Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Friday, November 1, 2024

Himachal Pradesh High Court Issues Directions For Government To Tackle Covid-19

Posted in: Civil Laws
Sun, Dec 6, 20, 11:06, 4 Years ago
star star star star star
5 out of 5 with 1 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 4009
Inderjit Singh vs H.P. has sharply taken to task even the people themselves and has explicitly held that public at large has also been callous, negligent and irresponsible. So the public have to blame themselves also for the spread of this Covid-19 pandemic.

It is quite remarkable and most heartening to note that the Himachal Pradesh High Court has just recently on December 3 in a recent and significant judgment titled Court On Its Own Motion vs. State of H.P. & Ors. in CWPIL No. 11 of 2020 along with Inderjit Singh vs State of H.P. & Ors. in CWP No. 2687 of 2020 has sharply taken to task even the people themselves and has explicitly held that public at large has also been callous, negligent and irresponsible. So the public have to blame themselves also for the spread of this Covid-19 pandemic. There can be no escaping from this stark and unpalatable truth.

To start with, Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan who authored this extremely laudable, learned and landmark judgment for himself and Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua sets the ball rolling by first and foremost observing in para 1 in simple and straight language that, A stitch in time saves nine if at all the respondent-State had kept this phrase in mind, the State would not have been facing so many new cases of COVID-19 and consequential deaths arising therefrom.

Having said this, the Bench then does not refrain itself from further also rapping the people on their knuckles and then holds in para 2 that, However, it is not the Government which is solely responsible for the rise in COVID-19 cases. We may note with regret that the public at large has also exhibited behaviour which is nothing short of being callous, negligent and irresponsible.

While setting the background, the Bench then observes in para 3 that:
It was in May, 2020, that a Public Interest Litigation being CWP No. 1440 of 2020 titled Sushma Kuthiala vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others came to be filed before this Court assailing therein the office order dated 04.05.2020, whereby the Deen Dayal Upadhayaya Hospital (for short 'DDU Hospital'), Shimla was declared as a Dedicated COVID Health Centre and Dedicated COVID Hospital.

To put things in perspective, the Bench then states in para 4 that:
This petition was though dismissed vide order dated 14.05.2020, but there was a pertinent observation made in para16, which reads as under:

16. It appears that the DDU Hospital has been notified as Dedicated Hospital on the basis of opinion of the experts in the field. This hospital has been Dedicated as COVID Hospital on the basis of facilities available and also it was notified on the basis of inflow of patients and facilities available, namely, the ventilators, ICUs etc.

The existing facilities have been notified for the purpose of Dedicated Hospital whereas in case of Indus Hospital, such facilities are not available there and it requires sufficient time for creating such facilities. While notifying the DDU Hospital as Dedicated Hospital it is the State who has to do it since it has acted as such by issuance of notification declaring the DDU Hospital as Dedicated COVID Hospital on the basis of various factors. According to the learned Senior Additional Advocate General, for making Indus Hospital as Dedicated COVID Health Hospital, it requires a considerable long time and it would not be possible to wait for that time due to fast spreading of this infectious disease.

While continuing forward, the Bench then adds in para 5 that:
It was on the very next day i.e. 15.05.2020, that a meeting was held wherein deliberations with regard to the gap analysis of equipments in DDU Hospital, but unfortunately no further steps in this regard were taken promptly.

Most significantly, the Bench then observes while issuing landmark directions in para 20 that:
After due deliberations, we feel that the following directions for the time being are absolutely necessary to tackle the steep surge in COVID-19 cases:

  1. The State shall ensure that senior doctors in all the notified COVID hospitals visit the ward on regular basis in accordance with the instructions issued by the Government.
     
  2. The State is directed to consider the feasibility of having liquid oxygen tankers stationed at all the notified COVID hospitals.
     
  3. Respondents to ensure that the manpower hired temporarily on outsource basis through authorised service providers be appointed as expeditiously as possible and in no event later than 5th December, 2020. iv. The State is directed to ramp up the testing by adopting the approved measures by associating private Labs or their technicians, or both.
     
  4. It shall be mandatory for the sample collecting authority to obtain contact number, e-mail id, if any, apart from other details like age, address etc. at the time of taking samples, so that the result of the test can be communicated on e-mail, whatsapp etc. Such report be supplied in a time bound manner and in no event beyond 48 hours, bearing in mind the necessary protocols.
     
  5. Wide publicity be given in the news, print and social media regarding testing that are to be conducted in walk-in kiosk in all the towns like Shimla, Mandi, Dharamshala, Kullu, Solan, Una, Hamirpur, Bilaspur etc. for the collection of samples during the pre-fixed time everyday. vii. A dedicated helpline in all the COVID Hospitals be notified so that the family members, near and dear ones of the COVID patients can get in touch with such patients to know about his/her well being etc.
     
  6. Such patients, who are willing to afford, be permitted to have trained nursing attendant at their own costs as this would be a long way to reduce the burden on the hospital staff.
  7. It be ensured that wrapping up of the dead body(ies) of those COVID patients, who unfortunately succumb to the disease, under no circumstances is/are carried out/done in the Ward and the body is removed immediately from the Ward.
     
  8. It be ensured that the toilets are kept in clean and hygienic condition round a clock and a dedicated helpline be provided to the patients, in case, they have any complaint regarding not only the toilets but other facilities.
     
  9. Provisions for hot water and steamer(s) be made by providing those in adequate quantities alongwith electricity extension boxes.
     
  10. The State may also consider making COVID test mandatory for the people entering the State from the outside.
     
  11. The rules regarding the wearing of mask, social distancing and quarantine be strictly enforced by associating not only the local police but also by engaging the employees of the Municipal Corporation, Home Department and local volunteers.
     
  12. It be ensured that no person or family is ostracised by the Society only because the family is COVID positive. xv. No social or public gathering shall be permitted henceforth without the prior approval of the Magistrate with intimation to the local police station who shall then be duty bound to ensure that such gathering does not exceed the prescribed limit. In addition thereto, it shall also be the duty and responsibility of the office bearers of the Panchayati Raj Institutions and local urban bodies, as the case may be, to ensure that the protocols and procedures including wearing of mask, social distancing, home isolation, public gathering etc. are strictly adhered to.
     
  13. It be ensured that every person, more particularly, who are engaged in delivery of essential services observe SoPs strictly and their test be conducted on priority basis. xvii. The State would consider providing additional incentives to those deployed in COVID-19 duties including the outsourced workers, more particularly, Class-III and IV, who are working in the COVID wards.
     
  14. The patients undergoing treatment at home will be contacted by dedicated medical personnel at least twice a day over his/her telephone so as to monitor the treatment at home.
     
  15. The State will ensure that the medicine kits being provided to patients undergoing treatment at home are of good and standard quality so as to remove any kind of doubt regarding its efficacy.
     
  16. The State would also consider having flexi or staggered office time from 9:30 a.m. for the first shift and 10:00 a.m. for the second shift which shall finish at 4:30 p.m. and 5:00 p.m., respectively This will help in reducing over-crowding in buses.
     
  17. The general public be educated about COVID19 by hoardings, messages through Radio, T.V., booklets etc. by convincing them that it is a collective fight by the society and no one should violate the regulations, procedures and protocols. The people should also be educated about the infection of the Corona, its prevention and treatment.
     
  18. Similar exercise shall be taken by all the Secretaries, State Legal Services Authority at their own level and through the PLV's etc.
     
  19. The Director General of Police is directed to depute extra police personnel(s) from the battalion and other places so as to ensure that no one unnecessarily leaves or enter the containment zones.
     
  20.  All those involved in COVID duties irrespective of their rank and files, are restrained from going on strike/dharna and, in case, any one of them have any difficulty, then they are at liberty to approach this Court individually or through the learned Amicus Curiae for redressal thereof, but under no circumstances they would resort to arm twisting by resorting to strike or dharna. In case, any one of them resort(s) to such mis-adventure, then in addition to any other action, which respondents-State may take including blacklisting the firm(s), terminating the services of such employees, he/they shall be liable to be prosecuted and punished for contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, for deliberately disobeying the directions of the Court.
     
  21. Ambulances, six in number, which are fitted with ventilator(s) and other equipments and are stated to be idle, shall be put to use forthwith.
     
  22. Adequate provisions be made for diet, rest etc. for those who have been deputed in connection with COVID-19 duties and if found necessary, assistance of NGOs, Charitable Institutions may be taken.


Finally, it is then held in the last para 21 that, Status report and point wise response to the suggestions given by the learned Amicus Curiae, as found mentioned in order dated 13.11.2020 alongwith latest status of the make-shift hospitals be filed by the Secretary (Health) in the open Court on the next date of hearing. List on 10.12.2020.

To sum up: It goes without saying that the people must now wake up and pay heed to what the court has said and stop being callous, negligent and irresponsible as advised by the Himachal Pradesh High Court. The State Government must also not just pay heed to what the Shimla High Court has advised but also implement the various directions issued by it to tackle Covid-19 pandemic which we have already discussed above and which form the cornerstone of this notable judgment. It must be reiterated that only then can this dangerous pandemic be seriously controlled and thus people be saved from falling a prey to its deadly impact also!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top