Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Sunday, November 24, 2024

West UP Having Its Own Bench Of High Court Will Help Undertrials And Overall Criminal Justice System Will Stand To Gain

Posted in: Criminal Law
Wed, Oct 6, 21, 19:41, 3 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 4880
ttar Pradesh which has the maximum population among all states, maximum districts, maximum constituencies, maximum poverty, maximum crime, maximum pending cases among all states

It can only happen in a country like India that the state of Uttar Pradesh which has the maximum population among all states, maximum districts, maximum constituencies, maximum poverty, maximum crime, maximum pending cases among all states which is nearly half of the pending cases all over India and is also among the top few largest states area wise has least number of high court benches in entire nation !

In 2011, the percentage of crime incidents in UP was 33.3 % of the country's total which itself serves as the biggest proof of just how bad things are in UP. Inspite of all this, there is only just one bench of high court in UP and that too just about 150 km from Allahabad high court! This notwithstanding that it is West UP which accounts for more than half of the pending cases in UP and is considered the crime capital of UP! Lakhimpur Kheri in news for wrong reasons is also in West UP!

Ever since 1955 when Dr Sampoorna Nand, the then Chief Minister of UP recommended that a bench of high court be established in West UP at Meerut, at least 14 Chief Ministers have time and again recommended in favour. But still it has not materialised.

In 1986, the former Law Minister Hansraj Bhardwaj made a statement in Rajya Sabha in response to a question of the then leader of opposition Atal Bihari Vajpayee that:
The government in principle has agreed for establishment of high court bench in West UP and the question of situs of the bench was left to the Central government as Agra was not found to be a suitable place. But where majority of people expect the bench to be formed, it will be formed there.

Vajpayee had himself said that if his party came to power in Centre, it will take no time in creating a bench in West UP. It is the bounden duty of every government to provide speedy justice to litigants and how can this be possible without creating more benches in UP? Many former PMs like late Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi and others have espoused the creation of a bench in West UP and even the present government has appreciated its necessity. But no one has ever cared to implement the tall promises made to the people of West UP by creating a high court bench here which they repeatedly promised only to forget later !

Needless to say, the people here are particularly miffed over the fact that a high court bench has been created in Aurangabad based on recommendations of Jaswant Commission report but West UP has been unfairly denied the same despite Jaswant Commission very strongly recommending for the same. One of my best friend and a senior colleague in Meerut Bar – Advocate Parvez Alam had informed me which even I was not aware that the demand for a high court bench in West UP is so old that it can enter in the Guiness Book of World Records! Both the Centre and the State throw the ball of decision making in each other's court which is most frustrating to see and this has been going on since 1955 when for the first time a high court bench was recommended for West UP by the then Chief Minister Sampoorna Nand. This is exactly what my another best friend and a colleague in Meerut Bar - Amit Sharma along with Tarun Dhaka, the former General Secretary of Meerut Bar pinpoints that it is petty politics that has prevented a high court bench from taking deep inroad in West UP and it is the undertrials who are suffering the most in the whole process!

Can we ignore that in many cases pertaining to West UP, either the plaintiff or the defendant or even both in some cases have died but still their cases have not yet been decided? Is it not a mockery of justice? I will cite few cases to substantiate my valid point:-

  1. Second Appeal 1278/74 Smt Aziz Begum v. Union of India, pending since 1974.
  2. Second Appeal 2177/75 Harishankar Others v. Bheygilu, pending since 1975.
  3. Second Appeal 2320/76 Jaswant Singh v. Deep Chand, pending since 1976.
  4. Writ Number 316/74 Ganga Devi v. Ram Har Singh, pending since 1974.
  5. Writ Number 447/73 Jagnarayan v. DDC, pending since 1973.

No one can refute what the former President of Meerut Bar and a very senior and eminent lawyer - MP Sharma revealed about the distance between various districts in West UP with Allahabad and how much distance will stand reduced if a high court bench is created in West UP which as illustrated in the Safarnama of Dainik Jagran newspaper dated December 31, 2012 is as follows:
 

 

District Allahabad Meerut
Saharanpur 752 132
Muzaffarnagar 660 57
Meerut 607  
Bulandshahar 560 65
Aligarh 501 140
Mathura 537 200
Agra 462 231
Mainpuri 462 260
Etah 447 260
Badayun 516 236
Bareilly 516 215
Moradabad 610 124
Pilhibit 430 240
Bijnore 692 80
Rampur 592 157
Ghaziabad 630 50
Noida 650 70
Bahgpat 640 45
JP Nagar 620 105

Still should a high court bench not be created in West UP ? Under such circumstances how can cheap, affordable and speedy justice be delivered to the litigants of West UP? But our government is least concerned about all this which saddens me most.

According to the eminent, senior criminal lawyer and former President of Meerut Bar and present member of Meerut Bar Council Anil Bakshi who in the same newspaper quoted above is quoted as saying that:
The distance from Meerut to Pakistan based Lahore high court is 500 km whereas from Meerut to Allahabad is 607 km. From Saharanpur to Allahabad is 752 km and from Saharanpur to Lahore high court is 380 km. Distance of Gautambuddhanagar and Ghaziabad to Delhi high court is just 25 – 30 km. Even if a bench is created in West UP then also Allahabad will be left with 50 districts because the number of districts in West UP are 26.

It was in 1955 that the then Chief Minister of UP – Sampoornanand had recommended creation of a high court bench of West UP in Meerut. Late former PM Mrs Indira Gandhi in 1977 elections had to face demand of bench from the people of West UP. In 1981 the UP State government had recommended to Centre for creation of a high court bench in West UP. In 1981 – 82, late former PM Rajiv Gandhi had assured the setting up of a high court bench in West UP to the lawyers of Meerut Bar Association when he arrived in Meerut. In September 1981, the Jaswant Singh Commission was constituted which recommended creation of a bench in West UP in its report submitted in April 1985 but Centre did not act even though it promptly acted on the other recommendation and created a high court bench in Aurangabad in Maharashtra as was recommended.

It was in 1981 that Central Action Committee was formed for pursuing the sacred goal of a high court bench for West UP. It was from May 1981 that the lawyers also decided to observe every Saturday as strike in support of a bench. In between 1981 and 2021, the lawyers went on strike for several months together but Centre cared a damn!

According to a statement by learned Andhra Pradesh High Court Judge Justice VV Rao in March 2010,:
The Indian judiciary would take 320 years to clear the backlog of 31.28 million cases pending in various courts including High Courts in the country''. Any attempt to speed up the disbursal of justice could go a long way in addressing the problem and what better than the setting up of more High Court benches and to start with which state is better than UP which is one of the biggest state in India, has maximum pending cases among all the states accounting for nearly half of the total pending cases and here too it is West UP which accounts for most of the cases among the pending cases in UP! Setting up of more High Court benches will help the system to come out of its present inertia and address the endless woes of the poorest of the poor who suffer the most in the entire process of delivery of justice for no fault of theirs! Our government most unfortunately is just simply refusing to appreciate this basic fact!

Shri KP Sharma, the eminent criminal lawyer from Meerut who first enlightened me on setting up of a high court bench in West UP expressed his deep anguish over the nonchalance and insensitive approach of both the State and Centre regarding this and not conceding to it inspite of acknowledging fully the dire necessity of the same in the interest of millions of people of West UP who are punished for being born here.

He also very rightly lamented that:
What a pity that Lahore High Court in Pakistan is nearer to the people of West UP as compared to Allahabad High Court. The lawyers of West UP obviously don't enjoy going on strike every Saturday since 1981 because ultimately it is our own livelihood which is most adversely affected which the world must understand and appreciate.

This decision was taken unanimously by all lawyers of West UP as a token protest against the abject callousness and utter disregard for the genuine grievances of a common people who have to suffer the most especially those who are very poor and can't afford to incur the huge expenses relating to travelling more than 600 or 700 km or even more, engaging a lawyer, staying in Allahabad etc. It is the illiterate people who are fooled the most in the whole process by cunning people of whom there is no dearth and government too is not doing any good by turning a blind eye to the endless woes suffered by the people of West UP since independence which is most disgusting to note.

The condition of educated and financially well off is not much better either especially the middle class. It is high time and now the government must take prompt action in creating a bench of high court for the millions of people residing in West UP!

Can anyone deny that West UP gives maximum revenue and yet they are facing worst punishment of being denied even their basic right of getting speedy and affordable justice as promised in our Constitution? Can anyone deny that article 214 of our Constitution which the critics opposed to creation of more Benches of High Court keep citing repeatedly nowhere prohibits the creation of new Benches? If there should be no High Court Bench as some lawyers of Allahabad High Court very vociferously argue, then my simple question to them is that:
Why is there a Bench at Lucknow which is so near to Allahabad? When a Bench can exist in Lucknow then why not in Meerut or Agra or any of 22 districts of West UP which are at a huge distance causing maximum inconveniences to the people here? Is it not a fact that initially High Court was based at Agra and later transferred to Allahabad?

Can we ignore even what the Supreme Court in Naseeruddin v. State Transport Appellate Tribunal reported in AIR 1976 SC 331, relevant portion of the para 68 of ruling, relating to para 14 of UP High Courts (Amalgamation) Order 1948 said that:
There is no permanent seat of High Court at Allahabad, the seats at Allahabad and at Lucknow may be changed in accordance with the provision of the order? Should a common man of West UP be still deprived of his basic right of having a High Court Bench in West UP?

Can anyone deny that till 31 Dec, 2008, the number of pending cases were 14, 64, 932 and out of these, the cases of West UP alone are nearly 52 percent? Can anyone deny that 60% cases are from West UP and this is the main obvious reason why some lawyers of Allahabad are stringently opposing a Bench for West UP because ultimately their source of livelihood is adversely affected? I understand and appreciate it. But can we ignore that it is always the people's interest which holds supreme as enshrined in our Constitution and not of the lawyers of any particular place? Never.

Can anyone deny that the members of the Bar of West Uttar Pradesh are basically fighting for the welfare and protection of poor litigants who have to travel a huge distance averaging 600 to 1000 km from their respective residence in West UP to Allahabad High Court? Can anyone deny that over 1 crore cases are pending in various courts of UP and account for nearly half of the entire cases pending in our country and here too West UP is at top with more than 50% cases ? If the problem of huge pending cases in UP is addressed soon, the whole nation will benefit.

Can anyone deny what Justice RV Raveendran, a former Judge of Supreme Court said recently that:
People trust more goons rather than judiciary because of delays and uncertainty in judgments of courts. The ratio of civil and criminal cases 58 years ago was 50 : 50 and now it is 20 : 80. The time is not far when in courts only criminal cases will be left? Still should a High Court Bench not be established in West UP ? Not only in West UP but also in all such places Benches must be established where the High Court is too far away as we see in West UP !

Can anyone deny that according to a report of National Police Commission, in criminal cases 60 percent accused are wrongly framed and for keeping them in jail, 43 percent of the total expenditure is incurred on them alone and here again those from West UP bear the maximum brunt because their relatives face lot of problems in travelling nearly thousand kilometers, arranging a lawyer, arranging bail, and many other unnecessary expenses which could have been saved if there was a Bench here? Can anyone deny that in West UP, crime is much more than in East UP?

Can anyone deny that East UP is endowed with not only High Court at Allahabad but even a sole Bench at Lucknow whereas West UP inspite of crime soaring higher and higher does not have even a single Bench? How can this be justified? Can anyone deny that UP being the biggest State in India has the least number of Benches in India? Should this disastrous anomaly not be immediately rectified by creating more Benches?

Can anyone deny that both the State and Centre time and again keep reiterating their commitment for speedy, cheap and easy justice? Why do then they deny a Bench for West UP ? Can anyone deny that the law and order problem is further deteriorating from worse to worst and criminals are roaming fearlessly because they know that they will escape the dragnet of law for lifelong as the Allahabad High Court is the maximum overloaded with regard to pending cases all over our country ? Can anyone deny that the root cause of increasing crime in West UP is lack of Bench because it takes a very long time in Allahabad High Court for the cases to be decided ? Can anyone deny that smaller States like MP where crime rate and pending cases is much lesser than UP has two Benches of High Court whereas on the contrary UP has only one Bench?

Can anyone deny that the crime ratio and pending cases of East UP is much lesser than West UP but still East UP is equipped with not only High Court but even a sole Bench whereas West UP does not have even a single Bench? Shameful and disgraceful that for more than 65 years, no one is hearing the crying voices of crores of people just because their only crime is that they are born in West UP ? Can anyone deny that criminals in West UP are praying day and night that a Bench should never be formed and are using all their influence to undermine its creation because ultimately they themselves will be worst hit as the justice delivery mechanism will pace up very quickly to push them where they really deserve to be?

Can anyone deny that whichever way one looks at it, the creation of a Bench in West UP will not only enormously benefit the more than 8 crore people residing in West UP but will also benefit thousands of undertrials of Eastern UP languishing in jail for years together especially the poorest of the poor? Can anyone deny that the lightening pace at which crime is burgeoning in West UP, it will soon attain the dubious distinction of being the worst crime infected region not just in India alone but in the entire world mainly because of delay in criminal cases due to lack of High Court Bench here? Still should no Bench be created here nor should West UP be attached to any other High Court closer than Allahabad?

Why are always all the legitimate demands of West UP as in the case of setting up of a Bench here first appreciated by all major political parties only to be later thrown in the backyard? Why? Please tell me why? What is preventing or stopping the Government from giving the green signal for creation of one more Bench in UP which has the maximum pending cases in our country but the least number of Benches which they have acknowledged also time and again. Isn't this a national shame? This sacred fight for Bench in West UP representing the aspirations of more than 8 crore people must be carried on until it reaches its logical conclusion. The Preamble of our Constitution opens with the words We, the people which itself underlines the supreme importance given to people by our Constitution.

So, if the Constitution is violated at the very threshold by denying the above 8 crore people a Bench in West UP, then what remains? Therefore, while deciding about the Bench there is need to take holistic view of all the issues and keep in mind the fact that our Constitution aims at securing for all its citizens, among other things, social, economic and political justice and establishing a welfare state which again is possible only by creation of a Bench not only in West UP but other places also where there is dire need of the same as our 18th Law Commission in its 230th report very rightly recommended creation of more Benches.

According to a statement by learned Andhra Pradesh High Court Judge Justice VV Rao in March 2010, The Indian judiciary would take 320 years to clear the backlog of 31.28 million cases pending in various courts including High Courts in the country.

Any attempt to speed up the disbursal of justice could go a long way in addressing the problem and what better than the setting up of more High Court benches and to start with which state is better than UP which is one of the biggest state in India, has maximum pending cases among all the states accounting for nearly half of the total pending cases and here too it is West UP which accounts for most of the cases among the pending cases in UP ! Setting up of more High Court benches will help the system to come out of its present inertia and address the endless woes of the poorest of the poor who suffer the most in the entire process of delivery of justice for no fault of theirs ! Our government most unfortunately is just simply refusing to appreciate this basic fact !

Government is announcing high courts for small states like Manipur, Meghalaya and Tripura but no one is bothered about West UP having more than 8 crore population whih is more than all these small states and accounts for more than half of pending cases in UP which tops the state list ! Why ?

That West UP does not have a Bench since 1947 till 2021 is most disquieting ! It is a ghoulish mockery of Article 21 and Article 39 A which provides for equal justice and free legal aid and the 230th report of Law Commission which provides for setting up of more High Court benches ! Former Chairman of Supreme Court Bar Association Krishna Mani had very categorically stated that:
Only by the creation of a bench of high court in West UP will the people be able to secure justice. Lawyers of West UP have on several occasions gone on strike for several months in support of a bench here but to no avail ! Not only this, they have been regularly going on strike since 1981 every Saturday to press home the point that bench is a dire necessity here which cannot be ignored but again to no avail !

Can anyone deny that it will amount to no exaggeration if I go to the extent of even predicting the collapse of our entire judicial and criminal justice system if more Benches are not created all over India especially in UP which has only one Bench inspite of being the most populated state which will have terrible consequences for our entire nation wherein there will be total anarchy and lawlessness all over as people will become completely fed up in quest of waiting for justice for which the Centre will be totally liable?

Can anyone deny what Justice Krishna Iyer said : The way to eliminate this ghastly syndrome of judicial arrears is not more state force but making the system of justice, justices and justicing truly accessible to the have-nots by means of radical judicial reform that is decentralised and democratic.

If this does not become possible, the suffering people may leave the courts and take to the streets? Does this not perfectly apply to UP where more than 1 crore cases are pending that is nearly half the cases pending all over India and here also West UP alone accounts for more than 50% cases? Still should a Bench not be created in West UP? You tell me. Even in other big States like Rajasthan, Orissa and many others, more high court benches should be created so that the huge backlog of pending cases comes crumbling down and the entire criminal justice system stand to gain in the whole process and undertrials gain quicker access to justice.

Written By: Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A-82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, UP

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
The general principle, is that a FIR cannot be depended upon a substantive piece of evidence.The article discusses the general priciple, along with exceptions to it.
Victim plays an important role in the criminal justice system but his/her welfare is not given due regard by the state instrumentality. Thus, the role of High Courts or the Supreme Court in our country in affirming and establishing their rights is dwelt in this article.
Can anybody really know what is going inside the heads of criminal lawyers? I mean, yes, we can pick bits of their intelligence during courtroom trials and through the legal documents that they draft.
Terrorism and organized crimes are interrelated in myriad forms. Infact in many illustration terrorism and organized crimes have converged and mutated.
Right to a copy of police report and other documents As per section 207 of CrPC, accused has the right to be furnished with the following in case the proceeding has been initiated on a police report:
In terms of Section 2 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 hereafter referred to as 'the Act'), "human rights" means the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed under the Constitution
The Oxford dictionary defines police as an official organization whose job is to make people obey the law and to prevent and solve crime
the Supreme Court let off three gang rapists after they claimed a ‘compromise formula’ with the victim and agreed to pay her a fine of Rs 50,000 each for their offence.
benefit those prisoners who are kept in solitary confinement, the Uttarakhand High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of State of Uttarakhand v 1. Mehtab s/o Tahir Hassan 2. Sushil @Bhura s/o Gulab Singh Criminal Reference No. 1 of 2014 on April 27, 2018
this article helps you knowing how to become a criminal lawyer
helps you to know adultery and its types
In the landmark case of Manoj Singh Pawar v State of Uttarakhand & others Writ Petition (PIL) No. 156 of 2016 which was delivered on June 18, 2018, the Uttarakhand High Court issued a slew of landmark directions
Scope and ambit of Section 6 of Indian Evidence Act,1872
Victims of Crime Can Seek Cancellation of Bail: MP HC in Mahesh Pahade vs State of MP
State of Orissa v Mahimananda Mishra said clearly and convincingly that the court must not go deep into merits of the matter while considering an application for bail and all that needs to be established from the record is the existence of a prima facie case against the accused.
Yashwant v Maharashtra while the conviction of some police officers involved in a custodial torture which led to the death of a man was upheld, the Apex Court underscored on the need to develop and recognize the concept of democratic policing wherein crime control is not the only end, but the means to achieve this order is also equally important.
20 more people guilty of killing a 60-year-old Dalit man and his physically-challenged daughter. Upheld acquittals of 21 other accused, holding that there was insufficient evidence to establish their guilt. So it was but natural that they had to be acquitted
No person accused of an offence punishable for offences involving commercial quantity shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless
Accident under section 80 under the Indian Penal Code falls under the chapter of general exceptions. This article was made with the objective of keeping in mind the students of law who are nowadays in dire need of material which simplify the law than complicating it.
Nishan Singh v State of Punjab. Has ordered one Nishan Singh Brar, convicted of abduction and rape of a minor victim girl, and his mother Navjot Kaur to pay Rs 90 lakh towards compensation.
Rajesh Sharma v State of UP to regulate the purported gross misuse of Section 498A IPC have been modified just recently in a latest judgment titled Social Action Forum Manav for Manav Adhikar and another v Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice and others.
Kodungallur Film Society vs. Union of India has issued comprehensive guidelines to control vandalism by protesting mobs. Vandalism is vandalism and it cannot be justified under any circumstances. Those who indulge in it and those who instigate it must all be held clearly accountable and made to pay for what they have done most shamefully.
Ram Lal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh If the court is satisfied that if the confession is voluntary, the conviction can be based upon the same. Rule of prudence does not require that each and every circumstance mentioned in the confession must be separately and independently corroborated. Absolutely right There can be no denying it
Joseph Shine case struck down the law of adultery under Section 497. It declared that adultery can be a ground for civil issues including dissolution of marriages but it cannot be a criminal offence. It invalidated the Section 497 of IPC as a violation of Articles 14 and 15 and under Article 21 of the Constitution
Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) represented through Legal Representatives v/s Karnataka, Had no hesitation to concede right from the start while underscoring the rights of victims of crime that, The rights of victims of crime is a subject that has, unfortunately, only drawn sporadic attention of Parliament, the judiciary and civil society.
State of Kerala v Rasheed observed that while deciding an application to defer cross examination under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. a balance must be struck between the rights of the accused, and the prerogative of the prosecution to lead evidence. The Apex Court in this landmark judgment also listed out practical guidelines.
Reena Hazarika v State of Assam that a solemn duty is cast on the court in the dispensation of justice to adequately consider the defence of the accused taken under Section 313 CrPC and to either accept or reject the same for reasons specified in writing.
Zulfikar Nasir & Ors v UP has set aside the trial court judgment that had acquitted 16 Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) officials in the 1987 Hashimpur mass murder case. The Delhi High Court has convicted all the accused and sentenced them to life imprisonment.
In Babasaheb Maruti Kamble v Maharashtra it was held that the Special Leave Petitions filed in those cases where death sentence is awarded by the courts below, should not be dismissed without giving reasons, at least qua death sentence.
Shambhir & Ors v State upholding the conviction and punishment of over 80 rioters has brought some solace to all those affected people who lost their near and dear ones in the ghastly 1984 anti-Sikh riots which brought disrepute to our country and alienated many Sikhs from the national mainstream
Naman Singh alias Naman Pratap Singh and another vs. UP, Supreme Court held a reading of the FIR reveals that the police has registered the F.I.R on directions of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate which was clearly impermissible in the law.
It has been a long and gruelling wait of 34 long years for the survivors of 1984 anti-Sikh riots to finally see one big leader Sajjan Kumar being sentenced to life term by Delhi High Court
Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik v State of Maharashtra held that criminals are also entitled to life of dignity and probability of reformation/rehabilitation to be seriously and earnestly considered before awarding death sentence. It will help us better understand and appreciate the intricacies of law.
Sukhlal v The State of Madhya Pradesh 'life imprisonment is the rule and death penalty is the exception' has laid down clearly that even when a crime is heinous or brutal, it may not still fall under the rarest of rare category.
Deepak v State of Madhya Pradesh in which has served to clarify the entire legal position under Section 319 CrPC, upheld a trial court order under Section 319 of the CrPc summoning accused who were in the past discharged by it ignoring the supplementary charge sheet against them.
It has to be said right at the outset that in a major reprieve for all the political leaders accused of being involved in the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, in CBI, Mumbai vs Dahyaji Goharji Vanzara
Devi Lal v State of Rajasthan the Supreme Court has dispelled all misconceived notions about suspicion and reiterated that,
Madhya Pradesh v Kalyan Singh has finally set all doubts to rest on the nagging question of whether offences under Section 307 of IPC can be quashed on the basis of settlement between parties.
Dr Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v Maharashtra made it amply clear that if a person had not made the promise to marry with the sole intention to seduce a woman to indulge in sexual acts, such an act would not amount to rape.
Rajesh v State of Haryana conviction under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (Abetment of Suicide) is not sustainable on the allegation of harassment without there being any positive action proximate to the time of occurrence on the part of the accused, which led or compelled the person to commit suicide.
Nand Kishore v Madhya Pradesh has commuted to life imprisonment the death sentence which was earlier confirmed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court of a convicted for the rape and murder of an eight-year-old girl.
Raju Jagdish Paswan v. Maharashtra has commuted the death penalty of a man accused of rape and murder of a nine year old girl and sentenced him to 30 years imprisonment without remission.
Swapan Kumar Chatterjee v CBI permitting the application filed by the prosecution for summoning a hand writing expert in a corruption case of which the trial had started in 1985. On expected lines, the Bench accordingly delivered its significant judgment thus laying down the correct proposition of law to be followed always in such cases
Sukhpal Singh v Punjab that the inability of the prosecution to establish motive in a case of circumstantial evidence is not always fatal to the prosecution case. Importance of motive in determining the culpability of the accused but refused to acknowledge it as the sole criteria for not convicting the accused in the absence of motive.
Gagan Kumar v Punjab it is a mandatory legal requirement for Magistrate to specify whether sentences awarded to an accused convicted for two or more offences, would run concurrently or consecutively.
Dnyaneshwar Suresh Borkar v Maharashtra Even poem can help save a death convict from gallows. The Apex Court has in this latest, landmark and laudable judgment commuted the death penalty of a kidnap cum murder convict who was just 22 years of age at the time of occurrence
Himachal Pradesh v Vijay Kumar Supreme court held about acid attack crime that a crime of this nature does not deserve any kind of clemency.
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Imprisonment Appears To Be An Altogether Inappropriate Punishment: SC
S. Sreesanth v. The Board of Control For Cricket In India the Supreme Court set aside a life ban imposed on former Indian cricketer S Sreesanth in connection with the 2013 IPL spot-fixing scandal and asked the BCCI Disciplinary Committee to take a fresh call on the quantum of his punishment under the Anti-Corruption Code.
Adding Additional Accused To Invoke Section 319 CrPC Stronger Evidence Than Mere Probability of Complicity of A Person Required: SC stated in Sugreev Kumar v. State of Punjab
Top