Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Sunday, November 24, 2024

Aghast, Appalled And Ashamed By Orchestrated Hooliganism At Kapil Sibal's House

Posted in: Criminal Law
Sun, Oct 3, 21, 11:30, 3 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 3779
One feels completely aghast, appalled and ashamed to witness the most dastardly and orchestrated hooliganism at senior Congress Leader and eminent Supreme Court lawyer-Kapil Sibal's house after he demanded an open dialogue in the party on the political situation in Punjab and Goa.

One feels completely aghast, appalled and ashamed to witness the most dastardly and orchestrated hooliganism at senior Congress Leader and eminent Supreme Court lawyer-Kapil Sibal's house after he demanded an open dialogue in the party on the political situation in Punjab and Goa. What wrong has he said? Why can't he say so? Is he not a very senior and eminent leader in Congress party?

This ruckus that one witnessed outside Kapil Sibal's house was bound to provoke a storm of criticism not just from leaders in other parties but also within the Congress party! It was reported that several Congress leaders of the  Group of 23  who had last year in 2020 written to party chief Sonia Gandhi demanding most rightly an organizational overhaul and elections for Congress party President strongly condemned the dastardly attack on Kapil Sibal's house calling it  orchestrated hooliganism . This is certainly no way to protest!

It must be mentioned that even former Finance Minister P Chidambaram who is also a senior and eminent Supreme Court lawyer and who was never a part of G23 also lamented strongly saying
I feel helpless when we cannot start meaningful conversations within party forums. I also feel hurt and helpless when I see pictures of Congress workers raising slogans outside the residence of a colleague and MP. The safe harbour to which one can withdraw seems to be silence  Never in my life have I ever seen Congress party in such dire straits! What one is now witnessing in Congress has no parallel in history!

While diverting from the main topic, it must be mentioned that we all know how just a short time before his death, RSS had invited and honoured late Pranab Mukherjee and he too had warmly accepted the honour and felt gratified but Rahul Gandhi compares  RSS  with Islamic organization Muslim Brotherhood  which is declared in some countries as a terror organisation which is most shocking, to say the least! I don't know who is guiding Rahul Gandhi but one thing I know: Rahul Gandhi's views on RSS can never be accepted by any sane person ever! I have never seen in my life his father late Rajiv Gandhi who was my favourite leader when I was in school or his grandmother late Mrs Indira Gandhi ever terming RSS in such derogatory language or criticizing RSS so strongly!

As if this is not enough, a strong nationalist Captain Amarinder Singh who since last 4 and a half years was Chief Minister of Punjab and who enjoys an impeccable nationalist reputation feels humiliated time and again in Congress and ultimately resigns as Chief Minister and Navjot Singh Sidhu who earlier enjoyed an impeccable reputation but once he went to Pakistan and controversially hugged Pakistani Army Chief Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa, his reputation nosedived as this was not liked by any good Indian as Pakistan has been waging cross border terrorism against India since last more than four decades! Even eminent Congress leader, former Union Minister and senior Supreme Court lawyer Manish Tewari too condemned the hug unequivocally and said most strongly
Do such people have right to stay in country? BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra eloquently said
Not only that, Sidhu's press conference today was trying to implicate India for what is happening between India and Pakistan. Yet Sidhu was promoted and made State Chief much against the wishes of Captain Amarinder and Sidhu still was not satisfied and so ultimately Captain Amarinder resigned after feeling humiliated in party!

Coming back to the subject of vandalism in Kapil Sibal's house, another very senior and eminent Supreme Court lawyer Vivek Tankha too while expressing his utter shock said
People may disagree with him. Even protest. But not damage his car. At least in my life, I never encouraged or promoted hooliganism. Shashi Tharoor who is another most eminent Congress leader too called the incident shameful. He said
As a democratic party we need to listen to what he has to say, disagree if you must but not in this way. Our priority is to strengthen ourselves to take on the BJP! It merits no reiteration that what has happened outside Sibal's house cannot be justified under any circumstances by anyone!

Eminent Supreme Court lawyer Manish Tewari described the violence as an effort to defend command performance, an apparent reference to the party high command. While condemning the attack, he said
Those who masterminded assault must bear in mind that he fights for @INCIndia both inside and outside courts of law. You may find his views uncomfortable but that cannot be a license for violence. Absolutely right! No denying it!

What provoked so much of ruckus was that Kapil Sibal had the guts, gall and gumption to question the party's decision making process and cautioned that they are G-23 but not Ji Huzoor 23! What wrong has he said in this? Kapil Sibal also said
We don't have a President. So, who's taking the decisions? We all know and yet we don't know. We want a CWC meeting for a dialogue to take place. Who can deny or dispute this? No man or woman in his/her right senses will ever deny or dispute what Kapil Sibal has said so outspokenly! Sibal further demanded introspection and internal dialogue to address the turmoil in the party in Punjab and the exodus of senior leaders in Goa where former CM Luizhenio Falerio joined the Trinamool Congress and said that the party was functioning without transparency.

It deserves mentioning here that Anand Sharma who is also a Congress leader and served as spokesperson also for a long time too while asserting that differences of opinion and perception are integral to democracy said
Congress has a history of upholding freedom of expression...Intolerance and violence is alien to Congress values and culture.:

It would be also relevant to mention here that former External Affairs Minister Natwar Singh commenting on the current crisis of the Congress party said, It's not alright at all, there are three people responsible, one of them is Rahul Gandhi who doesn't even hold any designation, and he is calling the shots : He said, the party is in very poor shape:. He also further lamented
What sort of Congress party do you have now? The Congress he (Amarinder Singh) joined is quite different from what it is now. It's in very poor shape. I don't know whether he will leave the Congress, but the fact of the matter is that at one point, the Congress was one of the greatest democratic parties in the world. Today, it's in a pathetic state. Natwar Singh had left Congress in 2008 after being in the party for a long time!

In short, one certainly feels most ashamed, aghast and appalled to see what has happened outside the house of such an eminent Congress leader like Kapil Sibal who is also a former Union Minister as also a senior Supreme Court lawyer who has the courage to speak truth to power! It was none other than Kapil Sibal who as Union Law Minister had recommended that High Court Bench should be created in West UP at Meerut but the then CM of UP Akhilesh Yadav was not prepared for it as was disclosed by another former Union Minister RPN Singh while talking with media! Ghulam Nabi Azad who is also a senior Congress leader and is also the former Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir described Sibal as a loyal Congressman fighting for the party both inside and outside the Parliament: and said
Any suggestion from any quarter should be welcomed instead of suppressing. No denying it!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
The general principle, is that a FIR cannot be depended upon a substantive piece of evidence.The article discusses the general priciple, along with exceptions to it.
Victim plays an important role in the criminal justice system but his/her welfare is not given due regard by the state instrumentality. Thus, the role of High Courts or the Supreme Court in our country in affirming and establishing their rights is dwelt in this article.
Can anybody really know what is going inside the heads of criminal lawyers? I mean, yes, we can pick bits of their intelligence during courtroom trials and through the legal documents that they draft.
Terrorism and organized crimes are interrelated in myriad forms. Infact in many illustration terrorism and organized crimes have converged and mutated.
Right to a copy of police report and other documents As per section 207 of CrPC, accused has the right to be furnished with the following in case the proceeding has been initiated on a police report:
In terms of Section 2 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 hereafter referred to as 'the Act'), "human rights" means the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed under the Constitution
The Oxford dictionary defines police as an official organization whose job is to make people obey the law and to prevent and solve crime
the Supreme Court let off three gang rapists after they claimed a ‘compromise formula’ with the victim and agreed to pay her a fine of Rs 50,000 each for their offence.
benefit those prisoners who are kept in solitary confinement, the Uttarakhand High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of State of Uttarakhand v 1. Mehtab s/o Tahir Hassan 2. Sushil @Bhura s/o Gulab Singh Criminal Reference No. 1 of 2014 on April 27, 2018
this article helps you knowing how to become a criminal lawyer
helps you to know adultery and its types
In the landmark case of Manoj Singh Pawar v State of Uttarakhand & others Writ Petition (PIL) No. 156 of 2016 which was delivered on June 18, 2018, the Uttarakhand High Court issued a slew of landmark directions
Scope and ambit of Section 6 of Indian Evidence Act,1872
Victims of Crime Can Seek Cancellation of Bail: MP HC in Mahesh Pahade vs State of MP
State of Orissa v Mahimananda Mishra said clearly and convincingly that the court must not go deep into merits of the matter while considering an application for bail and all that needs to be established from the record is the existence of a prima facie case against the accused.
Yashwant v Maharashtra while the conviction of some police officers involved in a custodial torture which led to the death of a man was upheld, the Apex Court underscored on the need to develop and recognize the concept of democratic policing wherein crime control is not the only end, but the means to achieve this order is also equally important.
20 more people guilty of killing a 60-year-old Dalit man and his physically-challenged daughter. Upheld acquittals of 21 other accused, holding that there was insufficient evidence to establish their guilt. So it was but natural that they had to be acquitted
No person accused of an offence punishable for offences involving commercial quantity shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless
Accident under section 80 under the Indian Penal Code falls under the chapter of general exceptions. This article was made with the objective of keeping in mind the students of law who are nowadays in dire need of material which simplify the law than complicating it.
Nishan Singh v State of Punjab. Has ordered one Nishan Singh Brar, convicted of abduction and rape of a minor victim girl, and his mother Navjot Kaur to pay Rs 90 lakh towards compensation.
Rajesh Sharma v State of UP to regulate the purported gross misuse of Section 498A IPC have been modified just recently in a latest judgment titled Social Action Forum Manav for Manav Adhikar and another v Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice and others.
Kodungallur Film Society vs. Union of India has issued comprehensive guidelines to control vandalism by protesting mobs. Vandalism is vandalism and it cannot be justified under any circumstances. Those who indulge in it and those who instigate it must all be held clearly accountable and made to pay for what they have done most shamefully.
Ram Lal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh If the court is satisfied that if the confession is voluntary, the conviction can be based upon the same. Rule of prudence does not require that each and every circumstance mentioned in the confession must be separately and independently corroborated. Absolutely right There can be no denying it
Joseph Shine case struck down the law of adultery under Section 497. It declared that adultery can be a ground for civil issues including dissolution of marriages but it cannot be a criminal offence. It invalidated the Section 497 of IPC as a violation of Articles 14 and 15 and under Article 21 of the Constitution
Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) represented through Legal Representatives v/s Karnataka, Had no hesitation to concede right from the start while underscoring the rights of victims of crime that, The rights of victims of crime is a subject that has, unfortunately, only drawn sporadic attention of Parliament, the judiciary and civil society.
State of Kerala v Rasheed observed that while deciding an application to defer cross examination under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. a balance must be struck between the rights of the accused, and the prerogative of the prosecution to lead evidence. The Apex Court in this landmark judgment also listed out practical guidelines.
Reena Hazarika v State of Assam that a solemn duty is cast on the court in the dispensation of justice to adequately consider the defence of the accused taken under Section 313 CrPC and to either accept or reject the same for reasons specified in writing.
Zulfikar Nasir & Ors v UP has set aside the trial court judgment that had acquitted 16 Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) officials in the 1987 Hashimpur mass murder case. The Delhi High Court has convicted all the accused and sentenced them to life imprisonment.
In Babasaheb Maruti Kamble v Maharashtra it was held that the Special Leave Petitions filed in those cases where death sentence is awarded by the courts below, should not be dismissed without giving reasons, at least qua death sentence.
Shambhir & Ors v State upholding the conviction and punishment of over 80 rioters has brought some solace to all those affected people who lost their near and dear ones in the ghastly 1984 anti-Sikh riots which brought disrepute to our country and alienated many Sikhs from the national mainstream
Naman Singh alias Naman Pratap Singh and another vs. UP, Supreme Court held a reading of the FIR reveals that the police has registered the F.I.R on directions of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate which was clearly impermissible in the law.
It has been a long and gruelling wait of 34 long years for the survivors of 1984 anti-Sikh riots to finally see one big leader Sajjan Kumar being sentenced to life term by Delhi High Court
Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik v State of Maharashtra held that criminals are also entitled to life of dignity and probability of reformation/rehabilitation to be seriously and earnestly considered before awarding death sentence. It will help us better understand and appreciate the intricacies of law.
Sukhlal v The State of Madhya Pradesh 'life imprisonment is the rule and death penalty is the exception' has laid down clearly that even when a crime is heinous or brutal, it may not still fall under the rarest of rare category.
Deepak v State of Madhya Pradesh in which has served to clarify the entire legal position under Section 319 CrPC, upheld a trial court order under Section 319 of the CrPc summoning accused who were in the past discharged by it ignoring the supplementary charge sheet against them.
It has to be said right at the outset that in a major reprieve for all the political leaders accused of being involved in the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, in CBI, Mumbai vs Dahyaji Goharji Vanzara
Devi Lal v State of Rajasthan the Supreme Court has dispelled all misconceived notions about suspicion and reiterated that,
Madhya Pradesh v Kalyan Singh has finally set all doubts to rest on the nagging question of whether offences under Section 307 of IPC can be quashed on the basis of settlement between parties.
Dr Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v Maharashtra made it amply clear that if a person had not made the promise to marry with the sole intention to seduce a woman to indulge in sexual acts, such an act would not amount to rape.
Rajesh v State of Haryana conviction under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (Abetment of Suicide) is not sustainable on the allegation of harassment without there being any positive action proximate to the time of occurrence on the part of the accused, which led or compelled the person to commit suicide.
Nand Kishore v Madhya Pradesh has commuted to life imprisonment the death sentence which was earlier confirmed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court of a convicted for the rape and murder of an eight-year-old girl.
Raju Jagdish Paswan v. Maharashtra has commuted the death penalty of a man accused of rape and murder of a nine year old girl and sentenced him to 30 years imprisonment without remission.
Swapan Kumar Chatterjee v CBI permitting the application filed by the prosecution for summoning a hand writing expert in a corruption case of which the trial had started in 1985. On expected lines, the Bench accordingly delivered its significant judgment thus laying down the correct proposition of law to be followed always in such cases
Sukhpal Singh v Punjab that the inability of the prosecution to establish motive in a case of circumstantial evidence is not always fatal to the prosecution case. Importance of motive in determining the culpability of the accused but refused to acknowledge it as the sole criteria for not convicting the accused in the absence of motive.
Gagan Kumar v Punjab it is a mandatory legal requirement for Magistrate to specify whether sentences awarded to an accused convicted for two or more offences, would run concurrently or consecutively.
Dnyaneshwar Suresh Borkar v Maharashtra Even poem can help save a death convict from gallows. The Apex Court has in this latest, landmark and laudable judgment commuted the death penalty of a kidnap cum murder convict who was just 22 years of age at the time of occurrence
Himachal Pradesh v Vijay Kumar Supreme court held about acid attack crime that a crime of this nature does not deserve any kind of clemency.
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Imprisonment Appears To Be An Altogether Inappropriate Punishment: SC
S. Sreesanth v. The Board of Control For Cricket In India the Supreme Court set aside a life ban imposed on former Indian cricketer S Sreesanth in connection with the 2013 IPL spot-fixing scandal and asked the BCCI Disciplinary Committee to take a fresh call on the quantum of his punishment under the Anti-Corruption Code.
Adding Additional Accused To Invoke Section 319 CrPC Stronger Evidence Than Mere Probability of Complicity of A Person Required: SC stated in Sugreev Kumar v. State of Punjab
Top