Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Sunday, December 22, 2024

Bar Council Of UP Chairman Writes To Allahabad HC's Acting Chief Justice And Seeks Bail For Undertrial Convicts

Posted in: Judiciary
Wed, Apr 28, 21, 10:31, 4 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 5543
seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.

It must be stated right at the outset before stating anything else that in a welcome, worthwhile and wonderful development which shall undoubtedly benefit immensely the under-trial prisoners, the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh which is the apex body of the lawyers of the state has very commendably, courageously and convincingly written a very brief, bold, balanced and brilliant letter to the newly appointed Acting Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court – Justice Sanjay Yadav, thereby very rightly, remarkably and rationally seeking interim bail/parole for the under-privileged and under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Who can deny this that under-trial prisoners must be now given respite promptly by releasing them for some time so that they don't get affected adversely and suffer irreparable, irreversible and incurable damages due to not being released in time from over-crowded jails? This alone explains that why the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh has very rightly, remarkably and rationally chosen to take a firm stand on this which under the present circumstances stands fully justified also.

While eloquently, elegantly and effectively pointing out the crux of the matter, the UP Bar Council Chairman – Rohitashwa Kumar Aggarwal very candidly, cogently and convincingly pointed out in his noteworthy letter which he wrote on April 20, 2021 pointing out that:
The print media and the electronic media is full of reports indicating doubling of infection during the last two weeks on account of overcrowding in jails across the Uttar Pradesh state. Scores of inmates have tested positive for the virus majorly due to flouting of social distancing norms occurring on account of congestion in jails. This is certainly a matter of grave concern and has to be dealt with on a war footing. The lives of even inmates are precious and efforts must be made to save them which can be possible only if they are made to stay away from overcrowded jails.

No doubt, the UP Bar Council Chairman then further very aptly, adeptly and ably also puts forth that:
The only available solution to help the congestion and to avoid the spread of virus appears to be decongesting the prisons so that social distancing is maintained. It merits no reiteration that this deadly disease which is spreading all over the world like a wild fire and has consumed more than 30 lakhs lives all over the world has to be combated, controlled and decimated by taking all the precautions by which the common person is protected from it. This is definitely most concerning and cannot be any longer put on the backburner. Extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures and this is what the Chairman of UP Bar Council very rightly underscores in his applauding letter to the Acting Chief Justice of UP – Sanjay Yadav.

What's more, Rohitashwa Kumar Aggarwal who is UP Bar Council Chairman also very simply, straightforwardly and suavely submitted in his letter that:
The need of the hour in such unprecedented circumstance of the pandemic calls for consideration of interim bail/parole for the under-trial/convict, not based upon legal considerations arising out of statutory right for bail, but more in the nature of human right to safeguard the life and health of the prisoners. No person with right senses can ever question this. In such an hour of unprecedented crisis, it becomes all the more imperative to take such extraordinary steps so that the jail inmates can be saved from becoming a prey of this deadly pandemic!

Truth be told, what is most distinguishing in this letter is that while stating that the present letter is written with the concurrence of the majority of the members of the UP Bar Council, the Chairman of UP Bar Council then while striking the right chord also pointed out most commendably, cogently and convincingly that:
The Chief Justice is the guardian of fundamental rights and human rights of every citizen of the state, as such it is humbly prayed that judicial notice may be taken of the alarming situation on account of the pandemic of Covid-19 due to which the inmates/prisoners who are languishing in jail are suffering irreparably, firstly on account of spread of virus due to overcrowding of prisons and secondly, for not having access to speedy justice, apart from such prevailing conditions in jail which are not fit and proper for human life and safety due to the current scenario.

It goes without saying also that when corona spreads so rapidly even among people who gather in rallies for a very short time and what is more even if someone comes in brief contact with someone anywhere like in a shop then we must think that what must be the condition of the jail inmates who reside in overcrowded jails day and night together. The conclusion is quite ostensible. This alone explains why the need has arisen when the Chief Justice of UP must step in and take some dedicated, determined and disciplined steps in this direction so that the lives of many jail inmates can be saved also!

Quite persuasively, pragmatically, prudently, penetratingly and also most powerfully, the Chairman of UP Bar Council then very rightly and remarkably urges as a humanitarian gesture that:
It is therefore humbly prayed that appropriate orders may be passed for releasing the under-trial prisoners/convicted persons who are facing trial or convicted to the maximum punishment of seven years or less, with or without fine, on interim bail/parole, to help decongestion of jails so as to contain the virus which in its second wave has divested the humanity or such further directions/orders may be passed by the high court as expedient in the interest of justice, especially under the prevailing circumstances. This is the crying need of the hour also. Who can deny or dispute it?

While simultaneously, the letter by the UP Bar Council Chairman also further added that:
Or in the alternative the earlier directions passed by this high court in the light of the policy decision and recommendations of the state government may yet again be enforced, so as to safeguard the basic human rights, life and liberty of the inmates/prisoners who are languishing in jail across the state of Uttar Pradesh. What is wrong in doing so? Nothing wrong. It is in fact the most pressing issue which cannot be allowed to lie unattended, unattended and unredressed!

Needless to say, the Chairman of UP Bar Council – Rohitashwa Kumar Aggarwal also very rightly relied on decision taken during the last corona wave when a high powered committee was constituted by the state government led by UP Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and a policy decision was taken to release the under-trial prisoners/convicts for the offences for which prescribed punishment was up to seven years or less which led to decongestion of jails across Uttar Pradesh thereby breaking the chain of virus and saving the lives of thousands of prisoners. When this can be done last time then why not this time when the second wave is perhaps much more chillingly dangerous and life consuming? It must be done at the earliest.

To put things in perspective, according to the recently released India Justice Report 2019 (IJR), the state of prisons in India is most abysmal. We see across the country that the average occupancy is 114%. One plausible cause for this is the high number of under-trials housed in the prisons. In 2016, 67.7% of India's prison population was under-trial prisoners; higher than it was a decade ago. It cannot be discounted that Uttar Pradesh alone contributed 23% to this number with over 68,000 under-trial inmates. To give a sense of the scale, this number is nearly two and a half times more than Bihar which is another state with over 50% under-trial inmates. In fact, in a district jail of Uttar Pradesh, the occupancy was a staggering 498%. According to the data available on the website of the UP Prisons Administration and Reform Services, at least 63 of the 72 jails across Uttar Pradesh are overcrowded, one of them as much as 498% of the capacity. The data further revealed that the total capacity of the UP jails was 60,305 but around 105,111 inmates were lodged in them. Now the figure must be even more higher.

All said and done, the Chairman of UP Bar Council – Rohitashwa Kumar Aggarwal who is also an eminent and senior advocate of Meerut Bar with wide ranging experience in criminal matters also and who has also donned the prestigious post of President of Meerut Bar five times apart from leading the High Court Bench agitation for West UP as its Chairman also and has an impeccable reputation of always leading from the front has very commendably, courageously and convincingly pointed out for the exclusive benefit of under-trial prisoners seeking interim bail/parole for under-trial prisoners/convicts keeping in view the terrible havoc unleashed by the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic. There is no reason why what he has suggested so rightly, reasonably and remarkably and also most eloquently, elegantly and effectively not be given effect to most urgently. One must always remember to adhere to what the legendary former Justice of Supreme Court late VR Krishna Iyer always advocated very rightly that:
Bail is the norm and jail is the exception!

One now fervently hopes that the Acting Chief Justice of UP – Sanjay Yadav too will seriously look into the matter and take an effective, efficient and elegant decision by which the under-trial prisoners who have been sentenced for not more than seven years would be able to benefit which is undoubtedly the crying need of the hour also! It brooks no more delay any longer. The decision if taken by the acting Chief Justice of UP – Sanjay Yadav in time will help ensure that many precious lives are saved from dying. This was the real purpose also for which the letter was written.

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Rahendra Baglari v. Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate (M) writ petitioner for adjoining a Judicial Magistrate and the High Court and its Registry as Respondents to his plea against the order passed by the said Magistrate.
Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs.Uttarakhand long standing or established status quo brought about by judgments interpreting local or state laws, should not be lightly departed from.
Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur apart from High Court at Mumbai but on the contrary UP which has maximum pending cases in India
It is most shocking to see that a peaceful, one of the most developed and most prosperous state like Maharashtra has 4 high court benches at Panaji, Nagpur, Aurangabad and Kolhapur
I am neither a member nor supporter of BJP or any other political party nor a member of any of BJP's affiliated organizations like the RSS or VHP or any other organization.
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited advocates cannot throw away legal rights or enter into arrangements contrary to law. It was also made clear that any concession in law made in this regard by either counsel would not bind the parties.
Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on December 28, 2020 had expressed shock and deep concern on the arbitrary, illegal and brazen exercise of brute power by the police against lawyers, including the search conducted at the premises of an advocate representing some of the accused in the North-East Delhi riots cases.
media trial during criminal investigation interferes with administration of justice and hence amounts to contempt of court as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Jamal v. Maharashtra dismissed a plea filed by the National President of BJP Minority Morcha – Jamal Anwar Siddiqui seeking 'X' category security.
Duroply Industries Limited and anr. Vs Ma Mansa Enterprises Private Limited in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction has recalled its own order of an injunction passed in a trademark dispute as the Judge presiding over the case had appeared for one party in respect of the same trademark in the past.
At the outset, it must be stated rather disconcertingly that it is India's misfortune that UP which has the maximum population more than 23 crore as Yogi Adityanath
At the outset, it has to be stated without mincing any words that it merits no reiteration that Judges age for retirement must be now increased to 75
Rajeev Bhardwaj v. H.P while dismissing a plea seeking a declaration of a sitting Judge's dissenting view as Coram non-judice and non est in the eyes of law.
Adv KG Suresh vs UOI has declared as unconstitutional the bar on lawyers representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals constituted under the Maintenance Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Maintenance Act).
Bar Council of India ensured that there is an entrance exam now for all those lawyers who want to practice which has to be cleared before lawyers can start practicing.
It is a matter of grave concern that while our Constitution enshrines the right to equality as postulated in Article 14 but in practice what we witness is just the reverse.
When an intellectual giant like Fali Sam Nariman whom I personally rate as the world's top jurist and it is not just me but his extremely impeccable credentials are acknowledged in legal field, it is not just India but the whole world which listens to him in silence
Treasa Josfine vs Kerala that a woman who is fully qualified cannot be denied of her right to be considered for employment on the ground that she is a woman and because the nature of the employment would require her to work during night hours.
Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a Committee to suggest reforms in our criminal justice system which has been facing repeated criticism for its various drawbacks
Congress government's rule in Centre, Kapil Sibal who was Union Law Minister had written very categorically to UP Government for creating a high court bench for West UP at Meerut
completely about the truthfulness of the retracted confession and should corroborate his/her confession as it is unsafe to convict an accused person solely on the basis of the retracted confession
Thabir Sagar vs Odisha the practice of Advocate's clerks filing affidavits on behalf of parties is unacceptable. Such a practice is in gross violation of Rule 26 of the Orissa High Court Rules. It has therefore rightly directed its Registry to ensure that steps are taken forthwith to stop the practice of accepting such affidavits
COVID situation in UP, the Allahabad High Court has issued revised fresh guidelines for the functioning of all the Courts and Tribunals subordinate to it.
amended its rules to make criticism and attack of Bar Council decisions by members a misconduct and ground for disqualification or suspension or removal of membership of a member from the Bar Council.
CJI NV Ramana who was appointed as the 48th CJI on 6th April, 2021 and took oath as CJI on 24th April 2021 has very rightly expressed his concern on the social media noise and how it adversely impacts the institutions also like judiciary to a great extent which actually should not be the case.
At the crucial meeting of the Central Action Committee. of more than 20 districts of Bar Association of West UP held at Aligarh
Why UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population more than 24 crore which is more than even Pakistan
When finances are needed for the purpose of improving the judicial system at the lower levels, there is reluctance to make such finances available.
rarely ever booked and made to face the consequences which only serves to further encourage men in uniform to take it for granted to indulge in worst custodial torture
Tarun Saxena vs Union of India as ultra vires Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 which bars lawyers from representing parties in matters before the Maintenance Tribunals
Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on morning of July 28 near the Magistrate colony of Dhanbad that was close to the Judge's residence.
Suman Chadha & Anr. vs. Central Bank of India in that the wilful breach of the undertaking given to the Court can amount to Contempt under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Rajasthan High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts 2020 which shall be applicable to the proceeding of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan and all the Subordinate Courts of the Rajasthan with immediate effect.
Arun Singh Chauhan v/s MP deprecate the conduct of a practicing advocate who chose not to answer the repeated queries of the Court pertaining to the maintainability of his petition seeking issuance of a writ of quo warranto and regarding the non-impleadment of a necessary party
Dr.Mukut Nath Verma vs UoI Allahabad High Court imposed Rs 5 lakh costs on an advocate Dr Mukut Nath Verma after concluding that he unauthorisedly filed a writ petition on behalf of suspended and absconding IPS officer Mani Lal Patidar and also levelled serious allegations against state authorities and thereby misleading the Court.
Anil JS vs Kerala that instances of allegations about the police disrespecting the citizens were arriving at its doors with alarming regularity and therefore issued certain general directions in its judgment.
If there is one Judge on whom I have blind faith for his exemplary conduct throughout his brilliant career and who can never favour wrongly even his own son
Indianisation of our legal system is the need of the hour and it is crucial to make the justice delivery system more accessible and effective.
the gang war of different gangs have now reached right up to the court premises itself which are supposed to be the holiest shrines for getting justice.
It is not just for enjoying life or going for some holiday trip that lawyers of West UP repeatedly keep going on strike since last many decades.
CM Yogi Adityanath UP has progressed by leaps and bounds which one certainly cannot deny but why is it that it has just one High Court Bench only and that too just approximately 200 km away at the city famously called Nawab City
Just changing name of Allahabad to Prayagraj won't change the ground reality. It is a proven fact that High Court is still called Allahabad High Court and not Prayagraj High Court.
It is most shocking that all the Chief Justices of India from 1947 till 2000 were never shocked nor were any world famous jurist like Nani Ardeshir Palkhiwala, Ram Jethmalani, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan among many others
Raggu Baniya @ Raghwendra vs UP has directed the Uttar Pradesh Government to instruct the District Magistrates of all the districts to re-evaluate the cases for remission after 14 years of incarceration even if appeals in such cases are pending in the High Court.
Union Minister of State for Law and Justice – SP Singh Baghel who is also an MP from Agra again in Western UP and who just recently took over has made it clear that his ministry was open to the setting up of a Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Western UP.
Anil Kumar and Anr. Vs Amit that the practice of advocates acting as power of attorney holders of their clients and also as advocates in the matter, is contrary to the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.
Shashank Singh vs/ Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that under Article 233 of the Constitution of India, a Judicial Officer regardless of his or her previous experience, as an Advocate, cannot apply and compete for appointment to any vacancy in the post of District Judge.
It must be stated at the very outset that it is quite bewildering and baffling to see that the state of UP which Ban ki moon who is the former UN Secretary General had slammed as the rape and crime capital of India
most powerfully raised vocally the legitimate demand for a High Court Bench in West UP which is the crying need of the hour also.
Top