Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, November 21, 2024

Media On Social Penetration

Posted in: Media laws
Mon, Nov 11, 19, 10:44, 5 Years ago
star star star star star
5 out of 5 with 1 ratings
comments: 8 - hits: 6230
Media On Social Penetration

Media on Social Penetration
Since the invention of the Internet Communication and information technology, including the social media is growing very fast. This has resulted in social penetration, including self-disclosure in interpersonal communication. Social penetration theory explores various facts about development of interpersonal relationships. It was propounded by psychologists Altman and Taylor in 1973. The social penetration theory stated that relationship become more intimate over time when partners disclose more and more information about themselves.

The social media plays a vital role in the process of the self-disclosure. Facebook, WhatsApp, twitter, snapchat, blogging, duo, imo, etc. avowed social networking object of the social media is related to self-revelation. The self-revelation is a more powerful disclosure of personal information to another person. Disclosure may include sharing both high-risk and low-risk information as well as personal experiences, ideas, attitudes, feelings, values, past facts and life stories and even future hopes, dreams, ambitions and goals.

Altman and Taylor believe that opening inner self to other is the main route to reach to intimate relationship. It is sometimes called the “onion theory” of personality which is like a multi-layer onion with public self on the outer layer and private self at the core. There are a number of interpretations of this model but the simplest one consists of six-key layers. These are 1) Biographical data (Age, gender, name) 2) Preference on clothes, food and music 3) Goals, aspirations 4) Religious convictions 5) Deeply held fears and fantasies 6) Concept of self. As time passes and intimacy grows the layers of one’s personality begin to unfold to reveal the core of the person.

The development of relation is not automatic, but different stages represent it:

  1. Orientation stage (basic facts about oneself)
  2. Exploratory affective stage (favourite foods, movies, books etc.)
  3. Affective exchange (Trip, plans, family news) and
  4. Stable exchange stage (personal feeling and intimate details)

Are important in social penetration. These are the main stages for development of relationship in proper self-disclosure. It can be assessed by an analysis of cost and rewords which can be further explained by social exchange theory.

We look at the many benefits of self disclosure which has been improving your life. There is availability of information, context of sharing, self-clarification, self-validation, reciprocity, impression formation, relationship maintenance, enhancement and moral obligation. But, there are many ways that self disclosure can disturb your life e.g. rejection, negative impression, decrease in relational satisfaction, loss of influence, loss of control etc.

Now a day social penetration and self disclosure produces various offences which affect the personality of individuals.

Can be point out as:

  1. Harassment via e-mail. [Section-66A of the IT (Amendment) Act, 2008].
  2. Cyber-stalking [Section-354D of the IPC]
  3. Dissemination of obscene Material [Section-67 of the IT act, Section-292 of the IPC].

    Defamation [Section-499 of the IPC Act].
  4. Hacking [Section-66 of the IT Act].
  5. Cheating and fraud [Section-416 of the IPC, Section-66D of the IT].
  6. Child pornography [Section-67, 67A , 67B of the IT Act].
  7. Violation of privacy [Section-66E of the IT Act].

Media plays a crucial role on it. Awareness campaigns, extra caution and vigilance are the best line of defense against malicious activity of social penetration in social media.

These topic shows that the media has made it possible to bring the private life of an individual into the public domain. Exposing him to the risk of an invasion of his space and privacy, and the social media changes the way we communicate and build interpersonal relationship. The social penetration and self-disclosure process become easier and faster with the media.

Written By: Riya Das. Advocate of Chinsurah Judges Court, Hooghly. (West Bengal)

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
RiyaDas.
Member since Jun 3, 2019
Location: West Bengal
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
This paper is written by "Kajal Kukreja"who is a final year Law student of New Law College, Pune.
free press which has the power to hold Government, public authorities and other parts of the State - in other words, those who exercise power over citizens - to account it is the watchdog of the public interest, a guardian against corruption, incompetence, waste, hypocrisy and greed. lt is, to coin a phrase, the arsenal of democracy
Close connection between media and law
Arnab Ranjan Goswami v/s Maharashtra Chief Editor of Republic TV by staying the two FIRs filed by Mumbai police against him under Sections 153, 153A, 153B, 295A, 500, 504, 505(2), 506, 120B and 117 of the IPC over alleged communication of the incidents of Palghar lynching.
All India Idara-E-Tahafuz-E-Hussainiyat v/s Maharashtra order allowed only five persons with a videographer to carry Tazia, replica of the tomb of Husain who was the martyred grandson of Prophet Muhammad in processions during Muharram
The police forcibly shut off news cameras before barging into the residence of Mr Goswami and attacking and thrashing a reputed national TV news journalist. The police even went to levels of misbehaving with Mr Goswami's elderly parents, in-laws and assaulting his son.
Philip Mathew vs. Kerala the press has the right to publish a news item with its necessary comments and views. Such right cannot be defeated unless malafides writ large on its face and not concerning with a matter of public interest or public good.
Mr Ravindra vs Maharashtra allegations levelled against a police officer that he is involved in criminal activities and publishing news report regarding the same would not incite the force to act against the government (within the meaning of Section 3 of the Police (Incitement to Disaffection) Act, 1922).
Let me begin with a disclaimer: I have no affiliation with eminent and senior journalist MJ Akbar of any kind and I have never met him in person
Dr CS Dwarakanath v/s Karnataka when the entire nation is facing a medical emergency situation due to the spread of Covid-19, it is the responsibility of the editor and concerned officers of the newspaper
At the very inception, let me begin by saying that there has been a fierce controversy over the huge debate triggered on the moot question Should opinion polls be banned?
On February 25th new IT rules called the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 [the “Rules”] were notified by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. The new ruled aimed to regulate and manage social media platforms and the content shared on it.
the job of editor is most prestigious and responsible one. There are huge responsibilities of the editor for every news published in the newspaper of which he/she is the editor.
Aditya Raj Kaul v/s Naeem Akhter quashed a defamation complaint filed by the senior leader of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Naeem Akhter against the Editor-in-Chief of Republic TV, Arnab Goswami
TVF Media Labs Pvt Ltd vs Delhi that the issue of enactment of appropriate law or guidelines to regulate content on social media and OTT platforms needs urgent attention.
Sri Protip Roy Basunia v/s West Bengal that merely being tagged in comments on the social media by any other person necessarily does not confer any liability or responsibility on the person being tagged.
S Ve Shekher v Al Gopalsamy has refused to quash a batch of criminal proceedings initiated against actor and BJP politician S Ve Shekher for his derogatory remarks that were directed against women journalists.
Rajat Sharma vs X Corp (Formerly Twitter) that journalist Rajat Sharma had abused and used foul language against Congress spokesperson - Ragini Nayak on live television. It would be material to note that in an ex parte interim order
Nipun Malhotra vs Sony Pictures Films India Private Ltd that was pronounced most recently on July 8, 2024 in the exercise of its civil appellate jurisdiction has issued a set of commendable guidelines to the visual media to ensure a dignified portrayal of persons with disabilities.
Dejo Kappan vs Deccan Herald that comments by the media declaring an accused guilty or innocent while a criminal case is still pending does not fall under protected free speech under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.
Top