Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, November 21, 2024

judiciary surpasses the route in the form judicial activism

Posted in: Constitutional Law
Tue, Jul 20, 21, 11:37, 3 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 5209
Activism is delicate exercise insight the issues to brings out needed innovation in the form of solution

Abstract:
Law is dynamic needed to change with the need of hours. Judicial Activism is an effective tool of Art 142 of the Indian Constitution.   Activism is a delicate exercise insight the issues to brings out needed innovation in the form of solution. It also provides a system of check and balance to the other governmental branches without overriding the line drawn by the Constitution. The overstepping into the ambit of legislative and executive areas is called Judicial overreach the aggravated form of the Judicial Activism                           

Introduction: “Judicial activism” makes the apex court the most powerful supreme court in the world. under the Indian constitution, the supreme court has the power to pass and enforce decrees for doing complete justice to society.

The constitution of India distributed powers between the three organs like legislative, Executive and judiciary in an implied manner. One organ should not interfere with other organs. Even as the conflicts between the three organs are far from eliminated. one of the judicial overreach and judicial activism due to continuing underperformance and at times, non-performance of the executive and legislative organs.

Article 142 of the Indian constitution deals with the enforcement of decrees and orders of the supreme court.” It states that the apex court in the exercise of its jurisdiction may pass such decree or make such order as is necessary for doing ‘complete justice, in any case, pending before it.” Under Article 142 the supreme court derives overarching powers to perform executive and legislative to bring about complete justice. Article 142 is supplemented by Article 32and Article 141 of the Indian constitution.

In the early 1990s, Indian courts stepped in with greater frequency on matters ranging from malfeasance in governance to legislative matters to political and policy matters, leading to constant friction between three organs. Judicial power refers to the interference of the judiciary in the legislative and executive fields. In the past few years, judicial activism has only flourished in India and become familiars with the Indian public. The best example of judicial activism is public interest litigation, which seems to be a relaxation for locus standi.

“Judicial activism” makes the apex court the most powerful supreme court in the world. Judicial activism is the use of the judiciary to articulate and enforce what is beneficial for society whereas the judiciary starts interfering with the proper functioning of the legislative and executive domains. Judiciary actively involved in many cases since 1990.there are several cases in which the judiciary is actively involved like the union carbide v. union of India,(1) coal block allocation cases,(2) etc. Likewise, in many of the cases judiciary was actively involved and gave decisions.

In judicial activism, the supreme court has done a tremendous amount of good. It has practically tried to wipe away every tear of the underprivileged, disadvantaged and illiterate sections of the society.in many cases judiciary has used excess powers to protect the concept of judicial activism.

In this pandemic period also, Judicial activism again acts as a guardian to rescue the people in the society. It pushes the authorities to execute what they are supposed to do. It's not a denied fact that in these extraordinary situations also the supreme court gave extraordinary decisions to protect the weaker sections of the society. In the first and second waves, the judiciary acted tremendously to do good to the people in the society who were affected in this pandemic period. Providing medical assistance in all other areas like education, but public safety etc it was working very actively in the recent time assistance in all other areas also it worked actively to make too good to the society. In the pandemic situation in all other areas also the judiciary is actively involving to make good to the society.

Recent trends in judicial activism
In the case of firecrackers (3) supreme court imposes restrictions on the kinds of firecrackers which polluting the air. In this case, it analysed the international environmental law principles and the balancing of fundamental rights performed by the court. based on the above decision the Telangana high court-imposed ban on the sale and use of crackers in the pandemic situation because already people are suffering from lungs infections burning of crackers will further increase the pollution so that the risk of infection may increase.

In green tribunal matters, the court directed the govt to establish special tribunals to dispose of the environmental related issues within 6 months from the date of filing. Green tribunal act came into effect with this one.

In the pandemic situation due to the shortage in supply of oxygen cylinders number of deaths taken place the supreme court asked the state governments to provide proper facilities to save the lives of the people. At the time of distributing the free vaccine, the supreme court-involved and told the govt clearly every person who is eligible for vaccination are supposed to get free vaccine-like other citizens in the society.

In the area of school and board examinations also some states want to conduct examinations but given the protection of the life of children the supreme court mentioned not to examine the pandemic situation. so the states promoted the children without conducting any examinations.

Conclusion remarks: Activism is not guarded by the constitution. as it is derived by the judiciary.it is justifiable only for the protection of fundamental rights of the Citizen as courts are guardians of the Constitution to maintain the equilibrium.

Footnotes:

  1. AIR 1987 SC 1086
  2. (2014),9 SCC 516
  3. (2017) ,SCC 218

References:

  1. https://www.indialegallive.com/special-story/again-judicial.activisms
  2. constitutional law by J.N.Pandey
  3. http://blog.pleaders.in/judicialactivism-vs-judicial-restraint-indian-disarray/
  4. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/business-laws/judicial-adventurism-time-to-introspect/article34465686.ece https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/business-laws/judicial-adventurism-time-to-introspect/article34465686.ece
  5. https://www.drishtiias.com/mains-practice-question/question.661
  6. https://www.pressreader.com/india/the-hindu-business-line/20210503/281921660909016
Written By: Swapna Vuyyuru, Asst.Professor, Mahatma Gandhi Law College, Hyderabad, Telangana

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
swapnasri12
Member since Jul 20, 2021
Location: n/a
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
This article critically analyses the concept of Parliamentary privileges enshrined under Article 105 of the Constitution of India along with various judicial pronouncement.
Here we have two legal systems, one tracing its roots to Roman law and another originating in England or we can say one codified and the other not codified or one following adversarial type of system other inquisitorial or one is continental whereas the other one Anglo-American
The principle of gender equality is enshrined in the Indian Constitution in its Preamble, Fundamental Rights, Fundamental Duties and Directive Principles.
The constitutional interpretations metamorphose a non-federal constitution into a federal one which results into a shift from reality to a myth
What justice is? and why one wants access to it? are important question which need to be addressed in introductory part of the literature. Justice is a concept of rightness, fairness based on ethics, moral, religion and rationality.
It is not the whole Act which would be held invalid by being inconsistent with Part III of the Constitution but only such provisions of it which are violative of the fundamental rights
Thomas Mann had in 1924 said; a man’s dying is more the survivor’s affair than his own’. Today his words are considered to be true as there is a wide range of debate on legalizing euthanasia.
India became one of 135 countries to make education a fundamental right of every child, when the Parliament passed the 86th Constitutional amendment in 2002.
Following are the salient features of the amended Lokpal bill passed by Parliament:
Good governance is associated with efficient and effective administration in a democratic framework. It is considered as citizen-friendly, citizen caring and responsive administration. Good governance emerged as a powerful idea when multilateral and bilateral agencies like the World Bank, UNDP, OECD, ADB, etc.
A democratic society survives by accepting new ideas, experimenting with them, and rejecting them if found unimportant. Therefore it is necessary that whatever ideas the government or its other members hold must be freely put before the public.
This article describes relationship between Indian Legislative provisions and freedom of press.
This article gives an overview of the Definition of State as per Article 12 Of the Constitution of India with emphasis on Relevant case law
Coming straight to the nub of the matter, The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Bir Singh v Delhi Jal Board held that Pan India Reservation Rule in force in National Capital Territory of Delhi is in accord with the constitutional scheme relating to services under the Union and the States/Union Territories
Jasvinder Singh Chauhan case that denial of passport or its non-renewal without assigning reasons as listed under the Passports Act, 1967 infringes the fundamental rights. who was praying for the renewal of his passport and issuance of a fresh passport to him.
In Indian Young Lawyers Association v/s Kerala has very laudably permitted entry of women of all age groups to the Sabarimala temple, holding that 'devotion cannot be subjected to gender discrimination'. It is one of the most progressive and path breaking judgment that we have witnessed in last many decades just like in the Shayara Bano case
Sadhna Chaudhary v U.P. has upheld the dismissal of a judicial officer on grounds of misconduct, on the basis of two orders passed by her in land acquisition cases. This has certainly sent shockwaves across Uttar Pradesh especially in judicial circles.
The term judiciary refers to the higher officials of the government i.e Judges of all the hierarchy of the courts. The constitution of India gives greater importance to the independence of the Indian judiciary. Every democratic country set up it’s own independent judiciary for the welfare of it’s citizens.
various allowances, perquisites, salaries granted to mp and mla
This article presents a glimpse of human life through the constitutional approach.
Er. K. Arumugam v. V. Balakrishnan In the contempt jurisdiction, the court has to confine itself to the four corners of the order alleged to have been disobeyed
As Parliamentarians, we remain the guardians and protectors of fundamental rights, and always need to ensure we are fulfilling our many responsibilities, as legislators, representatives and role models. to uphold the rights set out in the Declaration, particularly as regards safeguarding political and civil society space.
Kashmiri Sikh Community and others v. J&K has very rightly upheld PM's Employment Package 2009 for Kashmiri Pandits living in the Valley.
The Supreme Court on 12th September stuck down the penal provision of adultery enshrined under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code.
President A. Akeem Raja case it has been made amply clear that, Freedom of religion can't trump demands of public order. Public order has to be maintained at all cost. There can be no compromise on it.
Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghosh who is a former Supreme Court Judge and former Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh High Court who retired in May 2017 and a current member of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) was appointed as India's first Lokpal
colonial era Official Secrets Act (OSA) as many feel that it has far outlived its utility. Before drawing any definite conclusion on such an important issue, we need to certainly analyse this issue dispassionately from a close angle.
Sri Aniruddha Das Vs The State Of Assam held that bandhs / road/rail blockades are illegal and unconstitutional and organizers must be prosecuted.
ABout changes in Changes in Constitutional (Forty-Second) Amendment Act
Definition of State as per Article 12 f the Constitution of India with emphasis on Relevant case law
Justice KS Puttaswamy (Retd) and Anr vs UOI held that right to privacy is a fundamental right.
You want India to defend Kashmir, feed its people, give Kashmiris equal rights all over India. But you want to deny India and Indians all rights in Kashmir. I am a Law Minister of India, I cannot be a party to such a betrayal of national interests.
Faheema Shirin RK Vs State of Kerala and others that right to access internet is a fundamental right forming part of right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
the Supreme Court of UK has gone all guns blazing by categorically and courageously pronouncing in Gilham v Ministry of Justice the whistle-blowing protection envisaged under Employment
The Constitution directs the government that High Court shall have power, throughout in relation to it jurisdiction, to issue to any person or authority, including in appropriate cases, any Government, directions, orders or writs, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by Part III and for any other purpose also.
What is child labour ? Why bonded in india?
Shiv Sena And Ors. Vs UOI whether the newly sworn in Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis enjoys majority in the State Assembly or not! This latest order was necessitated after Shiv Sena knocked the doors of the Apex Court along with Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and Congress.
Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC), saying they are two different things. We all saw in different news channels that many people who were protesting did not had even the elementary knowledge of CAA but were protesting vehemently just on the provocation of leaders from different political parties
Sanmay Banerjee v/s. West Bengal in exercise of Constitutional writ jurisdiction on the appellate side has that people have every right to criticize dispensation running the country, being legislature, executive or judiciary
On May 16, 1946 Cabinet Mission Plan arbitrarily announced to group British Indian states in A, B & C categories. Assam was kept in Group C with Bengal, creating a predominantly Muslim zone in Eastern India like the one proposed to be setup in western India.
Top political leaders and Members of Parliament from Left Parties have very often raised the questions of atrocities and accommodation of these minorities even in the Parliament. Unfortunately when this dream of opening the doors of India for her cultural children was about to be realized
Why is it that even after more than 81 days the blocking of road at Shaheen Bagh in Delhi is continuing uninterrupted since 15 December 2019? Why is it that Centre allowed this to happen? Why were they not promptly evicted?
The Basic Structure Of Indian Constitution Or Doctrine Applies During The Time Of Amendments In Constitution Of India. These Basic Structure State That The Government Of India Cann’t Touch Or Destroy
Arjun Aggarwal Vs Union Of India And Anr (stay) dismissed a PIL filed by a petitioner who is a law student. The PIL had challenged the June 30 order of the Ministry of Home Affairs wherein considerable relaxations from lockdown were operationalised under Unlock 1.0
This blog deals explains the Right to Access Internet as a Fundamental Right under Constitution of India and the reasonable restrcitions which it is subject to and whether it can be considered to be a fundamental right or not.
This article talks about what exactly is meant by the doctrine of colourable legislation, how various case laws have come up time and again to reiterate its meaning and how the supreme court views this doctrine. To address legislative transparency for some improvements in the legislative system, colorable legislation is necessary to be studied
Shri Naini Gopal Vs The Union of India and Ors. in Case No. – LD-VC-CW-665 of 2020 has minced no words to hold that: We need to remind the Bank that the pension payable to the employees upon superannuation is a property under Article 300-A of the Constitution of India
Article 25 of the Constitution of India, thus ruled that the immediate family members of Covid-19 victims be permitted to perform the funeral rites of the deceased subject to them following certain precautionary guidelines
Top