Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Sunday, November 24, 2024

Police Stations Must Be Helpful To Victims Of Sexual Assault: Delhi HC

Posted in: Criminal Law
Thu, Jun 3, 21, 12:39, 4 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 3762
It is a matter of utmost concern that woman who are first sexually assaulted and traumatized are made to suffer the worst brunt when they go to the police station to lodge an FIR

"

Without beating about the bush and going left and right, let me come straight to the point. It is a matter of utmost concern that woman who are first sexually assaulted and traumatized are made to suffer the worst brunt when they go to the police station to lodge an FIR but are cajoled to either enter into a compromise with the accused or are straightaway told to keep quiet especially when the woman is not educated or hails from a rural background. Even educated woman too have to fight it hard just to lodge an FIR as we all know that the police leaves no stone unturned in most of the cases to see that an FIR is not lodged so that they can proudly brag that crime is minimum in their respective jurisdiction!

This is just not done at all! No country can progress where women are not safe. If India is to progress and march ahead, woman has to be accorded full protection and this can be possible only if the police stations are helpful to victims of sexual assault by promptly lodging FIR instead of forwarding hundred excuses for not doing so and putting undue pressure on her to instead withdraw and enter into compromise with the accused! Such guilty police men must be punished with full force so that the right message goes down the lane and policemen render their job properly!

While issuing commendable directions to create a congenial atmosphere in police stations so that women can come forward without fear, the Delhi High Court on October 29, 2014 said there was a need to create social reformation to bring down incidents of sexual offences against women within the home. Terming the trend of rape and molestation by persons known to the victim as alarming, the bench of Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed and Justice Siddharth Mridul directed the Delhi Police and the Women and Child Development department to give wide publicity to the societal problem as it must be highlighted. What I find even more alarming is that when persons known to the victim commit rape and molestation on her, she is coerced and cajoled to keep quiet and bear everything in silence to protect family honour in society!

However, what I find most alarming is that when the victim somehow summons the requisite courage to approach police to seek their help and reaches police station, she gets the worst shock of her life. In most cases, the police just refuses to lodge an FIR and on the contrary, the victim's own character and conduct is questioned which causes her to break down completely ! This has to stop at any cost and this is what Delhi High Court has said in its landmark judgment that the police stations must be helpful to victims of sexual assault.


Going a step further, I would also like to state that those police men who refuse to lodge FIR should not be just suspended but rather dismissed from service. They must be jailed also for at least five years and extending more depending on the offence committed. They should not be given any pay or pension! If all this is actually done, who on earth can dare to not lodge FIR? But this is what our law makers never want to do!

As we see, the commendable directions come after the court took note of submissions made by the Delhi State Legal Services Authority ( DSLSA ), which stated that access to the rape crisis centres should be made easier. The court also directed the Centre to provide DSLSA with a helpline – a three or four digit toll-free number. The directions were issued on a PIL regarding safety of women in the capital. The PIL was filed by social activist Nandita Dhar through advocate Gaurav Bansal last year.

The court said scientific investigation methods such as DNA and finger printing should be used in all cases and every investigating team should be equipped with the complete wherewithal to probe a case irrespective of whether the victim is rich or poor. The court also said that, We have issued detailed directions to police and the government. They are expected to be released by Thursday. The direction came after the court noted that the quality of police investigation in such cases was unsatisfactory as it differs from investigator to investigator.

The court also took note of data on crimes against women in 44 red-flagged areas of the city, which the Delhi Police had submitted earlier. According to the data, there has been a steep rise in incidents of rape, molestation and eve-teasing in national capital since the December 16 gangrape and majority of these occur inside the victims houses. The accused in most of the cases is a close relative or an acquaintance, the data showed. This is what I feel is most concerning and has to be checked which is possible only if police stations are more helpful to victims of sexual assault as was observed by the Delhi High Court.

The court observed that police can play an important role in stopping misuse of the law as they can differentiate between false and genuine cases and are also the first to arrive at the scene of crime. The observation came after ASG Neeraj Kishen Kaul, appearing for Delhi Police, said rape complaints are also filed in matters of failed live-in relationships, property disputes or elopement. The court directed police to file an affidavit with details on several aspects of these cases.

The Delhi High Court also asked police to look at the issue of obscene calls and stalking. The bench further sought details of paedophiles. It also suggested that immigration authorities should be mindful of such matters and advised that a cyber cell be set up specifically to deal with online paedophilia.

All said and done, the unmistakable message which the Delhi High Court sent out by this landmark judgment was that police stations must be helpful to victims of sexual assault and must co-operate with them in all respects. There can be no two opinions about this.

Needless to say, if police acts promptly, properly and punctually against the culprits, the future potential culprits will think thousands times before venturing into such a misadventure as they will realize it fully well that they will not be able to get away easily ! But if police gets manipulated by money or politicians then there is bound to be gloom and doom as police will refuse to lodge FIR and do everything possible to save the accused as we see also in many cases which is the real reason why dreaded criminals keep getting acquitted on one case or the other on one or other ground which makes a complete mockery of our criminal justice system also!

This is the real rub which merits serious surgery and not a mere cosmetic band aid treatment! But our lawmakers have always chosen to look the other side which alone explains why they have failed to implement the landmark, learned and laudable guidelines of the Apex Court in Prakash Singh case even after more than 15 years they were laid down! This cannot go on unnoticed, unattended and unredressed!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave, Sardhana Road,
Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, UP

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
The general principle, is that a FIR cannot be depended upon a substantive piece of evidence.The article discusses the general priciple, along with exceptions to it.
Victim plays an important role in the criminal justice system but his/her welfare is not given due regard by the state instrumentality. Thus, the role of High Courts or the Supreme Court in our country in affirming and establishing their rights is dwelt in this article.
Can anybody really know what is going inside the heads of criminal lawyers? I mean, yes, we can pick bits of their intelligence during courtroom trials and through the legal documents that they draft.
Terrorism and organized crimes are interrelated in myriad forms. Infact in many illustration terrorism and organized crimes have converged and mutated.
Right to a copy of police report and other documents As per section 207 of CrPC, accused has the right to be furnished with the following in case the proceeding has been initiated on a police report:
In terms of Section 2 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 hereafter referred to as 'the Act'), "human rights" means the rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed under the Constitution
The Oxford dictionary defines police as an official organization whose job is to make people obey the law and to prevent and solve crime
the Supreme Court let off three gang rapists after they claimed a ‘compromise formula’ with the victim and agreed to pay her a fine of Rs 50,000 each for their offence.
benefit those prisoners who are kept in solitary confinement, the Uttarakhand High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of State of Uttarakhand v 1. Mehtab s/o Tahir Hassan 2. Sushil @Bhura s/o Gulab Singh Criminal Reference No. 1 of 2014 on April 27, 2018
this article helps you knowing how to become a criminal lawyer
helps you to know adultery and its types
In the landmark case of Manoj Singh Pawar v State of Uttarakhand & others Writ Petition (PIL) No. 156 of 2016 which was delivered on June 18, 2018, the Uttarakhand High Court issued a slew of landmark directions
Scope and ambit of Section 6 of Indian Evidence Act,1872
Victims of Crime Can Seek Cancellation of Bail: MP HC in Mahesh Pahade vs State of MP
State of Orissa v Mahimananda Mishra said clearly and convincingly that the court must not go deep into merits of the matter while considering an application for bail and all that needs to be established from the record is the existence of a prima facie case against the accused.
Yashwant v Maharashtra while the conviction of some police officers involved in a custodial torture which led to the death of a man was upheld, the Apex Court underscored on the need to develop and recognize the concept of democratic policing wherein crime control is not the only end, but the means to achieve this order is also equally important.
20 more people guilty of killing a 60-year-old Dalit man and his physically-challenged daughter. Upheld acquittals of 21 other accused, holding that there was insufficient evidence to establish their guilt. So it was but natural that they had to be acquitted
No person accused of an offence punishable for offences involving commercial quantity shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless
Accident under section 80 under the Indian Penal Code falls under the chapter of general exceptions. This article was made with the objective of keeping in mind the students of law who are nowadays in dire need of material which simplify the law than complicating it.
Nishan Singh v State of Punjab. Has ordered one Nishan Singh Brar, convicted of abduction and rape of a minor victim girl, and his mother Navjot Kaur to pay Rs 90 lakh towards compensation.
Rajesh Sharma v State of UP to regulate the purported gross misuse of Section 498A IPC have been modified just recently in a latest judgment titled Social Action Forum Manav for Manav Adhikar and another v Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice and others.
Kodungallur Film Society vs. Union of India has issued comprehensive guidelines to control vandalism by protesting mobs. Vandalism is vandalism and it cannot be justified under any circumstances. Those who indulge in it and those who instigate it must all be held clearly accountable and made to pay for what they have done most shamefully.
Ram Lal vs. State of Himachal Pradesh If the court is satisfied that if the confession is voluntary, the conviction can be based upon the same. Rule of prudence does not require that each and every circumstance mentioned in the confession must be separately and independently corroborated. Absolutely right There can be no denying it
Joseph Shine case struck down the law of adultery under Section 497. It declared that adultery can be a ground for civil issues including dissolution of marriages but it cannot be a criminal offence. It invalidated the Section 497 of IPC as a violation of Articles 14 and 15 and under Article 21 of the Constitution
Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) represented through Legal Representatives v/s Karnataka, Had no hesitation to concede right from the start while underscoring the rights of victims of crime that, The rights of victims of crime is a subject that has, unfortunately, only drawn sporadic attention of Parliament, the judiciary and civil society.
State of Kerala v Rasheed observed that while deciding an application to defer cross examination under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. a balance must be struck between the rights of the accused, and the prerogative of the prosecution to lead evidence. The Apex Court in this landmark judgment also listed out practical guidelines.
Reena Hazarika v State of Assam that a solemn duty is cast on the court in the dispensation of justice to adequately consider the defence of the accused taken under Section 313 CrPC and to either accept or reject the same for reasons specified in writing.
Zulfikar Nasir & Ors v UP has set aside the trial court judgment that had acquitted 16 Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) officials in the 1987 Hashimpur mass murder case. The Delhi High Court has convicted all the accused and sentenced them to life imprisonment.
In Babasaheb Maruti Kamble v Maharashtra it was held that the Special Leave Petitions filed in those cases where death sentence is awarded by the courts below, should not be dismissed without giving reasons, at least qua death sentence.
Shambhir & Ors v State upholding the conviction and punishment of over 80 rioters has brought some solace to all those affected people who lost their near and dear ones in the ghastly 1984 anti-Sikh riots which brought disrepute to our country and alienated many Sikhs from the national mainstream
Naman Singh alias Naman Pratap Singh and another vs. UP, Supreme Court held a reading of the FIR reveals that the police has registered the F.I.R on directions of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate which was clearly impermissible in the law.
It has been a long and gruelling wait of 34 long years for the survivors of 1984 anti-Sikh riots to finally see one big leader Sajjan Kumar being sentenced to life term by Delhi High Court
Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik v State of Maharashtra held that criminals are also entitled to life of dignity and probability of reformation/rehabilitation to be seriously and earnestly considered before awarding death sentence. It will help us better understand and appreciate the intricacies of law.
Sukhlal v The State of Madhya Pradesh 'life imprisonment is the rule and death penalty is the exception' has laid down clearly that even when a crime is heinous or brutal, it may not still fall under the rarest of rare category.
Deepak v State of Madhya Pradesh in which has served to clarify the entire legal position under Section 319 CrPC, upheld a trial court order under Section 319 of the CrPc summoning accused who were in the past discharged by it ignoring the supplementary charge sheet against them.
It has to be said right at the outset that in a major reprieve for all the political leaders accused of being involved in the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, in CBI, Mumbai vs Dahyaji Goharji Vanzara
Devi Lal v State of Rajasthan the Supreme Court has dispelled all misconceived notions about suspicion and reiterated that,
Madhya Pradesh v Kalyan Singh has finally set all doubts to rest on the nagging question of whether offences under Section 307 of IPC can be quashed on the basis of settlement between parties.
Dr Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v Maharashtra made it amply clear that if a person had not made the promise to marry with the sole intention to seduce a woman to indulge in sexual acts, such an act would not amount to rape.
Rajesh v State of Haryana conviction under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (Abetment of Suicide) is not sustainable on the allegation of harassment without there being any positive action proximate to the time of occurrence on the part of the accused, which led or compelled the person to commit suicide.
Nand Kishore v Madhya Pradesh has commuted to life imprisonment the death sentence which was earlier confirmed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court of a convicted for the rape and murder of an eight-year-old girl.
Raju Jagdish Paswan v. Maharashtra has commuted the death penalty of a man accused of rape and murder of a nine year old girl and sentenced him to 30 years imprisonment without remission.
Swapan Kumar Chatterjee v CBI permitting the application filed by the prosecution for summoning a hand writing expert in a corruption case of which the trial had started in 1985. On expected lines, the Bench accordingly delivered its significant judgment thus laying down the correct proposition of law to be followed always in such cases
Sukhpal Singh v Punjab that the inability of the prosecution to establish motive in a case of circumstantial evidence is not always fatal to the prosecution case. Importance of motive in determining the culpability of the accused but refused to acknowledge it as the sole criteria for not convicting the accused in the absence of motive.
Gagan Kumar v Punjab it is a mandatory legal requirement for Magistrate to specify whether sentences awarded to an accused convicted for two or more offences, would run concurrently or consecutively.
Dnyaneshwar Suresh Borkar v Maharashtra Even poem can help save a death convict from gallows. The Apex Court has in this latest, landmark and laudable judgment commuted the death penalty of a kidnap cum murder convict who was just 22 years of age at the time of occurrence
Himachal Pradesh v Vijay Kumar Supreme court held about acid attack crime that a crime of this nature does not deserve any kind of clemency.
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Imprisonment Appears To Be An Altogether Inappropriate Punishment: SC
S. Sreesanth v. The Board of Control For Cricket In India the Supreme Court set aside a life ban imposed on former Indian cricketer S Sreesanth in connection with the 2013 IPL spot-fixing scandal and asked the BCCI Disciplinary Committee to take a fresh call on the quantum of his punishment under the Anti-Corruption Code.
Adding Additional Accused To Invoke Section 319 CrPC Stronger Evidence Than Mere Probability of Complicity of A Person Required: SC stated in Sugreev Kumar v. State of Punjab
Top