Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, October 31, 2024

Kalkaji Temple: Delhi HC Issues Directions Regarding Unauthorised Encroachment

Posted in: Civil Laws
Fri, Nov 19, 21, 10:58, 3 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 5447
Neeta Bharadwaj vs Kamlesh Sharma Delhi High Court issued a slew of directions concerning the functioning of city's Kalkaji temple on varied aspects including the unauthorized encroachment by shopkeepers, sanitation and drinking water facilities as also an inspection to be carried out

In a learned, laudable, landmark and latest judgment titled Neeta Bharadwaj & Ors vs Kamlesh Sharma in FAO 36/2021 & connected matters delivered as recently as on November 15, 2021, the Delhi High Court issued a slew of directions concerning the functioning of city's Kalkaji temple on varied aspects including the unauthorized encroachment by shopkeepers, sanitation and drinking water facilities as also an inspection to be carried out by the Delhi Fire Department for tackling emergency situations.

It must be apprised here that the single Judge Bench of Justice Pratibha M Singh which delivered this brief, brilliant, bold and balanced judgment also issued directions to the DCP of Delhi Police that he shall ensure that adequate personnel are posted at the temple so as to ensure that there is proper and regulated entry and exit of the devotees, to and from the temples, and to ensure that no untoward incident takes place. It must be mentioned here that this Court was shown videos depicting the manhandling by certain police constables who were posted in the temple.

To start with, this cogent, commendable, composed and convincing judgment authored by a single Judge Bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh sets the ball rolling by first and foremost observing in para 1 that:
This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. It is then put forth in para 2 that:
These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time.

While elaborating further, the Bench then observes in para 3 that:
On the last date i.e., 27th October 2021, it was submitted by Mr. Vipin Bharadwaj, one of the baridaars, that the police are not providing complete cooperation for the removal of encroachments and the management of devotees for darshan in accordance with the order of this Court dated 27th September 2021. Accordingly, this Court had directed Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Criminal) for GNCTD, to obtain instructions and file a status report in respect thereof.

Be it noted, the Bench then enunciates in para 4 that:
Today, Mr. Sanjay Lao has appeared virtually, along with SubInspector Mannu Dev from PS Kalkaji, and has presented a status report to the Court. The status report reads as under:

That in compliance of the Hon'ble Court order dated 08.09.2021 passed in the above noted FAO, joint inspection of the Kalkaji temple complex was conducted by the official of the SDMC and Delhi Police and a detailed report of the same was submitted before this Hon'ble court.

Further, in compliance of Hon'ble court orders dated 27.9.21, sufficient police force was deployed to assist the SDMC official and Ld. Administrator appointed by Hon'ble high court for removal of encroachment in mandir complex. Ld. Administrator conducted physical inspection of mandir premises with police and civic authorities and also held meeting with all baaridars and representatives of shop keepers on 29.9.21. after that sealing of unauthorized shops in the premises was started and total 107 shops were sealed during drive. Due to Adequate police arrangement no Law & Order situation was emerged and whole sealing process was completed peacefully.

During Navratras, this time the temple opened for general public after a gap of one and half year due to COVID pandemic so the devotees came in much large number and with more enthusiasm to pay their obeisance to the revered deity. Moreover, this time the added dimension to the challenging task was sealing of shops in temple complex, closure of one important route for devotees and issues related to unwillingness of pujaris and Baaridars to follow the directions of administrator appointed by Hon'ble Delhi high court. Despite all above facts, proper law & order as well as implementation of COVID guidelines was conducted during Navratra arrangement successfully by the police under the supervisions of Ld. Administrator.

Staff of 10 Policemen from police station Kalkaji always remain present in the temple to ensure proper management of devotees and provide police assistance in case of any need. Besides it, Extra staff is deployed including paramilitary force during days of heave footfall like weekends. Regular meetings are held with the baaridars, Pujaris & Mandir committee to ensure proper coordination.

Police force is always available to provide assistance as & when required by the Civic authorities or Ld. Administrator for Kalkaji temple. Undersigned is duty bound and willing to abide by any directions passed by this.

To put things in perspective, the Bench then envisages in para 7 that:
After perusing the video, a clarification was sought from Mr. Lao. In response, he submits that this video had, in fact, gone viral and was brought to the attention of the concerned DCP and the Joint Commissioner of Police. He submits that after the said video was brought to the notice of the higher authorities, the Delhi Police has taken sufficient steps to ensure that such actions are not repeated in the future.

As it turned out, the Bench then points out in para 8 that:
The ld. Counsels appearing for various baridaars and parties in these matters, have submitted that during the Navratra period, a large number of devotees had visited the Mandir, and couple of such incidents, as depicted in the video, took place during that period. On a query from the Court as to whether there has been any recent incident of this nature at the Mandir, ld. Counsels submit that there have been no such incidents post the Navratra period.

Most remarkably, what forms the cornerstone of this brief, brilliant, bold and reasonable judgment is then stated in para 9 wherein it is laid down that, Considering the overall sentiment expressed by the parties, and keeping in mind the interest of the devotees at the Mandir, which is paramount, the following directions are issued:

  1. The DCP of the Delhi Police, stationed in the concerned area, shall ensure that adequate personnel are posted at the Kalkaji Mandir to ensure that there is proper and regulated entry and exit of the devotees, to and from the Mandir, as also to ensure that no untoward incident takes place.
  2. Considering that there are many female devotees who visit the Mandir, adequate number of female constables of the Delhi Police shall be posted at the Kalkaji Mandir.
  3. The DCP concerned, of the Delhi Police, shall pass appropriate directions to ensure that a single set of constables are not posted at the Mandir for a long period of time. The police personnel who are posted shall be changed at least twice a month.

With these directions, the status report submitted on by the SHO, PS:Kalkaji, is taken on record.

For the sake of clarity, the Bench then makes it clear in para 13 that:
It is clear that none of the shopkeepers, who are in illegal occupation of Mandir premises, can remain in possession. The shopkeepers or their families also cannot reside in the Mandir complex. The same is impermissible and is nothing but unauthorized encroachment and trespass into the Mandir's premises.

Most crucially, the Bench then directed in para 14 that:
Accordingly, the ld. Administrator, with the cooperation of the Delhi Police and the SDMC, is permitted to take action for removal of all the unauthorized encroachments within the Kalkaji Mandir premises within two weeks. If any of the shopkeepers and illegal residents in the Mandir premises are entitled to seek alternate accommodation, the DUSIB may consider their request and provide alternate premises on humanitarian grounds. However, it is made clear that the pendency of any application for alternate accommodation before DUSIB shall not come in the way of the removal of encroachments and unauthorized construction of shopkeepers from the Mandir premises.

No less significant is what is then held by the Bench in para 18 that:
It is made clear that all the directions passed in these matters shall also be implemented and given effect to by the DDA.

Furthermore, the Bench then also directed in para 22 that:
This Court is of the opinion that a Medical Centre should be run continuously at the Kalkaji Mandir premises to cater to the devotees who visit the temple round the year.

Adding more to it, the Bench then also made it clear in para 23 that, Accordingly, Mr. Lao, ld. Standing Counsel for the GNCTD, may take instructions in this regard, and with the cooperation of the baridaars, at least two paramedics and one Doctor may be posted from any of the nearby hospitals/dispensaries of the GNCTD at the Mandir premises. The expenses of the Medical Centre shall be borne by the ld. Administrator from the account where funds for everyday expenses are being deposited by the baridaars.

What's more, the Bench then directed in para 43 that:
Let copy of this order be sent to the ld. Administrator and ld. Registrar General of this Court.

Going ahead, the Bench then directs in para 47 that:
Let copy of this order be sent to the ld. ADJ(West) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi dealing with RCA No. 60746/2016, to ensure compliance.

Not stopping here, the Bench then holds in para 48 that:
List along with all connected matters on 7th December 2021. This is a part-heard matter.

Finally, the Bench then concludes by holding in para 49 that:
The digitally signed copy of this order, duly uploaded on the official website of the Delhi High Court, www.delhihighcourt.nic.in, shall be treated as the certified copy of the order for the purpose of ensuring compliance. No physical copy of orders shall be insisted by any authority/entity or litigant.

In conclusion, this most notable, learned and brilliant judgment by a single Judge Bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh of Delhi High Court has very rightly issued a slew of directions for the paramount welfare of devotees of Kalkaji's temple. These landmark directions must be implemented at the earliest. It brooks no more delay anymore now!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top