Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Sunday, November 24, 2024

Strictest Punishment Must Be Awarded For Marital Rape

Posted in: Family Law
Mon, Jun 7, 21, 13:13, 4 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 3766
A husband who is supposed to protect his wife and take care of her in all possible respects if himself starts raping his wife must be awarded the strictest punishment and our laws

Without mincing any words and coming straight to the heart of the matter, let me say this from the bottom of my heart that I fully support the burgeoning demand for making marital rape an offence. A rape is a rape. It cannot be justified under any circumstances! A husband who is supposed to protect his wife and take care of her in all possible respects if himself starts raping his wife must be awarded the strictest punishment and our laws must be suitably amended to make the laws more stricter and most importantly must make marital rape an offence immediately so that it can be checked!

The figure of marital rape exceeds all our wildest imagination but never come in the limelight because very few cases are reported and out of them also less than a handful are registered and here too wife is finally cajoled or compelled by her own family members to relent and move ahead to save the so called institution of marriage from being destroyed which our politicians keep citing as a pretext to not making marital rape an offence! This is utterly reprehensible!

Just because a man has married a woman that by itself does not confer the legitimate right or unbridled license to man to have sex with woman against her wish by forcing her in anyway. By marriage woman becomes equal partner with men and not an object or property of man whom a man can ravish as and when he likes and in the manner he likes caring a damn for woman's wishes and safety! Highlighting the sheer hypocrisy of the political establishment in this, Supreme Court advocate Karuna Nundy reacted on Twitter that if a 17-year-old's husband rapes her, it is legal, but if a 17-year-old makes loves to her boyfriend, it is rape and then he goes to adult jail!

If a husband can be prosecuted for murdering his wife, why can't he be charged with raping her? A crime after all is a crime and under no circumstances should it ever be condoned! By not punishing marital rape, are we not reminded of a stone age mentality? In some states ruled by BJP, you can go to jail for eating beef but you face no punishment at all for raping your wife as you have the legal license! No marriage can confer unfettered right on husband to rape her wife without her consent!

I am ashamed to note that in our Indian society it is considered the right of a husband to rape her wife as many times as he likes and that too against her wishes as people feel that marriage confers the right on husband to do so! I had myself heard a senior lawyer saying on the 9 o' clock news on television that, When you sign up for marriage, you sign up for sex. Nothing on earth can be more atrocious!

When a woman signs for marriage, she signs up for equal partnership and not surrenders her body rights to her husband as is very absurdly assumed even by some of learned lawyers and eminent academicians in India and in many other countries of the world! Infact, I very strongly feel that a husband who breaks the sacred sanctity of marriage and dares to forcibly rape her wife must be awarded the strictest punishment and such abominable and heinous offence deserve no mercy of any kind!

It is most unfortunate that in India a woman is regarded as personal property of man who has been vested with the marital right to rape her whenever he likes and as many times as he want. Nothing on earth can be more unfortunate than this! Worse still, a woman has no remedy and if she dares to go to police station, she is laughed at by policemen who say that, Why did you marry him if you don't want to have sex with him? Even government feels that the introduction of a law against marital rape will destroy marriage! This is most ridiculous and absurd, to say the least!

This male dominated patriarchal medieval mindset must change if our nation is to progress! Our laws must be suitably amended and marital rape must be made a criminal offence which must contain more punishment than even rape because here a husband betrays the sacred trust created by the marriage and so must be punished most harshly! There can be no exception and zero tolerance has to be demonstrated towards not only rape but also marital rape!

According to the United Nations Population Fund, one-third of men out of a sample size of 9,205 admitted to have forced a sexual act on their wife. The study was conducted in eight states in India. The report also came out with the fact that 75% of married women were subjected to marital rape. What is most despicable is that inspite of all this, the government refuses to act in favour of making marital rape an offence and our Parliamentarians brazenly declare that the concept of marital rape in India does not apply to India leaving woman rights of protection against marital rape in the lurch!

It is in this context that we have to see and appreciate what a trial court in Delhi while emphasizing the need for a law to recognize marital rape as a crime said that lakhs of women are made to suffer by their husbands. Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Kamini Lau observed that absence of a provision to deal with marital rape as an offence exposes double standards and hypocrisy in law which has failed to recognize such incidents actionable offences. Lau was at great pains to note that, It is unfortunate that we are yet to recognize woman's right to control marital intercourse as a core component of equality. The shortfall in law was gross violation of the acknowledgement of a women's right of self-determination i.e. control on all matters relating to her body and criminalization of marital rape.

The court made the observations while rejecting the bail application of a Delhi resident, Praveen Arora who was accused of sodomising his wife. The wife alleged that her husband used to rape and commit unnatural sex with her. She further said that the man showed her adult videos and bit her. Denying bail to the man, the court said, There appears to be something seriously wrong with the accused and our society ...with sexual perversity pervading the system where lakhs of women suffer this kind of sexual violence and perversity in silence.

The court also cited United Nations Report – 'All Forms of Violence against Women' – which said 52 states have explicitly outlawed marital rape. The ASJ Kamini Lau made a scathing attack on this marital rape not being punishable in India by saying that, Non-recognition of marital rape in our nation set upon the bedrock of equality is gross double standard and hypocrisy in law which is central to the subordination and subjugation of women...it is rape when a man forces himself sexually upon a woman whether he has a license by marriage law to do it or not. It is the need of hour to seriously recognize and address this problem. There can be no denying what ASJ Lau has said rather I would say that it is high time and now marital rape must be made an offence, to say the least.

Throwing out Praveen Arora's bail application, court said it could not allow him to get away with such perverse actions, which had caused physical and psychological damage to the young girl who was married for only eight months on account of his abusive relationship. Activists and lawyers agree with Lau. Senior advocate Meenakshi Arora, who is best known as the lawyer who propelled forward the ground breaking Vishaka guidelines in the Supreme Court minced no words in stating that, A lot of violence exists in marriages, mostly in the form of spousal rape. We need to criminalise this so that the victims have a name for what they go through, so they have somewhere to turn to when they've been wronged.

In March 2014, Parliament rejected the Verma Committee's proposal to criminalise marital rape . A panel of lawmakers said the proposed marital rape law has the potential of destroying the institution of marriage. Women's rights activist Kalpana Vishwanath believes the decision could be attributed to patriarchal anxiety that stops people from taking it up as a serious issue.

If a woman is destroyed by raping her, what purpose does the institution of marriage serve? What institution are we talking about? That institution which confers unbridled license to a husband to rape her wife? Utter nonsense and load of rubbish this is! It only encourages husband to take her wife for granted and care a damn for her feelings and crave only for his own enjoyment and pleasure thus reducing her wife to a mere object to be exploited at her husband's own sweet will!

While craving for my esteemed readers exclusive indulgence, let me tell them that the Verma Committee Report headed by former CJI late Justice JS Verma recommended strongly that the exception for marital law be removed. It also recommended that:

  1. The law ought to specify that:
    1. A marital or other relationship between the perpetrator or victim is not a valid defence against the crimes of rape or sexual violation;
    2. The relationship between the accused and the complainant is not relevant to the inquiry into whether the complainant consented to the sexual activity;
    3. The fact that the accused and victim are married or in another intimate relationship may not be regarded as a mitigating factor justifying lower sentences for rape.


Eminent jurist Leila Seth, who was herself part of the three member panel constituting the Justice JS Verma Committee found the Minister of State for Home Affairs Haribhai Parathibhai Chaudhary comments in Parliament that:
It was not possible to amend the Indian Penal Code to remove marital rape from the definition of rape because of the cultural and religious values in India and society's belief that marriage is sacred absolutely strange. She rightly pointed out that, Today, you will deny woman the right to consent for sex after marriage ; tomorrow you could even deny her the right to life under the pretext of defending culture.

She further said that:
Unfortunately, as a Committee, they could only make recommendations and implementing it was in the hands of the State. Parliament can and must change the law as per the Committee's recommendations.

Most recently, marital rape the Pam Rajput Committee that recently submitted its report to the women and child development ministry, has recommended that as a pro-woman measure, marital rape should be considered an offence irrespective of the age of the wife and the relationship between the perpetrator and survivor. The recommendations will be discussed in an inter-ministerial consultation scheduled later. There is no reason why this landmark recommendation should be not accepted immediately and in its totality.

Women and Child Development minister Maneka Gandhi too had voiced her support of the view that marital rape was a form of violence against women and was unacceptable. She had stated categorically that, My opinion is that violence against women shouldn't be limited to violence by strangers. Very often a marital rape is not always about a man's need for sex ; it is only about his need for power and subjugation. In such case, it should be treated with seriousness.

According to the United Nations Population Fund, marital rape is the most common form of violence against women in India. Two-thirds of married Indian women surveyed by the UN, aged 15 to 49, allege to have been beaten and said their husbands had forced them to have sex on numerous occasions . In 2011, the International Men and Gender Equality Survey has revealed that one in five has forced their wives or partner to have sex.

This must end now ! To make this happen, those husbands who unabashedly rape their wife must be made to face the strictest punishment and should not be allowed to go away lightly or scot free without facing any punishment as most unfortunately we are seeing right now!

There are 104 countries that have outlawed marital rape. Why are we among the few nations like Yemen, Iran, Libya and Sudan where marital rape is no offence and woman has no option but to submit to rape? The present legal system in India does not recognize rape as crime except when a man rapes his wife who is below 15 years of age! This is most outrageous and deserves to be discarded right now!

Marital rape became a crime in every state in USA by 1993. Most states of USA penalize marital rape like any other crime with fines that could exceed $ 50,000 and prison terms varying between several years and life in prison without parole. Marital rape was made a crime in Britain in 1991. The 2003 Sexual Offences Act clarified the law, giving consent a legal definition in England and Wales. Under the law, the accused would face punishment of five years in prison.

Many other countries like Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, France, Israel, Poland, Turkey, Malaysia and, this year, Bolivia too have all criminalized marital rape. In Bhutan, marital rape is considered an offence but not a serious one. It is punishable with a minimum prison term of one year and a maximum term of three years!

  • Why are we splitting hairs on making marital rape a punishable offence?
  • Why can't we go headlong with the proposal to make marital rape an offence?

Domestic violence in any form is most reprehensible and completely unacceptable! I earnestly call upon Centre and our lawmakers to immediately implement the proposals of Justice Verma Committee report and make marital rape punishable in same manner as rape with no ifs and buts whatsoever!

What an irony that when a man has sex with a married woman with her consent, he is punishable for adultery under Section 497 of the IPC for imprisonment that may extend to five years but if a husband commits marital rape and breaks the blind trust that his wife poses on him, he is not at all punishable! This is utterly disgusting and can never under any circumstances be ever justified!

Every man has the birth right to do what he wants to do with his own body except obviously the right to commit suicide and here too Centre has now decided to decriminalize it so that committing suicide also becomes the birth right of not only man but also every person including woman! But no man including husband has the right to rape a woman against her will and even marriage confers no such right. It is only with her consent that he has the right to have physical relationship with her and not without her consent!

Those who fear that disgruntled wives would misuse this provision like they say has been the case with Section 498A must remember that just because a law can be misused is no ground for not making a law! I do, however, agree that some safety clauses must also be inserted like if the complaint is found to be false or malafide, woman can be fined or jailed or both! This would go a long way in checking false complaints and in saving the time of courts and unnecessary harassment of innocent husbands! Under no circumstances can marital rape be condoned and if it is not made even now the most heinous offence then we have to blame our ownself for condoning it! Shame on us! Shame on our law makers!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Abortion (or miscarriage) may occur spontaneously, in which case it is of no interest to the criminal law; or it may be deliberately induced, when it is a serious crime
To my understanding the MTP Act 1971 allows for abortions only under the following conditions:
Annulment of marriage: An annulment case can be initiated by either the husband or the wife in the marriage
Subject to the provisions of this Act and to the rules made thereunder, a petition for divorce may be presented to the District Court by both the parties together on the ground that they have been living separately
The people of India belong to different religions and faiths. They are governed by different sets of personal laws in respect of matters relating to family affairs, i.e., marriage, divorce, succession.
India a country of cultural values and rituals, ceremonies cannot afford to plunge into western society. But since growing economy and people getting more and more aware
The people of India belong to different religions and faiths. They are governed by different sets of personal laws in respect of matters relating to family affairs, i.e., marriage, divorce, succession.
Conditions relating to solemnization of foreign marriages.-A marriage between parties one of whom at least is a citizen of India may be solemnized under this Act by or before a Marriage Officer in a foreign country, if, at the time of the marriage, the following conditions are fulfilled
Here is a list of stages in a Contest Divorce Proceedings
Your fitness as a parent goes to be questioned in any custody dispute. Do not offer your spouse equivalent any facts
The people of India belong to different religions and faiths. They are governed by different sets of personal laws in respect of matters relating to family affairs,
It has to be stated at the very outset that in a landmark judgment with far reaching consequences, the Supreme Court on May 6, 2018 in Nandkumar & Anr v The State of Kerala & Ors in Criminal Appeal No. 597 of 2018 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4488 of 2017
The Bombay High Court in Neelam Choudhary V/s UOI in Writ Petition while refusing a plea seeking termination of pregnancy held that matrimonial discord cannot be considered as a reason for permitting termination of pregnancy by invoking provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.
Mahadevappa v Karnataka upheld the conviction of a man accused of dowry death, relying largely on the evidence of his deceased wife's parents and relatives. The Apex Court Bench also upheld the High Court finding that this was a case of homicidal death and not a case of accidental death.
Section 21, which purports to provide for legitimacy of children of annulled marriages, appears to be productive of arbitrary and incongruous results when compared to the analogous provisions of the Hindu marriage Act and the Special Marriage Act.
Judicial Separation under section 22 of Divorce Act and Husband not entitled to inherit wife’s property, wife not disentitled
Before the enactment of this Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, a Muslim woman, who was divorced by or from her husband, was granted a right to livelihood from her quondam husband in the shape of maintenance under the provisions of Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure until she remarried.
Complete guidelines on Dissolution of marriage by mutual consent section 10A - Christian Divorce in India
Sunil Kumar vs J&K held in no uncertain terms that an educated woman is supposed to be fully aware of consequences of having sex with a man before marriage. She cannot voluntarily first have sex with her own free will and later term it as rape or a sexual assault on her..
For NRIs, marriage registration is compulsory. The registration period for non-resident’s marriage is 30 days from the day of solemnization. It will be a precautionary measure to lessen the cases of abandoned wives and domestic violence by the non-residents. In case, the marriage remains unregistered, the spouses can be litigated.
There are many NRIs who are married, but still their certificate shows single status. The Registration of Marriage of Non-Residents bill has been passed.
Rupali Devi v State of Uttar Pradesh has laid down categorically that women can file matrimonial cases, including criminal matters pertaining to cruelty from the place where they have taken shelter after leaving or being driven out of their matrimonial home.
The UK citizen has decided to marry with a girl from India. Where can he collect from the marriage certificate in India? Is unmarried certificate required?
Sheenu Mahendru vs Sangeeta and Soniya that the persistent efforts of a wife to compel her husband to get separated from his mother constitute an act of cruelty. The Division Bench thus allowed the appeal of a husband who had sought divorce on the ground of cruelty by wife.
Ravinder Yadav Vs Padmini @ Payal has categorically and convincingly held that mere aggressive behaviour and sadness of mood of wife does not mean that the wife is spoiling the atmosphere of her matrimonial home.
To Protect the rights of married Muslim women and to prohibit divorce by pronouncing to talaq by their husbands and to provide for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Seventieth Year of the Republic of India as follows
SG Vs RKG held that irretrievable breakdown of marriage alone cannot be a ground of divorce and can only be considered as a circumstance by the Court if it is merged with cruelty.
The NRI Marriage Act is proposed to be amended at the beginning of this year. The propositions were tabled while keeping the surging cases of abandoning wives by non-residents of India.
Girish Singh Vs The State of Uttarakhand the Supreme Court has observed that the conviction under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code can be made only if the woman was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or his relatives which must be for or in connection with any demand for dowry, soon before her death.
basic rights and those men who insult them by resorting to triple talaq are not able to escape the long arms of the law. It took three attempts to make sure that ultimately it becomes a law.
Muslims like triple talaq and nikah halala by which if a husband pronounces triple talaq and he wants to marry her again then the women first has to undergo marriage with some other men then take divorce from him and then marry her former husband.
Whether where wife had been responsible for her atrocious allegations, actions and behaviour, same amounted to cruelty to husband? and the Hon'ble court held Yes.
The certificate of no marriage determines that its bearer is unmarried and in a capacity to solemnize marriage with anyone. India has SDM office, MEA and embassy to get it attested. The person can visit the notary officer for getting its affidavit first, showing all authentic proves of birth, address and citizenship.
R Srinivas Kumar v. R Shametha Can exercise its inherent powers under Article 142 of the Constitution for dissolution of a marriage, even if the facts of the case do not provide a ground in law on which the divorce could be granted.
Smt. Surbhi Trivedi Vs. Gaurav Trivedi held that in a matrimonial dispute, if gender of one of the parties is questioned by the other party, the court may direct such a party to undergo medical examination and the plea of violation of privacy shall not be tenable
When summons are served upon you as a respondent in any petition, you may yourself appear before the concerned Court. You may also appear by a pleader or Advocate, whom you should properly instruct so that he is able to answer all material questions before the Court.
The non-availability of birth certificate in India is one of the lesser known documents that could be an alternative to apply for the birth certificate even after 30 years of the age.
Even in the best family circumstances, with pristine intentions, preparing for adversity is a wise choice when separation becomes eminent.
Gurjit Singh vs Punjab the accused cannot be automatically held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the IPC by employing the presumption under Section 113-A of the Indian Evidence Act.
It must be stated forthright that the demand of money for any purpose from the wife can be termed as demand for dowry. The husband would be liable in such cases for demanding dowry even though it may not seem like dowry.
Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar v/s Ramchandra Bhimrao Kondalkar that if allegations of adultery are proved against the wife in a marriage, she is not entitled to maintenance. A wife is entitled to claim maintenance only if she is able to prove that all the allegations of adultery are wrong.
Divorce by Mutual Consent - Divorce petition by husband on adultery - Divorce Petition filed within few days of marriage - Divorce Petition-Provisions of mutatis mutandis,applies and when Can Divorced persons re-marry
Even though most people want things to go well, not everything is always perfect in our families. And like charity, even conflict begins at home.
Soumitra Kumar Nahar v/s Parul Naharthat the parental responsibility of the couple does not end even if there is a breakdown of marriage. It is the child who always suffer immeasurably and invaluably due to the ego clashes of the couple! sought to affix responsibility on the parents which they owe towards the child
Can you get legally married in Spain? Both religious weddings and Civil ceremonies are legally recognized as par Spainish law. Infact in 2005 Sex marriage has been legalized.
Article examines need for divorce by mutual consent and explores evolution of divorce. Application of consent theory under Hindu law. How has the theory been applied in other civil and common law countries. Conclusion- How to evolve the consent theory further?
Getting a divorce can be one of the most difficult decisions that you ever take in your life. Apart from the sentiments involved, there is typically a load of legal and financial implications for both the parties, which unless amicably settled can lead to a messy legal situation apart from details of your personal life coming into the public domain
Top