Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Tuesday, December 3, 2024

Kapil Sibal Had Asked For Making Available Land For Creating High Court Bench In Meerut: RPN Singh

Posted in: Judiciary
Sun, Jun 13, 21, 19:55, 4 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 5436
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut

I will give you a talisman. Whenever you are in doubt or when the self becomes too much with you, apply the following test:

Recall the face of the poorest and the weakest man whom you may have seen and ask yourself if the step you contemplate is going to be of any use to him. Will he gain anything by it? Will it restore him to a control over his own life and destiny? In other words, will it lead to Swaraj for the hungry and spiritually starving millions?

Then you will find your doubts and your self melting away. - Mahatma Gandhi

In one of the most sensational disclosure ever made in my life time, I was most astonished to read in the Hindi edition of Hindustan newspaper on page 4 that RPN Singh who is one of the leading Congress national spokesperson and former Union Minister whom we all keep hearing in various news channels saying that, In Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut and asked the State Government to make available land for creating a high court bench in Meerut. But the request was not granted. It is most hurting to learn that for more than 9 crore people of West UP, the then Union Law Minister Kapil Sibal wanted a bench to be created at Meerut but the State Government refused and did not grant the land for creating a bench in Meerut!

Let me recall here vividly that Dr Sampoornanand who was UP CM had recommended a high court bench to be created way back in 1955 at Meerut but till now no bench has been created! Many other UP CM later had also recommended for the same but the request was not complied by Centre! When Centre recommends State refuses and when State recommends Centre refuses! Disgusting!

RPN Singh further clarified that he himself wants that a high court bench for West UP should be created at Agra, Meerut, Bundelkhand and Gorakhpur! What a pity that still not a single more bench has been created till now except the one already at Lucknow just 150-200 km away from Allahabad where high court is located.! What a pity that when Justice Jaswant Singh Commission appointed by Central Government way back in 1970s headed by former Supreme Court Judge and former Chief Justice of J&K High Court Justice Jaswant Singh strongly recommended for creating 3 benches for West UP at Agra, Nainital and Dehradun did Centre ruled by Congress did not allow the creation of a single high court bench anywhere in West UP even while accepting the recommendations of Justice Jaswant Commission to create a high court bench at Aurangabad in Maharashtra! Benches were also approved for Madurai in Tamil Nadu and Jalpaiguri in West Bengal but not for West UP!

What a pity that all national parties kept a deafening silence when this worst form of injustice was committed on more than 9 crore people of West UP by denying even a single bench to West UP while later allowing high court for just 88 lakh people of new State Uttarakhand which till 2000 formed part of West UP and UP! It is precisely due to this third rated treatment meted out to West UP that the lawyers of West UP have been going on strike every Saturday since May 1981 and more than 40 years later they are still on strike and today being a Saturday they are again on strike with senior lawyers themselves supervising the complete boycott of work in all courts! What a pity that lawyers of West UP went on strike for 3 months as they did in 2014-15 and even for six months as they did in 2001 yet no bench ! What a pity that lawyers of West UP even started going on strike for 2 days in a week – Wednesday and Saturday but Centre refused to budge!

Former Justice BP Singh (retd) of Allahabad High Court few years back not just accepted the invitation to swear in the newly elected members of Meerut Bar recently but also publicly supported the age old demand for a high court bench in West UP. He said unambiguously that Centre should promptly create a high court bench in West UP without any more further delay. He also exhorted the lawyers of Meerut Bar to make bench movement a public movement. He also suggested that it is only by connecting people that the bench movement will be made more stronger and stronger.

Justice BP Singh minced no words in making it absolutely clear that as long as this bench movement for creation of a high court bench in West UP is restricted to lawyers only and will not get connected with people it will never attain success. It is a no brainer thus that the more than 9 crore people of West UP would have to connect with this bench issue to make it a splendid success. There can be no denying this and when such an experienced Judge of the Allahabad High Court himself says this on record, what more should I say?

What a pity that West UP whose population is more than any other state except Maharashtra and Bihar has not even a single bench whereas Andaman and Nicobar islands with just 3 districts and 3 lakh population, Goa with just 2 districts and 14 lakh population have benches! Not just this, areawise West UP exceeds that of Bihar which has 94000 square km and West UP has 98000 square kilometers! What a pity that Centre takes no time in creating high court itself at Sikkim where the number of pending cases were just 69 - 54 civil and 15 criminal but fails to approve even a single bench for West UP which has several lakhs of pending cases! What a pity that when a bench can be created at Goa for just 2 districts, at Dharwad for just 4 districts, at Gulbarga for just 8 districts, at Aizwal for just 8 districts, at Port Blair for 3 districts, at Lucknow for 12 districts etc but no bench for West UP with 26 districts!

What a pity that Centre decided to create high courts for Tripura, Meghalaya and Manipur with just 36, 29 and 27 lakh population but denied a bench to West UP with more than 9 crore population! What a pity that Centre has overlooked that as UP accounts for maximum pending cases - 15 lakh cases and here too West UP accounts for more than 57% of pending cases, UP must have maximum and not minimum benches and West UP must have most benches and not none as we see most unfortunately right now!

When a bench can exist just 150-200 km away from Allahabad at Lucknow then why can't it exist 700-800 km away at any of the 26 districts of West UP? Karnataka is just no patch to UP yet it has got 3 benches. The population of UP is more than 20 crore and of West UP alone is more than 9 crore and that of Karnataka is just 6 crore. For just 4 and 8 districts we see Centre creating 2 more benches in Karnataka even though they never agitated for a bench as opposed to the lawyers of West UP and the people here who have been agitating since many decades for a bench yet not a single bench has been created here! May I ask why? We see maximum lawlessness in UP and most notoriously in West UP yet no bench exists here! Why?

All parties admit that there has been an exodus of people from many places of West UP like Shamli, Kairana etc due to deteriorating law and order even though there is a difference over which community is affected worst. We all saw when brutally robbers not just looted on national highway in Bulandshahar but also gang-raped a women and her young daughter due to which the then UP Chief Justice DR Bhosale lamented that in Maharashtra woman are safe even in night and can go alone anywhere but in UP she is not safe even in national highway and in broad daylight also! Yet see the irony that Maharashtra has 3 high court benches and UP just one! No wonder Maharashtra tops in justice index rankings and UP is last!! In Meerut we saw how a son of a businessman was kidnapped and then brutally murdered as his parents failed to pay the extortion amount! Such incidents are rapidly taking place all across West UP yet Centre is not creating a high court bench here! Why?

My point is simple: Why can't a high court bench be created here by which all members of all communities benefit equally? For a peaceful state like Karnataka Dr Manmohan Singh created 2 more benches of high court at Dharwad and Gulbarga for just 4 and 8 districts respectively but for 26 districts of West UP and 75 districts of UP, the present PM – Narendra Damodardas Modi even after completing 2 years in office does not have the guts to create even a single more bench in not just West UP but in any hook and corner of UP which has 75 districts and is bigger than many countries!

None other than PN Bhagwati who is former CJI and longest serving Judge of Supreme Court for more than 13 years had once rightly opined that:
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available. We do not seem to realise that it is subordinate courts which form the basis of the pyramid of justice and unless the base is strengthened, the pyramid is bound to crumble. It is often forgotten that the contact of the common man with the justice system occurs only at the level of the subordinate courts, he has rarely occasion to go to the High Court and therefore, if we want to inspire confidence in the common man that he can get justice, it is imperative to strengthen the subordinate judiciary.

Will creation of more Benches not help in strengthening it further? At the outset , let me be categorical in stating that undoubtedly setting up of high court benches in needy places like West UP will not only be a very positive step strengthening our lower judiciary but also help in reducing the huge backlog of pending cases to a great extent !

Can anyone deny that the 18th Law Commission in its 230th report noted : In almost every High Court, there is huge pendency of cases and the present strength of the judges can hardly be said to be sufficient to cope with the alarming situation. It is also necessary that the work of the High Courts is decentralized, that is, more Benches are established in all States. If there is manifold increase in the strength of the judges and the staff, all cannot be housed in one campus.

Therefore, the establishment of new Benches is necessary. It is also in the interest of the litigants. The Benches should be so established that a litigant is not required to travel long. It is true that the new establishments will require money, but it is necessary as a development measure, particularly, when efforts are being made for all-round development of the country. Therefore, the money should not be a problem. We have to watch and protect the interest of the litigants.

We must always keep in mind that the existence of judges and advocates is because of the litigants and they are there to serve their cause only. Sometimes, some advocates object to creation of new Benches and selection of new sites for construction of new buildings. But they raise objections in their personal, limited interest. Creation of new Benches is certainly beneficial for the litigants and the lawyers and a beginning has to be made somewhere.

A speedy trial is not only required to give quick justice but it is also an integral part of the fundamental right of life, personal liberty, as envisaged in article 21 of the Constitution. Article 39A of the Constitution provides for equal justice and free legal aid. The said article obligates the State to promote justice on a basis of equal opportunity and, in particular, provide free legal aid by suitable legislation or schemes or in any other way, to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities?

What a pity that when UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population – more than 20 crore, maximum districts - 75, maximum constituencies, maximum MPs – 80, maximum MLAs - 404, maximum PM including Narendra Modi, maximum pending cases – more than 10 lakh and here too West UP accounts for more than half of pending cases as noted by Justice Jaswant Commission about 57%, maximum Judges which earlier was 160 and increased to 200 in high court, maximum vacancies of Judges - 88 in high court, maximum poverty, maximum villages more than one lakh, maximum cities more than 700, maximum fake encounters killings, custody killings, maximum cases of human rights violations, maximum undertrials, maximum cases of crime, loot, arson and riots and here too West UP tops with Saharanpur riots, Meerut riots, Muzaffarnagar riots tarnishing our international reputation to the extent that UN Secretary General termed UP as crime and rape capital of India where former UP Bar Council Chairman Darvesh Yadav was brutally murdered right inside court premises in Agra soon after becoming first woman in UP to occupy such a high office and that too at just about 36 years and what not yet Centre is not prepared to create even a single bench for not just West UP but entire UP! What a pity that when UP sends maximum MPs to Lok Sabha – 80, maximum MPs to Rajya Sabha – 30, maximum MLAs to State Assembly – 404 MLAs and maximum members to State Legislative Council – 100 MLAs and yet has least benches – only one and that too just 150 km away from Allahabad at Lucknow! What a pity that UP has least benches in India and West UP has none?

What a pity that more than 9 crore people of West UP are compelled to travel more than 800 km on an average all the way to Allahabad to attend hearings, spend huge money in travelling, staying and other needless expenses as Centre feels only Eastern UP is elite class and that is why a single bench for UP is set up just 150 km away from Allahabad at Lucknow which is capital even though capitals of other states like Bhopal, Dehradun, Thiruvananthapuram, Bhubaneshwar etc have neither high court nor bench! Is Bhopal inferior to Lucknow in any manner? Then why it has no high court or bench even though it is capital? Same can be said for other capital cities like Dehradun and others!

Dr Satyapal Singh who is the former Mumbai Police Commissioner, former Union Minister and presently represents Baghpat constituency raised most forcefully the pressing issue of setting up of a high court bench issue in Lok Sabha on March 9, 2016. He pointed out how despite UP having more than 22 crore population and 75 districts has least benches and West UP has none! Should we be proud of this? He rightly said that:
I had raised the issue of the HC bench in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. This is not only a need for lawyers but also the need of the common people as well. There should be a bench in Meerut, Agra, Gorakhpur, Varanasi and Jhansi. If the Lucknow bench of HC can be created for 12 districts, why can't we have 4-5 separate benches for all the 75 districts in the state? The first war of independence began from Meerut and the movement to provide affordable justice to people should also start from Meerut. I have already written a letter to PM Modi and I will write to him again. We don't need the consent of either the state government or the CJ of the Allahabad HC. Still even after more than 7 years of BJP being in power with majority in Parliament, it is not creating even a single bench anywhere in UP not even in Varanasi which PM Modi himself represents! Former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee too had forcefully raised it in Parliament way back in 1986 and demanded the setting up of a bench in West UP!

Rajnath Singh who is number 2 in the present NDA government holding Home Minister portfolio too recently assured the creation of high court bench at the earliest when a delegation of lawyers from West UP met him. He had even while in Opposition assured the creation of a bench in West UP if his party came to power in Centre! He admitted that there was a dire need of a bench in West UP. Two years have already passed since this government came to power in Centre and now it must walk the talk and waste no time in creating a high court bench in West UP. Where the bench is created is not relevant. What is relevant is that a bench must be created at the earliest as the people have to travel so far all the way to Allahabad which is about 750 km away on an average from most of the districts of West UP and suffer all sorts of inconveniences! But still we see no bench being created not just in West UP but anywhere in UP except the one at Lucknow! Most disgusting!

Centre is following what the previous governments in Centre have followed – No bench not just in West UP but in any hook and corner of UP except at Lucknow which is so near to Allahabad! This is the real rub! Centre wastes no time to set up 2 more benches for Karnataka at Dharwad and Gulbarga for just 4 and 8 districts in 2012 but refuses to set up even a single bench for 26 districts in West UP or for 75 districts of UP! Karnataka has just 6 crore population and less than 2 lakh cases pending whereas UP has more than 10 lakh cases pending with West UP alone having more than 5 lakh cases pending still not a single more bench being created here not just in West UP but anywhere in UP!

For Haryana with just 2 crore population, Centre is contemplating setting up of a bench for Western Haryana and a 4 Judge panel comprising of high court judges of Punjab and Haryana high court had been set up for the purpose! The Assembly of Jharkhand has approved setting up of bench at Dumkur and it already has high court and population just 3 crore! When states like Maharashtra, Karnataka, Assam etc have 3 or more benches then why should UP have only one bench and that too just 150 km away from Allahabad and West UP with more than 9 crore population have none? When UP has maximum pending cases among all states more than 10 lakhs and here too West UP accounts for more than half of them and here also in all heinous crimes like riots, rape, murder, arson, loot it is West UP which tops the list and yet West UP has no high court bench in any of the 26 districts which are about 750-900 km away from Allahabad and UP only one bench and that too very near to Allahabad at Lucknow which is just 150-200 km away! Is this fair? This is the crux of the matter! Centre must now create one! It brooks no delay anymore now.

Just promising to make UP Uttam Pradesh without creating even a single more bench anywhere in UP will only tantamount to duping people of not just West UP but of entire UP which is the largest state with maximum population! When the Law Commission itself in its 230th report had strongly recommended more than seven years ago that more high court benches must be created in India then why only Karnataka alone is the single beneficiary with 2 more benches being created for 4 and 8 districts but not anywhere else? Why is Centre always afraid of creating more benches in UP even though it knows that it is UP alone with more than 20 crore population that needs more benches with West UP needing it most with more than 9 crore population and most crime, riots, murders, loots etc happening in maximum cases here?

When West UP contributes to 75% of the total revenue of UP then why the people of West UP are compelled to travel so far to get justice? Rajinder Chaudhary who was a senior minister in UP CM Akhilesh Yadav's Cabinet while addressing lawyers of Meerut Bar strongly recommended creation of 6 more benches for UP and just recently Madhulika Yadav who was Vice Chairman of UP Bar Council pitched her voice very strongly in favour of creation of a bench in West UP. Many Union Cabinet ministers like Rajnath Singh who is our home minister, Dr Mahesh Sharma, Gen VK Singh, etc have too strongly demanded creation of a bench in West UP!

Eminent jurist and former Attorney General Soli J Sorabjee, former Supreme Court Bar Association Chairman BN Krishnamani, Ram Jethmalani, Kapil Sibal, and many others have also strongly supported demand of bench in West UP! Ravi Shankar Prasad who is now Law Minister had in his earlier stint himself asked the Chief Justice of UP High Court to give his opinion on creating a high court bench in West UP!

Why West UP has an area of 98,933 square km which accounts for 33.61 percent of total area of UP and yet no bench but Lucknow in Central region has just 62,363 square km and yet it has a bench? Why Centre keeps on blaming State for not recommending even when it was in 1955 that a bench for West UP was first recommended and as Soli J Sorabjee, the former Attorney General rightly said way back in 2001 that:
The Centre without any recommendation from the State Chief Minister or Chief Justice of a State is fully empowered under our Constitution to set up a high court bench anywhere it wants at its own volition. Why Centre ignores blithely what the Chairman of Supreme Court Bar Association Krishna Mani had said quite explicitly that:
Only by the creation of a bench of high court in West UP will the people be able to secure speedy and cheap justice at their doorsteps! Even former CJI Ranjan Gogoi had himself conceded that there were valid grounds for creation of a High Court bench in West UP but he also added while listening to a PIL filed by a woman lawyer named named KL Chitra in 2018 as he ruled that it is is for Centre to decide on this!

I very strongly feel that if 4 to 5 benches are created in UP there is no need for UP being divided into 4 to 5 parts! But the real problem is: Centre is not ready to create even a single bench anywhere in UP leave alone West UP! Centre and State keep throwing the ball of decision making in the court of other when it comes to creating more benches in UP! It is the more than 23 crore people of UP who are suffering the most especially those who are not close to Allahabad or Lucknow both in Eastern UP yet we see only promises being dished out every time when elections are just round the corner like we see now and nothing else!

Why Centre trembles to create even a single more bench anywhere in UP when 3 benches can exist in much smaller states with far less pending cases? This is the worst form of hypocrisy which I dislike the most and no party in Centre till now has risen to the expectations of the people of not just West UP but of whole of UP! Centre must either create 4 to 5 benches or else the last option is to divide UP into 4 or 5 parts just like when it refused to create even a single bench at either Dehradun or Nainital even after Justice Jaswant Singh Commission had recommended for the same had no compunction in creating a high court at Nainital after Uttarakhand was created as a separate state! Why Centre knowing well that West UP has maximum crime, maximum riots as happened recently in Saharanpur, Muzaffarnagar etc which brought us international shame yet it approves no bench? Most disgusting! How tragic!

All parties admit that there has been an exodus of people from many places of West UP like Shamli, Kairana etc due to deteriorating law and order even though there is a difference over which community is affected worst. My point is simple: Why can't a high court bench be created here by which all members of all communities benefit equally? For a peaceful state like Karnataka Dr Manmohan Singh had the guts to create 2 more benches of high court at Dharwad and Gulbarga for just 4 and 8 districts respectively but for 26 districts of West UP and 75 districts of UP, the present PM – Narendra Damodardas Modi even after completing 2 years in office does not have the guts to create even a single more bench in not just West UP but in any hook and corner of UP which has 75 districts and is bigger than many countries! Why?

He speaks so confidently but why he behaves so meekly when it comes to setting up of even a single bench in not just West UP but in any hook and corner of UP and personally goes uninvited to Allahabad High Court as was pointed out by Rohitashawa Aggarwal who was the then President of Meerut Bar and is also now Chairman of UP Bar Council and assures the lawyers that no decision on creating a high court bench in West UP would be taken without their consent and this was roundly condemned in West UP by all leading senior lawyers? Will PM Modi keep waiting for the lawyers of Allahabad High Court to give consent knowing fully well that they did not want even a separate high court to be set up at Nainital for Uttaranchal and had prevented setting up of even a bench there even after Justice Jaswant Singh Commission had recommended for the same at Dehradun and Nainital? If they don't give consent will he not act at all?

Narendra Modi must behave like PM and not like a subordinate official! If PM Narendra Modi can't create more benches he must divide UP into 4 to 5 parts! But he can't just sit idle and wait for others to advice him! UP is the worst faring state and if prompt action is not taken right now by striving hard to improve UP in all respects then well perhaps it may be too late! He must act soon and not just keep shouting from rooftop of ushering peace, progress and prosperity in UP! This cannot happen unless either more benches are created in UP as Rajinder Aggarwal who is BJP MP from Meerut rightly pointed out as also Dr Satpal Singh who is again his party MP from Baghpat!

When West UP contributes to 75% of the total revenue of UP then why the people of West UP are compelled to travel so far to get justice? Rajinder Chaudhary who is a senior minister in UP CM Akhilesh Yadav's Cabinet while addressing lawyers of Meerut Bar strongly recommended creation of 6 more benches for UP and just recently Madhulika Yadav who is Vice Chairman of UP Bar Council pitched her voice very strongly in favour of creation of a bench in West UP. Many Union Cabinet ministers like Rajnath Singh who is our home minister, Dr Mahesh Sharma, Gen VK Singh, etc have too strongly demanded creation of a bench in West UP!

Eminent jurist and former Attorney General Soli J Sorabjee, former Supreme Court Bar Association Chairman BN Krishnamani, Ram Jethmalani, Kapil Sibal, and many others have also strongly supported demand of bench in West UP! Ravi Shankar Prasad who is now Law Minister had in his earlier stint himself asked the Chief Justice of UP High Court to give his opinion on creating a high court bench in West UP! He must now convince PM Narendra Modi of wasting no time in creating a high court bench in West UP at the earliest! When former PM Manmohan Singh could create 2 benches for just 4 and 8 districts of Karnataka then why can't PM Narendra Modi create even a single bench for 26 districts of West UP or 75 Districts of UP?

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top