Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Friday, November 1, 2024

Pakistan Army Is Biggest Land Grabber: Lahore HC

Posted in: Civil Laws
Sun, May 16, 21, 13:24, 4 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 3786
We all know fully well how notorious Pakistani Army is in grabbing land at the drop of a hat that it can be gauged from this that it always indulged in committing

We all know fully well how notorious Pakistani Army is in grabbing land at the drop of a hat that it can be gauged from this that it always indulged in committing worst form of terrible atrocities in its soil without any compunctions whatsoever and also wantonly and brazenly indulging in worst form of land grabbing just like mafias do whenever they find it convenient to do so.

It is certainly by any reckoning not a professional and disciplined army committed totally for the welfare and upliftment of the people. It has a very poor track record of always wielding huge discretionary power to benefit their own kith ànd kin. This alone explains why there was revolt in Bangladesh then called East Pakistan in 1971 which formed till then an inalienable part of Pakistan but then with India's help fought their sacred aim of attaining independence as the people there were fed up of misrule and tyranny committed by the 'ruthless and arrogant' Pakistani Army.

What an unbeatable irony that 50 years later, we still see no change in the Pakistani Army dictatorial approach and it seems that the only lesson that the Pakistani Army has learnt from history is that it has not learnt any lesson till now! This definitely does not forebode well for Pakistan where people especially in Balochistan, Sindh and Karachi are most frustrated and yearning to separate from Pakistan due to huge atrocities committed by heartless Pakistani Army. It is this same Pakistani Army which has nurtured and patronized most dreaded criminal mafias and dubious land grabbers like Dawood Ibrahim who is an Indian fugitive and so also Shabir Ibrahim Kaskar and Chhota Shakeel who are all running this dirty business racket based in Karachi with full patronage from Pakistani army!

Needless to state, this alone explains why while slamming
Pakistan' s army, Lahore High Court has come down heavily raining on the force calling it the biggest land grabber of Pakistan. We all saw how just recently the Lahore High Court Chief Justice Mohammad Qasim Khan lashed out strongly at the Defence Housing Authority (DHA) for its neck deep involvement in illegal occupation of lands and regretted that the Army seemed to have become the biggest land grabber. It must be mentioned here that the Chief Justice was hearing petitions of three citizens seeking an order against the DHA to not disturb their lawful possession of the land that they had obtained on lease from the Evacuee Trust Property Board (ETPB). It must be mentioned here that the Chief Justice Mohammad Qasim Khan deeply regretted that the Army had also grabbed a piece of land measuring 50-kanal which was owned by the Lahore High Court. Such is the sheer audacity of Army in Pakistan that it does not care a damn even for the Lahore High Court itself also!

While elaborating further, the Chief Justice Qasim Khan said explicitly that he would instruct the Lahore High Court Registrar to write a letter to the Chief of the Army Staff in this regard. He was at pains to point out that the Bar also remained indifferent to the issue. The ostensible reason for it is: No one wants to ruffle feathers of Pakistani Army under any circumstance as it is most notorius for crushing dissent with an iron hand!

Furthermore, the DHA's counsel Altafur Rehman Khan feigned his ignorance about the occupation of the Lahore High Court's land. At this, the Chief Justice Mohammad Qasim Khan made it amply clear that the Corps Commander of Lahore could be summoned to verify the fact. This itself ostensibly shows that there is strong force in what the Lahore High Court Chief Justice Mohammad Qasim Khan said.

While mincing no words whatsoever to clearly specify Army's role, the Chief Justice of Lahore High Court observed unequivocally that the uniform of the army was for service and not to rule as a king. We have seen how in Pakistan time and again Army Generals like Yahya Khan, Zia ul Haq, Pervez Musharraf among others have ruled with huge powers but no limitations of any kind. Most unfortunately, Pakistan's Army right since 1947 till 2021 has been ruling Pakistan like an emperor with all powers but no responsibilities which alone explains why it split in 1971 and if things are not controlled well in time then that day is certainly not far when Pakistan will be staring at another split as people of Sindh, Balochistan, PoK and many other regions are totally fed up of the complete unfettered tyranny and misrule of Pakistani Army interested just in grabbing of land illegally to the maximum possible extent.

To be sure, the Chief Justice of Lahore High Court referred to above said confidently that he did not say anything wrong about the Army and Almighty Allah made him speak the truth. He also pulled back no punches to state unequivocally that, The way the Army occupies the properties of people is nothing but land grabbing. No doubt, the Chief Justice of Lahore High Court has to be applauded unambiguously for summoning the courage to speak out against the misdeeds of the Pakistani Army!

As we see, advocate Asif Imran Awan who is the counsel for the petitioners pointed out that no reply had been submitted to the petitions as the respondent/DHA belonged to the Army. Chief Justice of Lahore High Court Khan maintained that no one had ever dared to refuse filing a reply in his court during his 11-year stay in the Lahore High Court. He asked the counsel for the housing authority that, Do they appoint serving or retired army officers in the DHA? The counsel said that retired officers of the Army worked in the DHA. However, he said that DHA administrator Brig Waheed Gul Satti was a serving officer.

What's more, the Chief Justice of Lahore High Court then directed the DHA's counsel to make the administrator appear before the court immediately. The Chief Justice also directed a provincial law officer to ensure the appearance of the Lahore police chief before the court. Chief Justice Khan then also said to the law officer that, If CCPO feels any fear, ask him to send his IG instead.

Going ahead, CCPO Ghulam Mahmood Dogar appeared before the court as the Chief Justice resumed hearing after a break. However, the DHA's counsel informed the court that Brig Satti was in Islamabad for his appearance before the Supreme Court. The Chief Justice then directed the counsel to make the DHA administrator appear before the Lahore High Court along with complete record.

Without mincing any words, Chief Justice Khan also asked the CCPO to better leave the job if he could not take any action against the illegal occupations by the DHA. He ordered the police officer to lodge an FIR if he received any application against the DHA. The Chief Justice observed that the Army had an attractive post-retirement welfare plan for its officers, which other institutions like police and judiciary lacked. This is all because Pakistani Army calls the shots in all crucial matters.

To put things in perspective, the Chief Justice very rightly posed a query that, Is it only the army that makes sacrifices? Do other institutions like police, lawyers and judges not make sacrifices? It is really good to see that the Chief Justice of Lahore High Court summoned the unfettered courage to speak out against the unilateral dominance of Army in Pakistan and it's misdeeds in grabbing lands like mafias! It goes without saying that the Chief Justice of Lahore High Court referred to hereinabove has exposed the real face of the Pakistani Army!
Needless to state, the petitioners Zeeshan Mehboob, Rakeel Tufail and Zulfiqar Hussain had got different chunks of land allotted to three-year lease from the ETPB for cultivation purposes in Mota Singhwala, Lidhar and Dera Chahal Mauzas near Bedian Road, Lahore. A counsel for the ETPB also told the court that the petitioners were the lawful owners of the land in question. So they had a legitimate claim on the land in question!

It is a no-brainer and we all know too very well that the Army which has ruled Pakistan with an iron vice-like grip for more than half of its 70 plus years of existence and had earlier gained considerable power in several matters of security and foreign policy has enjoyed unquestionable supremacy in calling the shots everywhere! This latest judgment by Lahore High Court in April is definitely a rare rebuke of Pakistan's powerful Army! Of course, the true monstrous face of the Pakistani Army has now this been manifestly exposed by the Lahore High Court for all of us to see for ourselves. How long will Pakistani Army deny this unpalatable truth laid bare by Lahore High Court?

What a crowning irony that Pakistani Army is just interested in minting money, grabbing huge tracts of land and even using notorious criminal mafias like Dawood among others, dreaded terror groups and terror leaders like Hafiz Saeed, Masood Azhar and Syed Salaluddin among others to indulge in more and more such land grabbing mercilessly by employing muscle power and gun power among others this caring two hoots for the people at large for whose welfare and safety they exist. The writing is thus now clear on the wall. There is nothing more to add to it.

It would certainly not be wrong to say that Pakistan is not a country with an army but an army with a country! Today, the Pakistan armed forces run at least 50 commercial entities including banks, bakeries, petrol pumps, schools, universities, food processing units, milk dairies, cement plants, insurance companies and even restaurants and wedding halls! These businesses are operated under five foundations, namely the Fauji Foundation, Army Welfare Trust, Shaheen Foundation and the Defence Housing Authority - the one involved in the current land grab case. We all know how in 2017 former Pakistani Army General Raheel Sharif was allotted 90 acres of land for agriculture in Lahore without any explanation. All attempts to find out the reason we're labelled as treason. Earlier also we saw how in 2010 an Army Battalion grabbed wrongly 3500 acres of land in Karachi which included a centuries old graveyard too.

It must be mentioned here that the Chief Justice of Lahore High Court revealed that the Lahore High Court had itself been a victim of the Army's notorious land grab. The Judge said that, The DHA has also illegally occupied 50 kanals of the Lahore High Court and I will have an FIR lodged against the DHA. Everyone is equal before the law. Men in uniform cannot escape their crimes. Men in uniform in Pakistan must understand what Lahore High Court has held so damningly against the way of functioning of Pakistani Army! They better understand!

It shall be in their own best interest!

It is high time and Pakistan Army must also now mend its ways and start behaving like professional army just like we see in India and stop backing criminal mafias indulging in land grabbing and so also terror groups as it can still be blacklisted by FATF! It can afford to ignore what Lahore High Court has held at its own peril! It must learn a lot from Indian Army! It shall be in its own best interest!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
S/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera. Meerut - 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top