Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Monday, December 23, 2024

No Bona Fide Reason To Deny A High Court Bench To West UP

Posted in: Judiciary
Wed, Nov 30, 22, 10:23, 2 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 16026
If one is a democrat, one has to believe that however powerful the government may be, public opinion can ultimately assert itself and compel the Government to submit to that opinion.

I often hear the remark that it is useless to try to do anything because the government is all-powerful. But in holding this opinion one also denies the very basis of democracy. If one is a democrat, one has to believe that however powerful the government may be, public opinion can ultimately assert itself and compel the Government to submit to that opinion. It is only this faith which can make the working of democratic institutions possible, and as I said in this, lawyers can play a big part.

These most pragmatic, powerful and pertinent statements were made by none other than the most legendary former Bombay High Court Chief Justice late Mr MC Chagla who had the unique distinction of manning the most prestigious post of the Chief Justice of Bombay High Court for 11 years from 1947 to 1958 and who famously penned these sagacious words in his autobiography titled Roses In December. If in world anywhere the lawyers have practically dared to differ with the government at Centre and speak out most vocally in favour of the more than 75 years old legitimate demand for setting up a High Court Bench, it is none other than the lawyers of West UP who have been unrelenting, undeterred and uncompromising in its sacred struggle for setting up a High Court Bench in West UP! So it cannot be ever disputed that the lawyers of West UP have been unanimous in not compromising on anything less than the setting up of a High Court Bench in West UP!

It must be mentioned here that the lawyers of West UP have always put their best foot forward in arguing strictly on the ground of merit and pure merit alone for setting up a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also right since independence. None other than the Union Law Minister of State SP Baghel has himself conceded that the litigants of West UP have to travel more than 800 km on an average all the way to not just Lucknow which is 200 km earlier but right uptill Allahabad to secure justice! But much to my dismay and to the dismay of the lawyers of West UP, Centre has just rode roughshod over our robust, remarkable, rational and reasonable arguments in support of the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP.

What I find totally inexplicable is that why inspite of UP having maximum pending cases among all the States in India and here too it is West UP which alone owes for more than half of the total pending cases still why West UP has been deprived of even a Single High Court Bench? What is equally inexplicable is that why when Justice Jaswant Singh Commission which was constituted with a former Supreme Court Judge – Justice Jaswant Singh as its head when former PM late Mrs Indira Gandhi was PM and who had very strongly recommended three High Court Benches for undivided UP at Agra, Dehradun and Nainital yet not even a single High Court Bench was created which is most confounding! Why Centre took no time in creating High Court Bench for other States like Maharashtra at Aurangabad which already had High Court Bench at Nagpur and Panaji? Same is the case with West Bengal which already had a Bench at Port Blair and yet one more was approved for it at Jalpaiguri and one High Court was approved for Tamil Nadu at Madurai? It is for Centre to come clean on this!

It would certainly not tantamount to an exaggeration from any angle if I say with a sense of responsibility that Centre most preposterously deciding in not ever implementing the Justice Jaswant Singh Commission’s historic recommendations to create 3 High Court Benches in undivided UP is a missed opportunity of gargantuan proportions. It must be said that Uttarakhand would definitely not have ever come into existence if Centre had been honest enough to actually ensure that the landmark recommendations were unbiasedly implemented in undivided UP where all it was recommended at Agra, Dehradun and Nainital. Centre not conceding to even a Single High Court Bench since 1948 when the first PM Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru approved a Bench at Lucknow just 200 km away from Allahabad where High Court itself is located is nothing but stupidity of the highest order due to which the people of Uttarakhand had to travel more than a thousand kilometers all the way not just till Lucknow which is 200 km before but right till Allahabad itself to get justice! When people furiously agitated for separate State itself as they became convinced that Centre will never allow a High Court Bench to them in undivided UP then Centre most smilingly dished out High Court itself at Nainital to those same hilly areas who till November 2000 when they formed part of UP were denied even a single High Court Bench!

Why is it that the former Union Minister in PM Narendra Modi’s Cabinet named Satyapal Singh who is also former Mumbai Police Commissioner and who had very strongly recommended 5 High Court Benches at Meerut, Agra, Varanasi, Jhansi and Gorakhpur yet not a single created till now? Why BJP under leadership of PM Narendra Modi has behaved like a copycat of late former PM Jawaharlal Nehru by not approving a single High Court Bench in any nook and corner of UP in his 8 and a half year rule? Why PM Modi took no time in approving Telangana as a separate State on 2 June 2014 whose population is just about 3 crore but for ten crore people of West UP, Centre is not ready to approve even a single High Court Bench nor for any other needy region of UP like Bundelkhand or Purvanchal?

Why none other than former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee himself took the lead in raising forcefully the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP in Parliament in 1986 most vociferously but still Centre did nothing? Why none other than BJP own MPs like Rajender Aggarwal from Meerut, Sanjeev Baliyan, Gen VK Singh and many other MPs and MLAs from West UP have time and again raised the demand for a High Court Bench yet we see nothing happening on ground which is most dejecting? Rajender Aggarwal who represents BJP as MP in Parliament was in fact honoured in Meerut Bar for forcefully raising the demand of a High Court Bench in Parliament but what has it yielded on ground? Just nothing!

Why is it that the lawyers of West UP are now compelled and left with no option but to declare November 30, 2022 as a No Work Day and will all assemble at Meerut as decided by the Central Action Committee formed to fight the cause for High Court Bench in West UP many decades back to discuss, deliberate and debate threadbare on future strategies to accelerate most rapidly the sacred agitation of setting up a High Court Bench in West UP? I have seen for myself how lawyers of West UP have gone on strike for 6 months as in 2001 with full gusto, one month as in 2010, two months as in 2009 and four to five months as in 2014-15 and many times every Wednesday apart from every Saturday since May 1981 till November 2022 and one month hunger strike in 1976 and some times for weeks together and what not including taking out padyatras, sleeping whole night outside court premises while boycotting Lok Adalat yet Centre remains totally unmoved which is really most shocking to see!

Not just this, why many times so many senior lawyers themselves apart from the young lawyers have most willingly braved police lathis, got injured in hands, legs, face, head and what not and some have even attempted to self-immolate on this most emotive issue of setting up of a High Court Bench in West UP yet it has had most shockingly just no effect on Centre? How long will Centre take to decide ultimately on setting up a High Court Bench in West UP? For how many years did Jawaharlal Nehru deliberated to create a High Court Bench in Eastern UP where already there was a High Court at Allahabad? Not even one year! Just in few months he had the guts, gall and gumption to create a High Court Bench in Nawab City which is termed as Lucknow way back on July 1 in 1948! This is called strong political will! He certainly had taken wrong decisions but he had the unflinching faith in himself but all the PM after him till now never had that type of faith to create even a single High Court Bench in even the hilly areas that were more than thousands of kilometers away from Allahabad!

What also merits noticing is that in its hearts of heart, Centre from 1947 till November 2022 feels most elated to have honoured Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru’s wish of undivided UP having just one High Court Bench at Lucknow better known as Nawab City so that the people there and adjoining regions don’t even have to travel till Allahabad which is just about 200 km away to attend court hearings and seek justice and most comfortably, coolly and calmly travel in their own Nawab City named Lucknow! It is very difficult at least for me to get my mind besotted by Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru who is not just India’s first PM but also a Barrister trained in UK who propounded that no place except Lucknow and Lucknow alone which is more renownedly known as Nawab City alone fits the bill deserving to be given a High Court Bench and all PM till incumbent PM Narendra Modi have continued to play out senselessly this duplicitous charade that Lucknow alone deserves a High Court Bench and no other place in whole of UP! Most disgusting and this tantamounts to nothing but making a worst mockery of Article 14 of the Constitution and trampling it under its feet without being held accountable by any court in India!

It is indisputable that criteria for creation of High Court Bench has to be evolved based on reason, fair play and non arbitrariness. In such case, the public interest has to be the prime guiding consideration and so also distance from the High Court so that litigants are not compelled to travel whole night and half day as we see in case of litigants from West UP! What I find totally inexplicable is that why inspite of West UP accounting for more than half of total pending cases of UP and the districts of this region are at an average of about 700 km all the way to Allahabad still no Bench has been created here.

It must definitely be asked: Why the 230th report of Law Commission of India has not been implemented in UP and Bihar where it was needed most as it is UP which tops the State list of having maximum pending cases of more than 10 lakhs in High Court and nearly in crore in lower courts and so also in other needy states like Rajasthan and Odisha? Why Karnataka whose population at 6 crore is far less than that of population of West UP whose population is 10 crore and still it has High Court and in 2013 Benches were created for just 4 and 8 districts of Karnataka at Dharwad and Gulbarga respectively? Why Centre is ready to give anything to UP except High Court Bench?

Let me be very candid in conceding that:
All this only serves to makes me hang my head in shame as even Supreme Court has never risen to the occasion by speaking most vociferously for the people of West UP and Bihar who have suffered endlessly and are still suffering due to no decision being taken by Centre on this count! Maharashtra tops in justice index ranking among all States still has 4 High Court Benches and UP for whom former UP Chief Justice DB Bhosale who himself hailed from Maharashtra said that in UP, women and children are not safe with their men even on national highways while referring to rape and loot of women and children in a national highway at Bulandshahr in West UP but in Maharashtra women and girls are safe even in nights and that too all alone still Maharashtra has High Court Benches at Aurangabad, Nagpur, Panaji and Kolhapur but UP has just one at Lucknow! Most shocking indeed!

Parvez Alam (Advocate), BA, LLB, LLM,
Chamber No. 151, Near Election Office,
Collectrate Compound, Kutchery, Meerut - 250003

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
parvezalamadvocate
Member since Dec 11, 2021
Location: n/a
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top