Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Sunday, January 12, 2025

Judiciary Must Reach Out To People Instead Of People Reaching Out To It: CJI Dr DY Chandrachud on Constitution Day

Posted in: Judiciary
Sun, Nov 27, 22, 17:12, 2 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 4763
Why the historic 230th report of Law Commission of India recommending creation of more High Court Benches

Chief Justice of India Dr DY Chandrachud is hundred percent right that judiciary must reach out to people instead of people reaching out to it. But the moot question is: When will that day come? Why the historic 230th report of Law Commission of India recommending creation of more High Court Benches in India implemented only in Karnataka and in no other state ever since it recommended nearly 14 years back in 2009?

As recently as on August 2, 2022, the total number of pending cases in India in Supreme Court are 71,411 out of which 56,365 are civil matters and 15,076 are criminal matters. This was informed by the Union Minister of Law and Justice Kiren Rijiju informed the Rajya Sabha on August 4, 2022. Out of these cases, we see that more than 10,491 cases are awaiting disposal for over a decade. Here too we see that over 42,000 cases were pending for less than five years and 18,134 between 5 and 10 years. The Minister gave the statistics from the information provided by the Supreme Court.

Needless to say, the situation of pending cases in High Courts is much worse and still worse is the case of Allahabad High Court of UP which tops among all the States as far as the number of pending cases are concerned and what is worst is that Allahabad has least High Court Benches in India – just one and that too just 200 km away from Allahabad at Lucknow which was created by none other than Lord Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru on July 1, 1948 less than a year after independence and now as we celebrate 75 years of independence we find that not a single more High Court Bench has been added most stupidly, most shamelessly and most senselessly by Centre and worst of all the 30 districts of West UP have been attached not with Lucknow which is 200 km earlier but with Allahabad which cannot be justified under any circumstances! What is worse is that Supreme Court too behaved like a mute and helpless spectator and did nothing to address it! When Supreme Court can take suo motu action in so many other cases then why it never acted on this key issue concerning the largest populated state of India?

To top it all, I just recently learnt that the Allahabad High Court is the biggest court not just in Asia but in the whole world as even our PM Narendra Damodardas Modi openly and very proudly acknowledges as I heard once and UP CM Yogi Aditynath proudly acknowledging that UP has more than 25 crore population which is more than even Pakistan and many other countries! But you see the supreme irony that Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by the former Supreme Court Judge Justice Jaswant Singh appointed by the then PM Mrs Indira Gandhi in mid 1970s after fully going into the issue strongly recommended 3 High Court Benches for undivided UP at Agra, Dehradun and Nainital but not even a single High Court Bench was created due to which people of Uttarakhand had to travel thousands of kilometers all the way most stupidly, most shamelessly and most senselessly as if they were slaves right not just till Lucknow where High Court Bench is located but more than 200 km away all the way up till Allahabad to get justice till November 2000 when it was created as a separate state after people agitated very hard and many even lost their precious lives! If High Court Benches had been created well in time as recommended so very commendably by the Justice Jaswant Singh Commission then why would the people have agitated so hard?

Why Supreme Court Judges and even the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till November 2000 kept watching as if they had just no power to speak up against this most shameless, senseless and stupid act due to which people of now Uttarakhand had to travel so far as if they were slaves? Ultimately it got High Court itself because of people’s agitation and not because of Supreme Court which did just nothing in this matter as it is doing just nothing now also in case of West UP where population is more than 10 crore and still people of 30 districts are compelled to travel again most stupidly, most shamelessly and most senselessly right up till Allahabad to get justice as Supreme Court leaves everything on Centre alone who is ready to give anything to UP and West UP except High Court Bench!

It must be mentioned here that 59,55,907 cases are pending in 25 High Courts across the country as on July 29, 2022. The highest figure is 1026158 pending cases in Allahabad High Court still most disgracefully has just one High Court Bench but Gauhati High Court has just 57164 cases and still has 4 High Court Benches! Similarly, we see that Bombay High Court has just 592648 pending cases and it has 3 High Court Benches at Nagpur, Aurangabad and Panaji and 4th one was approved by former Maharashtra CM Uddhav Thackeray at Kolhapur for just 6 districts and.

In addition the present Deputy CM Devendra Fadnavis who was former CM also wants the fifth Bench at Pune which earlier also he had himself approved! Calcutta High Court has just 215680 pending cases and it has two High Court Benches at Jalpaiguri and Port Blair, Madhya Pradesh High Court has just 417288 pending cases and still it also has two High Court Benches at Gwalior and Indore, Karnataka has just 297429 pending cases and it has 3 High Court Benches at Hubli, Dharwad and Gulbarga. This is what I find most troubling! How can any sane person justify just one High Court Bench for UP and that too so close to Allahabad. If Lucknow is capital then so is Bhopal which is capital of Madhya Pradesh which has neither High Court nor Bench, Dehradun is capital of Uttarakhand but High Court is at Nainital, Bhubaneshwar is capital of Odisha but High Court is at Cuttack, Thiruvananthapuram which is capital of Kerala but High Court is at Ernakulam, Dispur which is capital of Assam but High Court is at Gauhati, Raipur which is capital of Chhattisgarh but High Court is at Bilaspur and so also is case in many other states but why most unabashedly both High Court and a single High Court Bench are located so close to each other thereby putting people of far flung areas to maximum inconvenience as we see in case of West UP, Purvanchal and Bundelkhand but Centre most callously just prefers to always look the other way and pretend as if everything is fine on this count!

Adding more to it, we must note here that the figure of backlogs in subordinate courts is 4.13 crores and here too again UP tops with 10535946 pending cases which has minimum High Court Benches in India just one! Maharashtra has 5009824 pending cases still has 3 High Court Benches, Assam has just 462922 pending cases still has 4 High Court Benches, Karnataka has just 1872057 pending cases and still has 3 High Court Benches and even Madhya Pradesh has just 1907117 still has 2 High Court Benches!

Why Centre has most contemptuously refused to create even a single High Court Bench in any nook and corner of UP including at West UP which has 30 districts? Why so many former PMs like Atal Bihari Vajpayee who even himself forcefully raised the demand for a High Court Bench for West UP right inside Parliament in 1986, Mrs Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi, Dr Manmohan Singh among others who had all appreciated the dire need for a High Court Bench in West UP yet not even a single has been created anywhere in UP? Why another lawless state Bihar has not even a single High Court Bench? Why so many UP CM like Dr Sampoornanand, ND Tiwari, Rajnath Singh and present Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath had demanded a High Court Bench for Gorakhpur in Parliament in 1998 as he was MP from Gorakhpur and even brought a private member Bill in 2015 for the same then also yet why not even a single Bench created till now anywhere in UP? Why former Governor of J&K and now Governor of Meghalaya Satya Pal Malik openly declared in Meerut his unstinted support for High Court Bench in West UP in which he said he himself would participate after retirement in September 2022? Centre must wake up at least now!

To top it all: Why most shamelessly has Centre ignored that it is the practising lawyers of West UP who have repeatedly went on strike for months and months together since last many decades when I who am nearing 50 years was not even born as was seen in the one month hunger strike in 1978 and many other such strikes earlier? Why even the six months old strike by practising lawyers of 30 districts of West UP as was done in 2001 from July till December and so also four to five months strike as was done in 2014-15, two months as was done in 2010 and one month as was done in 2009 apart from the strike every Saturday without break for more than 41 years since May 1981 till November 2022 apart from the so many strikes like every Wednesday also which was discontinued so that litigants don’t suffer? Now again on November 30, 2022 the lawyers of West UP will again assemble and deliberate on ways to accelerate the struggle for High Court Bench in West UP and lawyers will stay away from work! Why nothing on earth fails to shake Centre in taking any concrete step for creating a high court bench in West UP?

In addition, the lawyers of more than 30 districts of West UP have been regularly meeting under the banner of Central Action Committee in which the President and General Secretary of every District Bar gather along with senior and eminent lawyers to discuss on strategies to further the cause for getting a Bench approved from Centre since last many decades but again to no avail! The worst part is: Centre in 2008 as earlier even after taking memorandum from lawyers of West UP repeatedly decided to create 2 High Court Benches in Karnataka for just 4 and 8 districts respectively at Dharwad and Gulbarga respectively thus slapping the senior lawyers of West UP direct on their face which is most shocking and most disgusting! Nothing on earth can be more unfortunate than this! Yet the lawyers of West UP have always protested in the most dignified manner which has just no parallel!

It cannot be lightly dismissed that none other than the former CJI Ranjan Gogoi while in office as CJI had categorically appreciated the dire need of a High Court Bench in West UP when a woman lawyer named KL Chitra raised this burning issue in her PIL but Gogoi made it clear that it was for the Centre to take the final call on this! But Centre led by PM Narendradas Damodardas Modi is very firm that what Lord Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru did in 1948 to allot Bench only for Nawab City should be always maintained and in his 8 years he has proudly done that about which I myself feel most ashamed as the most historic recommendations of 230th report of Law Commission recommending creation of more Benches have been thrown virtually in the dustbin! This despite the irrefutable fact that BJP tall leaders like Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, Union Minister like Gen VK Singh among so many other elected MPs and MLAs have always reiterated their support for a Bench as the people of more than 30 districts are compelled to travel whole night and half day all the way to Allahabad most foolishly which is truly incomprehensible!

Why only Eastern UP has both High Court and a single Bench and West UP, Purvanchal and Bundelkhand have not even a single Bench anywhere which is most shocking! Supreme Court and so also the CJI have definitely not covered themselves with glory anyway in last 75 years by stupidly leaving everything on Centre alone who has done just nothing on it! Supreme Court is final but it cannot be always infallible! It has grievously erred by not doing anything on this since last nearly 75 years! Let's fervently hope that better sense prevails on CJI Dr DY Chandrachud who himself has seen the ground reality as Chief Justice for nearly 3 years as he himself conceded also and Apex Court also on this burning issue also as this will benefit directly most the poorest of poor, women, aged and the needy people who cannot afford to travel by plane!

Why the extremely commendable recommendation made by many UP CM like Sampoornanand who in 1955 had recommended that a High Court Bench be created in Meerut was most contemptuously discarded by Centre? Why when Mayawati as UP CM had recommended that West UP be created as a separate state in 1995 did Centre not just rejected it but also vowed never to create any bench in this region? Why former PM late Atal Bihari Vajpayee in 1986 thundered right inside Parliament for a High Court Bench in West UP? Whose agenda is Centre working on? It is criminals who are gaining the most due to no Bench being created here or in other needy regions of UP like Purvanchal, Bundelkhand among others!

Why even most eminent Supreme Court lawyers like former thrice President of Supreme Court Bar Association and former Union Law Minister and former Additional Solicitor General of India – Kapil Sibal who has a distinguished experience of more than 50 years in the top court itself strongly recommended for High Court Bench at Meerut in UPA’s tenure as was disclosed by another Union Minister then – RPN Singh who was Sibal’s colleague in UPA government yet no Bench was created anywhere in UP even though Centre proudly created 2 more Benches at Karnataka at Dharwad and Gulbarga for just 4 and 8 districts which is such a peaceful state? Why not a single High Court Bench created anywhere in UP other than at Lucknow in last 75 years? Should I salute Centre for this?

To say the least, why has Centre chosen to most brazenly disregard the most commendable recommendation made by one of the most eminent jurist of India and two times Attorney General – late Soli J Sorabjee who as Attorney General in 2001 had categorically and convincingly recommended that Centre is fully empowered to create a High Court Bench in West UP without any recommendation from the Chief Justice or Chief Minister or anyone else in this regard? Why Centre even most shamelessly disregarded what former Chairman of Supreme Court Bar Association – BN Krishnamani had said that:
Only by the creation of a High Court Bench in any of the districts in West UP will the people living there get real justice? Why the landmark recommendations of 230th report of Law Commission of India in 2009 to create more High Court Benches implemented shamelessly, senselessly and stupidly only in Karnataka?

There can be no gainsaying that if UP can’t be given more high court benches and West UP can’t have even one High Court Bench which owes for more than half of pending cases of UP as was itself acknowledged even by the Justice Jaswant Singh Commission itself then all the High Court Benches in India must be definitely disbanded right now itself.

Because UP has maximum pending cases and if it can function without any Benches in most needy regions like West UP who are suffering to the hilt where people of more than 30 districts have to travel more than 800 km on an average all the way to Allahabad as conceded by none other than SP Baghel himself recently who is Union Minister of State for Law then why Maharashtra which tops the state list ranking in justice index has 3 High Court Benches and we see even 4th Bench at Kolhapur had been sanctioned by the CM earlier for just 6 districts but not a single more for UP!

The process of law should not ever itself become punishment as we see most unfortunately in case of High Court Bench creation in West UP and why 100 excuses are always forwarded most readymade so as not to create a High Court Bench anywhere in UP most shamelessly by Centre? There is certainly more to it than meets the eye! This is what I find really most disgusting! Neither Centre nor Apex Court itself has covered itself with glory by doing just nothing on it!

No point really whatsoever in celebrating Constitution Day every year on November 26 if Centre does not allow even a single High Court Bench to be created in any nook and corner of UP except the one that was created by Lord Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru at Nawab City called Lucknow so that the people there were not made to travel even 200 km upto Allahabad and the 10 crore people of 30 districts of West UP were attached not with Lucknow which is about 200 km prior to Allahabad but with Allahabad itself which is most atrocious?

The purpose of celebrating Constitution Day will be served only and only if UP which tops in having maximum pending cases is given more High Court Benches and so also Bihar which is another lawless State yet has not even a Single High Court Bench!

This is the real rub! Why only Eastern UP has capital and so also High Court and so also a Single High Court Bench? Why the other regions of West UP have not been deemed fit to be given even a single High Court Bench? Is this not an open mockery of Article 14 of Constitution which talks about right to equality? You decide! When will judiciary reach out to the people of West UP and take prompt steps in creating five more High Court Benches at least in whole of UP but what is most shocking is that not one Bench created since 1948 till now by end of 2022? Most hurting!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top