Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, November 21, 2024

Why CJI Never Dares To Speak Up On Bench In West UP?

Posted in: Judiciary
Thu, Feb 9, 23, 09:59, 2 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 7273
Why is it that no CJI ever dared to question the most horrendous decision to attach the hilly areas of undivided Uttar Pradesh just like 30 districts of West UP

At the very outset, it must be asked: Why is it that no Chief Justice of India (CJI) ever dared to question the most horrendous decision taken by the first Prime Minister named Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru to create a High Court Bench so near to Allahabad at Nawab City named Lucknow only in Eastern UP and at no other place in undivided Uttar Pradesh way back on July 19, 1948 when it started functioning? Why is it that no CJI ever dared to question the most horrendous decision to attach the hilly areas of undivided Uttar Pradesh just like 30 districts of West UP with not even Lucknow which falls 200 km earlier but with Allahabad? Does it not make a complete mockery of Article 21 of the Constitution? Why Apex Court demonstrated complete helplessness on it?

As if this was not enough, why is it that when a high powered Commission headed by the former Supreme Court Judge – Justice (Retd) Jaswant Singh appointed by Centre itself in mid 1970s had strongly recommended that three High Court Benches be created in undivided Uttar Pradesh at Dehradun, Nainital and Agra yet not one was created yet CJI said nothing? Why is it that on the recommendations of Justice Jaswant Singh Commission we saw that a High Court Bench was approved at Aurangabad in Maharashtra which started functioning since 1985 even though it had already multiple High Court Benches at Nagpur and Panaji yet CJI said nothing? Why on recommendations again of Justice Jaswant Singh Commission we saw a High Court Bench approved for Jalpaiguri in West Bengal for just 6 districts which already had a Bench for just 3 lakh people at Port Blair in Andaman and Nicobar islands but not a single more for UP which tops the State list in having maximum pending cases yet CJI again said nothing? Why is it that UP Bar Council is the largest Bar Council in the world as claimed in the website of UP Bar Council itself and still UP has least Benches in India and that too so close to Allahabad leaving the other regions high and dry? Why UP High Court has maximum Judges among all the States but Bench just one? Is it not a grave violation of Article 14 of Constitution which talks about right to equality?

It must also be definitely asked: Why is it that when the historic 230th report of Law Commission of India prepared by eminent experts under the Chairmanship of former Supreme Court Judge – Dr AR Lakshmanan recommended creation of more High Court Benches in different States yet CJI said nothing? Why is it that when Centre in a most unfair manner all of a sudden decided to first create 2 circuit benches in Karnataka for just 4 and 8 districts at Dharwad and Gulbarga respectively in 2008 and then as main benches in 2013 without there being any strike by lawyers or any other big agitation and on the contrary deciding most arbitrarily to not approve even a single High Court Bench for West UP as was actually recommended also by the Justice Jaswant Singh Commission for 30 districts of West UP with more than 10 crore population as opposed to just 6 crore population of Karnataka yet CJI did nothing? Why even after 14 years of such landmark recommendations made by the 230th report of Law Commission of India is it still lying unattended and unimplemented?

My simple and straightforward argument precisely is: Is this the best way of dismantling inequality? Should we be very proud that a peaceful State like Maharashtra which is the native State of the CJI Dr DY Chandrachud tops in the latest justice index ranking list of States and where women can go alone in night anywhere without any fear as was conceded also by former UP Chief Justice Dilip Babasaheb Bhosale whose native State is Maharashtra while he was UP Chief Justice as opposed to Uttar Pradesh where a women and girl is not safe even with her relatives in broad day light on national highway also while listening to an incident of crime against them in national highway in Bulandshahr again in West UP yet neither CJI nor UP Chief Justice does anything to create a Bench in West UP to end the worst discrimination against UP and West UP in particular? My reading of the Constitution certainly does not tell me that equality can be guaranteed and perpetuated only by ensuring always that both the High Court and so also the single High Court Bench in the most populated State of India are only in Eastern UP alone as Western UP, Bundelkhand and Purvanchal are considered “untouchables” for Bench as we have witnessed since last more than 75 years and here too all districts of West UP are attached again not with Lucknow which is 200 km earlier but right up till Allahabad which is 200 km still further to get justice!

To say the least, a fusillade of troubling questions keep tormenting my mind such as: Is this is what the Constitution teaches us? Should we really be ever proud of it? Is this is exactly what the learned CJI Dr DY Chandrachud who coincidentally is also from Maharashtra which has multiple High Court Benches should always applaud and be most proud of?

CJI must ask himself: Which State has maximum pending cases? Maharashtra which has 3 Benches and former CM Uddhav Thackeray approved even 4th at Kolhapur for just 6 districts or Assam which has four Benches or Karnataka which has 3 Benches or West Bengal and Madhya Pradesh which have two each or is it UP which has just one Bench? Again the answer is Uttar Pradesh! Which High Court has maximum Judges? Again Uttar Pradesh at 160 much more than the rest! Which part of the State of UP owes for more than half of the total pending cases of UP as was conceded by Justice Jaswant Singh Commission report? Again the answer is West UP which has no Bench inspite of Justice Jaswant Singh Commission recommending the same! Should CJI Dr DY Chandrachud be proud of this? Should he feel proud that just like he did nothing in his nearly 3 years tenure as Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court similarly he should do nothing in his two year tenure as CJI?

One must also ask: Why has Centre and Apex Court and so also the CJI and PM have completely blindfolded themselves to presume that no region except “Nawab City” named Lucknow just 200 km away from Allahabad High Court is alone fit for Bench? It must be said without any reservation that Apex Court is the watchdog of democracy and so how can it keep quiet maintaining a deafening silence to the worst injustice perpetrated on the most populated State of India with impunity so brazenly and openly due to which the litigants of 30 districts of West UP have to waste whole night and half day in travelling alone to get justice? The burden is definitely on the shoulders of the Apex Court to pick up the gauntlet and rise to the occasion by creating a Bench in West UP!

As we all know, the incumbent Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dr DY Chandrachud is not a stranger to Uttar Pradesh. He was the Chief Justice of Uttar Pradesh High Court at Allahabad for nearly three years as he himself concedes! It was in his term as Chief Justice that lawyers of West UP went on strike for five and a half months in 2014-15 demanding the creation of a High Court Bench! What I find quite baffling is that the CJI speaks a lot on the way Judges of UP behaves but why he never speaks on High Court Bench in West UP for which lawyers of West UP have gone on strike for 6 months as in 2001, hunger strike for one month as in 1978 and strike every Saturday since May 1981 till now after more than 42 years ?

CJI must ask himself: Why UP Bar Council is the largest Bar Council in the world as claimed in the website itself of UP Bar Council and yet UP has just one Bench? Will heavens fall if for more than 10 crore people of 30 districts of West UP a High Court Bench is created? Will heavens fall if like Maharashtra which is the native State of CJI, UP too has multiple Benches in needy regions like West UP, Bundelkhand, Purvanchal etc?

To be sure, CJI must also ask himself: Why when for most needy regions of UP like West UP, Bundelkhand and Purvanchal there is no Bench then why a Bench in Lucknow which is so close to Allahabad and why the litigants are made to travel 200 km further away from Lucknow till Allahabad to seek justice? Why catchy slogans like “speedy justice” and “justice at the doorsteps” seem to be fizzling out so rapidly? Why the historic 230th Report of Law Commission of India recommending the creation of more High Court Benches remains unimplemented even after 14 years of its recommendations? Why CJI has always allowed Centre to convert an open-and-shut case into an intractable issue?

I am most anguished and saddened beyond words to see that how all PM have acted like copycats of Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru that only Nawab City is alone fit for a Bench and no other city and all CJI have been a mute spectator in watching how an open mockery was being made of Article 14 of Constitution! Why the demand for a Bench has always fallen on deaf ears? Denial of a Bench to West UP since last more than 75 years cannot be ever countenanced under any circumstances!

CJI must introspect and ask himself: Why the litigants of 30 districts of West UP have to travel like a fool all the way to not even Lucknow but more than 200 km away till Allahabad to seek justice as there is no Bench in West UP! Was it just for fun that none other than former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee himself demanded Bench for West UP in Meerut as leader of Opposition right inside Parliament? Why a galaxy of prominent leaders like Union Defence Minister Rajnath Singh among many others including the elected representatives in Parliament have time and again reiterated their full support for a Bench in West UP? Again is it just for fun?

No doubt, the paramount welfare of the people at large of all needy regions of UP like West UP and so also other States should be the watchword for Centre always! Centre must always remember that it got elected not to just serve the vested interests of only a particular region or religion or community or caste but of all the people of all the religions! If Centre fails to act as we have seen also in case of UP where not a single Bench created in nearly last 75 years not even for West UP then why CJI never dares to speak up on it? It is the litigants of West UP who will stand to gain the most if a High Court Bench is created here due to the CJI’s intervention! No denying it!

Parvez Alam (Advocate), BA, LLB, LLM,
Chamber No. 151, Near Election Office, Collectrate Compound,
Kutchery, Meerut - 250003

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
parvezalamadvocate
Member since Dec 11, 2021
Location: n/a
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top