Delhi High court order to file complaint against wife and her two brothers in Habeus Corpus Article

This is a habeas corpus petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India read with section 482 of the Cr.P.C. by the petitioner
praying for the following reliefs:

“a. Issue a writ of habeas corpus or any order or direction in the nature of habeas corpus, thereby directing all the respondents to produce the said son of petitioner namely Virender before this Hon’ble Court; AND

b. pass any other or further order or direction which this

Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in facts of circumstances of the case, in favour of the petitioner.”

Mr. Sanjay Lao, learned Standing Counsel (Criminal) appearing on
advance notice on behalf of Delhi Police states that they shall produce Mr.
Virender Kumar, the petitioner’s son, before this court in the forenoon
session tomorrow i.e. 17.09.2021.

Directed accordingly.

List on 17.09.2021.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J

SEPTEMBER 16, 2021
Ne

Register your Copyright Online: We offer copyright registration right from your desktop Call us at Ph no: 9891244487
File Mutual Consent Divorce: Right Away Call us at Ph no: 9650499965
Online legal Advice: Receive professional Legal Solution within 48hrs
File caveat in Supreme Court

Comments

There are no comments for this article.

Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.

Sponsor

Accident/Motor vehicle Laws ( 23 )

Arbitration Law ( 19 )

Australian Law ( 1 )

Banking/Finance/Business law ( 54 )

Civil Laws ( 243 )

Computer laws ( 22 )

Constitutional Law ( 130 )

Consumer Law ( 13 )

Criminal Law ( 869 )

Employment laws ( 36 )

Entertainment Law ( 3 )

Environmental laws ( 25 )

Family Law ( 246 )

General Practice ( 64 )

Health Care Law ( 26 )

Immigration Law ( 23 )

Insurance laws ( 8 )

Intellectual Property ( 25 )

International Law ( 9 )

Judgment Reviews ( 22 )

Juvenile Laws ( 46 )

Media laws ( 21 )

medico Legal ( 55 )

Military Law ( 20 )

Political ( 38 )

Privacy Law ( 14 )

Property & Inheritance Laws ( 44 )

Reference & Education ( 95 )

Supreme Court ( 75 )

Tax laws ( 5 )

UK Laws ( 2 )

Woman laws ( 102 )

About Author

gitasadvocate

Member since Sep 28, 2021

Location: n/a

Following

User not following anyone yet.

You might also like

Evidentiary Value of FIR

The general principle, is that a FIR cannot be depended upon a substantive piece of evidence.The article discusses the general priciple, along with exceptions to it.

Role of Indian Judiciary in Protecting Victims Rights

Victim plays an important role in the criminal justice system but his/her welfare is not given due regard by the state instrumentality. Thus, the role of High Courts or the Supreme Court in our country in affirming and establishing their rights is dwelt in this article.

Are Criminal Lawyers bothered by their conscience

Can anybody really know what is going inside the heads of criminal lawyers? I mean, yes, we can pick bits of their intelligence during courtroom trials and through the legal documents that they draft.

Effect of Terrorism and Organized Crimes on Indian Society

Terrorism and organized crimes are interrelated in myriad forms. Infact in many illustration terrorism and organized crimes have converged and mutated.

Legal Protection available to the accused during a criminal trial

Right to a copy of police report and other documents As per section 207 of CrPC, accused has the right to be furnished with the following in case the proceeding has been initiated on a police report:

Frequently Asked Questions about NHRC

In terms of Section 2 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 hereafter referred to as 'the Act'), "human rights" means the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed under the Constitution

Need for Police Reforms in India

The Oxford dictionary defines police as an official organization whose job is to make people obey the law and to prevent and solve crime

Supreme Court let off three gang rapists

the Supreme Court let off three gang rapists after they claimed a â€˜compromise formulaâ€™ with the victim and agreed to pay her a fine of Rs 50,000 each for their offence.

Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Confinement - State of Uttarakhand v Mehtab, Sushil and Bhura

benefit those prisoners who are kept in solitary confinement, the Uttarakhand High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of State of Uttarakhand v 1. Mehtab s/o Tahir Hassan 2. Sushil @Bhura s/o Gulab Singh Criminal Reference No. 1 of 2014 on April 27, 2018

how to become a criminal lawyer

this article helps you knowing how to become a criminal lawyer

5 Types of Adultery You Probably Did not Know About

helps you to know adultery and its types

Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Peddling

In the landmark case of Manoj Singh Pawar v State of Uttarakhand & others Writ Petition (PIL) No. 156 of 2016 which was delivered on June 18, 2018, the Uttarakhand High Court issued a slew of landmark directions

Res Gestae Section 6 Indian Evidence Act,1872

Scope and ambit of Section 6 of Indian Evidence Act,1872

Victims of Crime Can Seek Cancellation of Bail: MP HC

Victims of Crime Can Seek Cancellation of Bail: MP HC in Mahesh Pahade vs State of MP

Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Considering Bail Application: SC

State of Orissa v Mahimananda Mishra said clearly and convincingly that the court must not go deep into merits of the matter while considering an application for bail and all that needs to be established from the record is the existence of a prima facie case against the accused.

SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize â€˜Democratic Policingâ€™ Concept; Enhances Punishment To Cops...

Yashwant v Maharashtra while the conviction of some police officers involved in a custodial torture which led to the death of a man was upheld, the Apex Court underscored on the need to develop and recognize the concept of democratic policing wherein crime control is not the only end, but the means to achieve this order is also equally important.

Mirchpur Dalit Killings: Atrocities Against SCs By Dominant Castes Continue Despite 71 Years Of Independence: Delhi...

20 more people guilty of killing a 60-year-old Dalit man and his physically-challenged daughter. Upheld acquittals of 21 other accused, holding that there was insufficient evidence to establish their guilt. So it was but natural that they had to be acquitted

NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational And Defy Human Logic: Punjab and Haryana HC

No person accused of an offence punishable for offences involving commercial quantity shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless

Accident under The Indian Penal Code,1860

Accident under section 80 under the Indian Penal Code falls under the chapter of general exceptions. This article was made with the objective of keeping in mind the students of law who are nowadays in dire need of material which simplify the law than complicating it.

Punjab and Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To Pay Rs 90 Lakh As Compensation To Victim, Her Parents

Nishan Singh v State of Punjab. Has ordered one Nishan Singh Brar, convicted of abduction and rape of a minor victim girl, and his mother Navjot Kaur to pay Rs 90 lakh towards compensation.

Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases on Settlement; A Third Agency Created By Courts Can't Exercise Statutory...

Rajesh Sharma v State of UP to regulate the purported gross misuse of Section 498A IPC have been modified just recently in a latest judgment titled Social Action Forum Manav for Manav Adhikar and another v Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice and others.

Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable For Damages: SC

Kodungallur Film Society vs. Union of India has issued comprehensive guidelines to control vandalism by protesting mobs. Vandalism is vandalism and it cannot be justified under any circumstances. Those who indulge in it and those who instigate it must all be held clearly accountable and made to pay for what they have done most shamefully.

Extra-Judicial Confession of Accused Need Not In All Cases Be Corroborated

Ram Lal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh If the court is satisfied that if the confession is voluntary, the conviction can be based upon the same. Rule of prudence does not require that each and every circumstance mentioned in the confession must be separately and independently corroborated. Absolutely right There can be no denying it

SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Section 497 IPC

Joseph Shine case struck down the law of adultery under Section 497. It declared that adultery can be a ground for civil issues including dissolution of marriages but it cannot be a criminal offence. It invalidated the Section 497 of IPC as a violation of Articles 14 and 15 and under Article 21 of the Constitution

Rights of Accused Far Outweigh That of Victims, Need Some Balancing So That Criminal Proceedings Are Fair To Both

Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) represented through Legal Representatives v/s Karnataka, Had no hesitation to concede right from the start while underscoring the rights of victims of crime that, The rights of victims of crime is a subject that has, unfortunately, only drawn sporadic attention of Parliament, the judiciary and civil society.

SC Issues Directions on Examination of Witnesses In Criminal Trial

State of Kerala v Rasheed observed that while deciding an application to defer cross examination under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. a balance must be struck between the rights of the accused, and the prerogative of the prosecution to lead evidence. The Apex Court in this landmark judgment also listed out practical guidelines.

Defence of The Accused U/s 313 CrPC; Non-Consideration Can Vitiate Conviction

Reena Hazarika v State of Assam that a solemn duty is cast on the court in the dispensation of justice to adequately consider the defence of the accused taken under Section 313 CrPC and to either accept or reject the same for reasons specified in writing.

Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonment In Hashimpura Massacre Case

Zulfikar Nasir & Ors v UP has set aside the trial court judgment that had acquitted 16 Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) officials in the 1987 Hashimpur mass murder case. The Delhi High Court has convicted all the accused and sentenced them to life imprisonment.

SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed Without Giving Reasons: SC

In Babasaheb Maruti Kamble v Maharashtra it was held that the Special Leave Petitions filed in those cases where death sentence is awarded by the courts below, should not be dismissed without giving reasons, at least qua death sentence.

1984 Anti Sikh Riots Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction And Punishment

Shambhir & Ors v State upholding the conviction and punishment of over 80 rioters has brought some solace to all those affected people who lost their near and dear ones in the ghastly 1984 anti-Sikh riots which brought disrepute to our country and alienated many Sikhs from the national mainstream

Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Register FIR: SC

Naman Singh alias Naman Pratap Singh and another vs. UP, Supreme Court held a reading of the FIR reveals that the police has registered the F.I.R on directions of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate which was clearly impermissible in the law.

1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To Congress Leader Sajjan Kumar

It has been a long and gruelling wait of 34 long years for the survivors of 1984 anti-Sikh riots to finally see one big leader Sajjan Kumar being sentenced to life term by Delhi High Court

Supreme Court Observations On Criminals And Death Penalty

Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik v State of Maharashtra held that criminals are also entitled to life of dignity and probability of reformation/rehabilitation to be seriously and earnestly considered before awarding death sentence. It will help us better understand and appreciate the intricacies of law.

Even Heinous, Brutal Crimes May Not Be Rarest of Rare

Sukhlal v The State of Madhya Pradesh 'life imprisonment is the rule and death penalty is the exception' has laid down clearly that even when a crime is heinous or brutal, it may not still fall under the rarest of rare category.

Person Once Discharged Can Also Be Added As Accused U/S 319 CrPC Based On New Materials

Deepak v State of Madhya Pradesh in which has served to clarify the entire legal position under Section 319 CrPC, upheld a trial court order under Section 319 of the CrPc summoning accused who were in the past discharged by it ignoring the supplementary charge sheet against them.

Sohrabuddin Case A Pre-Meditated Theory To Implicate Political Leaders: CBI Court

It has to be said right at the outset that in a major reprieve for all the political leaders accused of being involved in the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, in CBI, Mumbai vs Dahyaji Goharji Vanzara

Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can't Substitute Proof In Criminal Trial

Devi Lal v State of Rajasthan the Supreme Court has dispelled all misconceived notions about suspicion and reiterated that,

Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can't Be Quashed On The Basis of Settlement Between Parties

Madhya Pradesh v Kalyan Singh has finally set all doubts to rest on the nagging question of whether offences under Section 307 of IPC can be quashed on the basis of settlement between parties.

If The Promise To Marry Was Not Made With Sole Intention To Seduce A Woman To Indulge In Sex, It Is Not Rape

Dr Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v Maharashtra made it amply clear that if a person had not made the promise to marry with the sole intention to seduce a woman to indulge in sexual acts, such an act would not amount to rape.

Mere Allegations of Harassment Without Proximate Positive Action Not Sufficient For Conviction U/S 306 IPC

Rajesh v State of Haryana conviction under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (Abetment of Suicide) is not sustainable on the allegation of harassment without there being any positive action proximate to the time of occurrence on the part of the accused, which led or compelled the person to commit suicide.

Rape And Murder of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes Death Sentence To 25 Years Imprisonment Without Remission

Nand Kishore v Madhya Pradesh has commuted to life imprisonment the death sentence which was earlier confirmed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court of a convicted for the rape and murder of an eight-year-old girl.

Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is Unquestionably Foreclosed

Raju Jagdish Paswan v. Maharashtra has commuted the death penalty of a man accused of rape and murder of a nine year old girl and sentenced him to 30 years imprisonment without remission.

Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Should Not Be Encouraged

Swapan Kumar Chatterjee v CBI permitting the application filed by the prosecution for summoning a hand writing expert in a corruption case of which the trial had started in 1985. On expected lines, the Bench accordingly delivered its significant judgment thus laying down the correct proposition of law to be followed always in such cases

Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circumstantial Evidence Not Always Fatal: SC

Sukhpal Singh v Punjab that the inability of the prosecution to establish motive in a case of circumstantial evidence is not always fatal to the prosecution case. Importance of motive in determining the culpability of the accused but refused to acknowledge it as the sole criteria for not convicting the accused in the absence of motive.

Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded Would Run Concurrently or Consecutively In The Order

Gagan Kumar v Punjab it is a mandatory legal requirement for Magistrate to specify whether sentences awarded to an accused convicted for two or more offences, would run concurrently or consecutively.

Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallows

Dnyaneshwar Suresh Borkar v Maharashtra Even poem can help save a death convict from gallows. The Apex Court has in this latest, landmark and laudable judgment commuted the death penalty of a kidnap cum murder convict who was just 22 years of age at the time of occurrence

Uncivilized And Heartless Crime: SC Enhances Compensation To Acid Attack Victim

Himachal Pradesh v Vijay Kumar Supreme court held about acid attack crime that a crime of this nature does not deserve any kind of clemency.

Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Imprisonment Appears To Be An Altogether Inappropriate Punishment: SC

SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed on Cricketer Sreesanth

S. Sreesanth v. The Board of Control For Cricket In India the Supreme Court set aside a life ban imposed on former Indian cricketer S Sreesanth in connection with the 2013 IPL spot-fixing scandal and asked the BCCI Disciplinary Committee to take a fresh call on the quantum of his punishment under the Anti-Corruption Code.

Adding Additional Accused To Invoke Section 319 CrPC Stronger Evidence Than Mere Probability of Complicity of A...

Adding Additional Accused To Invoke Section 319 CrPC Stronger Evidence Than Mere Probability of Complicity of A Person Required: SC stated in Sugreev Kumar v. State of Punjab

Lawyers in India - Search By City
Delhi Chandigarh Allahabad Lucknow Noida Gurgaon Vapi Faridabad Jalandhar	Mumbai Pune Nagpur Nashik Ahmedabad Surat Indore Agra Jalgaon	Kolkata Siliguri Durgapur Janjgir Jaipur Ludhiana Dimapur Guwahati Amritsar	Chennai Coimbatore Bangalore Eluru Hyderabad Belgaum Cochin Rajkot Jodhpur Lawyers

Delhi High court order to file complaint against wife and her two brothers in Habeus Corpus

Comments

gitasadvocate

Lawyers in India - Search By City