Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, November 21, 2024

Allahabad HC Issues Revised Fresh Guidelines For Functioning Of District Courts And Tribunals

Posted in: Judiciary
Mon, Jun 28, 21, 21:40, 3 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 4605
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.

On June 23, 2021 after wide consultations and considering the COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it. These guidelines are primarily aimed at ensuring that the rapid spread of corona is contained and the courts carry on their work with utmost caution.

Most significantly, what is really worth paying attention is that the letter circulated by the Registrar General states in simple, straight and suave language that:

  1. All the Courts/Tribunals subordinate to High Court of Judicature at Allahabad shall open to take up the matters as detailed below:
    • All cases, excluding recording of evidence. (In urgent Cases the recording of evidences may be done with prior permission of District Judges)
      Matters of urgent nature are given priority.
    • The Remand/Other Judicial Work in respect of under-trial prisoner shall be done through video conference only. In case of any technical issues, other modes can be adopted.
    • Other Office related pending works.
    • Any other Administrative work.
       
  2. As soon as the work is completed, the Judicial Officers and Court Staffs may kindly be directed to leaVe the Court premises.
     
  3. Before opening of campus, District Judges shall ensure complete sanitization (strictly as per medical guidelines), cleaning of entire court campus with the help of District Magistrate, other administrative officers & CMOs/CMSs. District Authorities shall ensure sanitization of Court campus daily.
  4. Sanitization of Court campus is a pre-condition for opening of Courts, which needs to be Strictly complied with, as per the medical guidelines. Wherever such sanitization work in the Court & Court Campus is not carried out, Such Courts should not be opened for the Judicial Work. The District Judges concerned in such eventuality shall not open the District Courts and inform the District Administration and High Court with detailed report as soon as possible.
  5. Thermal scanning check-up of all the persons entering in the court premises shall also be ensured with the help of District Magistrate, other administrative officers & CMO/CMS.
  6. In case of demand made by the Judicial Officers/learned counsel, the facility of Virtual Court may be utilized for the above purpose.
  7. The Judicial Service Centre (Centralised filing Counter) or any other suitable space/place be identified for receiving/collecting fresh cases/Applications (Civil/ Criminal) or any other applications. All such cases/Applications shall be registered in CIS. The applications/ Cases shall contain the details of advocate/ Litigants including their mobile number. The defects if any, may be informed to Counsel Concerned. Such applications be thereafter placed before the assigned/ concerned Court
  8. Written arguments by the parties can also be submitted in the Judicial Service Centre, which shall be sent to the Court concerned by the concerned Computer Section.
  9. A dedicated email of District Court may be created and the same may also be published on the website of District Court concerned. The above email may be used for receiving the Bail/Anticipatory bail Applications or other urgent applications including written arguments. This shall be an alternative mode for receiving applications.
  10. Only four (4) chairs will be arranged in courtroom for advocates with proper distance. Social distancing shall strictly be followed into the Court premises and into the Court room.
  11. Masks shall he strictly used by everyone who enters into the Court premises as well as into the Court room. Sanitizer shall be arranged at the door of courtroom. Reader, Clerk etc. shall follow Social Distancing guidelines.
  12. The discussions shall be made with the Office bearer of Bar Association for the mechanism/modalities regarding functioning of Courts. Necessary assistance may be taken from them to restrict/regulate the entry of Advocates in the Court premises. As soon as the arguments of Learned Counsels are complete, they shall leave the Court premises.
  13. Only such Advocates whose case is listed on a particular date may be permitted to enter into the Court premises.
  14. Litigants or other representatives shall be strictly prohibited in the premises or at the entrance of Court.
  15. In urgent Cases where evidence is to be recorded, with the prior permission of District Judges, the litigants/persons in that respect, may be allowed to enter into the Court premises.
  16. All the Courts/ Tribunals subordinate to High Court of Judicature at Allahabad shall ensure compliance of directions given by Hon'ble Apex Court/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Judicial side and all directions/ guidelines issued by the Central Government & State Government regarding COVID-19.
  17. As per para 18 of the State Govt. guidelines No. – 1054/2021-CX-3 — GRIH(GOPAN) ANUBHAG-3, dated 19.06.2021, the above guidelines shall be applicable for the Districts where, as per the daily reports of Health Department, active COVID cases are less than 500. As soon as the active COVID cases exceeds the limit of 500, the previous guidelines regarding functioning of Courts shall be applicable.

    Daily consolidated report be submitted by the District Judges on the e-Services module on regular basis.
     
  18. The above guidelines shall be applicable from 23.06.2021, till further orders.

In conclusion, these guidelines issued by the Allahabad High Court are quite commendable. It is the bounden duty of all the courts and Tribunals subordinate to it to comply with these commendable directions! They must comply with it in totality so that safety of all is also ensured along with work! This is what the situation at hand demands also!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top