Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Friday, November 1, 2024

Centre's Relentless War Against Corona Has Enhanced India's Image

Posted in: Civil Laws
Sun, May 23, 21, 20:32, 4 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 4117
It cannot be denied that corona has claimed lakhs of lives in India and even in most developed countries like America the figure has crossed more than five lakhs which is 3 lakhs more than that of India

It cannot be denied that corona has claimed lakhs of lives in India and even in most developed countries like America the figure has crossed more than five lakhs which is 3 lakhs more than that of India! It cannot be denied that the prompt action taken by PM Narendra Modi in enforcing strict lockdown in 2020 ensured that the corona virus spread was contained and so was the death rate due to which reputed international organisations like World Health Organisation (WHO) among others lauded India generously!

It also cannot be denied that states like UP which is the most populated state of India too took prompt, effective and laudable steps which ensured that it was contained due to which UP CM Yogi Adityanath received time and again lavish praise from many international organisations like WHO to which we all were witness just like we saw recently! With due respect to all the courts in India, we didn't witness the same admiration from them! On the contrary, questions were raised on the handling of the pandemic by different courts and there was severe criticism also!

I consider myself too small a fry to say anything on courts but it just cannot be denied that when a deadly virus like corona has struck nearly the whole world, we all need to stay united and focus all our energy in providing relief and ensuring that the precious lives of people are saved! It is easy for anyone to criticise the government and for political parties it is most convenient also and expedient also for furthering their own vested political interests! It cannot be denied that when a war of words erupted between Congress and the BJP over the handling of the pandemic, eminent Congress leader and senior Supreme Court lawyer Kapil Sibal struck the right chord by saying that:
Stand Together India, it's time to stand together not time to criticise after this battle is finally won will find out who was wrong and who was right. But leaders from Sibal's own party are not listening to him!

It just cannot be denied that no matter how hard political leaders from different political parties may try, the whole world applauded when India took the lead in helping the needy people from different countries by providing the necessary help and this was the main reason why when India now needed more oxygen and vaccines, many countries volunteered to help India generously with much needed help for which the real credit goes to PM Narendra Modi! Modi and his team have been working relentlessly round the clock since 2020 to contain the corona and yet maintained low key which I am afraid did not receive the much deserved applauding from either the press or the judiciary barring notable exceptions!

One such exception is Syed Iqbal Simnani who is VP Technology, Deutsche Bank and who in his enlightening editorial titled Before slamming India's handling of Covid, let's look at facts and not Twitter noise published on May 1, 2021 in Sunday Times newspaper remarkably observes that, Many commentators are making claims that India's response to Covid has been bad from the beginning; also it is being asserted that the second severe wave was entirely predictable and the oxygen shortage was a simple solvable problem. Was it? I argue that India's response to the first wave was much better than the global average.

Pandemics are rare events which can overwhelm systems. Due to a much larger population, there was always a risk of a pandemic like Covid overwhelming India's limited health infrastructure. And India did react quickly to the first wave of Covid in early 2020, putting in place a very admirable public awareness campaign and a nationwide lockdown keeping in view the systematic risks of a large-scale pandemic. Of course, there were heart-breaking scenes like a very large number of migrant workers leaving cities en masse and for their villages without any transport. There are always lessons to be learned, but under the circumstances, the government of the day did a good job.

Who can deny that Centre as well as State governments had made lots of arrangements for stay and free food also but due to rumours by few vested elements the migrant workers panicked which resulted in them taking the extreme step for which it would not be appropriate to blame any government for it? Syed Iqbal Simnani who lives outside India and has nothing to do at all with Centre very rightly applauds it as it did a good job and also rightly suggests that, Before slamming India's handling of Covid, let's look at facts and not Twitter noise.

More to the point, Dilip Joshi who is an actor further very rightly opines that:
People should be responsible and cooperate, instead of just blaming the government. We have to be careful and follow guidelines, else this will never end. We've to maintain social distance, wear masks and get vaccinated at the earliest.

Even our Courts and Judges must always bear this in mind! Dilip also rightly suggests that, When the lockdown ends, we have to be as careful as we are today. People shouldn't start going out or behaving as if nothing happened. Absolutely right!

It cannot be denied that PM Narendra Modi while chairing a high level meeting on May 15, 2021 to review the Covid-19 situation in the country asked officials to focus on testing, including door-to-door testing and assisting health care workers in rural areas. He also rightly underscored the dire need of reporting data accurately and helping rural India with Oxygen. PM also asked for augmentation of healthcare resources in rural areas to focus on door-to-door testing and surveillance. PM also rightly advocated empowering ASHA and Anganwadi workers with all necessary tools. Of course, these directions assume significance given that the deadly second wave of infections in the country appears to have affected rural hinterland faster than it did during the first outbreak.

It is a national tragedy that while we see different Courts lambasting government on one pretext or the other but no Judge has so far demonstrated the courage to ask farmers led by Rakesh Singh Tikait to stop protesting on roads because of which the corona virus had become a super spreader in rural areas and vacate roads promptly which is the crying need of the hour also! The Apex Court has clearly held that roads cannot be blocked and Shaheen Bagh protesters also had to leave but why blank cheque for Rakesh Singh Tikait?
Should I salute Apex Court for this double standard adopted? Is Rakesh above Supreme Court that no rule applies to him?

Now Rakesh is seen saying that they will also march to Parliament in protest against the farm laws! We saw earlier how violence broke out when Rakesh led tractors rally till Red Fort and how Red Fort was desecrated on Republic day thus making a mockery of India in front of the world! What are our Judges doing?
Why judiciary has surrendered so lamely, became mute spectators and allowed farmers led by Rakesh Singh Tikait to become super spreaders? Our Judges must introspect on this instead of just lambasting goverment which is doing all that it can to contain the virus but are helpless on Rakesh Tikait as Apex Court has strangely allowed him and his supporters to protest freely and a free run which is most baffling! One rule for Shaheen Bagh protesters and a different rule for farmers led by Rakesh cannot be ever justified even by the top court itself. Supreme Court must feel terribly ashamed for not implementing the Shaheen Bagh ruling on one and all equally! It must feel terribly ashamed for allowing farmers led by Rakesh Singh Tikait to become super spreaders when our nation stands engulfed in corona and let me candidly confess that I am shell shocked to see all this! Before lambasting Centre, Supreme Court must introspect seriously on its own shortcomings and fallacies and remember the time tested adage that, The Supreme Court is final but is not infallible.

I am neither a member of BJP nor owe any affiliation to it. But let me say this most clearly that I am most impressed to see how Centre has declared war against corona and is working relentlessly to ensure that it is eliminated at the earliest. Our Defence Minister Rajnath Singh has also directed even Army Hospitals in Delhi and other needy places to be used for civilians. Retired army doctors have been recalled to render their services again to benefit the common man! It is good to see that the PM asked for guidelines to be made available in easy language along with illustrations for home isolation and treatment in rural areas.

Of course, Centre is taking so many steps to control corona and it is just not possible to dwell on all of them. PM very rightly took serious note of reports of ventilators provided by Centre lying unutilised in storage, directing the authorities to undertake an immediate audit of their installation and operation. It is not for nothing that reputed organisations like WHO among others are applauding PM Modi and UP CM Yogi for their herculean efforts round the clock in doing their best to control corona by taking all requisite steps in this regard which has certainly enhanced India's reputation. It is not just Opposition parties but also Judges who must think holistically on this and not just dampen the morale of government by frequently criticising the government on one pretext or the other!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top