Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Monday, November 4, 2024

Lord Ram Always Stood For Justice And Fairness In His Life

Posted in: Judgment Reviews
Thu, Aug 6, 20, 17:22, 4 Years ago
star star star star star
5 out of 5 with 1 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 5474
Lord Ram did not fight shy to even sacrifice his life for the cause of justice and for satisfying what his people thought was right! Lord Ram always wanted that justice must be available to the poorest of the poor! He was not happy to see even a single person being unhappy in his kingdom

Lord Ram did not fight shy to even sacrifice his life for the cause of justice and for satisfying what his people thought was right! Lord Ram always wanted that justice must be available to the poorest of the poor! He was not happy to see even a single person being unhappy in his kingdom!

But see what is happening in UP since independence in 1947 till 2020? UP has just one high court bench at Lucknow located just 200 km away from Allahabad where high court itself is located leaving West UP which is more than 700 to 800 km away from Allahabad where high court is located as also Bundelkhand and Purvanchal high and dry with only Eastern UP enjoying the facility of having both high court and a single bench! Is this is what Lord Ram ever wanted? You answer! Why can't a high court bench be created at Ayodhya from whom people of all religions can benefit equally without any discrimination whatsoever?

It is a national tragedy that the lawyers of West UP have been on strike uninterruptedly every Saturday since May 1981 till now which means for more than 39 years against denying West UP even a single bench of high court still no action! It is a national tragedy that lawyers of West UP have even gone on strike for 6 months as was seen in 2001 from July to December, for 3 to 4 months as we saw in 2014-2015 and apart from this many times on other occasions too still no bench! It is a national tragedy that the more than 9 crore people of West UP have to perforce travel more than 700 km on an average all the way to Allahabad to get justice as the elected representatives have only made tall promises but never cared to implement it!

It is a national tragedy that at a time when the whole nation is rejoicing over the bhumi poojan of Shri Ram temple in Ayodhya, the lawyers of 26 districts of West UP once again are on strike on August 4, 2020 in protest against the gruesome, dastardly and ghastly murder of a fellow lawyer named Dharmendra Chaudhary from Bulandshahr in West UP just recently! This eminent and senior lawyer named Dharmendra Chaudhary had been missing for the past eight days and ultimately his decomposed body was recovered from a marble godown in Khurja area on night of July 31, 2020! In last few years West UP in particular along with UP have witnessed many murders of lawyers and this explains why even UP Bar Council too had earlier called for boycott of work!

It is a national disgrace that UP which has maximum pending cases in India among all the states which is more than 10 states put together has just one high court bench and that too just 200 km away from Allahabad where high court itself is located at Lucknow and nowhere else! It is a national disgrace that UP which is among the largest States, has maximum population – more than 23 crore, maximum districts - 75, maximum constituencies, maximum MPs – 80, maximum MLAs - 404, maximum PM including Narendra Modi who represents Varanasi as an MP, maximum pending cases – more than 10 lakh and here too West UP accounts for more than half of pending cases as noted by Justice Jaswant Commission about 57%, maximum Judges both in High Court – 160 and also in lower courts, maximum vacancies of Judges, maximum members in UP Bar Council and which is the largest Bar Council in the world yet the former Chairman of UP Bar Council – Darvesh Yadav who was first woman to get appointed to this post was murdered right in court premises in Agra again in West UP, maximum poverty, maximum villages more than one lakh, maximum fake encounters killings, maximum custody killings, maximum dowry cases, maximum bride burning cases, maximum cases of human rights violations, maximum robberies, maximum dacoities, maximum undertrials, maximum cases of crime, loot, arson and riots and here too West UP tops with Saharanpur riots, Meerut riots, Muzaffarnagar riots tarnishing our international reputation to the extent that former UN Secretary General Ban ki Moon termed UP as crime and rape capital of India and what not yet Centre till now from 1948 when a bench was created in Lucknow which is so close to Allahabad is not prepared to create even a single bench for not just West UP but for entire UP! It is a national disgrace that UP sends maximum MPs to Lok Sabha – 80, maximum MPs to Rajya Sabha – 30, maximum MLAs to State Assembly – 404 MLAs and maximum members to State Legislative Council – 100 MLAs and what not yet has least benches just one! It is a national disgrace that Centre along with political leaders from many parties are pompously celebrating the bhumi poojan of Lord Ram temple in Ayodhya knowing fully well that Lord Ram always stood for justice yet believe firmly that Nehruji's conviction for just one bench for whole of UP must be followed always as the best tribute to him!

It is a national disgrace that the High Courts and Benches of 8 states are nearer to West UP as compared to Allahabad High Court and even Lahore High Court in Pakistan is nearer to West UP than Allahabad? How long will Centre ignore that Allahabad High Court is the biggest court in whole of Asia with maximum Judges and also among the oldest courts which completed its 150 years on March 17, 2016 yet has just one bench only? How long will Nehruji's name be invoked to oppose the creation of a bench in West UP or in any hook and corner of UP except at Lucknow which Nehruji himself created in 1948! If Lucknow is capital then so is Bhopal of Madhya Pradesh, Raipur of Chhattisgarh, Dehradun of Uttarakhand, Trivandrum of Kerala, Dispur of Assam, Bhubaneshwar of Orissa etc then why all these capitals have been denied a high court or even a bench?

It is a national tragedy that as Opposition leader former PM late Atal Bihari Vajpayee had vociferously demanded the creation of a high court bench in West UP in 1986 but when he became PM in 1999 till 2003, he too decided to honour Nehruji's word of not allowing a single bench anywhere except Lucknow! It is a national tragedy that as PM Dr Manmohan Singh decided to create 2 more benches for just 4 and 8 districts of Karnataka at Dharwad and Gulbarga and where the population of entire state is just 6 crore and which already had a bench at Hubli and where pending cases are just about 1 lakh but not a single for UP where pending cases are more than 10 lakhs and West UP alone has more than 5 lakhs and population at 9 crore which is more than Karnataka and here again Nehru's words were given effect of not allowing a single bench anywhere in UP except Lucknow even though Dr Manmohan had repeatedly assured the delegation of lawyers from West UP of allowing a bench to be created here!

It is a national tragedy that things did not change even under incumbent PM Narendra Modi also and he too decided to follow what Pandit Nehruji always wanted and decided to create one more bench of high court at Kolhapur for just 6 districts taking the tally of benches in Maharashtra to 4 but not a single bench for West UP! No wonder, Maharashtra tops in the state index list for speedy justice and UP figures in the bottom!

It is a national tragedy that criminals are ruling the roost and making the headlines in UP. No wonder, the former UN Secretary General had termed UP as rape and crime capital of India! The latest incident pertains to kidnapping cum murder of a 28 year-old technician named Sanjeet Yadav who worked in a private lab. What is worse is that criminals even took 30 lakh rupees from the deceased Sanjeet Yadav's family as the family allege after cops told them to do so and still they murdered him most mercilessly! Prior to this we saw how a journalist Vikram Joshi was brutally killed right in front of his two daughters in Ghaziabad's Vijay Nagar again in West UP! In Meerut again in West UP, a mother and a daughter are brutally killed! The list of such criminal acts are endless! It is a national tragedy that there is no fear of law in West UP among criminals still there is not a single high court bench here!

It cannot be denied that Yogi Adityanath had raised the demand for a high court bench for Gorakhpur in 1998 right inside Parliament but even now as he completes more than three years as CM of UP, he is unable to create even a single bench even in Gorakhpur leave alone West UP! For just 3 lakh population of Andaman and Nicobar islands a high court bench is approved at Port Blair and similarly for small states like Sikkim with just 6 lakh population and less than 100 cases pending, high court itself is approved but no action for West UP! Manipur, Meghalaya and Tripura had population of less than 30 lakh yet high court created but not a single bench is being approved for more than 9 crore people living in West UP!

The population of West UP is more than all the states except Maharashtra, Bihar and UP of which it itself forms a part and here too areawise West UP is bigger than Bihar yet has no bench leave alone high court! Why inspite of bandh call given by lawyers and traders all over West UP time and again due to which heavy loss is incurred running into crores and crores of rupees but still Centre miserably failed to take any action in addressing this humongous problem once and for all by creating a single bench anywhere where it wants? Why Satyapal Singh who is BJP MP from Baghpat and former Union Minister and former Mumbai Police Commissioner very strongly demanded right inside Parliament the creation of 5 high court benches at Meerut, Agra, Gorakhpur, Jhansi and Varanasi but Centre is not prepared to set up even a single bench in any part of UP even as it completes 3 years and is about to complete 4 years in office? Many other MPs from West UP have raised the same old demand many times but Centre is in just no mood to relent! Why?

Why when former CJI Ranjan Gogoi while deciding on a PIL brought by a woman lawyer KL Chitra for a high court bench in West UP fully appreciated the reasons for setting up a high court bench in West UP but added that it is for Centre to take a decision and yet even after 74 years of independence if Centre fails to act not just for West UP but for whole of UP should Supreme Court not take suo motu action and order for more benches not just in West UP but also in different parts like Jhansi in Bundelkhand, Gorakhpur in Purvanchal and other needy places? Why Supreme Court never acts on this? It must act now most decisively as this serious issue directly concerns the judiciary!

Why Bar Council of India never speaks a word on this? Why all political parties have never acted to create more benches in UP when they can act to create benches in other much smaller states and where pending cases are much lower as compared to UP? If people have to wait for decades to get justice then will Lord Ram temple in Ayodhya serve its true purpose? How can Ram Rajya be brought in UP without creating more benches? Just offering Swaha, Swaha on occasion of some special puja won't help ameliorate the law and order situation in UP! Prompt action is needed now on creating more benches in UP! There should be no more dilly-dallying now any more on this burning issue!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Arun Kumar Bhadoria v State, Improve Working Conditions For Police And Ensure Minimum Three Promotions For All Cops
Senior Citizen Welfare Organization & Another v State of Uttarakhand & Another in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 52 of 2013 with far reaching consequences, the Uttarakhand High Court on June 12, 2018 has issued a slew of directions for welfare and protection of rights of senior citizens in the state.
in Arun Kumar v State of Uttarakhand and other [Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2112 of 2011] dated July 6, 2018 issued a slew of landmark directions to ensure that road safety is enhanced to the best possible extent.
It is a matter of deepest regret that both the Congress and the BJP which have ruled India from 1947 to 2018 fully and firmly support the unrestricted, unaccounted and undisclosed political donations to political parties from foreign countries.
Delhi High Court in Jasmeen Kaur v Union of India and others in W.P.(C) 7040/2018 while holding merit over technical grounds has opened up a closed opportunity for an aspiring medico to register for the second round of counselling for deemed universities after the due date. How can merit be defeated on technical ground?
What will the lawyers of West UP do on August 4? Strike like they do every Saturday since May 1981.
The State of Rajasthan v Mohan Lal, Minced no words in sending out a clear and categorical message to all courts below that courts must see that the public doesn’t lose confidence in the judicial system.
Alim v State of Uttarakhand, The Uttarakhand High Court issued a slew of directions for the welfare of cows and other stray cattle in the state.
Chhitij Kishore Sharma v Mr Justice Lok Pal Singh while holding that contempt proceedings cannot be initiated against a Judge of Court of Record, on allegations of committing a contempt of his own Court has dismissed as not maintainable.
ection 377 of the IPC has been decriminalised partially by a Five Judge Constitution Bench of Supreme Court for sex between consenting adults on a batch of petitions filed.
In Mohammed Imran v Maharashtra has directed the state authorities to reconsider the candidature of a successful aspirant for judicial service, whose selection for appointment was cancelled on the ground of 'Moral Turpitude' and even high court had turned down his plea against cancellation.
many other UP Chief Ministers like ND Tiwari, Rajnath Singh and others too suported the demand for a high court bench in West UP but Centre never cooperated
Swapnil Tripathi v Supreme Court of India has clearly and convincingly held that the Court proceedings shall be live-streamed in the larger public interest.
dismissed the plea by Associated Journals Ltd (AJL), who are the publisher of National Herald newspaper and who challenged the Centre's order to vacate the premises
Adultery is the symptom of broken marriage and not the reason of broken marriage.
Anil Kumar v UOI that no authority can claim a privilege not to comply with its judgment.
Madras High Court has been very categorical in drawing a red line for itself on which it just cannot tread upon! Each and every Court in India must always bear this in mind while ruling in such sensitive and emotional cases
ICJ has held upfront that Pakistan violated the Vienna Convention in the Kulbhushan Jadhav case and it should review and reconsider his conviction and sentencing while allowing India consular access to the Indian national.
AS Marimuthu Vs The Ministry of Telecommunications slammed BSNL for virtually grabbing the property belonging to one AS Marimuthu without any compunction by paying a paltry sum of just Rupee one.
critical and comprehensive analysis of the case kapore chand vs. kadar unnisa begum
Pankaj Bansal v. State (Govt of NCT Delhi) that was pronounced as recently as on June 9, 2023 has decisively ruled that the discretion of an applicant
Top