Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Tuesday, November 5, 2024

Record Rape Victim's Statement Before Magistrate Within 24 Hours: SC

Posted in: Woman laws
Thu, Jun 3, 21, 11:34, 4 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 6674
fast-tracking rape trials, the Supreme Court has said that a rape victim should be taken directly to a Magistrate for recording her statements within 24 hours of the crime.

Coming straight to the point, I am happy to note that in a major reform which is primarily directed towards fast-tracking rape trials, the Supreme Court has said that a rape victim should be taken directly to a Magistrate for recording her statements within 24 hours of the crime. Needless to add, if a rape victim is taken directly to a Magistrate for recording her statements within 24 hours of the crime, the veracity and truthfulness will be more and chances of concoction will diminish greatly. In addition, the affluent offenders will not be in a position to intimidate her in any manner to not give any statement if her statement is recorded soon after the crime is committed!

In its order in the last leg of April 2014 a bench of Supreme Court led by Justice Gyan Sudha Misra ( since retired ) held that there was no need to record a victim's statement first before the police and then again before a Magistrate. Under the law, a statement recorded by the police is inadmissible with no legal sanctity.

This new procedure, the court said, would put an end to repeated recording of the statements – the primary reason for delay of the trial. Very rightly said and I am sure that this is in the interest of rape victim as she will not be required to recall time and again all the harrowing experiences which she had to undergo! It is therefore a very landmark and welcome judgment which will benefit the rape victim the most and will ensure speedy justice for her by sending the rapists to their right place behind bars well in time and not after a long period!

It has to be appreciated that the bench of Supreme Court which delivered this landmark judgment minced no words in stating unequivocally We are perturbed and anguished to notice that although there are fast-track courts for disposal of such cases, we do not yet have a fast-track procedure for dealing with cases of rape and gangrape, with the result that such heinous offences are repeated incessantly all over the country, including in the metropolitan cities. Rightly said!

It also said If a victim's statement was recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, preferably by a woman magistrate, it would be treated as her deposition for the trial.

The bench expressed its optimism that recording rape victim's statement before Magistrate within 24 hours will immensely benefit in wrapping up the trial in time when it noted It can surely cut short and curtail the protracted trial if it is introduced at least for trial of rape cases... and thus offer a speedy remedy by way of a fast-track procedure. It further directed categorically If there is any delay exceeding 24 hours in taking the victim to the Magistrate, the investigating officer should record the reasons in the case diary and hand over a copy of the same to the Magistrate.

Not just stopping here, the bench further directed The investigating officer should record the date and time when he got to know about the offence and when he took the victim to the Magistrate. The victim should be medically examined before being taken to the Magistrate.

Also, it directed that:
Necessary instructions by the DGPs and police commissioners of all the states and union territories be also issued to all the police station in-charges, incorporating the directions issued by us. There was a pressing need to introduce further amendments in the CrPC.

Let me point out here that Additional Solicitor General Sidharth Luthra while appearing for the government, had referred to the latest provisions in the Criminal Law ( Amendments ) Act, 2013 while claiming that the new law had the potential to cut down on unnecessary delay in rape trials. The Apex Court, however, noted that these amendments were not adequate and sought the views of the law secretaries of all states and the law commissions before passing this order while hearing a rape case from Karnataka.

All said and done, we can safely infer from this latest landmark judgment that the Supreme Court has sought to fast-track rape trials and also has sought to check the police interference by getting the statement recorded directly to a Magistrate so that the role of police is further minimized as we have seen for ourselves as to how in many cases there is a lot of bungling in recording evidence by the police especially when the offender is affluent and has many connections!

Moreover, the rape victim is saved from the trouble of getting her statement recorded again and again and on the slightest of variation due to her not being in fit mental state is faced with a barrage of questions which further torments her and makes her feel totally drained in this entire process! So, I have no doubt in my mind that this is a landmark judgment which has to be welcomed with open arms and all the lower courts must implement this in totality as it is the rape victim who will benefit the most in this entire process!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave, Sardhana Road,
Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, UP

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Gender equality, also known as sexual equality, is the state of equal ease of access to resources and opportunities regardless of gender, including economic participation and decision-making; and the state of valuing different behaviors, aspirations and needs equally, regardless of gender.
Child sex ratio and right to life: The child sex ratio had deteriorated across the country over the last decade. In the Indian context there is a strong preference for son.
Facet relating to offences against women. The offences are of various types. They find mention in many enactments. These under- mentioned provisions are enumerated in Indian Penal Code, 1860:
The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 was brought into force by the Indian government from October 26, 2006.
For couples who cannot have children, a surrogate mother is a viable and increasingly popular option. A surrogate mother is a woman who has agreed to become pregnant in order to deliver a child specifically for a couple
Article 15(3) of Indian Constitution permits State to make any special provision in law for women as well as children.
Let me begin at the very beginning by first and foremost pointing out that in a latest landmark judgment by the Bombay High Court titled Mr Ali Abbas Daruwala v/s Mrs Shehnaz Daruwala
Uttarakhand High Court in State of Uttarakhand v/s Karandeep Sharma, Razia, Raju in its landmark judgment delivered on January 5, 2018 recommended strongly the state government to enact in three months a suitable legislation for awarding death sentence to those found guilty of raping girls of 15 years or below.
Brutal Gang Rape and murder of a 12 years old girl in Uttarkashi v State of Uttarakhand The Court took cognizance of two reports published in newspaper
It is most gratifying and satisfying to learn that from now onwards victims of online sexual abuse can report the same anonymously from their homes without bothering to run from pillar to post and pleading with police to lodge their report! The first-of-its-kind national sex offenders registry was launched on September 20.
Legal Implications of the #Metoo Movement and remedies under Indian law for the victims
Laws pertaining to online harassment abuse faced by women, and the the stringent measures taken by the Government to prevent online harassment/abuse of women with an insight to cyber-crime cell catering to women
The UDHR is a milestone document consisting of international human rights law based on the ideas of freedom, equality and dignity, a living text which is universal in scope and relevant to all individuals.
There are various property rights of women in India. This is a short study about them.
Delhi High Court in Anita Suresh vs. Union of India imposed Rs. 50,000 cost on a woman for false sexual harassment plea.
An over all view of Surrogacy Bill 2016
Punjab and Sind Bank and Others v/s Mrs Durgesh Kuwar have minced no words to make it abundantly clear that sexual harassment at the workplace is an affront to the fundamental rights of a woman.
The Secretary, Ministry of Defence vs Babita Puniya vs Lt Cdr Annie Nagaraja that serving women Short Service Commission Officers in Indian Navy were entitled to Permanent Commission at par with their male counterparts.
Scenario of Marital Rape in India - By Malvika Verma
This article relates to the Female Genital Mutilation that is being carried out in India.
The Author of this Article is Yashpriya Sahran. He is currently pursuing B.A. LL.B from Lloyd Law College, Greater Noida.
Reference v. Union of India asked Indian Railways to consider re-prioritising the lower berth allotment by giving the highest priority to pregnant women, then to senior citizens and thereafter to the VVIPs.
Nasiruddin Ali vs The State of Assam rape is a violation of victim's fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. Mrs Justice Rumi Kumari Phukan of Gauhati High Court who authored this noteworthy judgment
Muhammad Abbas Vs The State in Jail Supreme Court of Pakistan observed that extremism and violence has permeated through Pakistani society and it has been brutalized. Not enough is done to ensure that crimes against women do not take place.
X vs State of Kerala Guidelines for maintaining rape victim's anonymity in the matters instituted before it. Justice PB Suresh Kumar who authored this recent, remarkable and righteous judgment while considering a petition arising out of a bail order passed by POCSO
Maheshwar Tigga vs Jharkhand have acquitted a man accused of raping a woman on the pretext of marriage. It observed that misconception of fact arising out of promise to marry has to be in proximity of time to the occurrence and cannot be spread over a long period of time coupled
Smt. Neeraj v. Rajasthan A female government servant is entitled to grant of maternity leave, irrespective of the fact that she had given birth to the child prior to her joining government service.
J & K v/s Md. Imran Khan while reminding the mandate of Section 228A of the J&K Ranbir Penal Code directed the Trial Courts of the Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh to avoid disclosing identity of rape survivors in their proceedings and judgments.
marital rape an offence. A rape is a rape. A husband who is supposed to protect his wife and take care of her in all possible respects if himself starts raping his wife must be awarded the strictest punishment
Satish vs Maharashtra groping a child's breasts without skin-to-skin contact would amount to molestation under the Indian Penal Code but not the graver offence of sexual assault under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
Sangita v/s Maharashtra has issued additional guidelines to restrain print/electronic media as well general public, using social media, from publishing information related to rape victim that could directly or indirectly disclose her identity.
Dr Sandeep Mourya vs State in Bail Appn granted anticipatory bail to a doctor based in Delhi accused of raping a woman on the pretext of false promise of marriage after observing that there was no forceful sexual assault done in the case.
The idea of marital rape has always been under a limelight when it came to the situations of India. The laws in India have extensively worked on rape, sexual assault and sexual abuse but have turned a dead eye to the concept of marital rape
A rape is a rape. Just because a man has married a woman that by itself does not confer the legitimate right to man to have sex with woman against her wish by forcing her in anyway.
huge surge in complaints by women of sexual harassment at workplace. As things stand, if strongest possible action is not taken against the culprits who dare to sexually harass a woman
This article puts light on how a woman's life could have a positive impact if the marital age is revised.
Mohasina Mukhtar PhD Scholar Law, RIMT University,Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab
Monika vs HP there should be no restraint to a woman throughout the period of her pregnancy as restraints and confined spaces might cause mental stress to a pregnant woman.
Mahesha vs Malebennur Police Davanagerewhile displaying zero tolerance for crimes against humanity laid down in no uncertain terms
Aarti Sharma vs Ganga Saran provisions of Domestic Violence Act, being a social welfare legislation, cannot be used by a son as a ploy to either claim a right in his father's property or to retain possession of the same on the strength of his wife's right of residence
Rajkishore Shrivastava vs. MP that getting the consent of the prosecutrix to involve in a sexual act by making false promise of re-employment, can't be called 'free consent' and it would amount to consent obtained under a misconception of fact (as per Section 90 of IPC).
Guruvinder Singh v UP even if sexually explicit images and videos are captured with the consent of a woman, the misuse of the same can't be justified once the relationship between the victim and the accused gets strained.
Irappa Siddappa Murgannavar vs Karnataka the low age of the rape victim is not considered as the only or sufficient factor for imposing a death sentence.
Mamta Devi Vs UP Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow the rescue of a married woman who had moved the High Court with her protection plea claiming that she is facing threats from her family members
Kumari D v/s Karnataka has held most commendably that the right of a woman to exercise her reproductive choice is a dimension of personal liberty as understood under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and she has a sacrosanct right to have her bodily integrity protected.
Kashinath Narayan Gharat v/s Maharashtra that mere refusal to marry a woman after a long relationship would not constitute cheating under Section 417 of the IPC if there is no evidence of fraudulent misrepresentation of promise of marriage for sex.
Neha vs Vibhor Garg Recording of telephonic conversations of the wife without her knowledge amounts to infringement of her privacy and the transcripts of such conversations cannot be accepted as evidence by Family Courts.
Mirza Iqbal @ Golu v/s Uttar Pradesh quashed the criminal proceedings lodged for a dowry death and dowry demand against a man and a woman observing that the husband's family members are frequently named as accused in matrimonial disputes by making passing reference of them in the FIR.
Siddhivinayak Umesh Vindhe v/s Maharashtra asked the Maharashtra State Government to consider making offence punishable under Section 498A of IPC a compoundable offence. The Court also pointed out that Andhra Pradesh is already taking this approach.
Top