Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, November 21, 2024

Enact Law To Stop Blocking of Roads Under Any Circumstances

Posted in: Civil Laws
Tue, Feb 4, 20, 20:54, 5 Years ago
star star star star star
5 out of 5 with 1 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 15307
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.

No matter how sacred the cause may be, there can be no justification for blocking roads under any circumstances. To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others. It is high time and now a law needs to be enacted which would make it obligatory that under no circumstances can anyone be allowed to block roads or block any rail route or any route which would cause maximum inconvenience to others.

What has happened in Shaheen Bagh is most disgraceful and cannot be justified under any circumstances. Since last more than 50 days the route connecting Delhi and Noida has been blocked by protesters from Shaheen Bagh who are seeking the removal of Citizenship Amendment Act as they feel that it is discriminatory and are determined that this would not be allowed under any circumstances. Why has Centre allowed this to happen at the first place?

Why PM Narendra Modi along with UP CM Yogi Adityanath are busy launching scathing attacks on the Opposition for planning the blockade of Shaheen Bagh but are themselves doing nothing to clear the blockade? One can understand that Yogi is the CM of UP and not of Delhi but Narendra Modi is the PM of India and when he is seeing that Delhi government is doing nothing to clear the blockade then why is he himself not doing anything to clear it at all? Blockade of roads, national highways, rail routes etc cannot be justified under any circumstances.

What trend has PM Modi set by not doing anything on this till now? Why will others also not follow the same route as we see in Shaheen Bagh?
Will it not lead our country on the surest path to anarchy?

Should we be proud of it?
Should we clap when PM Modi says in election rallies that the real faces of many are getting exposed but himself doing nothing to clear the road?
Why has Centre not acted at all since last more than 50 days?

Why even our Courts keep watching all this like a mute spectator?
Why Courts and especially our Supreme Court which is the highest court of the land not ready to direct the clearing of road forthwith as it is the common man who suffers the maximum inconvenience due to such blockades?
Why don't the long term interests of the people at large placed on the highest priority even by Centre who is watching everything and making it a part of mud-slinging exercise with Opposition party leaders?

To hell with CAA and NRC if Centre is determined to allow anti-India slogans right in our national capital itself. To hell with CAA and NRC if Centre fails to enact a law whereby those who chant anti-India slogans are just booked for sedition and not expelled from India permanently and their citizenship rights are not promptly terminated. To hell with CAA and NRC if Centre allows  rogues and scoundrels  to occupy roads and public places as we are now seeing in Shaheen Bagh just to safeguard their own political interests and be fully satisfied by just indulging in futile  blame game exercise  as we are seeing this happen right in front of our eyes.

To hell with CAA and NRC if those who are illegal immigrants are expelled from India even though they love India to the fullest but those Indians who have all valid documents proving Indian citizenship are given unlimited freedom to abuse India openly and vandalise public property. To hell with CAA and NRC if Centre feels proud to allow few bunch of people who are citizens of India by birth to openly occupy public roads and public places as we are now seeing in Shaheen Bagh and take no action against them and be happy with just criticizing Opposition parties and apportioning all blame on them alone. To hell with CAA and NRC if Centre justifies this in the name of  right to dissent  and takes no action to evict them from illegally occupying public roads.

My anger against PM Narendra Damodardas Modi was brimming fully when he decided to invite Pakistani ISI agents to inspect Pathankot and went uninvited to Pakistan. My anger swelled when he further stupidly and shamelessly declared  Ramzan ka ceasefire  which I consider as the biggest insult of Muslims as this directly places terrorists and Muslims on same footing which can never be justified under any circumstances over which majority of Muslims maintain a conspicuous silence and which Pakistani Army and terrorists exploited to send Border Action Team (BAT) across the border to India so that they could behead Indian soldiers with sharp weapons and then take their heads to Pakistan to play with them like football. When Centre says that terrorists have no religion then why the hell this  Ramzan ka ceasefire ?

As if this was not enough , PM Modi has now given full unfettered freedom to traitors and  tukde tukde gang  to chant anti-India slogans right in the heart of India and in the capital of India with full freedom. Should I salute PM Modi for this like I did when surgical strikes were carried out in 2016 and air strikes were carried out to avenge Pulwama terror attack in which we lost more than 40 of our brave soldiers? Certainly not.

How can I appreciate PM Modi if he behaves so cowardly?
Why police force was used against our brave ex-servicemen in removing them violently when they were protesting peacefully demanding  One Rank One Pension  in totality but now why he has no guts to act against those who are not only blocking roads to cause maximum inconvenience to public but also chanting anti-India slogans and stopping media from entering there and placing women and children ahead so that no action is taken? Why different laws for ex servicemen and for those residing in Shaheen Bagh? This is certainly most befuddling.

Why cheap politics is being played on this? Why are forces not ensuring that no person is allowed to block roads and public places as they like as per their own whims and fancies? Why Centre is not giving a free hand to forces so that illegal usurpation of roads and public places is removed at the earliest? Why Centre is allowing this national insult?

Why all parties in India very strongly believe that under no circumstances should citizenship be terminated of those Indians who behave like soldiers of Pakistan and vow to fulfil their agenda by burning Indian flags, abusing our Constitution and chanting slogans of  Azadi  and  Bharat tere tukde-tukde karenge hum? Why it took many decades to end 'Most Favoured Nation' to Pakistan which India most stupidly and most shamelessly conferred on it unilaterally in 1990s? Why we don't follow Justice Markandey Katju who says that,  Pakistan and Bangladesh are fake countries and till 1947 integral part of India and when father Jawaharlal Nehru created one fake country called Pakistan then daughter Indira Gandhi stepped ahead and created another fake country called Bangladesh? But I am sure that in next few decades they both will be merged with India.  Now PM Modi has created Shaheen Bagh by taking no action and God knows what will be created in the coming days and what will happen if this is replicated by anti-Indian agents all across the country?

What a complete mockery is being made of India. How can lawless people be allowed to hold the traffic of our country to ransom for more than 50 days?
Why no action has been taken by Centre on this for such a long time till now?

When CAA does not take the citizenship of any Indian then why so much of brouhaha over it?
Why can't more tolerance be demonstrated on it?
Who is behind all this also needs to be investigated now.

Why vote bank politics is being played and why our national interests are being gravely compromised on this?
Why no political party is ready to make sure that public roads are never occupied under any circumstances by anyone on any ground whatsoever?
Where is our nation heading for?

Why mobocracy is ruling in Shaheen Bagh and not rule of law? Why Centre is most astonishingly not doing anything on this and is happy by just blaming everything on Delhi Government where it is the Lieutenant Governor who calls the shot and who too dismally fails in doing anything decisive on it? Why even Supreme Court has failed to act decisively on this by suo motu taking cognizance and calling for immediately lifting the siege of roads and public places in Shaheen Bagh?

What precedent is being set? Will this not encourage others also to do similarly? Why is Pakistan being allowed to set India's agenda through its proxies in India?

I can never support this under any circumstances no matter who does it. Even if Jats to which community I belong block roads and highways I will never support it under any circumstances. If Jats boycott me or even expel me for not supporting them then so be it but I can never be a party to anything which hurts our national interests under any circumstances. This can never be good in protecting the long term national interests of our country which are paramount and stands above everything else including me.

By any reckoning, Centre has certainly not covered itself with glory by not doing anything to ensure that the common man does not suffer because of a few lumpen people in Shaheen Bagh. This is no way to protest that you block roads for more than 50 days. Should we be very proud and excited about it?

No doubt, Centre has demonstrated quite explicitly that it is just interested only in expelling illegal immigrants even if they profess loyalty to nation as they don't have valid documents but those Indians who have all documents are free to chant anti-India slogans and chalk out plans to divide India as long as they feel like as we are seeing right now over which there is a huge national outrage as anti national slogans are unacceptable under any circumstances and even eminent legal luminary and senior Apex Court lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi voiced his utmost concern on the repeated chanting of anti-national slogans and this is certainly not a good news for Centre led by PM Narendra Modi himself who is not doing anything to end this impasse. Centre is watching shamelessly in silence on what is happening in Shaheen Bagh and yet doing absolutely nothing to stop it. Most disgusting.

On a departing note, it must be said unequivocally that Centre is to be squarely blamed for allowing things to turn for the worse in Shaheen Bagh. Protest is a fundamental right of every Indian but this cannot include right to abuse India and vowing to break India to pieces and blocking roads, rail routes etc. Strictest action must be taken promptly against anyone who blocks roads, rail routes and if a law is needed to do this, it must be done right now but we see nothing happening in Shaheen Bagh even as more than 50 days have passed. This is the real tragedy.

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi, A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera, Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top