Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, October 31, 2024

Courts Must Bulldoze Merciless Bulldozing By Bulldozers

Posted in: Civil Laws
Sat, Apr 23, 22, 19:45, 3 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 4157
India is a proud democratic country which is uninterrupted since independence with no military takeover and with strong democratic

At the outset, it must be stated with certainty that India is a proud democratic country which is uninterrupted since independence with no military takeover and with strong democratic roots for which it is acclaimed and applauded all over the world unlike Pakistan where no elected government has ever completed five years in Centre since independence till now because of Army takeover time and again.

But, of late, we are witnessing how this merciless bulldozing by bulldozer by State machinery has ensured that India garners limelight for all the wrong reasons thus portraying our nation in a very poor light. If Courts don’t step in and watch like a mute spectator then definitely people will say that even the Courts fear the Governments who behave like tyrants when they shamelessly, senselessly and stupidly decide to punish the whole family for a wrong act committed by one single individual. We see how farmer leaders like Rakesh Tikait too jump in the fray and say that we will reply bulldozer with tractor and we saw how last year during Republic day a spectacle was made of India and even Red Fort was not spared!

Most recently, we saw how apart from two temples even a 300-year old Lord Shiva temple in Alwar in Rajasthan was not spared and was bulldozed by a bulldozer! How can the religious sentiments of Hindus be brutally butchered and held to ransom in such a callous and horrendous manner as we saw most recently in Rajasthan where there is a Congress government in power? Who is dictating such dangerous, deplorable and disastrous orders which can engineer violence and killings on a large scale in India? What is happening in India?

It must be fairly asked: Are elected State Government taking inspiration from some farmer leader like Rakesh Tikait who gave a free run to tractors on Republic Day occasion in 2021? Let us not forget that even Rakesh Tikait himself didn’t demolish somebody’s houses and shops but now we see how brazenly the elected bodies and so also the elected governments are openly monitoring and mastering all such demolitions without seeking the prior legal approval even from courts as is mandatory also! Shame on all such governments who are behaving like a dictator does and violating law with impunity without fear of anyone! How still can our Courts watch everything by maintaining a conspicuous and deafening silence?

It is a matter of some solace that the Madhya Pradesh High Court just recently on April 21, 2022 asked the State government not to demolish the home of an accused in the Khargone communal violence without following due process of law. The petition was filed by one Fardeen Bi who is a resident of Tawadi Mohalla whose husband Firoz Khan was arrested in connection to his alleged involvement in the violence. In the plea, Fareeda moved the court seeking protection against possible demolition of her newly constructed 1400 sq mt house without following the due process of law as municipal council officials asked her to produce building permissions after Khan was arrested. A single Judge Bench of Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla while asking the state government’s response warned that follow due process of law before razing house of accused or else be ready to face the consequences. On behalf of the state government, Advocate General Pushyamitra Bhargava gave a written assurance that no action would be taken with regard to the demolition without following due process of law. Very rightly so!

On the face of it, we all witnessed for ourselves how just recently the Supreme Court on April 20 stopped North Delhi Municipal Corporation’s bulldozers an hour into their drive against encroachments on public land at Jahangirpuri which saw communal violence in which many were injured after alleged stone pelting at a Hanuman Jayanti procession. But for the Supreme Court to swing into action, we saw how eminent and senior Supreme Court lawyers like Kapil Sibal and Dushyant Dave swung into action and urged the Court to act promptly on this new bulldozing trend to save the many people of Jahangirpuri who had got nothing to do with the riots! But by the time the order was received, we saw how a lot of structures and buildings were bulldozed.

As we saw, the bulldozers razed concrete and temporary structures, including the outer gate of a mosque in Jahangirpuri as part of the drive by the BJP-ruled civic body, days after the northwest Delhi neighbourhood was rocked by communal violence. This was because even though the Bench passed the status quo order at around 10.50 am, it could not be typed and signed as the Judges were busy hearing other listed matters. In the meanwhile, the damage was done.

Raman Jha said that he lost his paan shop and has to now apply for a loan. He lamented that, It is not like I can find another job. We have not been able to work for a week now and will soon have no money to buy food. I had spent all my cash stocking up my paan shop. Ganesh Kumar Gupta who was owner of a juice shop since last many decades which was razed said that he had all the necessary documents and that his establishment was completely legal. There are many more such cases where innocents suffered!

Needless to say, the Delhi MCD Act has clear provisions which must always be adhered to in totality. It is clearly stipulated under Section 317 that the Commissioner is supposed to issue notice to remove projections (structures or fixtures) onto streets. Similarly we see that Section 343 allows demolition of buildings with a minimum notice period of 5-15 days. We have to also concede here that there is only one Section 322 that doesn’t require issuing notice, because it involves only removing temporary structures like stalls encroaching into public streets. We also ought to know that there is also an appellate tribunal under the Act that is mandated to hear appeals against notices.

Justice BR Gavai of Supreme Court while hearing the Jahangirpuri case very rightly said that, If the statute provides that something has to be done in a particular manner… (was it) done or not? That’s it…It also provides for an appellate tribunal and the time given is between 5 to 15 days, not being less than 5 days and more than 15 days.

The Apex Court Bench headed by CJI NV Ramana and also comprising of Justice BR Gavai and Justice L Nageswara Rao said that it will ask all those who were allegedly affected to file affidavits and that status quo will continue with the matter being listed for hearing after two weeks. Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind chief Arshad Madani welcomed the Supreme Court’s decision to stall the anti-encroachment drive by authorities in Delhi’s Jahangirpuri area. Fazlur Rahman who is the Press Secretary of Jamiat said that, On the special directive of President Madani, a petition was filed on 17 April in the Supreme Court against bulldozing of commercial and residential properties of Muslims in BJP ruled states under the guise of crime prevention.

It is really good to see that Rahul Gandhi of Congress party fearlessly lashes out on Jahangirpuri demolitions in Delhi remarking that, This is a demolition of India’s constitutional values. This is state-sponsored targeting of poor and minorities. BJP must bulldoze the hatred in their hearts instead… Switch off the bulldozers of hate and switch on power plants! But why Rahul Gandhi maintains a deafening silence when his own government in Rajasthan led by Chief Minister proudly monitors the brazen and brutal demolition of 300-year-old Lord Shiva temple in Alwar district in Rajasthan as also two other temples along with other places without following the due norms which definitely has hurt the religious sentiments of Hindus? Rahul Gandhi himself professes to be a devotee of Lord Shiva just as I am then why does he not lashes out similarly against his government in Rajasthan? Rahul must answer! It goes without saying that selective anger against bulldozing by bulldozer also cannot be justified under any circumstances!

By all accounts, those who faced merciless and sudden demolition in Rajasthan, Delhi and so also in other states where bulldozer was given a free run by the State administration got just no time to appeal. We thus see that this was in stark contravention of the principles of natural justice. It is the bounden duty of the Courts to step in and call a spade a spade.

For the sake of argument, even if we accept State’s contention that those who do wrong must be punished then also punishing his whole family by bulldozing the wrong doer’s house cannot be justified under any circumstances! Similarly, why is the entire locality punished for a wrong act done by one particular individual as we witnessed in Jahangirpuri in Delhi and so also in other States. It is high time and those who dare to turn the bulldozer into political theatre not sparing even the harmless Lord Shiva’s 300-year old temple in Alwar in Rajasthan and choosing to proudly attack it with the sword arm of instant justice must be seriously themselves taken to task and should not be allowed to escape scot free! Even the Courts must step in seriously and not just watch helplessly, hopelessly and haplessly from the gallery like a mute spectator.

It thus merits no reiteration that the Courts have the power to themselves take suo motu action which it must take if it wants to redeem its prestige among the people! Of course, there is not even an iota of doubt that the Courts must bulldoze this merciless bulldozing by bulldozers at the behest of State government or a local body by standing up for the rule of law and not for bulldozing by bulldozer by watching everything like a hopeless, helpless and hapless spectator and washing off its hands from this whole unpalatable saga!

On the whole, even if a demolition is to be carried out, it has to be carried out strictly as per the rules and regulations and not otherwise. It merits no reiteration that just because a demolition is to be carried out against the property of a criminal or a notorious person, it does not confer an unfettered licence on the authorities and the State to break all the rules, regulations and bulldoze everything with its bulldozer which concerns the criminal or the notorious person. It must also be mentioned here that where the demolitions that are carried into effect without following the due process of law and where demolitions are used as most potent weapons of vigilante justice would certainly be a travesty of law and per se illegal for which the executing authorities must certainly face action and so also the State government too must be taken to task. India definitely cannot afford under any circumstances to ever allow an alarming retreat from the rule of law and must ensure strictly that the due process of law is followed always under all and under any circumstances! Those who break the law must definitely be made to pay a very heavy price always without fail but this has to happen strictly as per law and the whole family or all the people living in the entire locality where the person breaking the law lived should not be made to suffer for it for no fault of theirs!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top