Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Sunday, November 24, 2024

Tihar Jail Officials Cannot Be Above The Law Of The Land

Posted in: Criminal Law
Fri, Aug 12, 22, 11:06, 2 Years ago
star star star star star
5 out of 5 with 1 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 4879
I am most ashamed, aghast and appalled to learn that a convict named Ankit Gujjar aged 29 years who died in Tihar jail was murdered by none other than the jail staff itself

It was most shocking to learn and I am most ashamed, aghast and appalled to learn that a convict named Ankit Gujjar aged 29 years who died in Tihar jail was murdered by none other than the jail staff itself because of which six Inspectors have been suspended till now. This was the finding of CBI which probed into it. When those who are meant to uphold the law themselves start committing crime then what can we expect our society to become?

Yet we see no Policeveer Yojana for police ever being launched by Centre which really baffles me most! Are police officers deciding Centre’s agenda? Centre must also always remember that Tihar jail officials cannot be above the law of the land under any circumstances and if they dare to break law then they must be punished most ruthlessly for becoming law breakers instead of law protectors!

What I find even worst is that Centre just like it is deadly determined in last 75 years most shamelessly never to allow any High Court Bench in any part of UP where maximum Hindu holy cities exist like Ayodhya where biggest Ram temple is being most pompously built, Mathura, Varanasi, Gorakhpur, Meerut among others which are all considered nothing but legally most and totally worthless for the same except the one created by world’s greatest jurist and first PM of India who is none other than Barrister trained most rigorously in UK also called Great Britain also called England who ruled us like slaves for more than 200 years at Lucknow also called Nawab City for just 12 districts so that the people don’t have to travel even 200 km away to Allahabad due to which the people of hilly areas of undivided UP were made to travel thousands of kilometers senselessly till Allahabad not even Lucknow which is about 200 km nearer than Allahabad to get justice for more than 50 years when ultimately it was given High Court itself at Nainital and more than 10 crore people of West UP to travel again till Allahabad not even Lucknow most stupidly similarly we see nothing being done on police reforms as was recommended by none other than Supreme Court itself way back in 2006 in Prakash Singh case till 2022 even though Centre is very quick to work upon Agniveer scheme for soldiers to serve in defence services for just 4 years instead of 15 years as we see right now which is its own self creation thus making a complete mockery of Apex Court itself which is watching everything in silence since last 16 years like a helpless, hapless and hopeless spectator just like it is watching in case of demand for more Benches in UP since last 75 years waiting senselessly for Centre or UP Chief Justice to act who are all sleeping most comfortably since last 75 years on this front in the name of due process has to be followed thus making due process itself the biggest punishment on earth!

While shifting our total focus now on main topic, it must be mentioned that on August 4, 2021, 29-year-old Ankit Gujjar accused in at least eight murder cases and lodged in jail number 3 at the time was found dead inside the high-security prison. Thus far, we should notice that the police and prison officials have maintained the line that Ankit who is one of Western Uttar Pradesh’s (where Centre is most deadly against the creation of any High Court Bench even though Justice Jaswant Commission headed by Justice Jaswant Singh who is a former Supreme Court Judge recommended creation of High Court Bench in Agra where High Court itself existed from 1866 to 1869 even though on its recommendations Benches were created at Aurangabad in Maharashtra which already had 2 Benches and which tops in Justice Index ranking among all states and so also at Jalpaiguri in West Bengal which already had a Bench at Port Blair for just 3 lakh people and so also at Madurai in Tamil Nadu) top gangsters had died during a scuffle that broke out when he resisted attempts by jail officers to search his cell during which it is alleged that he also slapped a senior prison official. But this definitely does not give an unfettered licence to police to kill him!

What is most alarming is that in a damning indictment of the role of senior officials inside Tihar jail, an affidavit filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation in the Delhi High Court on May 21 has now claimed that the murder was an act of sheer revenge that is borne out by the brutal pre-meditated assault by six jail officials thus giving a final brutal end to a chain of events that began two months before the eventual killing. Let me mention that my information here is based mostly on the article that was published by Prawesh Lama in page 4 in Hindustan Times newspaper dated August 8, 2022. The CBI took over the case on September 8, 2021.

It must also be mentioned here that it was on July 29 that the central agency arrested Assistant Superintendent Dinesh Dabas and head warder Deepak Chikara on charges of murder. Before that, it was on May 5 that the main accused in the case who is Deputy Superintendent Narender Meena was arrested as well with the role of other officers also coming under a serious cloud who are under investigation as well. Six jail officers had allegedly assaulted three inmates – Ankit Gujjar himself, Gurjeet and Gurpreet which is most shocking and exposes how inhumane our police has become. The CBI affidavit pointed out that:
While using criminal force, vital parts of Ankit Gujjar were targeted by jail officials. As per the statement of eyewitnesses, applicant (Meena) put his foot over the neck of Ankit Gujjar and said that:
Aakhri baar dekh le mujhe, aaj barah baje se pehle maar dunga tujhe (Look at my face for the last time as I will kill you before midnight)… The CBI pointed out that the assault lasted for at least half an hour with DNA samples collected from the polycarbonate lathis matching with Gujjar. They were beaten so brutally and badly that they had to be carried by the jail staff and other inmates as they could not walk on their own! It added that an assistant superintendent urged Meena to send Gujjar for medical aid but was met with the response, Koi medical nahin karana, ek round aur khelengay (there will not be any medical examination, we will play another round). Instead of sending a doctor a nursing staff was sent and did not note the extent of injuries. Gujjar was kept alone in ward1A. On morning of August 4, when a head warder announced Gujjar’s name and asked him to exit his cell, there was no response. A team of doctors that went inside found him unconscious. He was taken to jail hospital and was declared brought dead at 7:15 am! The three officials are now themselves lodged inside that same notorious Tihar jail! It is solely because such police cops who indulge in worst torture are never awarded the most strictest punishment that it has become a dangerous trend in our country of taking the legal rights of prisoners for granted! Yet we see no Agniveer Yojana for them as Centre considers them most proudly a distinct permanent superior class and not some temporary inferior class like army soldiers to be thrown out after just 4 years in most of the cases!

It is most shocking to learn that the CBI’s affidavit says that Gujjar who had been lodged in Tihar jail since August 2020 had been providing money to jail officers through different sources for favours. It very explicitly notes that Ankit had easy access to different cell phones within jail ordinarily banned within the premises. It must be noted that as evidence, the affidavit notes several phone numbers that Gujjar allegedly used in full connivance with jail officials. This itself is enough to vindicate that:
When money speaks, truth is silent and helpless! This dirty business of money power holding supreme prevails in Tihar jail itself with Ankit Gujjar family alleging that he was beaten to death for allegedly failing to pay protection money to prison officers yet Centre never launches Police Veer Yojana! Anyway, who are we to comment on it! Let us wait as we are waiting most endlessly since last 75 years with full patience when even my father was not born and my grandfather was very young that a High Court Bench will come up some day later in West UP but all the Chief Justices in Allahabad are taking time in deliberating whether to give or not to give most senselessly even though many Union Law Ministers like Kapil Sibal among others recommended a High Court Bench at Meerut!

It is quite evident that the Tihar jail police officials consider themselves above all law and regulations as they enjoy the supreme blessings of top politicians in our country! This alone explains why the Vohra Committee report headed by former Indian Home Secretary NN Vohra that was set up by PV Narasimha Rao government in July 1993 and was submitted in October 1993 had gone into very minute details into the criminalization of politics and most dirtiest nexus among criminals, politicians and bureaucrats in India which he exposed but most shockingly only 13 pages of the report are made available to the public and the rest remain a source of deepest mystery as they were never made public yet Centre most proudly never favours Agniveer Yojana to be launched for police personnel nor ever favours reforms recommended by none other than Apex Court itself in Prakash Singh case as mentioned earlier also just like it is most deadly opposed to setting up of even a single High Court Bench not just in West UP but in any nook and corner of UP which tops among all states in the list of pending cases!

Needless to say, every Indian knows that how difficult it is to lodge even an FIR in a police station and have to undergo worst treatment in so many police stations yet Centre does nothing to address it ever in last 75 years which is an unpalatable reality from which we cannot run away! This is exactly what I find most disgraceful but Centre is too busy only with Agniveer scheme for Army which enjoys definitely a much more clean reputation even though I concede that there are black sheeps in very profession! Why Centre never demands accountability from police and ushers reforms in it even though time and again so many high powered Committees like the National Police Commission (1978-82), the Padmanabhaiah Committee on restructuring of police (2000) and the Malimath Committee on reforms in criminal justice system (2002-03) and Soli J Sorabjee Committee headed by former Attorney General of India in September 2005 have recommended for the same? Ask Centre and definitely not me as it is certainly not in my realm to answer it!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col (Retd) BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
The general principle, is that a FIR cannot be depended upon a substantive piece of evidence.The article discusses the general priciple, along with exceptions to it.
Victim plays an important role in the criminal justice system but his/her welfare is not given due regard by the state instrumentality. Thus, the role of High Courts or the Supreme Court in our country in affirming and establishing their rights is dwelt in this article.
Can anybody really know what is going inside the heads of criminal lawyers? I mean, yes, we can pick bits of their intelligence during courtroom trials and through the legal documents that they draft.
Terrorism and organized crimes are interrelated in myriad forms. Infact in many illustration terrorism and organized crimes have converged and mutated.
Right to a copy of police report and other documents As per section 207 of CrPC, accused has the right to be furnished with the following in case the proceeding has been initiated on a police report:
In terms of Section 2 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 hereafter referred to as 'the Act'), "human rights" means the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed under the Constitution
The Oxford dictionary defines police as an official organization whose job is to make people obey the law and to prevent and solve crime
the Supreme Court let off three gang rapists after they claimed a ‘compromise formula’ with the victim and agreed to pay her a fine of Rs 50,000 each for their offence.
benefit those prisoners who are kept in solitary confinement, the Uttarakhand High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of State of Uttarakhand v 1. Mehtab s/o Tahir Hassan 2. Sushil @Bhura s/o Gulab Singh Criminal Reference No. 1 of 2014 on April 27, 2018
this article helps you knowing how to become a criminal lawyer
helps you to know adultery and its types
In the landmark case of Manoj Singh Pawar v State of Uttarakhand & others Writ Petition (PIL) No. 156 of 2016 which was delivered on June 18, 2018, the Uttarakhand High Court issued a slew of landmark directions
Scope and ambit of Section 6 of Indian Evidence Act,1872
Victims of Crime Can Seek Cancellation of Bail: MP HC in Mahesh Pahade vs State of MP
State of Orissa v Mahimananda Mishra said clearly and convincingly that the court must not go deep into merits of the matter while considering an application for bail and all that needs to be established from the record is the existence of a prima facie case against the accused.
Yashwant v Maharashtra while the conviction of some police officers involved in a custodial torture which led to the death of a man was upheld, the Apex Court underscored on the need to develop and recognize the concept of democratic policing wherein crime control is not the only end, but the means to achieve this order is also equally important.
20 more people guilty of killing a 60-year-old Dalit man and his physically-challenged daughter. Upheld acquittals of 21 other accused, holding that there was insufficient evidence to establish their guilt. So it was but natural that they had to be acquitted
No person accused of an offence punishable for offences involving commercial quantity shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless
Accident under section 80 under the Indian Penal Code falls under the chapter of general exceptions. This article was made with the objective of keeping in mind the students of law who are nowadays in dire need of material which simplify the law than complicating it.
Nishan Singh v State of Punjab. Has ordered one Nishan Singh Brar, convicted of abduction and rape of a minor victim girl, and his mother Navjot Kaur to pay Rs 90 lakh towards compensation.
Rajesh Sharma v State of UP to regulate the purported gross misuse of Section 498A IPC have been modified just recently in a latest judgment titled Social Action Forum Manav for Manav Adhikar and another v Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice and others.
Kodungallur Film Society vs. Union of India has issued comprehensive guidelines to control vandalism by protesting mobs. Vandalism is vandalism and it cannot be justified under any circumstances. Those who indulge in it and those who instigate it must all be held clearly accountable and made to pay for what they have done most shamefully.
Ram Lal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh If the court is satisfied that if the confession is voluntary, the conviction can be based upon the same. Rule of prudence does not require that each and every circumstance mentioned in the confession must be separately and independently corroborated. Absolutely right There can be no denying it
Joseph Shine case struck down the law of adultery under Section 497. It declared that adultery can be a ground for civil issues including dissolution of marriages but it cannot be a criminal offence. It invalidated the Section 497 of IPC as a violation of Articles 14 and 15 and under Article 21 of the Constitution
Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) represented through Legal Representatives v/s Karnataka, Had no hesitation to concede right from the start while underscoring the rights of victims of crime that, The rights of victims of crime is a subject that has, unfortunately, only drawn sporadic attention of Parliament, the judiciary and civil society.
State of Kerala v Rasheed observed that while deciding an application to defer cross examination under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. a balance must be struck between the rights of the accused, and the prerogative of the prosecution to lead evidence. The Apex Court in this landmark judgment also listed out practical guidelines.
Reena Hazarika v State of Assam that a solemn duty is cast on the court in the dispensation of justice to adequately consider the defence of the accused taken under Section 313 CrPC and to either accept or reject the same for reasons specified in writing.
Zulfikar Nasir & Ors v UP has set aside the trial court judgment that had acquitted 16 Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) officials in the 1987 Hashimpur mass murder case. The Delhi High Court has convicted all the accused and sentenced them to life imprisonment.
In Babasaheb Maruti Kamble v Maharashtra it was held that the Special Leave Petitions filed in those cases where death sentence is awarded by the courts below, should not be dismissed without giving reasons, at least qua death sentence.
Shambhir & Ors v State upholding the conviction and punishment of over 80 rioters has brought some solace to all those affected people who lost their near and dear ones in the ghastly 1984 anti-Sikh riots which brought disrepute to our country and alienated many Sikhs from the national mainstream
Naman Singh alias Naman Pratap Singh and another vs. UP, Supreme Court held a reading of the FIR reveals that the police has registered the F.I.R on directions of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate which was clearly impermissible in the law.
It has been a long and gruelling wait of 34 long years for the survivors of 1984 anti-Sikh riots to finally see one big leader Sajjan Kumar being sentenced to life term by Delhi High Court
Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik v State of Maharashtra held that criminals are also entitled to life of dignity and probability of reformation/rehabilitation to be seriously and earnestly considered before awarding death sentence. It will help us better understand and appreciate the intricacies of law.
Sukhlal v The State of Madhya Pradesh 'life imprisonment is the rule and death penalty is the exception' has laid down clearly that even when a crime is heinous or brutal, it may not still fall under the rarest of rare category.
Deepak v State of Madhya Pradesh in which has served to clarify the entire legal position under Section 319 CrPC, upheld a trial court order under Section 319 of the CrPc summoning accused who were in the past discharged by it ignoring the supplementary charge sheet against them.
It has to be said right at the outset that in a major reprieve for all the political leaders accused of being involved in the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, in CBI, Mumbai vs Dahyaji Goharji Vanzara
Devi Lal v State of Rajasthan the Supreme Court has dispelled all misconceived notions about suspicion and reiterated that,
Madhya Pradesh v Kalyan Singh has finally set all doubts to rest on the nagging question of whether offences under Section 307 of IPC can be quashed on the basis of settlement between parties.
Dr Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v Maharashtra made it amply clear that if a person had not made the promise to marry with the sole intention to seduce a woman to indulge in sexual acts, such an act would not amount to rape.
Rajesh v State of Haryana conviction under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (Abetment of Suicide) is not sustainable on the allegation of harassment without there being any positive action proximate to the time of occurrence on the part of the accused, which led or compelled the person to commit suicide.
Nand Kishore v Madhya Pradesh has commuted to life imprisonment the death sentence which was earlier confirmed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court of a convicted for the rape and murder of an eight-year-old girl.
Raju Jagdish Paswan v. Maharashtra has commuted the death penalty of a man accused of rape and murder of a nine year old girl and sentenced him to 30 years imprisonment without remission.
Swapan Kumar Chatterjee v CBI permitting the application filed by the prosecution for summoning a hand writing expert in a corruption case of which the trial had started in 1985. On expected lines, the Bench accordingly delivered its significant judgment thus laying down the correct proposition of law to be followed always in such cases
Sukhpal Singh v Punjab that the inability of the prosecution to establish motive in a case of circumstantial evidence is not always fatal to the prosecution case. Importance of motive in determining the culpability of the accused but refused to acknowledge it as the sole criteria for not convicting the accused in the absence of motive.
Gagan Kumar v Punjab it is a mandatory legal requirement for Magistrate to specify whether sentences awarded to an accused convicted for two or more offences, would run concurrently or consecutively.
Dnyaneshwar Suresh Borkar v Maharashtra Even poem can help save a death convict from gallows. The Apex Court has in this latest, landmark and laudable judgment commuted the death penalty of a kidnap cum murder convict who was just 22 years of age at the time of occurrence
Himachal Pradesh v Vijay Kumar Supreme court held about acid attack crime that a crime of this nature does not deserve any kind of clemency.
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Imprisonment Appears To Be An Altogether Inappropriate Punishment: SC
S. Sreesanth v. The Board of Control For Cricket In India the Supreme Court set aside a life ban imposed on former Indian cricketer S Sreesanth in connection with the 2013 IPL spot-fixing scandal and asked the BCCI Disciplinary Committee to take a fresh call on the quantum of his punishment under the Anti-Corruption Code.
Adding Additional Accused To Invoke Section 319 CrPC Stronger Evidence Than Mere Probability of Complicity of A Person Required: SC stated in Sugreev Kumar v. State of Punjab
Top