Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, October 31, 2024

What Happened With Muskan Khan Is Most Disgraceful

Posted in: Civil Laws
Mon, Feb 14, 22, 18:47, 3 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 4162
As an Indian and as a good human being, I feel most hurt to see with my own eyes with what has happened with Muskan Khan even though she is a Muslim and I am a Hindu

As an Indian and as a good human being, I feel most hurt to see with my own eyes with what has happened with Muskan Khan even though she is a Muslim and I am a Hindu just like all those who are most offended to see with what has happened with her. Who am I or anyone else to dictate what dress Muskan Khan or any other girl or women will wear? It is their own choice which dress they want to wear!

Our Constitution promises right to equality to all of us. No one can interfere with what any other person wears. Even if there is a prescribed dress in any college then also the authorities must ensure that no girl or women is ever hooted by any boy or men and those who dare to do so must be promptly punished or at least admonished most strongly! But when Muskan Khan was being hounded by about 30 or more such boys and men we saw no one coming to her aid in news channels! She bravely held to her faith and made it clear that she would not succumb under any unrelenting pressure from anyone under any circumstances!

Without any hesitation of any kind, I salute Muskan Khan from the innermost core of my heart and also bow my head in front of her for bravely confronting so many boys more than 30 to 40 or perhaps even more who heckled her, shouted religious slogans and due to which she lost her temper! Muskan has emerged as the symbol of courage and she still don't want it to be termed as Hindu or Muslim fight.

Speaking straight from my heart, let me say this clearly that I will prefer to die rather than terrorise any woman or girl who is wanting to lead her own life in her own manner in such a dastardly manner as we witnessed for ourselves in Karnataka! Nothing on earth can be more cowardly and dastardly than to gather in group and start hooting a woman or a girl when she is alone! All those boys who did such a shameful act with Muskan Khan who is a second year Commerce student of Mandya's pre-University college in Karnataka must be brought to book and must be made to realize that India will not tolerate such intolerance and insult towards woman!

Bluntly put: Those who terrorise and try to intimidate women over wearing of hijab which is the birth right of every woman to wear what she likes are no less than terrorist and must be punished strictly. No good person can ever in his right senses try to ever justify what happened in Karnataka on any ground whatsoever! This is bound to dent our national image beyond repair and I am most terribly ashamed that such a despicable, dastardly and dangerous act which degrades women in public has not just happened in India but has not received the strongest condemnation as should have been the case! Most shocking and most condemnable!

To put it differently: If any person who does not feel anguished and angered to see the horrifying manner in which those boys behaved like hooligans by surrounding one girl of different religion from theirs are not good human beings and their insouciance is perhaps even most shocking! This is not just eve teasing but more than it! They should have been promptly arrested by the Karnataka police.

At PES College in Mandya, second year B.Com student Muskan was the face of defiance while confronting a crowd of young men wearing saffron shawls who heckled her and shouted religious slogans. Muskan disclosed that she was allowed to wear the burqa on campus and the hijab inside classrooms. She also disclosed that:
My college administration and principal has never opposed us wearing the burqa. Some outsiders are forcing it. Who are these people to stop us? Why should I listen to them?"

Recounting the day's event that was captured in a viral video, Muskan said that, "I was going to submit my assignment. Even before I entered the college, there were a few Muslim students wearing the hijab who were being heckled. They were crying. I am here for education and my college allows me to wear the attire. In the crowd, there were only 10 percent of students from our college, most of them were outsiders. I was disturbed by the way they were behaving and I countered them." Those outsiders as well as insiders who heckled Muskan must be identified and promptly booked and punished as per law!

By all accounts, we Indians are famous all over for according highest esteem to women and if such disgraceful, dastardly and dangerous acts are not controlled promptly then the future of our nation definitely cannot be safe! What has happened with Muskan has definitely brought a bad name for our nation and which cannot be justified on any ground whatsoever! The ruthless and vulgar manner in which Muskan was being teased and heckled by those wearing saffron scarfs cannot be taken lightly by any good Indian and prompt steps must be taken to ensure that such incidents never happen in our nation again!

It is most depressing to see that the focus of the debate has shifted in news channels to whether wearing hijab is mandated by religion and whether it is correct to wear hijab in colleges! There can be no quibbling about it that if there is uniform in any school or college one has to wear it but if a women wears something which is not the uniform then also the manner in which the women is dealt with has to be in decent manner maintaining the decency, dignity and decorum which is imperative for any democracy to function smoothly! Woman's dignity and honour is paramount and any compromise with it should not be tolerated with under any circumstances!

It goes without saying that every Indian must definitely feel most terribly ashamed, aghast and appalled to see with what has happened with Muskan Khan with such brazenness and that too with a woman who simply was practicing what she considered was right. Is this is what our culture teaches us? Definitely not!

It merits no reiteration that every true Indian must definitely salute Muskan Khan for her indefatigable courage in not fearing scores of boys wearing saffron scarfs and daring to stick to what she believes is her right. This was a crime of intimidating a single woman by so many men yet we see no strong action being taken against all those who tried to terrorise her even though they failed miserably as she remained totally unfazed! This most reprehensible incident has certainly brought disrepute to our nation and it must be condemned in the strongest possible parliamentary language.

Of course, there certainly could have been a better way to resolve a petty issue with dignity. We saw for ourselves how one girl was being hounded by so many of boys and many were even looking like men! This is just not done under any circumstances and there has to be zero tolerance towards such acts which have to be condemned as "most regressive"! Such boys also must be given strict counselling at least by not just their parents but also by the concerned police officials where such third rated incidents happen! It is a sad commentary on the state of affairs in our country.

Most commendably, Muskan Khan still does not want this issue to become a Hindu-Muslim issue at all. This is what has touched me to the core! Nothing on earth can justify so many boys making taunting remarks and trying to shout her down! The brash and ruthless manner in which she was misbehaved with by so many boys can never be dismissed lightly and our news channels also must give more time to this that how can boys escape with impunity even after misbehaving with such brazenness!

Muskan who was seen standing up against the shameless hecklers in a video that has gone viral was candid enough to say that:
I faced the situation boldly and I want all girls to be tough and face such situations boldly to claim their rights. People are free to practice any religion in the country. They follow their culture. I follow mine. I should be allowed to follow my culture. I'm not questioning anybody. They should also not question me either. It's my right to wear a burqa and hijab. Why should we stop this?" Absolutely right!

Even if we concede that every college has its uniform then also the manner of dealing with girls and women has to be strictly in the highest decorum and those boys or men who behave like goons and hoodlums must be taken to task and should not be allowed to go scot free under any circumstances!

Senior and eminent Supreme Court advocate Sanjay Hegde appearing on behalf of some students argued that the Education Act does not empower the state governments to prescribe uniforms in colleges. How can then state government act in breach? This is the moot question!

It is good to learn that the BJP government in Madhya Pradesh made it clear that no proposal to ban hijab (head scarf) in educational institutions in the state is under consideration. So there should be no confusion on this. Since the matter is pending before the Karnataka High Court, we have no option but to keep our fingers crossed on what it rules finally on this and what the Apex Court rules in the end! Whatever the Court rules has to be followed but what happened most unfortunately with Muskan and other Muslim girls like her who were ruthlessly heckled cannot be justified under any circumstances by anyone! No denying!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top