Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, November 21, 2024

Centre Legally Worships Lord Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru

Posted in: Political
Mon, Nov 7, 22, 20:45, 2 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 5615
why Lord Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru is not the official father of the nation?

The first question that strikes my mind most hard ever since I gained senses is that why Lord Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru is not the official father of the nation? Who accepted partition as harsh truth? Lord Pandit Nehru! Who has ruled India for longest 17 years? Lord Pandit Nehru! Who has created IITs and big dams like Bhakranangal etc etc? Lord Pandit Nehru! Who never suffered any electoral defeat in his lifetime and continuously became PM of India? Lord Pandit Nehru! Who would have been elected PM of India for 100 years if he had stayed alive? Lord Pandit Nehru!

Whether we like it or not but it is an unpalatable truth that even BJP which is the party which is ruling India since last more than eight years and which stands totally pitched against Congress legally worships Lord Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru who had been most rigorously trained in United Kingdom also called England and also called Great Britain by some very eminent jurists and barristers as most of the key decisions that he took still stand intact! As for instance, in this article, I will focus mainly on the creation of a High Court Bench. Lord Pandit Nehru wanted that High Court Bench be created only at the City of Nawabs which is famous by the name of Lucknow! He took no time and less than a year after independence, he easily created a High Court Bench on July 1, 1948 just 200 km away from Allahabad where High Court itself is located at Lucknow!

That’s all! After that no High Court Bench created at any nook and corner of UP by any Prime Minister! This despite the irrefutable fact that the people of hilly regions of undivided Uttar Pradesh now called Uttarakhand had to most stupidly, shamelessly and senselessly thousands of kilometers all the way not even till Lucknow which is 200 km earlier but right up till Allahabad to get justice! Not a single CJI dared to speak up! Why? Again Lord Pandit Nehru!

Why the designated CJI Justice Dr Dhananjaya Yashwant Chandrachud cannot create a High Court Bench not just in West UP but in any nook and corner of UP even after being on post of Chief Justice of India for two years? Again Lord Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru! Why the designated CJI Justice Dr Dhananjaya Yashwant Chandrachud inspite of being the Chief Justice of Uttar Pradesh from October 31, 2013 till May 12, 2016 could not create a High Court Bench in West UP or any other needy region of UP? Again Lord Pandit Nehru! Why the lawyers of West UP have been relentlessly agitating for a High Court since ages when my father was a small baby and yet not a single created till now? Again Lord Pandit Nehru! Why inspite of lawyers forming Central Action Committee many decades back which meets regularly of all districts of West UP to chalk out strategy on how to create High Court Bench has not succeeded inspite of repeated agitations? Again it is Lord Pandit Nehru!

Why can’t the glass ceiling on High Court Bench in West UP not be broken? Again Lord Pandit Nehru! Why lawyers of all districts of West UP went on hunger strike as in 1978 yet no High Court Bench created? Again Lord Pandit Nehru! Why lawyers of West UP went on strike for 6 months from July to December 2001 yet no High Court Bench created? Again Lord Pandit Nehru!

Why the lawyers of West UP went on strike for a month and in between many weeks in 2009 yet no Bench? Again Lord Pandit Nehru! Why lawyers of West UP went on strike for 4 to 5 months in 2014-15 yet no Bench? Again Lord Pandit Nehru!

Why lawyers of West UP even boycotted some times Lok Adalats and once in 2014-15 protested outside court premises whole night yet no Bench? Again Lord Pandit Nehru! Why Centre behaving like servant (called in Hindi as Das) on creating more High Court Benches in UP? Again Lord Pandit Nehru!

Why lawyers of West UP even went on a grand scale historic Padyatra from Mussorrie to Delhi in 1989 accompanied by lawyers of hilly regions which now constitute a separate State termed Uttarakhand yet no Bench created? Again Lord Pandit Nehru! Why lawyers of West UP since last 75 years have been submitting memorandum for High Court Bench yet no Bench? Again Lord Pandit Nehru!

Why when the most promising senior lawyer, former Union Law Minister of India and jurist named Kapil Sibal recommended High Court Bench to be created in Meerut in his official capacity as was disclosed by another former Union minister RPN Singh while in Congress but now in BJP still it was not created and instead two High Court Benches were created at Karnataka for just 4 and 8 districts respect? Again Lord Pandit Nehru! It must be asked: When Maharashtra can have 3 High Court Benches with 4th being approved at Kolhapur for just 6 districts by former CM Uddhav Thackeray then why can't UP have even two Benches like Madhya Pradesh even though Maharashtra tops in justice index ranking as opposed to UP which fares poorly and has maximum pending cases ? Again Lord Pandit Nehru!

Why is it that the practicing lawyers of West UP of all the districts were on strike on August 4, 2022 demanding a High Court Bench in West UP among other things? Why is it that I who am nearing 50 years old and when even I was not born, the lawyers of West UP were most relentlessly striking and agitating for a High Court Bench for months and months together but Centre most stupidly, most shamelessly and most senselessly decides not to allow not just a High Court Bench in West UP alone but in any nook and corner of UP except the one that was created by Barrister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru termed by many as World’s Greatest Jurist created on July 1, 1948 just 200 km away from Allahabad at Lucknow called the City of Nawabs for just 12 districts so that the people there were not troubled to travel 200 km away to Allahabad to get justice! For Centre it just did not matter that the people of West UP of 30 districts are compelled to travel more than 700 km on average all the way to Allahabad most foolishly by not allowing any Bench anywhere in UP! Not just this the people of hilly regions of undivided UP were compelled most horrifyingly to travel all the way more than thousands of kilometers away to Allahabad to get justice and Supreme Court also kept watching everything like a hapless, hopeless and helpless spectator for more than 50 long years till Uttarakhand itself was created in 2000 when it got High Court itself at Nainital and it definitely cannot be ever lauded for this worst inaction! It also cannot be glossed over that the then UP CM Sampoornanand in 1955 had recommended a High Court Bench at Meerut but Pandit Nehruji overruled him. Since then all the PM firmly, fully and finally decided not to allow any more High Court Bench in any nook and corner of UP except at Lucknow as they all including the incumbent PM Narendra Damodardas Modi very strongly feel that Lord Pandit Nehruji is hundred percent right on what he did and even God cannot change this as God is not world’s greatest jurist as Lord Pandit Nehruji is according to many!

It must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India’s utter misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 25 crore as Yogi Adityanath who is UP CM keeps proudly declaring time and again which is more than the population of many countries including Pakistan whose population is 22 crore, has maximum villages more than one lakh whereas in other states the number of villages don’t exceed 5000 or 6000 at the most, has maximum pending cases about 10 lakh cases as per official figures in High Court and Bench whereas other states like Karnataka which has 3 high court Benches, Maharashtra which has 3 high court Benches, Assam which has 4 high court benches, Madhya Pradesh which has two etc even though they have less than 1 lakh pending cases or just 1 lakh, UP has maximum districts 75 whereas other states have just about 25 or 30 on an average, UP has maximum MPs, maximum MLAs, maximum Mayors, maximum towns, maximum pending cases in lower courts about to touch one crore pending cases whereas other states have comparatively much lesser figures, UP has given maximum PM to India including the incumbent Narendra Modi who is MP from Varanasi, maximum poverty, maximum crime, maximum riots, maximum killings, maximum rape, assault and other crimes against women, etc and is one of the biggest states of India yet has just one high court bench created way back in 1948 on July 1 at Lucknow which is just about 200 km away from Allahabad where the high court itself is located! Seventy three years have lapsed but till now in November 2021 no bench has been created in any other part of UP even though the former UN Secretary General Ban ki moon had slammed UP as the rape and crime capital of India! All true Indians must hang their head in shame at this despicable act!

It is most shocking that UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population – more than 25 crore as CM Yogi Adityanath always proudly claims, maximum districts - 75, maximum constituencies - 80, maximum MPs – 80, maximum MLAs - 404, maximum PM including Narendra Modi who represents Varanasi as an MP, maximum pending cases – more than 10 lakh and here too West UP accounts for more than half of pending cases as noted by Justice Jaswant Commission about 57%, maximum cases in lower courts about to touch 1 crore, maximum Judges both in High Court – 160 and also in lower courts, maximum vacancies of Judges both in High Court and also in lower courts, maximum members in UP Bar Council more than 1 lakh and which is also the largest Bar Council in the world as claimed in the website itself of UP Bar Council yet the former Chairman of UP Bar Council – Darvesh Yadav who was the first woman to get appointed to this post was murdered cold blooded right in court premises in Agra which is again in West UP on June 12, 2019 when she was busy celebrating her historic win by pumping bullets on her head and stomach, maximum poverty, maximum villages more than one lakh the exact number being 107040, maximum gram panchayats at 74626, maximum fake encounters killings, maximum custody killings, maximum dowry cases, maximum bride burning cases, maximum cases of human rights violations, maximum robberies, maximum dacoities, maximum undertrials, maximum cases of crime, loot, arson and riots and here too West UP tops with Saharanpur riots, Meerut riots, Muzaffarnagar riots tarnishing our international reputation to the extent that former UN Secretary General Ban ki Moon termed UP as crime and rape capital of India and what not yet Centre till now at end of 2022 from 1948 when a bench was created in Lucknow which is so close to Allahabad is not prepared to create even a single bench for not just West UP but for the entire UP? Area of West UP is 98,933 square km and accounts for 33.61 percent of total area of UP and has 26 districts yet no bench but Lucknow with just 62,363 square km and 12 districts has a bench! Allahabad High Court is biggest High Court in whole of Asia as was claimed by Yogi Adityanath and also is one of oldest High Court and UP Bar Council has maximum members yet has least Bench just one and so very near to Allahabad which is nothing but most senseless, shameless and stupid decision perpetuated since independence and not rectified till now!



Why is it that the people of West UP of more than 30 districts foolishly were compelled and are still compelled most senselessly, most shamelessly and most stupidly to travel all the way to Allahabad which is far away even from Lucknow where High Court Bench is located and averages 600 to 700 km on an average but the people of Nawab City i.e. Lucknow cannot travel even 200 km away to Allahabad? Most shamefully, why no one cares for poorest of poor, women and infirm and physically handicapped people who can’t travel so far easily and Centre is most happy by inaugurating an international airport at Kushinagar and now again at Jewar in West UP which is a very good thing but why so miserly on High Court Bench for West UP which will benefit all whether poor or rich or Hindu or Muslim or of any other religion? Centre must act now and not just keep remembering the greatest jurist on earth who is none other than Lord Pandit Nehru as a pretext for not creating Bench anywhere in UP!

It cannot be lightly dismissed that none other than the former CJI Ranjan Gogoi while in office as CJI had categorically appreciated the dire need of a High Court Bench in West UP when a woman lawyer named KL Chitra raised this burning issue in her PIL but Gogoi made it clear that it was for the Centre to take the final call on this! But Centre led by PM Narendradas Damodardas Modi is very firm that what Lord Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru did in 1948 to allot Bench only for Nawab City should be always maintained and in his 8 years he has proudly done that about which I myself feel most ashamed as the most historic recommendations of 230th report of Law Commission recommending creation of more Benches has been thrown in the dustbin! This despite the irrefutable fact that BJP tall leaders like Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, Union Minister like Gen VK Singh among many others have always reiterated their full support for a Bench as the people of 30 districts are compelled to travel whole night and half day all the way to Allahabad most foolishly which is truly incomprehensible!

Even Supreme Court has no valid reason to justify this worst stupidity on earth! It is akin to what all the PM have done from 1955 till 2022 that only Hindus have been banned from polygamy and not Muslims as my best friend Sageer Khan used to always lament which he said cannot be justified under any circumstances about which I never cared as I personally don’t even want to marry and am unmarried even though I am nearing 50 years! Sageer used to ask his own Muslim brothers as I saw from 1993-95 that:
Are Hindus second graded citizens in India that they have been barred from marrying more than one since 1955 even though Dr BR Ambedkar favoured retention of polygamy among Hindus and if they want to marry more than one they have to first convert to Islam which is the worst crime even though earlier in British India, Mughal India and even earlier Hindus could marry as many as they liked? He said that:
Muslims enjoy maximum liberty in India all over the world as can be seen from this but discriminating between Hindus and Muslims is most unfair and cannot be justified under any circumstances. Hindus are most tolerant and they have so quietly accepted all this which Muslims will never accept so quietly and humbly. The same holds true for High Court Benches also which concerns me most!

Why only Eastern UP has both High Court and a single Bench and West UP, Purvanchal and Bundelkhand have not even a single Bench anywhere which is most shocking! Again Lord Pandit Nehru! Supreme Court and so also the CJI have definitely not covered themselves with glory anyway in last 75 years by stupidly leaving everything on Centre alone who has done just nothing on it! Supreme Court is final but it cannot be always infallible! It has grievously erred by not doing anything on this since last nearly 75 years! Let’s fervently hope that better sense prevails on designate CJI Dr DY Chandrachud and Apex Court also on this burning issue also as this will benefit directly most the poorest of poor, women, aged and the needy people who cannot afford to travel by plane!

There can be no gainsaying that if UP can’t be given more high court benches and West UP can’t have even one High Court Bench then all the Benches in India must be definitely disbanded right now itself because UP has maximum pending cases and if it can function without any Benches in needy regions like West UP who are suffering to the hilt where people of more than 30 districts have to travel more than 700 km on an average all the way to Allahabad then why Maharashtra which tops the state list in justice index has 3 High Court Benches and we see even 4th Bench at Kolhapur had been sanctioned by the CM earlier for just 6 districts but not a single more for UP! Most disgusting! Incidentally, the previous CJI was from Maharashtra and now the CJI designate Dr DY Chandrachud is also from Maharashtra!

Most strikingly and most touchingly, Centre is ready to do anything for UP like creating more airports, sports universities, medical colleges, engineering colleges, AIIMS and what not except creating a High Court Bench in West UP or at Bundelkhand or at Purvanchal as Lord Pandit Nehru only wanted it to be at Nawab City called Lucknow and nowhere else! This alone explains why Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge – Justice Jaswant Singh appointed by Centre itself in mid 1970s made recommendations to create a High Court Bench at Aurangabad which was created in 1985 and so also recommendation to create a Bench in Jalpaiguri in West Bengal and at Madurai in Tamil Nadu were implemented but its recommendations to create not just one or two but three High Court Benches at Agra, Dehradun and Nainital were thrown straightaway in dustbin! Again Lord Pandit Nehru! Such is the aura of Lord Pandit Nehru!

So who can deny that Centre most proudly legally worships Lord Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru who is the Greatest Barrister, Greatest Jurist, Greatest Prime Minister, Longest Prime Minister and what not which alone explains why not a Single High Court Bench has been created in Hindu holy cities like Gorakhpur, Mathura, Meerut, Ujjain, Ayodhya, Varanasi etc which are all legally most worthless cities just not fit to be given a High Court Bench under any circumstances! Why can’t polygamy be abolished for all? Again it is solely because Lord Pandit Nehru did not want it to be abolished for all! The list is just endless!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Najma vs Govt of NCT of Delhi a promise or assurance given by the Chief Minister in a press conference amounts to an enforceable promise and that a CM is expected to exercise his authority to give effect to such a promise.
It goes without saying that the population of India is increasing very rapidly which is a cause of grave concern
Madhav Sathe v Maharashtra a plea filed by two politician-applicants seeking quashing of a conviction order on the ground that they had settled the dispute with the victim-complainant.
Talibanis are entering in one go from Pakistan to Afghanistan to occupy it and massacre whoever comes in their way with full help, active support both moral and material with latest weapons
The purpose of this proposed law is to tackle the growing population in the State and so ensuring judicious and equal availability of all the resources in the State through a two-child policy.
Susmita Saha Dutta v/s UOI has outrightly rejected State Government's argument that police can't be held responsible for post-poll violence due to Election Commission of India's (ECI's) Model Code of Conduct.
Dumya Alias Lakhan Alias Inamdar, Etc vs Maharashtra the default sentences imposed on a convict cannot be directed to run concurrently.
Hindus are the most tolerant of all the religions in the world. I am a Muslim but I will never shy away from saying that Muslims must learn tolerance from Hindus
Nine of our soldiers died in J&K and India will be playing T20 match with Pakistan on October 24? Do the lives of our soldiers carry no value?
o one can dare do what Congress can dare do in India. The biggest, bluntest and the boldest truth to prove my inevitable point lies in the irrefutable fact that it was the Congress party under the dynamic
West Bengal vs Suvendu Adhikari refused to interfere with an order of a Single Bench wherein criminal proceedings initiated against BJP MLA Suvendu Adhikari who secured maximum limelight after he defeated Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee in Nandigram by a convincing margin had been stayed.
Hasratullah Shervani v/s UP From perusal of the injury report, it prima facie supports the contents of first information report, therefore, in above circumstances and that the injured has turned hostile is of no consequence.
Lawyers Voice vs Punjabthere is a blame game between the State and Central Government as to who is responsible for such lapses.
High Court Bench must be created in West UP at Meerut even though his most commendable recommendation was not implemented in UPA's regime
Ashish Shelar v/s Maharashtra Legislative Assembly that the suspension of 12 BJP MLAs from the Maharashtra Assembly for a full year is prima facie unconstitutional and worse than expulsion as the constituency is remaining unrepresented.
dogged the limelight for quite some time over the wearing of hijab in educational institutions in Karnataka was most unfortunate.
hat had happened so brazenly with Muskan Khan even though she is a Muslim and I am a Hindu as there was no justification to haul her up in the manner
Dr Rajeev Gupta M.D. v. U.P. that it is like a termite in every system and once it enters the system, it keeps on getting bigger and bigger.
March a woman was shown offering namaz in a class in Sagar University
Shahida vs UP that tolerance, respect for all communities is essential to keep country united.
Madrasa-e-Anware Rabbani Waqf Committee v/s Surat Municipal Corporation on the ground that the construction was without prior permission of the competent authority.
Brinda Karat v. State of NCT of Delhi that: Hate speeches especially delivered by elected representatives, political and religious leaders based on religion, caste, region or ethnicity militate against the concept of fraternity, bulldoze the constitutional ethos, and violates Articles 14, 15, 19, 21 read with Article 38 of the Constitution
she was squarely blamed single handedly for the terror acts that were perpetrated in Udaipur, Kanpur and other parts of the country.
had lashed out most severely at Nupur Sharma for being single handedly responsible for putting the entire nation on fire which drew scathing criticism
Kamini Arya Through Perokar vs NCT Of Delhi has taken suo motu cognizance to facilitate admission of an 8 year old child to school which could not be facilitated for the reason that her parents were in judicial custody in a murder case since July 2021.
Parvez Parwaz vs Uttar Pradesh dismissed a plea challenging denial of sanction to prosecute Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath in a case alleging making of hate speech in 2007
Vishwanath Pratap Singh vs Election Commission of Indiathat the right to contest an election is not a fundamental right but only a right conferred by a statute.
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Satyender Jain, dismissed the plea made by Delhi Health Minister challenging the trial court order transferring his money laundering case to another Judge.
Umar Khalid that the attack on police personnel during the 2020 North East Delhi riots by women protestors prima facie be covered by the definition of ‘terrorist act’ under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
United we stand and divided we fall! They also gloss over what Deanswift had once very famously
Ramaprasad Sarkar v. Union of India dismissed a PIL praying for a direction to the Central government to remove Jagdeep Dhankhar as the Governor of West Bengal, claiming that he was acting as the ‘mouthpiece of the Bharatiya Janata Party’.
Kapil Sibal himself says on record about Rahul Gandhi’s conviction that both the process and the outcome of the 2019 case are bizarre.
Mamata Banerjee is an Indian politician and the current Chief Minister of West Bengal. She was born on January 5, 1955, in Kolkata, West Bengal. Mamata Banerjee completed her education from Jogamaya Devi College and the University of Calcutta.
Shri Potsangbam Jaminikanta Singh v/s Manipur directed the State government to decongest the traffic on national highway in front of the Old Manipur Secretariat by making arrangements for proper parking of vehicles on both sides.
Shamim vs UP that it is a clear case of false implication due to political rivalry and property dispute. The Court also held that there is no material evidence to substantiate the prosecution case.
In my life, I definitely cannot ever even dare dream of a more bigger insult of legendary Prabhu Shri Ram
Top