duty of checking passengers passports of the Indira Gandhi International Airport in 1996, observing that the police officers who break law must be dealt with iron hands.
Mohd Abdul Khaliq Vs UP that the Central Government would take the request appropriate decision to ban cow slaughter in the country and to declare the same as a protected national animal.
Nikhil Singh Vs UOI that: As would be evident from the chart supplied by Dr KN Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General of India, most of the Airports/Airstrips in the State of Bihar are non-functional.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) President Dr Adish C Aggarwala who recently got elected as President after surpassing many of his strong competitors with most strongest being Mr Dushyant Dave
Al Tawaf Hajj And Umrah Travel And Tourism vs UoI that: Haj Pilgrimage and the ceremonies involved therein and the ceremonies involved therein fall within the ambit of a religious practice, which is protected by the Constitution of India.
It is ‘shockingly bizarre’ that UP has maximum pending cases among all States that is more than 10 lakhs in High Courts and about a crore in lower courts and has maximum population
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs BN Magon that an advocate’s office run from a residential building is not subject to property tax under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act as a business building.
Meena Pradhan vs Kamla Pradhan that a will is required to fulfill all the formalities required under Section 63 of the Succession Act.
Whenever you are in doubt, or when the self becomes too much, recall the face of the poorest and the weakest man/woman
Top